Clinical utility of the new fluoroquinolones for treating respiratory and urinary tract infections

Fluoroquinolones: Blessings Or Curses

Fluoroquinolones are one of the world's most valuable and popularly used categories of antimicrobial agents. This paper attempts to review the substantial progress of fluoroquinolones from their discovery to black box warning. Antibiotic drug choice will remain difficult in the presence of increasing resistance, but the introduction of fluoroquinolones has created a new and exciting era in antimicrobial treatment. These are a synthetic heterogeneous group of compounds used in both hospital and community practices to treat numerous severe infections. The era of quinolone antibiotics began with the serendipitous discovery of the quinolone prototype in 1962. The chronological development of fluoroquinolone reported that nalidixic acid was the first quinolone that gained popular choice for the treatment of urinary tract infection. The subsequent agents like levofloxacin, ofloxacin, norfloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, clinafloxacin, sparfloxacin, and ciprofloxacin were derived through side chain and nuclear manipulation from basic pharmacophore. The fluoroquinolone motifs have been found as a milestone, effective in certain infections that are respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, bone disorders, meningococcal and mycobacterial infections, sexually transmitted diseases, skin infections, etc. Fluoroquinolones are first entirely man-made antibiotics that exhibit antibacterial activity through the inhibition of topoisomerase II, topoisomerase IV and deoxyribonucleic acid gyrase, which is vital for chromosome replication and function. The post-marketing surveillance pointed out the favorable side effects associated with fluoroquinolones such as phototoxicity, QT interval prolongation and anaphylaxis. The discovery, development and clinical use of fluoroquinolone antibiotics in the last century contributed to a decline in morbidity and mortality rates.

Determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) of selected antimicrobials in bovine and swine Pasteurella multocida, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus isolates

We compared the values of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) values ​​of three antimicrobial agents for 72 bovine isolates ofPasteurella multocida, 80 swine isolates ofP. multocida, 80 bovine isolates ofEscherichia coli, 80 swine isolates ofE. coli, and 80 isolates ofStaphylococcus aureusfrom bovine mastitis. The ratio of MIC90​​/MPC90which limited mutant selection window (MSW) was ≤ 0.12/4 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 0.5/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 4/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in bovineP. multocidaisolates, ≤ 0.12/2 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 0.5/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 4/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in swineP. multocidaisolates, 1/16 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 8/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 8/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in bovineE. coliisolates, 0.5/16 mg/l for enrofloxacin, ≥ 64/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 8/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in swineE. coliisolates, and 0.25/16 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 4/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 4/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin inS. aureusisolates. These findings indicate that the dosage of antimicrobial agents to achieve serum concentration equal to or higher than MPC could reduce selection of resistant bacterial subpopulation.

Optimal antimicrobial therapy: the balance of potency and exposure

Antimicrobial therapy has evolved to be an essential component for treating bacterial infection; however, the optimal duration of therapy continues to be defined for a number of different infections. Previously, uncomplicated infections of the lower and upper urinary tracts required treatment durations of 10-14 days and can now be successfully managed with < or = 3-7 days of oral therapy. Similarly, optimal durations of therapy for community-acquired respiratory tract infections continue to be defined with shorter durations being approved, based on the clinical outcome of comparative trials. The shorter durations of therapy are thought to clearly benefit patient care with improved compliance. But, are all of the approved antimicrobial compounds ideal for shorter durations of therapy? Optimal use of these compounds involves re-evaluating each drug's antimicrobial spectrum, pharmacological characteristics, clinical outcome and side-effects profiles, and a reduced likelihood of selecting drug-resistant bacteria during therapy (due to the current environment of global antimicrobial resistance and fewer new antimicrobials under development).

Comparison of minimal inhibitory and mutant prevention drug concentrations of 4 fluoroquinolones against clinical isolates of methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus remains an important human pathogen affecting both outpatients and those hospitalized. Increasing antimicrobial resistance is global but prevalence rates are variable for different geographical areas. Fluoroquinolones have been used to treat S. aureus infections and the newer quinolones have enhanced in vitro activity against this organism. The mutant prevention concentration (MPC) defines the antimicrobial drug concentration threshold that would require an organism to simultaneously possess two mutations for growth in the presence of the drug. We tested clinical isolates of methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant (MRSA) S. aureus by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and MPC against gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. For MSSA strains, the rank order of potency based on MIC(90) values were gemifloxacin (0.063 mg/l) = moxifloxacin (0.063 mg/l) > gatifloxacin (0.05 mg/l) = levofloxacin (0.25 mg/l) and by MPC values moxifloxacin (0.25 mg/l) > gemifloxacin (0.5 mg/l) > gatifloxacin (1 mg/l) = levofloxacin (1mg/l). For 87% of the isolates the MPC value was 0.5 mg/l for gatifloxacin. The rank order of potency based on the time the serum drug concentration exceeded the MPC(90), was as follows: moxifloxacin (>24 h) > levofloxacin (>18 h) > gatifloxacin (12 h) > gemifloxacin (9 h). Serum drug concentration remained in excess of the MPC(87) for 24 h for gatifloxacin. Both MIC(90) and MPC(90) values were higher against MRSA strains and the time above the MPC(90) was significantly shorter for all agents.

Aqueous Penetration of Gatifloxacin and Levofloxacin into the Rabbit Aqueous Humor Following Topical Dosing

The aqueous penetration of the commercial preparations of the fluoroquinolone antibiotics ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and gatifloxacin were compared following topical dosing in a rabbit model. Levofloxacin achieved the highest aqueous concentrations, with a mean aqueous level of 4.8014 microcg/mL (p = 0.002, p = 0.00002, p = 0.015.) Ofloxacin (2.5136 microcg/mL) and gatifloxacin (2.4817 microcg/mL) achieved statistically equal aqueous concentrations (p = 0.479). Ciprofloxacin reached the lowest levels in the aqueous humor (0.9616 microcg/mL, p = 0.00002, 0.00004, 0.008). Gatifloxacin alone achieved concentrations in excess of the MIC90s of gram-positive pathogens of concern.

Rapid resolution of symptoms with ciprofloxacin therapy in 3859 hospitalised patients with urinary tract infection

This post-marketing surveillance study including 3859 hospitalised patients with urinary tract infection (UTI) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of treatment with intravenous or orally administered ciprofloxacin. The most frequent initial doses of ciprofloxacin were a total daily dose of 400 mg intravenously and 500 mg orally. After 4 days of therapy, 75.6% of patients were asymptomatic and, 92.0% after 7 days. 93.9% of patients were rated as having improved or have been cured at the end of the observation period. Improvement and cure were independent of the severity of infection. The tolerability of the treatment was rated by physicians as good or very good for 96.9% of patients. Adverse events were reported in 3.5% of patients.

Fluoroquinolone AUIC Break Points and the Link to Bacterial Killing Rates Part 2: Human Trials

OBJECTIVE

To review clinical trials with fluoroquinolones and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters predictive of clinical and microbiologic outcomes and resistance. Data on fluoroquinolones are summarized and the premise that a single AUIC target >125 may be used for all fluoroquinolones against all target organisms is examined.

DATA SOURCES

Primary articles were identified by a MEDLINE search (1966-February 2002) and through secondary sources.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All of the articles identified from the data sources were evaluated and all information deemed relevant was included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The fluoroquinolones exhibit concentration-dependent killing. This effect clearly depends upon concentrations achieved and outcomes depend upon endpoints established by individual investigators. With AUIC values <60, the actions of fluoroquinolones are essentially bacteriostatic; any observed bacterial killing is the combined effect of low concentrations in relation to minimum inhibitory concentration and the action of host factors such as neutrophils and macrophages. AUIC values >100 but <250 yield bacterial killing at a slow rate, but usually by day 7 of treatment. AUICs >250 produce rapid killing, and bacterial eradication occurs within 24 hours. Disagreements regarding target endpoints are the expected consequences of comparing microbial and clinical outcomes across animal models, in vitro experiments (Part 1), and humans when the endpoints are clearly not equivalent. Careful attention to time-related events such as speed of bacterial killing versus global endpoints such as bacteriologic cure allows optimal break points to be defined.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from human trials favors the use of AUIC values >250 for rapid bactericidal action, regardless of whether the organism is gram-negative or gram-positive.

The role of fluoroquinolones in skin and skin structure infections

Skin and skin structure infections encompass a broad range of clinical presentations and disease severity. Antimicrobial therapy is clearly beneficial for both recovery from these infections as well as preventing disease progression. Fluoroquinolones are potent broad spectrum antimicrobial agents with the older agents characterized as having broad spectrum anti-Gram-negative activity, borderline activity against clinically important Gram-positive pathogens and little or no anti-anaerobic bacteria activity. In contrast, the new quinolones are characterized by having enhanced activity against Gram-positive pathogens, anti-anaerobic activity and they remain highly active against aerobic-Gram-negative bacilli. Several fluoroquinolones have been evaluated for the treatment of uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infection, difficult skin and soft tissue infection and serious skin and skin structure infections. Clinical cure rates were found to be equivalent to comparators suggesting a role for the fluoroquinolone in treating these infections. It may be necessary to use some fluoroquinolones in combination with anti-anaerobic agents for those infections with mixed aerobic and anaerobic pathogens. Some additional clinical trials are necessary to identify the full potential of newer fluoroquinolones for skin and skin structure infections. At present, quinolones are, in general, equivalent to beta-lactam agents in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infection.