Pharmacogenomics and stomach cancer

The integration of personalized and systems medicine: bioinformatics support for pharmacogenomics and drug discovery

Pharmacogenomics may have a deep impact on every drug treatment protocol to bring the right drug to the right patient. While pharmacogenomics can help achieve individualized medicine, the study of systems biology can help us understand the key issues in pharmacogenomics at different levels. These key issues include the associations between structure and function, the correlations between genotype and phenotype, and the interactions among gene, drug, and environment. Utilizing bioinformatics in pharmacogenomics that is conducted in a systemic way can help integrate information from different levels. At the molecular level, the detailed features of a gene and the relationship between genetic structure and function need to be explored. These detailed features include sequence analytic information such as sequence retrieval and structural modeling, sequence variation information, and sequence patterns that can correlate sequence structure to functional motifs. At the cellular level, the interactions and networks among those molecules should be examined. Higher degrees of understanding at the tissue and organism levels can help establish the correlations between genotype and phenotype. The application of bioinformatics methods in pharmacogenomics and systems biology should enable a more profound understanding of diseases at different levels and lead to both individualized and systems medicine. To facilitate up-to-date bio-informatics support, an integrated search engine and updated collections of tools are freely available at http://sysmed.pharmtao.com.

Pharmacogenetics and stomach cancer: an update

Although new drugs and association regimens have been used in recent years, the chemotherapeutic outcome for gastric cancer is still poor and improvement in patient survival is not satisfactory. Pharmacogenetics could represent a useful approach to optimize chemotherapeutic treatments in order to identify individuals that are true candidates for clinical benefits from therapy, avoiding the development of severe side effects. The most recent update regarding gastric cancer pharmacogenetics highlights a prominent role of genetic polymorphisms of thymidylate synthase and glutathione S-transferase in the pharmacological treatment with commonly used drugs, such as 5-fluorouracil and platinum derivatives. In order to validate the genetic markers, further larger scale and controlled studies are required. A future challenge is represented by the introduction of targeted therapy in gastric cancer treatment, with the potential emerging tool of pharmacogenetic impact on this field.

DPYD*5 gene mutation contributes to the reduced DPYD enzyme activity and chemotherapeutic toxicity of 5-FU

BACKGROUND

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) plays an important role in the metabolism of 5-FU, which can directly influence the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of 5-FU in patients undergoing chemotherapy. However, little is known of the relationship between DPYD gene polymorphism and metabolism and chemotherapeutic toxicity of 5-FU in gastric carcinoma and colon carcinoma. The present genotyping study demonstrated the relationship between DPYD gene polymorphism among 75 gastric carcinoma and colon carcinoma patients and its impact on 5-FU pharmacokinetic and side effect.

METHODS

We used a chemotherapy scheme based on 5-FU for the treatment of 75 patients with gastrointestinal carcinoma and detected the serum drug concentration and DPYD gene polymorphism (DPYD*2, *3, *4 *5 *9 *12).

RESULTS

We found that there were no DPYD*2, *3, *4, *12 type mutation, in all patients. Of DPYD*9 gene polymorphism loci in 75 patients, 7 were heterozygote and 68 wild type; of DPYD*5 gene polymorphism loci in 75 patients, 11 were mutation and 23 heterozygote and 41 wild type. The elimination rate constant (Ke) value of DPYD*5 mutation group was statistically lower than the wild type (p=0.022). The incidence of middle-severe nausea and vomiting and white blood cell decreases in DPYD*5 gene type ranging from the highest to lowest can be listed as: mutation, heterozygote, wild type (p<0.05). The incidence of middle-severe nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in DPYD*9 heterozygous genotype than in DPYD*9 wild genotype (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DPYD*5 gene mutation contribute to reduced DPYD enzyme activity and 5-FU dysmetabolism, which is associated with the accumulation of 5-FU and the chemotherapeutic toxicity in gastric carcinoma and colon carcinoma.

Molecular markers for gastric adenocarcinoma: an update

Gastric cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide. Treatment of localized gastric cancer relies primarily on surgical intervention, although growing evidence suggests that the addition of chemoradiation may improve disease-free intervals and overall survival. In this regard, the current high rates of recurrence and subsequent poor survival have prompted an ever-increasing use of multimodal strategies, even for early-stage disease. However, these therapies are often limited by debilitating toxicities and varying degrees of response efficacy. As a result, pharmacogenomics, the study of specific genetic and molecular signatures that may be predictive of treatment outcomes, has gained considerable interest. For example, studies have demonstrated that the expression of enzymes involved in the metabolism or conjugation of commonly used chemotherapy agents, such as fluoropyrimidines and cisplatin, can serve as surrogate markers predictive of chemotherapy response. Polymorphisms in the genes encoding these enzymes have also been identified and may further account for altered expression patterns, resulting in varied clinical responses. Future work is necessary to further refine the list of molecular genetic markers and to identify novel markers for prognostic and predictive purposes. Technologies such as microarray analysis may be useful in identifying new molecular genetic markers, and further work may determine whether these markers can be employed to help stratify patients into different multimodal treatment regimens.

MDR1 genotype-related pharmacokinetics: fact or fiction?

Multidrug resistant transporter MDR1/P-glycoprotein, the gene product of MDR1, is a glycosylated membrane protein of 170 kDa, belonging to the ATP-binding cassette superfamily of membrane transporters. A number of various types of structurally unrelated drugs are substrates for MDR1, and MDR1 and other transporters are recognized as an important class of proteins for regulating pharmacokinetics. The first investigation of the effects of MDR1 genotypes on pharmacotherapy was reported in 2000; a silent single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), C3435T in exon 26, was found to be associated with the duodenal expression of MDR1, and thereby the plasma concentration of digoxin after oral administration. In the last 5 years, clinical studies have been conducted around the world on the association of MDR1 genotype with MDR1 expression and function in tissues, and with the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs; however, there are still discrepancies in the results on C3435T. In 1995, a novel concept to predict in vivo oral pharmacokinetic performance from data on in vivo permeability and in vitro solubility has been proposed, and this Biopharmaceutical Classification System strongly suggested that the effects of intestinal MDR1 on the intestinal absorption of substrates is minimal in the case of commercially available oral drugs, and therefore MDR1 genotypes are little associated with the pharmacokinetics after oral administration. This review summarizes the latest reports for the future individualization of pharmacotherapy based on MDR1 genotyping, and attempts to explain discrepancies.