Pozanicline for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Serotonergic and Adrenergic Neuroreceptor Manipulation Ameliorates Core Symptoms of ADHD through Modulating Dopaminergic Receptors in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats

The core symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are due to the hypofunction of the brain's adrenergic (NE) and dopamine (DA) systems. Drugs that enhance DA and NE neurotransmission in the brain by blocking their transporters or receptors are the current therapeutic strategies. Of late, the emerging results point out the serotonergic (5-HT) system, which indirectly modulates the DA activity in reducing the core symptoms of ADHD. On this basis, second-generation antipsychotics, which utilize 5-HT receptors, were prescribed to children with ADHD. However, it is not clear how serotonergic receptors modulate the DA activity to minimize the symptoms of ADHD. The present study investigates the efficacy of serotonergic and alpha-2 adrenergic receptor manipulation in tackling the core symptoms of ADHD and how it affects the DA neuroreceptors in the brain regions involved in ADHD. Fifteen-day-old male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) received 5-HT1A agonist (ipsapirone) or 5-HT2A antagonist (MDL 100907) (i.p.) or alpha-2 agonist (GFC) from postnatal days 15 to 42 along with age-matched Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) (n = 8 in each group). ADHD-like behaviors were assessed using a battery of behavioral tests during postnatal days 44 to 65. After the behavioral tests, rat brains were processed to estimate the density of 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, DA-D1, and DA-D2 neuroreceptors in the prefrontal cortex, the striatum, and the substantia nigra. All three neuroreceptor manipulations were able to minimize the core symptoms of ADHD in SHRs. The positive effect was mainly associated with the upregulation of 5-HT2A receptors in all three areas investigated, while 5-HT1A was in the prefrontal cortex and the substantia nigra. Further, the DA-D1 receptor expression was downregulated by all three neuroreceptor manipulations except for alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists in the striatum and 5-HT2A antagonists in the substantia nigra. The DA-D2 expression was upregulated in the striatum while downregulated in the prefrontal cortex and the substantia nigra. In this animal model study, the 5-HT1A agonist or 5-HT2A antagonist monotherapies were able to curtail the ADHD symptoms by differential expression of DA receptors in different regions of the brain.

Viloxazine extended-release capsules for the treatment of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder in adult patients

INTRODUCTION

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurobehavioral disorder with symptoms that may persist in up to 90% of adults diagnosed during childhood and continue to cause significant impairment throughout the lifespan. In the United States (US), amphetamine and methylphenidate formulations have been available to treat ADHD for several decades. Only one nonstimulant, atomoxetine, was available for the treatment of ADHD in adults until recently. In April 2022, a second nonstimulant, viloxazine extended-release (VLX-ER), became available in the US for the treatment of adult ADHD. Efficacy was previously established in placebo-controlled trials in children and adolescents.

AREAS COVERED

VLX-ER is a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with serotonin activity. The efficacy in adults, adverse event profile, pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, and metabolism of VLX-ER are reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the availability of effective pharmacological treatments for ADHD, many patients discontinue treatment in less than 1 year. Stimulants are effective in more than 80% of patients; however, some may have difficulty tolerating them. Although there were no head-to-head studies, the effect size of VLX-ER in an adult efficacy trial was lower than has been shown for stimulants. Nevertheless, the approval of VLX-ER adds another effective ADHD treatment option for adults.

Potential Targets and Action Mechanism of Gastrodin in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Bioinformatics and Network Pharmacology Analysis

Objective

Gastrodin is a main medicinal component of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) Gastrodia elata Blume (G. elata), presenting the potential for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, the underlying targets and action mechanisms of the treatment have not been identified.

Methods

The gastrodin-related microarray dataset GSE85871 was obtained from the GEO database and analyzed by GEO2R to obtain differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Subsequently, the targets of gastrodin were supplemented by the Encyclopedia of Traditional Chinese Medicine (ETCM), PubChem, STITCH, and SwissTargetPrediction databases. ADHD-associated genes were collected from six available disease databases (i.e., TTD, DrugBank, OMIM, PharmGKB, GAD, and KEGG DISEASE). The potential targets of gastrodin during ADHD treatment were obtained by mapping gastrodin-related targets with ADHD genes, and their protein–protein interaction (PPI) relationship was constructed by the STRING database. The GO function and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were performed using the ClueGO plug-in in the Cytoscape software and DAVID database, respectively. Finally, the binding affinity between gastrodin and important targets was verified by molecular docking.

Results

A total of 460 gastrodin-related DEGs were identified from GSE85871, and 124 known gastrodin targets were supplemented from 4 databases, including ETCM. A total of 440 genes were collected from the above 6 disease databases, and 267 ADHD-relevant genes were obtained after duplicate removal. Through mapping the 584 gastrodin targets to the 267 ADHD genes, 16 potential therapeutic targets were obtained, among which the important ones were DRD2, DRD4, CHRNA3, CYP1A1, TNF, IL6, and KCNJ3. The enrichment analysis results indicated that 16 potential targets were involved in 25 biological processes (e.g., dopamine (DA) transport) and 22 molecular functions (e.g., postsynaptic neurotransmitter receptor activity), which were mainly localized at excitatory synapses. The neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, cholinergic synapse, and dopaminergic synapse might be the core pathways of gastrodin in ADHD treatment. Through molecular docking, it was preliminarily verified that gastrodin showed good binding activity to seven important targets and formed stable binding conformations.

Conclusions

Gastrodin might exert an anti-ADHD effect by upgrading the dopaminergic system and central cholinergic system, inhibiting the inflammatory response and GIRK channel, and exerting a synergistic effect with other drugs on ADHD. For this reason, gastrodin should be considered a multitarget drug for ADHD treatment.

Reviewing the role of emerging therapies in the ADHD armamentarium

Introduction: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurobehavioral disorder that can be treated with both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic modalities. Effective drug treatments for ADHD have been available for more than six decades. However, initial treatments had limitations in duration of effect, need for multiple daily doses, requirement for patients to swallow intact tablets, adverse effects and risk for abuse and diversion. During the past 20 years, more than two dozen stimulant and nonstimulant drugs have been developed. Nonetheless, there remain unmet needs in the treatment of ADHD.Areas covered: New stimulant and nonstimulant formulations in development are reviewed with emphasis on drugs in phase II and III trials. Efficacy, mechanism of action and adverse effect data are described where available. Abuse liability studies are described for abuse-deterrent formulations in development.Expert opinion: The review found a robust pipeline of stimulants and nonstimulants. Medications in development are formulated to optimize onset and duration of effect, alter the time of administration, obviate the need to swallow whole capsules or tablets and to deter abuse. While each of these formulations may fill a unique niche, these incremental improvements based on new drug delivery technologies may lead to very significant clinical effects.

The contribution of agonist and antagonist activities of α4β2* nAChR ligands to smoking cessation efficacy: a quantitative analysis of literature data

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

Two mechanisms underlie smoking cessation efficacies of α4β2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonists: a "nicotine-like" agonist activity reduces craving by substituting for nicotine during a quit attempt, and a "nicotine-blocking" antagonist activity attenuates reinforcement by competing with inhaled nicotine during a relapse. To evaluate the contribution of each mechanism to clinical efficacy, we estimated the degree of agonist and antagonist activities of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), varenicline, cytisine, and the discontinued nAChR agonists dianicline, ABT-418, ABT-089, CP-601927, and CP-601932, relative to the functional effects of nicotine from smoking.

METHODS

Functional activities that occur in vivo with clinical doses were predicted from literature data on binding and functional potencies at the target α4β2 nAChR, as well as at α6β2* nAChRs, and from estimates of free drug exposures in human brain. Agonist activity is comprised of nAChR activation and desensitization, which were expressed as percentages of desensitization and activation by nicotine from smoking. Antagonist activity was expressed as the reduction in nAChR occupancy by nicotine during smoking in the presence of an agonist.

RESULTS

Comparisons with odds ratios at end of treatment suggest that extensive α4β2 and α6β2* nAChR desensitization combined with α6β2* nAChR activation at similar levels as nicotine from smoking is associated with clinical efficacy (NRT, varenicline, cytisine, ABT-418). Effective competition with inhaled nicotine for α4β2 and α6β2* nAChRs further improves clinical efficacy (varenicline). Other discontinued nAChR agonists have lower agonist and antagonist activities at α4β2 nAChRs and are inactive or less efficacious than NRT (dianicline, ABT-089, CP-601927, CP-601932).

CONCLUSION

Three pharmacological effects appear to be key factors underlying smoking cessation efficacy: the degree of activation of α6β2* nAChRs, desensitization of α4β2 and α6β2* nAChRs (agonist activity), and the reduction of nicotine occupancy at α4β2 and α6β2* nAChRs (antagonist activity). No single activity is dominant, and the level of smoking cessation efficacy depends on the profile of these activities achieved at clinical doses. While adequate agonist activity alone seems sufficient for a clinical effect (e.g., NRT, cytisine), clinical efficacy is improved with substantial competitive antagonism of α4β2 nAChRs, i.e., if the drug has a dual agonist-antagonist mechanism of action (e.g., varenicline).

Designing selective modulators for the nicotinic receptor subtypes: challenges and opportunities

Nicotinic receptors are membrane proteins involved in several physiological processes. They are considered suitable drug targets for various CNS disorders or conditions, as shown by the large number of compounds which have entered clinical trials. In recent years, nonconventional agonists have been discovered: positive allosteric modulators, allosteric agonists, site-specific agonists and silent desensitizers are compounds able to modulate the receptor interacting at sites different from the orthodox one, or to desensitize the receptor without prior opening. While these new findings can further complicate the pharmacology of these proteins and the design and optimization of ligands, they undoubtedly offer new opportunities to find drugs for the many therapeutic indications involving nicotinic receptors.

Nicotinic α4β2 Cholinergic Receptor Influences on Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortical Neuronal Firing during a Working Memory Task

The primate dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) subserves top-down regulation of attention and working memory abilities. Depletion studies show that the neuromodulator acetylcholine (ACh) is essential to dlPFC working memory functions, but the receptor and cellular bases for cholinergic actions are just beginning to be understood. The current study found that nicotinic receptors comprised of α4 and β2 subunits (α4β2-nAChR) enhance the task-related firing of delay and fixation cells in the dlPFC of monkeys performing a working memory task. Iontophoresis of α4β2-nAChR agonists increased the neuronal firing and enhanced the spatial tuning of delay cells, neurons that represent visual space in the absence of sensory stimulation. These enhancing effects were reversed by coapplication of a α4β2-nAChR antagonist, consistent with actions at α4β2-nAChR. Delay cell firing was reduced when distractors were presented during the delay epoch, whereas stimulation of α4β2-nAChR protected delay cells from these deleterious effects. Iontophoresis of α4β2-nAChR agonists also enhanced the firing of fixation cells, neurons that increase firing when the monkey initiates a trial, and maintain firing until the trial is completed. These neurons are thought to contribute to sustained attention and top-down motor control and have never before been the subject of pharmacological inquiry. These findings begin to build a picture of the cellular actions underlying the beneficial effects of ACh on attention and working memory. The data may also help to explain why genetic insults to α4 subunits are associated with working memory and attentional deficits and why α4β2-nAChR agonists may have therapeutic potential.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The acetylcholine (ACh) arousal system in the brain is needed for robust attention and working memory functions, but the receptor and cellular bases for its beneficial effects are poorly understood in the newly evolved primate brain. The current study found that ACh stimulation of nicotinic receptors comprised of α4 and β2 subunits (α4β2-nAChR) enhanced the firing of neurons in the primate prefrontal cortex that subserve top-down attentional control and working memory. α4β2-nAChR stimulation also protected neuronal responding from the detrimental effects of distracters presented during the delay epoch, when information is held in working memory. These results illuminate how ACh strengthens higher cognition and help to explain why genetic insults to the α4 subunit weaken cognitive and attentional abilities.

Prenatal Alcohol Exposure in Rodents As a Promising Model for the Study of ADHD Molecular Basis

A physiological parallelism, or even a causal effect relationship, can be deducted from the analysis of the main characteristics of the “Alcohol Related Neurodevelopmental Disorders” (ARND), derived from prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE), and the behavioral performance in the Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). These two clinically distinct disease entities, exhibits many common features. They affect neurological shared pathways, and also related neurotransmitter systems. We briefly review here these parallelisms, with their common and uncommon characteristics, and with an emphasis in the subjacent molecular mechanisms of the behavioral manifestations, that lead us to propose that PAE in rats can be considered as a suitable model for the study of ADHD.

Neuronal effects of nicotine during auditory selective attention

RATIONALE

Although the attention-enhancing effects of nicotine have been behaviorally and neurophysiologically well-documented, its localized functional effects during selective attention are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we examined the neuronal effects of nicotine during auditory selective attention in healthy human nonsmokers. We hypothesized to observe significant effects of nicotine in attention-associated brain areas, driven by nicotine-induced increases in activity as a function of increasing task demands.

METHODS

A single-blind, prospective, randomized crossover design was used to examine neuronal response associated with a go/no-go task after 7 mg nicotine or placebo patch administration in 20 individuals who underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. The task design included two levels of difficulty (ordered vs. random stimuli) and two levels of auditory distraction (silence vs. noise).

RESULTS

Significant treatment × difficulty × distraction interaction effects on neuronal response were observed in the hippocampus, ventral parietal cortex, and anterior cingulate. In contrast to our hypothesis, U and inverted U-shaped dependencies were observed between the effects of nicotine on response and task demands, depending on the brain area.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that nicotine may differentially affect neuronal response depending on task conditions. These results have important theoretical implications for understanding how cholinergic tone may influence the neurobiology of selective attention.