Therapeutic inhibition of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system

Differential Expression of the Angiotensin-(1-12)/Chymase Axis in Human Atrial Tissue

BACKGROUND

Heart chymase rather than angiotensin (Ang)-converting enzyme has higher specificity for Ang I conversion into Ang II in humans. A new pathway for direct cardiac Ang II generation has been revealed through the demonstration that Ang-(1-12) is cleaved by chymase to generate Ang II directly. Herein, we address whether Ang-(1-12), chymase messenger RNA (mRNA), and activity levels can be differentiated in human atrial tissue from normal and diseased hearts and if these measures associate with various pathologic heart conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Atrial appendages were collected from 11 nonfailing donor hearts and 111 patients undergoing heart surgery for the correction of valvular heart disease, resistant atrial fibrillation, or ischemic heart disease. Chymase mRNA was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction and enzymatic activity by high-performance liquid chromatography using Ang-(1-12) as the substrate. Ang-(1-12) levels were determined by immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTS

Chymase gene transcripts, chymase activity, and immunoreactive Ang-(1-12) expression levels were higher in left atrial tissue compared with right atrial tissue, irrespective of cardiac disease. In addition, left atrial chymase mRNA expression was significantly higher in stroke versus nonstroke patients and in cardiac surgery patients who had a history of postoperative atrial fibrillation versus nonatrial fibrillation. Correlation analysis showed that left atrial chymase mRNA was positively related to left atrial enlargement, as determined by echocardiography.

CONCLUSIONS

As Ang-(1-12) expression and chymase gene transcripts and enzymatic activity levels were positively linked to left atrial size in patients with left ventricular heart disease, an important alternate Ang II forming pathway, via Ang-(1-12) and chymase, in maladaptive atrial and ventricular remodeling in humans is uncovered.

Azilsartan compared to ACE inhibitors in anti-hypertensive therapy: one-year outcomes of the observational EARLY registry

BACKGROUND

Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M), has been demonstrated to be more effective than the other sartans currently in use; however, there is insufficient information available comparing it with ACE-inhibitors. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of AZL-M with that of ACE-inhibitors in a real life clinical setting.

METHODS

The EARLY registry is a prospective, observational, national, multicentre registry with a follow-up period of 12 months. There were two principal objectives: 1) documentation of the achievement of target BP values set according to recent national and international guidelines, and 2) description of the safety profile of AZL-M.

RESULTS

A total of 3 849 patients with essential arterial hypertension were recruited from primary care offices in Germany. Patients who initiated monotherapy at baseline comprising either AZL-M or an ACE-inhibitor were included at a ratio of seven to three. Results demonstrated that a blood pressure target of <140/90 mmHg was achieved by a significantly greater proportion of patients in the AZL-M group (61.1 %) compared with the ACE-inhibitor group (56.4 %; p < 0.05; OR, 1.21; 95 % CI, 1.03-1.42), with this finding maintained after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics. AZL-M appeared to have an equivalent safety profile to the ACE-inhibitors, with a similar incidence of adverse events in the two patient groups (p = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

These data add to the results of previous randomized controlled clinical trials suggesting that, compared with other agents that target the renin-angiotensin system, AZL-M provides statistically significant albeit small improvements in blood pressure control.

Differential expression of the angiotensin-(1-12)/chymase axis in human atrial tissue

OBJECTIVE

Heart chymase rather than angiotensin converting enzyme has higher specificity for angiotensin (Ang) I conversion into Ang II in humans. A new pathway for direct cardiac Ang II generation has been revealed through the demonstration that Ang-(1-12) is cleaved by chymase to generate Ang II directly. We address here whether Ang-(1-12) and chymase gene expression and activity are detected in the atrial appendages of 44 patients (10 females) undergoing heart surgery for the correction of valvular heart disease, resistant atrial fibrillation or ischemic heart disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Immunoreactive Ang-(1-12) expression was 54% higher in left atrial compared with right atrial appendages. This was associated with higher abundance of left atrial appendage chymase gene transcripts and chymase activity, but no differences in angiotensinogen mRNA. Atrial chymase enzymatic activity was highly correlated with left atrial but not right atrial enlargement as determined by echocardiography, while both tyrosine hydroxylase and neuropeptide Y atrial appendage mRNAs correlated with atrial angiotensinogen mRNAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher Ang-(1-12) expression and upregulation of chymase gene transcripts and enzymatic activity from the atrial appendages connected to the enlarged left versus right atrial chambers of subjects with left heart disease defines a role of this alternate Ang II forming pathway in the processes accompanying adverse atrial and ventricular remodeling.

New treatment options in the management of hypertension: appraising the potential role of azilsartan medoxomil

Renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) activation plays a key role in the development of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Drugs that antagonize the RAS (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) have proven clinical efficacy in reducing blood pressure values and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. ACE inhibitors partially inhibit plasma ACE, and angiotensin II generation. Thus, ARBs, which block selectively type 1 angiotensin II receptor (AT(1)R), have been developed and used in the clinical management of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Experimental and clinical trials with ARBs indicate that this class of drug represents an effective, safe and well tolerated therapeutic option for the prevention and care of hypertension, even though there is no proven superiority as compared to ACE inhibitors except for the better tolerability. Most ARBs may not completely inhibit the AT(1)R at the approved clinical doses. Azilsartan medoxomil is a newly approved ARB for the management of hypertension. This ARB induces a potent and long-lasting antihypertensive effect and may have cardioprotective properties. This article reviews the current evidence on the clinical effectiveness of azilsartan in hypertension.

End-organ protection in patients with hypertension: focus on the role of angiotensin receptor blockers on renal function

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a key role in a number of pathophysiological mechanisms that are involved in the development and progression of cardiovascular and renal disease. For these reasons, pharmacological antagonism of this system, particularly the blockade of formation or the receptor antagonism of angiotensin II, has been demonstrated to be an effective and safe strategy to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease. Among different drug classes, angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) have provided an excellent alternative to ACE inhibitors, representing a more selective and a better tolerated pharmacological approach to interfere with the RAS. Results derived from large, international, randomized clinical trials have consistently indicated that ARB-based therapeutic strategies may effectively provide cardiovascular and renal disease prevention and protection in different clinical conditions across the entire cardiovascular continuum. This article reviews the pathophysiological rationale of RAS involvement in the pathogenesis of renal diseases, focusing on the beneficial effects provided by ARBs in terms of renal protection.

Reducing cardiorenal risk through combination therapy with a direct renin inhibitor

Interruption of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) cascade with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), or more recently direct renin inhibitors (DRIs) is a safe and effective antihypertensive strategy that is in routine clinical use. The clinical utility of these agents in cardiorenal end-organ protection is increasingly being recognized. Although both ACE inhibitors and ARBs demonstrate substantial benefit in patients with cardiovascular and/or renal disease, considerable evidence indicates that they only partially suppress the RAAS pathway due to feedback upregulation of plasma renin activity. With the goal of providing more comprehensive RAAS blockade, combination ACE inhibitor/ARB therapy has been evaluated. However, this approach has not shown the anticipated improvements in composite cardiovascular and renal outcomes and appears to be associated with significant toxicity. Due to a unique mechanism of action, the combination of a DRI with an ACE inhibitor or ARB may represent an effective end-organ-protective therapeutic strategy.

Angiotensin receptor blockers for management of hypertension

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a major role in blood pressure regulation and is thus an important therapeutic target in the management of hypertension. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), which interrupt RAAS overactivity by blocking a specific receptor that mediates the pathogenic activity of angiotensin II, represent a major addition to the clinician's armamentarium for the management of hypertension. A solid body of clinical evidence demonstrates that ARBs are effective in the management of hypertension as monotherapy or in combination with other agents. Although comparable to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and other major classes of antihypertensive agents in the treatment of hypertension, the favorable tolerability profile of ARBs make them an attractive alternative for many patients. Recent evidence suggests that treatment persistence with ARB therapy during a 12-month period is typically higher than with other antihypertensive classes, a finding perhaps driven by fewer treatment-limiting side effects. The combination of clinical efficacy and tolerability should render ARBs as a major treatment alternative for hypertension.