Treatment of autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy

Focus on pemphigus treatment publications: A bibliometric and visual analysis (1992-2022)

Pemphigus is a chronic recurrent disease in dermatology. Although it is not very common, its treatment has been an increasing concern in recent years because it is difficult and long-lasting. At present, there are many papers on pemphigus treatment, and to better understand the research trends and research frontiers of pemphigus treatment, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and analysis. We combined bibliometric and visualization methods to analyze 1365 papers published in the Web of Science database from 1992 to 2022, including basic information about countries, institutions and authors, to gain a general understanding of the treatment of pemphigus. Among them, the United States is the country with the most output, Iran's Tehran University of Medical Sciences is the institution with the most published works, and Ahmed, A. Razzaque of Tufts University is the most influential scholar. In addition, we also learned about the research hotspots and frontiers of pemphigus treatment through a series of analyses on the frequency, clustering, keywords bursts and cited literature, and we briefly reviewed the highly cited literature. We found that the current research focuses in the study of pemphigus treatment are the types, pathogenesis, and treatment of pemphigus, including glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants and many other major treatment methods. Hailey-Hailey disease, genetic susceptibility, and traditional Chinese medicine are potential research hotspots. Rituximab is a research frontier. In conclusion, we hope to provide new research ideas for promoting the development of pemphigus treatment.

Rituximab as the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris in the COVID-19 pandemic era: A narrative review

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV), an autoimmune blistering disease is treated with immunosuppressive medications. As the immunosuppressive effect of rituximab, the first‐line therapy of PV, lasts more than 6 months, many concerns have raised due to the ongoing novel coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) pandemic. With this background, our objective was to review the currently available literature as well as important websites for the evidence related to rituximab, PV and COVID‐19, adverse effects associated with drugs, and relevant guidelines. “PubMed” and “Google Scholar” database were systematically searched for retrieving all articles related to anti‐CD20 therapy in pemphigus vulgaris and COVID‐19 published up to 14 July 2020. A total of seven clinical studies are performed with anti‐CD20 therapy in COVID‐19, three of which are performed on pemphigus patients, and have shown concerns employing rituximab in patients with COVID‐19. Evidence for treating PV patients with rituximab in COVID‐19 pandemic is limited. Until sufficient evidence or guideline for pemphigus and COVID‐19 treatment is available, we advocate caution commencing rituximab in patients with pemphigus, due to the reported adverse outcomes.

Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris: part 1 - current therapies

Introduction: While biologic agents that can be used for treating pemphigus vulgaris (PV) are increasing, themajority of the world's PV patients can afford only corticosteroids (CS) and some immunosuppressive agents (ISA). Areas covered: The spectrum of side effects encountered when PV patients receive high-dose, long-term CS and ISA are presented based on total dose and duration of therapy. The steroid-sparing effect of individual ISA as documented in published studies and their clinical outcomes, in terms of duration of remissions, frequency of relapses and time to relapse, are presented, so that comparisons are possible. Thus, rational choices can be made for the individual patient. Expert opinion: In 2019, the majority of PV patients globally will continue to be treated with CS and ISA. This review will help clinicians and patients become aware of when to anticipate which side effects and if possible, to prevent or avoid them. It provides guidelines to maximize the clinical benefits of ISA in inducing and maintaining remission and minimizing side effects by monitoring them.

Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris: part 2 - emerging therapies

Introduction: Corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents have been the mainstay for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris (PV). While they have benefited patients, they have been associated with the risks of prolonged immune suppression and a high incidence of significant and catastrophic side effects. Relapses are common. Novel agents promising targeted therapies, that may provide better outcomes, are being studied. Areas covered: Recently rituximab with corticosteroids has been recommended as the first-line treatment for PV. A number of known and new therapeutic agents currently investigated are BAFF, P13K, BTK inhibitors along with the use of IVIg and CAR-T therapy. The possible role of these therapeutic targets in the pathophysiology appears to be the rationale for the treatment of this potentially fatal disease. Expert opinion: While there is significant enthusiasm for these therapies, certain concerns and consequences are being under-discussed. None of the current clinical trials in progress are specific for PV, except possibly CAR-T therapy. The major issue(s) that are unclear is whether these therapies would be successful in providing long-term clinical remissions. Will these therapies require additional agents to be effective? Will the benefits be limited in duration? The answers to many questions will determine their final place in the algorithm for the treatment of PV.

Reversing Autoimmunity Combination of Rituximab and Intravenous Immunoglobulin

In this concept paper, the authors present a unique and novel protocol to treat autoimmune diseases that may have the potential to reverse autoimmunity. It uses a combination of B cell depletion therapy (BDT), specifically rituximab (RTX) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), based on a specifically designed protocol (Ahmed Protocol). Twelve infusions of RTX are given in 6–14 months. Once the CD20⁺ B cells are depleted from the peripheral blood, IVIg is given monthly until B cells repopulation occurs. Six additional cycles are given to end the protocol. During the stages of B cell depletion, repopulation and after clinical recovery, IVIg is continued. Along with clinical recovery, significant reduction and eventual disappearance of pathogenic autoantibody occurs. Administration of IVIg in the post-clinical period is a crucial part of this protocol. This combination reduces and may eventually significantly eliminates inflammation in the microenvironment and facilitates restoring immune balance. Consequently, the process of autoimmunity and the phenomenon that lead to autoimmune disease are arrested, and a sustained and prolonged disease and drug-free remission is achieved. Data from seven published studies, in which this combination protocol was used, are presented. It is known that BDT does not affect check points. IVIg has functions that mimic checkpoints. Hence, when inflammation is reduced and the microenvironment is favorable, IVIg may restore tolerance. The authors provide relevant information, molecular mechanism of action of BDT, IVIg, autoimmunity, and autoimmune diseases. The focus of the manuscript is providing an explanation, using the current literature, to demonstrate possible pathways, used by the combination of BDT and IVIg in providing sustained, long-term, drug-free remissions of autoimmune diseases, and thus reversing autoimmunity, albeit for the duration of the observation.

Efficacy of dapsone in the treatment of pemphigus and pemphigoid: analysis of current data

Dapsone is a chemotherapeutic agent primarily used in treating leprosy, Pneumocystis jiroveci (previously carinii) pneumonia, and malaria. It is also used as an adjuvant in the treatment of pemphigus and pemphigoid. To assess the role of dapsone in the treatment of pemphigus and pemphigoid, a retrospective review of reports in the English-language literature was conducted. Information on the number of patients treated, their average age, prior therapies, indications for use, protocol (dose and interval) used, concomitant therapies, reported adverse effects, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. There were 35 case reports/series published describing the use of dapsone in a total of 427 patients. Data on 55 pemphigus patients were obtained from several case reports and some case series and one randomized controlled trial. Of these, 32 patients with pemphigus vulgaris and 14 patients with pemphigus foliaceus responded to dapsone. Data from 13 case series, each including at least five patients, accounted for 372 patients with pemphigoid. The overall response rates to dapsone, when given either alone or in combination with corticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents, were 84% in mucous membrane pemphigoid, and 81% in bullous pemphigoid. Hemolysis was the most common adverse effect observed. Dapsone is a promising and useful agent in patients with autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases, especially in mucous membrane pemphigoid. It can be used as a corticosteroid-sparing agent. Therefore, its combined use with oral corticosteroids may be useful in pemphigus vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid. Adverse effects of dapsone are dose dependent and usually reversible. Hemolysis and concomitant anemia secondary to hemolysis are expected in most patients. In the opinion of the authors, dapsone is underutilized in the treatment of autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases.

Analysis of thromboembolic risk related to high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin treatment: a preliminary clinical study of 10 patients with autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases

BACKGROUND

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment is a well-known treatment that has been used successfully in a broad spectrum of autoimmune diseases. Currently no data are available in the literature about the role of IVIg in the pathogenesis of thromboembolic events in patients with autoimmune blistering diseases refractory to conventional immunosuppressive treatment.

AIM

To determine the relationship between IVIg and thromboembolism in patients with autoimmune blistering diseases and to establish a protocol to deal with the thromboembolic risk.

METHODS

In our preliminary clinical study, 10 patients with autoimmune blistering diseases underwent IVIg cycles to a total of 133 cycles in all (total number of infusions in the patient group: 399), at a standard dose of 2 g/kg/infusion accompanied by an accurate and a complete clinical and laboratory screening for thromboembolism. Preventive measures, such as hydration before and after IVIg, and administration of 100 mg of acetyl salicylic acid (aspirin) or 1000 IU of subcutaneous heparin calcium per day for 3 weeks, were introduced to reduce the thromboembolic risk.

RESULTS

Throughout the 2 years of IVIg treatment, no patient developed a superficial and/or deep venous or arterial thrombosis, even though some of the patients had underlying thromboembolic risk factors and had tested positive for some congenital and acquired thrombophilia markers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that thromboembolic events are uncommon, despite the presence of risk factors. However, as these disorders are very rare and the percentage of nonresponder patients is very low, further investigations are needed to better understand whether IVIg alone is able to trigger these fatal events in blistering disorders.

Prominent plasmacytosis following intravenous immunoglobulin correlates with clinical improvement in Guillain-Barré syndrome

Background

High doses of pooled polyclonal IgG are commonly used to treat numerous autoimmune diseases. Their mode of action nevertheless remains only partially explained. At the same time, until now, no early biological marker has been able to predict their efficacy.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In a first pilot retrospective analysis, we reviewed white blood cell counts and blood smears in consecutive patients with autoimmune disease (n = 202) and non-autoimmune disease (n = 104). Autoimmune patients received either intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg, n = 103), plasma exchange (n = 78) or no specific treatment (n = 21). We then prospectively monitored consecutive autoimmune patients with IVIg injection (n = 67), or without any specific treatment (n = 10) using the same routine laboratory tests, as well as flow cytometry. Both retrospective and prospective analyses identified large plasma-cell mobilization exclusively in IVIg-treated autoimmune patients 7 days after initiation of treatment. The majority of IVIg-mobilized plasma cells were immature HLA-DR^high/CD138^low/CXCR4^low plasma cells expressing intracellular immunoglobulin G which were neither IVIg- nor human IgG-specific. Importantly, we found a strong negative correlation between the absolute number of IVIg-mobilized plasma cells and time to improve neurological function in both retrospective and prospective studies of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), (r = −0.52, p = 0.0031, n = 30, r = −0.47, p = 0.0028, n = 40, respectively).

Conclusions/Significance

IVIg promotes immature plasma-cell mobilization in patients with GBS, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, myasthenia gravis and inflammatory myopathy. Prominent day 7 plasma-cell mobilization is a favourable prognostic marker in patients with GBS receiving IVIg treatment.

A single cycle of rituximab for the treatment of severe pemphigus

BACKGROUND

The combination of multiple cycles of rituximab and intravenous immune globulins has been reported to be effective in patients with severe pemphigus. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a single cycle of rituximab in severe types of pemphigus.

METHODS

We studied 21 patients with pemphigus whose disease had not responded to an 8-week course of 1.5 mg of prednisone per kilogram of body weight per day (corticosteroid-refractory disease), who had had at least two relapses despite doses of prednisone higher than 20 mg per day (corticosteroid-dependent disease), or who had severe contraindications to corticosteroids. The patients were treated with four weekly infusions of 375 mg of rituximab per square meter of body-surface area. The primary end point was complete remission 3 months after the end of rituximab treatment; complete remission was defined as epithelialization of all skin and mucosal lesions.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 21 patients (86%; 95% confidence interval, 64 to 97%) had a complete remission at 3 months. The disease relapsed in nine patients after a mean of 18.9+/-7.9 months. After a median follow-up of 34 months, 18 patients (86%) were free of disease, including 8 who were not receiving corticosteroids; the mean prednisone dose decreased from 94.0+/-10.2 to 12.0+/-7.5 mg per day (P=0.04) in patients with corticosteroid-refractory disease and from 29.1+/-12.4 to 10.9+/-16.5 mg per day (P=0.007) in patients with corticosteroid-dependent disease. Pyelonephritis developed in one patient 12 months after rituximab treatment, and one patient died of septicemia 18 months after rituximab treatment. These patients had a profound decrease in the number of circulating B lymphocytes but normal serum levels of IgG.

CONCLUSIONS

A single cycle of rituximab is an effective treatment for pemphigus. Because of its potentially severe side effects, its use should be limited to the most severe types of the disease. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00213512 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Concurrence of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Pemphigus: Coincidence or Correlation?

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have previously been reported to coexist in the same patient. However, the relationship between the 2 diseases has not been elucidated.

OBJECTIVE

This review was conducted to examine the relationship between pemphigus and SLE when they occur together in the same patient.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the literature to identify previously reported cases of pemphigus and SLE coexisting in the same patient. The temporal relationship, clinical course, response to therapy and effects of 1 disease on the other were examined.

RESULTS

Eight patients with a dual diagnosis of pemphigus and SLE have been previously reported. Most were female and non-Caucasian, with a mean age of 41 years. In the 8 patients reviewed here clinical outcomes, organ system involvement and demographic profiles are more typical of SLE. Seven of these 8 patients had pemphigus vulgaris, and 1 had pemphigus erythematosus. The limited follow-up did not permit studying issues of disease interaction. An additional 17 patients with pemphigus have been reported who have features suggestive of SLE. Organ system involvement in these patients was less typical of SLE.

CONCLUSION

It appears that a true dual diagnosis of pemphigus and SLE is less common than suggested by the literature. Comparing patients with only pemphigus or only SLE to those with both may provide insights into genetic predisposition and pathogenesis, and provide an opportunity to study the effects of drugs that influence their course.

Variations in serum hemoglobin, albumin, and electrolytes in patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin therapy: a real clinical threat?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is a solution of globulins containing antibodies derived from pooled human plasma of donors and used in the treatment of a number of immune deficiencies and autoimmune diseases. However, several investigators have reported biochemical alterations with use of IVIg. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of IVIg therapy on selected biochemical and hematologic parameters in patients with autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases (AMBDs).

METHODS

In this preliminary clinical study, ten patients with AMBDs (seven with pemphigus vulgaris and three with mucous membrane pemphigoid) received 133 cycles of IVIg for a total of 399 infusions. We evaluated the effects of IVIg therapy on serum hemoglobin (Hb), albumin, and electrolyte levels, including sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), chloride (Cl-) and calcium (Ca2+). Values of these parameters were measured 24 hours before, during, and 24 hours and 4 weeks after the 3-day infusion period.

RESULTS

The observed variations in serum electrolyte levels were physiologically and clinically negligible. Furthermore, 24 hours after the last infusion, mean electrolyte values had spontaneously returned to normal levels without the need for additional supplementation: Na+ 137.59+/-1.42 mmol/L (p=0.6091 vs baseline); K+ 3.97+/-0.5 mmol/L (p=0.2689); Cl- 103.4+/-2.69 mmol/L (p=0.0388); and Ca2+ 9.07+/-0.44 mg/dL (p=0.5332). Conversely, significant variations in mean Hb and albumin levels were observed. When measured 24 hours after the last infusion, mild/moderate decreases in Hb (11.62+/-2.12 g/dL; p=0.009 vs baseline) and/or albumin (mean 3.14+/-0.24 g/dL; p=0.0016 vs baseline) were evident. Such changes may, albeit very rarely, be of sufficient clinical significance in individual patients as to necessitate additional treatment.

CONCLUSION

In patients receiving intravenous IVIg for AMBDs, electrolyte values should be monitored but do not represent a real clinical threat. Hemoglobin and albumin values may be altered sufficiently to require additional treatment but this is a very rare occurrence. These findings confirm and extend previous reports of the safety of IVIg therapy.

Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris with rituximab and intravenous immune globulin

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus vulgaris is a potentially fatal autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering disease. Conventional therapy consists of high-dose corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, and intravenous immune globulin.

METHODS

We studied patients with refractory pemphigus vulgaris involving 30% or more of their body-surface area, three or more mucosal sites, or both who had inadequate responses to conventional therapy and intravenous immune globulin. We treated the patients with two cycles of rituximab (375 mg per square meter of body-surface area) once weekly for 3 weeks and intravenous immune globulin (2 g per kilogram of body weight) in the fourth week. This induction therapy was followed by a monthly infusion of rituximab and intravenous immune globulin for 4 consecutive months. Titers of serum antibodies against keratinocytes and numbers of peripheral-blood B cells were monitored.

RESULTS

Of 11 patients, 9 had rapid resolution of lesions and a clinical remission lasting 22 to 37 months (mean, 31.1). All immunosuppressive therapy, including prednisone, could be discontinued before ending rituximab treatment in all patients. Two patients were treated with rituximab only during recurrences and had sustained remissions. Titers of IgG4 antikeratinocyte antibodies correlated with disease activity. Peripheral-blood B cells became undetectable shortly after initiating rituximab therapy but subsequently returned to normal values. Side effects that have been associated with rituximab were not observed, nor were infections.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of rituximab and intravenous immune globulin is effective in patients with refractory pemphigus vulgaris.

Rituximab: A monoclonal antibody to CD20 used in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is an anti-CD20 chimeric antibody that selectively targets B lymphocytes. Recently, it has been reported to be beneficial in treating pemphigus vulgaris.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to review the English-language literature on the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) with rituximab and to determine its efficacy and influence on clinical outcome(s).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective review of the literature on the use of rituximab in the treatment of PV was conducted. Seventeen patients in 10 reports were described and their data were reviewed.

RESULTS

The majority of patients received one course of rituximab along with conventional immunosuppressive therapy as concomitant therapy; 88% of the patients demonstrated improvement. More than half of the patients were followed up for more than 6 months after rituximab treatment; they appeared to be clinically disease free, but were still receiving conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Side effects in most patients were transient and infusion related. Serious infections occurred in 4 patients. One patient died.

LIMITATIONS

The sample size of this study is small; there is no uniformity of data collection or measurement of key and critical indices, and follow-up was limited.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab may be a promising agent in treatment of PV.

Intravenous immunoglobulin: striving for appropriate use

BACKGROUND

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is the mainstay therapy in human immune deficiency states characterized by qualitative and quantitative reductions in B cells. In addition, however, there is widespread use of IVIG in a number of other areas, including neuroimmunologic, infectious, dermatologic, hematologic, autoimmune, inflammatory and idiopathic disorders. In many of these cases, there are little objective data to support the use.

METHODS

We performed a review of more than 400 publications in PubMed using the key words 'intravenous immunoglobulin' and excluded publications that focused on immune deficiency, for which the indication for IVIG is already clear.

RESULTS

For a number of off-label indications, there is significant evidence of efficacy and IVIG has become the standard of care for many clinical syndromes other than immune deficiency. In some conditions, however, the data have not been well controlled or randomized and are often limited to case reports that are difficult to interpret. Although the critical shortage of IVIG of the last decade is no longer an issue, IVIG is expensive and not without risk. The use of IVIG should be based not only on clinical data, but also, and especially, on the biological rationale for its use.

CONCLUSIONS

The appropriate use of IVIG is an important issue that is difficult to resolve, and will continue to challenge clinicians based on expense and potentially limited supply, including the intrinsic limitations of donor plasma. The establishment of national and international voluntary registries to report use of IVIG in disorders for which evidence is lacking would be a first step toward facilitating randomized, controlled clinical trials.

Use of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in autoimmune blistering diseases

Autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering diseases (AMBD) are an interesting group of rare diseases that affect the mucous membranes and the skin and are frequently or potentially fatal. The clinical presentation is significantly variable, as is the course and prognosis. The immunopathology is well characterized and the target antigens to which the autoantibodies are directed have been studied by various investigators. A significant majority of the patients respond to conventional therapy, which consists of high-dose long-term systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. This treatment program has significantly improved the prognosis in many patients. In such patients, significant side effects of the drugs may appear and produce a very poor quality of life. In patients with progressive diseases, especially those with mucous membrane pemphigoid, the significant sequela; such as blindness, aphonia, and stenosis of the anal and vaginal canals can occur. In several patients treated with conventional immunosuppressive therapy, death occurs as a consequence of prolonged immune suppression leading to opportunistic infections. In this manuscript, the published data on the use of immunoglobulins intravenous (IGIV) in patients with AMBD is presented. The most important features of IGIV in patients with AMBD are: 1) the ability to clinically control the disease; 2) the ability to induce and maintain a long-term clinical remission; 3) a lower incidence of side effects; and 4) a higher quality of life. The important characteristic of the IGIV therapy in the AMBD is two-fold. First, the therapy, when given according to a published protocol, produces a lasting and long-term clinical remission, rather than a temporary arrest of the disease. Second, the therapy, as described in the protocol, has a very definitive endpoint. Consequently, once the patients are treated and go into long-term remission, the therapy is no longer required. The significant positive results obtained with IGIV are to a large extent also due to the associated aggressive topical therapy that was used and the frequent use of sublesional injections with triamcinolone. The rapid and early detection of cutaneous and mucosal infections and their treatment with systemic antibiotics is also a very important feature of IGIV therapy. When patients are under long-term conventional therapy, the infections are often not detected because they lack the ability to mount signs of inflammation. It is also becoming increasingly clear for patients to have a successful outcome, in treatment with IGIV therapy, it is critical that the physician spends a significant amount of time with each patient, monitor the therapy closely, and be familiar with the overall health of the patient. It is also best if the therapies are instituted by a physician who has significant interest and experience in blistering diseases and IGIV therapy.

Eyelid skin involvement in pemphigus foliaceus

PURPOSE

To report the involvement of eyelid skin in a patient with pemphigus foliaceus.

METHODS

Retrospective, interventional case report of a patient with pemphigus foliaceus involving both eyelids. The diagnosis of pemphigus foliaceus was based on histopathology and confirmed by direct immunofluorescence and immunoblot. Failure to respond to conventional immunosuppressive therapy, including high-dose corticosteroids, methotrexate, azathioprine, dapsone, and mycophenolate mofetil, necessitated the use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy.

RESULTS

After successful treatment with IVIg, no change in visual acuity or other sequelae secondary to ocular pemphigus foliaceus were observed. Normal ocular architecture was maintained. Clinical remission was observed after successful therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemphigus foliaceus involves the skin of the eyelid and does not involve the conjunctiva. The patient did not respond to conventional immunosuppressive therapy. The use of IVIg as mono-therapy resulted in long-term clinical remission.