COX-2 inhibitors compared and contrasted

Selective COX-2 inhibitors after bariatric surgery: Celecoxib, etoricoxib and etodolac post-bariatric solubility/dissolution and pharmacokinetics

Anatomical/physiological gastrointestinal changes after bariatric surgery may influence the fate of orally administered drugs.Since non-selective NSAIDs are not well-tolerated post-surgery, selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors may be important for these patients. In this work we investigated celecoxib, etoricoxib and etodolac, for impaired post-bariatric solubility/dissolution and absorption. Solubility was studied in-vitro, and ex-vivoin aspirated gastric contents from patients pre- vs. post-surgery. Dissolution was studied in conditions simulating pre- vs. post-surgery stomach. Finally, the experimental solubility data were used in physiologically-based biopharmaceutics model (PBBM) (GastroPlus®) to simulate pre- vs. post-surgery celecoxib/etoricoxib/etodolac pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles.For etoricoxib and etodolac (but not celecoxib), pH-dependent solubility was demonstrated: etoricoxib solubility decreased ∼1000-fold, and etodolac solubility increased 120-fold, as pH increased from 1 to 7, which was also confirmed ex-vivo. Hampered etoricoxib dissolution and improved etodolac dissolution post-surgery was revealed. Tablet crushing, clinically recommended after surgery, failed to improve post-bariatric dissolution. PBBM simulations revealed significantly impaired etoricoxib absorption post-surgery across all conditions; for instance, 79% lower Cmax and 53% decreased AUC was simulated post-gastric bypass procedure, after single 120 mg dose. Celecoxib and etodolac maintained unaffected absorption after bariatric surgery.This mechanistically-based analysis suggests to prefer the acidic drug etodolac or the neutral celecoxib as selective COX-2 inhibitors, over the basic drug etoricoxib, after bariatric surgery.

Risk of drug-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the total population of the Netherlands: a time-trend analysis

Objective

Many prescribed and over-the-counter medications, for example, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Recently, a decrease in prescribing of NSAIDs was observed in the Netherlands, but whether a similar decreasing trend could be observed in the incidence of severe UGIB (either fatal or requiring hospitalisation), contingent on medication prescription, is unknown.

Design

We conducted a cohort study using Dutch national statistics on pharmacy claims, hospitalisation and mortality between 2013 and 2018. We explored the incidence of sex-specific and age-specific severe UGIB in four (sub)populations: (A) total population, (B) without a filled prescrption for NSAIDs, (C) without filled prescriptions for NSAIDs and antithrombotic agents, (D) without any risk factors for UGIB.

Results

The cumulative incidence of severe UGIB did not decrease throughout the study period, regardless of the subgroup analysis. In the total population, it was 199 per 100 000 inhabitants (95% CI 197 to 201) in 2013–2014 and 260 (95% CI 258 to 263) in 2017–2018. The absolute risk of severe UGIB was 50% lower in the subgroup B than in the full cohort. It decreased further by 50% in the subgroup D when compared with subgroup B. The risk of severe UGIB was 1.5–1.9 fold higher in young women than in young men; an indication of over-the-counter NSAIDs use being more prevalent in women than men in this age group.

Conclusion

We found no evidence to support a relationship between reduced prescribing of NSAIDs and the incidence of severe UGIB in the Netherlands since 2013. The relationship was also not observed when we removed the effect of risk factors.

Nimesulide-induced hepatotoxicity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the risk for hepatotoxicity with nimesulide, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) available in Republic of Korea but withdrawn from the market in several countries.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of studies retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, the Research Information Sharing Service and ClinicalTrials.gov up to September 2017. All studies reporting nimesulide-associated hepatotoxicity in patients as compared with the unexposed or the exposed to other NSAIDs were included. Studies using spontaneous reporting databases were included to estimate reporting odds ratio (ROR) of hepatotoxicity associated with nimesulide exposure. The association between nimesulide use and hepatotoxicity was estimated using relative risk (RR) and ROR with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

A total of 25 observational studies were eligible for review. In a meta-analysis of five observational studies, nimesulide was significantly associated with hepatotoxicity [RR 2.21, 95% CI 1.72–2.83]. From studies using spontaneous reporting databases (n = 6), rates of reported hepatotoxicity were significantly higher in patients using nimesulide, compared with those treated with other NSAIDs [pooled ROR 3.99, 95% CI 2.86–5.57]. Of a total of 33 patients from case studies and series, the majority (n = 28, 84.8%) were female, and the mean age (± standard deviation) was 56.8 (± 15.6) years. Almost half of the patients on nimesulide (45.5%) either required liver transplantation or died due to fulminant hepatic failure, of whom a third developed hepatotoxicity within less than 15 days of nimesulide administration.

Conclusions

Our study findings support previous reports of an increased risk for hepatotoxicity with nimesulide use and add to existing literature by providing risk estimates for nimesulide-associated hepatotoxicity. As the limited number of studies with primarily observational study designs were included in the analysis, more studies are needed to further describe the effects of dose and length of treatment on the risk for hepatotoxicity.

Are there any differences among non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs? Focus on nimesulide

Although the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic agents is well established, there is still an open question as to whether their different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics do have a different clinical impact in treating rheumatology patients. The mechanism related to the anti-inflammatory activity of these drugs is mainly related to the inhibition of the cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 isoform, whereas inhibition of COX-1 is associated with the side effects of these drugs. However, some NSAIDs exert their anti-inflammatory and analgesic action by additional mechanisms. The NSAID nimesulide, along with its preferential activity on COX-2 and a short half-life that correlates with a rapid onset of analgesic action, acts also through a variety of COX-independent pathways that contributes to its potent antiinflammatory and analgesic activity. The pathways affected by nimesulide include inhibition of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) release, histamine release, reactive oxygen species production and chondrocyte death. Furthermore, the use of nimesulide has been associated with reduced levels of matrix metalloproteases and other biomarkers of joint destruction, suggesting it may have a protective effect against disease progression. Due to its multifactorial mechanism as well as to rapid onset of the analgesic action, nimesulide represents an appealing therapeutic choice for the treatment of rheumatology patients.

Adverse drug reactions associated with the use of NSAIDs: a case/noncase analysis of spontaneous reports from the French pharmacovigilance database 2002-2006

To evaluate the safety profile of eight oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) available in France, using data reported through the French pharmacovigilance system. Data (from 2002 to 2006) were analysed for aceclofenac, diclofenac, ketoprofen, meloxicam, naproxen, nimesulide, piroxicam and tenoxicam, focusing on the reported rates of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the following system organ classes: gastrointestinal, hepatic, cutaneous, renal and cardiovascular. A total of 42 389 serious ADR reports were identified, and 38 506 were included in a case/noncase analysis. Ketoprofen was associated with the highest cumulative reported rate of serious ADRs (0.78 cases per million defined daily doses), followed by diclofenac (0.58), nimesulide (0.52), naproxen (0.50), piroxicam (0.47), tenoxicam (0.42), meloxicam (0.41) and aceclofenac (0.30). The most frequently reported serious ADRs were cutaneous, followed by gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal and rarely, cardiovascular events. In the case/noncase analysis, ketoprofen, piroxicam and naproxen were associated with the highest risk of serious gastrointestinal ADRs (odds ratios [ORs] of 6.87, 6.54 and 5.07, respectively). Nimesulide and aceclofenac were associated with the highest risk of liver ADRs (adjusted ORs of 4.53 and 3.67, respectively), as was meloxicam for cutaneous ADRs (adjusted OR of 3.15) and tenoxicam for renal ADRs (adjusted OR of 3.17). The most frequent serious ADRs reported with the selected oral NSAIDs are cutaneous, followed by gastrointestinal, hepatic and renal events. The highest risks for serious gastrointestinal, hepatic, cutaneous and renal adverse events were linked, respectively, with ketoprofen, nimesulide, meloxicam and tenoxicam compared with the other NSAIDs.

Cyclooxygenase 2 and Prostaglandin E2 are not Involved in N-Nitrosodiethylamine-Initiated Early Rat Hepatocarcinogenesis

The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of dietary supplementation with nimesulide or eugenol on N-nitrosodiethylamine (DEN)-initiated early hepatocarcinogenesis in F344 male rats. Both compounds did not alter the expression of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2E1, the enzyme that plays a major role in the activation of DEN to genotoxic products; however, nimesulide induced the expression of CYP1A1. Western blot analysis revealed that COX-1 and COX-2 protein expressions were not modulated by DEN compared with normal controls. Furthermore, post-initiation feeding with nimesulide or eugenol did not modulate COX-2 protein expression in normal or DEN-treated rats, whereas eugenol significantly increased the liver prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) levels of DEN-injected animals compared with the DEN controls. Ultimately, nimesulide or eugenol did not modify DEN-induced hepatocarcinogenesis as evidenced by insignificant changes in the number and size of preneoplastic placental glutathione S-transferase (GST-P) positive liver foci compared with the DEN controls. These results suggest that COX-2, as well as prostaglandin E₂, may play no role in the post-initiation development of DEN-induced rat hepatocarcinogenesis at an early stage.

Etodolac versus dexamethasone effect in reduction of postoperative symptoms following surgical endodontic treatment: a double-blind study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this prospective study was to analyze the effect of etodolac versus dexamethasone in reducing postoperative pain in patients who had surgical endodontic treatment using a strict protocol.

STUDY DESIGN

The study consisted of 90 patients (38 males and 52 females) referred for surgical endodontic treatment. All procedures were performed using a microsurgical technique with a strict protocol. Patients were randomly premedicated with placebo or with one of both protocols: either a single dose of oral dexamethasone, 8 mg, preoperatively and 2 single doses, 4 mg, 1 and 2 days postoperatively, or a single dose of etodolac, 600 mg, and 2 single doses, 600 mg, 1 and 2 days postoperatively. Pain was recorded at 8, 24, and 48 hours, as well as 7 days postoperatively, on a 1-10 scale. The influence of different variables on postoperative sequelae was analyzed.

RESULTS

On a 1-10 scale, the mean values of pain report recorded were 3.8 +/- 2.9 (8 hours postoperatively), 2.93 +/- 2.4 (24 hours), 2.31 +/- 2.2 (48 hours), and 1.4 +/- 0.9 (7 days postoperatively). One day postoperatively, 41.8% of the patients reported no or very mild pain (score 1 or 2), whereas after 7 days, 87.9% reported no or very mild pain (score 1 or 2). Both etodolac and dexamethasone had a significant effect of reducing postoperative pain in patients who had surgical endodontic procedure compared with placebo (P < or = .001).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative pain following endodontic surgical treatment is not uncommon. Etodolac as well as dexamethasone might serve as a pain relief measure for postoperative pain in these patients.