Eribulin mesylate for the treatment of late-stage breast cancer

Baseline interleukin-6 is a prognostic factor for patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin

PURPOSE

Eribulin is a unique anti-cancer drug which can improve overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), probably by modulating the tumor immune microenvironment. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of serum levels of immune-related and inflammatory cytokines in patients treated with eribulin. Furthermore, we investigated the association between cytokines and immune cells, such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and cytotoxic and regulatory T cells, to explore how these cytokines might affect the immune microenvironment.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with MBC treated with eribulin were recruited for this retrospective study. The relationship of cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-6, to progression-free survival and OS was examined. CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte, MDSCs and regulatory T cell levels were determined in the blood by flow cytometry analysis.

RESULTS

In our cohort, patients with high IL-6 at baseline had shorter progression-free survival and OS compared with those with low IL-6 (p = 0.0017 and p = 0.0012, respectively). Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed that baseline IL-6 was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.0058). Importantly, CD8+ lymphocytes were significantly lower and MDSCs were significantly higher in patients with high IL-6, compared to those with low IL-6.

CONCLUSION

Baseline IL-6 is an important prognostic factor in patients with MBC treated with eribulin. Our results show that high IL-6 is associated with higher levels of MDSCs which suppress anti-tumor immunity, such as CD8+ cells. It appears that eribulin is not particularly effective in patients with high IL-6 due to a poor tumor immune microenvironment.

From seaside to bedside: Current evidence and future perspectives in the treatment of breast cancer using marine compounds

To date, only few marine natural compounds have been proved to be active in breast cancer (BC). The main marine-derived drugs that have been studied for the treatment of BC are tubulin-binding agents (eribulin and plocabulin), DNA-targeting agents (cytarabine and minor groove binders—trabectedin and lurbinectedin) and Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs). Notably, eribulin is the only approved cytotoxic drug for the treatment of advanced BC (ABC), while cytarabine has a limited indication in case of leptomeningeal diffusion of the disease. Also plocabulin showed limited activity in ABC but further research is needed to define its ultimate potential role. The available clinical data for both trabectedin and lurbinectedin are of particular interest in the treatment of BRCA-mutated tumours and HR deficient disease, probably due to a possible immune-mediated mechanism of action. One of the most innovative therapeutic options for the treatment of BC, particularly in TNBC and HER2-positive BC, are ADCs. Some of the ADCs were developed using a specific marine-derived cytotoxic molecule as payload called auristatin. Among these, clinical data are available on ladiratuzumab vedotin and glembatumumab vedotin in TNBC, and on disitamab vedotin and ALT-P7 in HER2-positive patients. A deeper knowledge of the mechanism of action and of the potential predictive factors for response to marine-derived drugs is important for their rational and effective use, alone or in combination. In this narrative review, we discuss the role of marine-derived drugs for the treatment of BC, although most of them are not approved, and the opportunities that could arise from the potential treasure trove of the sea for novel BC therapeutics.

Prognostic and predictive factors of eribulin in patients with heavily pre-treated metastatic breast cancer

A predictive marker for efficacy of eribulin administered as different lines of treatment in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has not been identified. We aimed to determine the predictive factors for efficacy of eribulin administered as different lines of treatment in MBC patients.This restrospective cohort study included 49 heavily pre-treated MBC patients who received either eribulin monotherapy or combination therapy with eribulin and anti-Her2 therapy. Associations between clinical response of eribulin-based treatment, time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and possible predictive markers were investigated.Patients' median age was 55 years; 65% were ER+; 43% were HER2+; and 16% were triple-negative. Median TTF was 5.23 months and longer in non-visceral metastases patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status was 0-1; eribulin as ≥2nd-line treatment; eribulin combined with dual blockades; lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) ≥3; and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) <0.4. In patients with eribulin as >3rd-line treatment, univariate analysis showed that ECOG status was 0-1, and LMR ≥3 and MLR <0.4 were associated with a low risk of TTF. Multivariate analysis showed that ECOG status 0-1 was an independent protective factor. Leukopenia and neutropenia were the most common manageable adverse events.ECOG status is an independent predictor for TTF, while LMR and MLR may have an interactive effect with other biomarkers (e.g., ECOG status) to predict response in MBC patients receiving eribulin as ≥2nd-line treatment.

Predictive Factors of Eribulin Activity in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVES

Predictive factors of response to eribulin are lacking. We aimed to investigate the activity and safety of eribulin in a real-world population of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients and to identify possible predictive factors of progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 71 eribulin-treated MBC patients. Best response rate, PFS, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. The impact of different clinical-pathological factors on PFS was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Predictive factors of response were identified by discriminant function analysis (DFA).

RESULTS

Median PFS was 3.75 months (95% CI, 2.39-4.48); 12 patients (16.90%) achieved partial response (PR), 27 (38.03%) stable disease. The most common AEs were fatigue (25.83%), neutropenia (16.56%), and peripheral neuropathy (13.91%). A worse performance status (p = 0.025) and a higher number of metastatic organ sites (p = 0.011) were associated with a worse PFS under eribulin. Overall, in the DFA-predictive model, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at baseline, estrogen receptor, Ki67, histology, and age were predictive of PR with 100% accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Activity and safety profiles of eribulin were consistent with literature data. Performance status and number of metastatic sites were predictive factors of PFS. DFA could be a promising tool to discriminate responses to eribulin among MBC patients.

Prognostic and predictive factors of eribulin efficacy in heavily pretreated patients affected by metastatic breast cancer: correlation with tumor biology and previous therapies

Background

Eribulin mesylate is currently approved in the United States and Europe for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Scope

The objective of this retrospective study is to find specific predictive criteria related to patient or tumor characteristics in order to select patients that might benefit the most from eribulin and define the correct treatment sequence.

Findings

Forty-four patients with MBC who received eribulin in third or subsequent lines of therapy in a single Italian center were considered eligible. Patients were stratified by body mass index, hormonal/HER2 status, and previous therapies. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), whereas secondary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR).

A longer PFS was found in patients with hormone-positive tumors (p=0.0051), in HER2-negative cases (p=0.037), and in overweight patients (p=0.0015). No difference in efficacy was observed when eribulin was administered in third or subsequent lines of therapy. Significantly longer PFS (p<0.0001) and higher DCR (p=0.035) were achieved by patients previously treated with paclitaxel-bevacizumab in comparison to those pretreated with other drug combinations or with anthracyclines. Prior treatment with nab-paclitaxel seems to have a detrimental effect on PFS (p=0.0008).

Conclusion

Hormone and HER2 status seems a good predictive and prognostic indicator of response to eribulin. Efficacy seems independent from the number of prior therapies, and it is not influenced by prior endocrine treatments and anthracyclines-containing regimens. On the other hand, sensitivity to a prior treatment with paclitaxel-bevacizumab might be predictive of response to eribulin.

Tumour biology, metastatic sites and taxanes sensitivity as determinants of eribulin mesylate efficacy in breast cancer: results from the ERIBEX retrospective, international, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Our retrospective, international study aimed at evaluating the activity and safety of eribulin mesylate (EM) in pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a routine clinical setting.

METHODS

Patients treated with EM for a locally advanced or MBC between March 2011 and January 2014 were included in the study. Clinical and biological assessment of toxicity was performed at each visit. Tumour response was assessed every 3 cycles of treatment. A database was created to collect clinical, pathological and treatment data.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-eight patients were included in the study. Median age was 59 years old. Tumours were Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive (73.3 %) HER2-positive (10.2 %), and triple negative (TN, 22.5 %). 86.4 % of the patients presented with visceral metastases, mainly in the liver (67.4 %). Median previous metastatic chemotherapies number was 4 [1-9]. Previous treatments included anthracyclines and/or taxanes (100 %) and capecitabine (90.7 %). Median number of EM cycles was 5 [1-19]. The relative dose intensity was 0.917. At the time of analysis (median follow-up of 13.9 months), 42.3 % of the patients were still alive. The objective response rate was 25.2 % (95 %CI: 20-31) with a 36.1 % clinical benefit rate (CBR). Median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival were 3.97 (95 %CI: 3.25-4.3) and 11.2 (95 %CI: 9.3-12.1) months, respectively. One- and 2-year survival rates were 45.5 and 8.5 %, respectively. In multivariate analysis, HER2 positivity (HR = 0.29), the presence of lung metastases (HR = 2.49) and primary taxanes resistance (HR = 2.36) were the only three independent CBR predictive factors, while HR positivity (HR = 0.67), the presence of lung metastases (HR = 1.52) and primary taxanes resistance (HR = 1.50) were the only three TTP independent prognostic factors. Treatment was globally well tolerated. Most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (20.9 %), peripheral neuropathy (3.9 %), anaemia (1.6 %), liver dysfunction (0.8 %) and thrombocytopenia (0.4 %). Thirteen patients (5 %) developed febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

EM is an effective new option in heavily pretreated MBC, with a favourable efficacy/safety ratio in a clinical practice setting. Our results comfort the use of this new molecule and pledge for the evaluation of EM-trastuzumab combination in this setting. Tumour biology, primary taxanes sensitivity and metastatic sites could represent useful predictive and prognostic factors.

Clinical impact of eribulin in the treatment of breast cancer

SUMMARY 

Metastatic breast cancer is considered incurable, with a 5-year survival of approximately 23%. However, sequential chemotherapy regimens produce clinical benefit for patients, including prolonged progression-free and overall survival times. Eribulin is a convenient (<5 min infusion) and novel treatment that has shown activity and efficacy and tolerability in advanced breast cancer patients in Phase II and Phase III trials. Eribulin has also shown encouraging results as first-line treatment, either alone in patients with HER2- disease or in combination with trastuzumab in patients with HER2+ disease, in Phase II trials.

Curcumin-induced Aurora-A suppression not only causes mitotic defect and cell cycle arrest but also alters chemosensitivity to anticancer drugs

Overexpression of oncoprotein Aurora-A increases drug resistance and promotes lung metastasis of breast cancer cells. Curcumin is an active anticancer compound in turmeric and curry. Here we observed that Aurora-A protein and kinase activity were reduced in curcumin-treated human breast chemoresistant nonmetastatic MCF-7 and highly metastatic cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Curcumin acts in a similar manner to Aurora-A small interfering RNA (siRNA), resulting in monopolar spindle formation, S and G2/M arrest, and cell division reduction. Ectopic Aurora-A extinguished the curcumin effects. The anticancer effects of curcumin were enhanced by Aurora-A siRNA and produced additivity and synergism effects in cell division and monopolar phenotype, respectively. Combination treatment with curcumin overrode the chemoresistance to four Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anticancer drugs (ixabepilone, cisplatin, vinorelbine, or everolimus) in MDA-MB-231 cells, which was characterized by a decrease in cell viability and the occurrence of an additivity or synergy effect. Ectopic expression of Aurora-A attenuated curcumin-enhanced chemosensitivity to these four tested drugs. A similar benefit of curcumin was observed in MCF-7 cells treated with ixabepilone, the primary systemic therapy to patients with invasive breast cancer (stages IIA-IIIB) before surgery. Antagonism effect was observed when MCF-7 cells were treated with curcumin plus cisplatin, vinorelbine or everolimus. Curcumin-induced enhancement in chemosensitivity was paralleled by significant increases (additivity or synergy effect) in apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at S and G2/M phases, the consequences of Aurora-A inhibition. These results suggest that a combination of curcumin with FDA-approved anticancer drugs warrants further assessment with a view to developing a novel clinical treatment for breast cancer.

Characterization of the pharmacokinetics of a liposomal formulation of eribulin mesylate (E7389) in mice

Eribulin mesylate (E7389), a tubulin and microtubule inhibitor, has been approved to treat metastatic breast cancer in certain patient populations. A liposomal formulation of E7389, E7389-LF, aims to increase the therapeutic profile of E7389. As determining the free drug concentration is crucial for the assessment of efficacy and toxicity of liposomal drug, in this study, an ultracentrifugation method coupled with LC-MS/MS was developed to separate the free E7389 from liposomal and protein bound E7389. The pharmacokinetics of the free E7389 after dosing either E7389 or E7389-LF was characterized. The concentration ratio of E7389 in ultracentrifuged mice plasma (UCM) vs E7389 in plasma after a 2mg/kg i.v. of E7389 ranged from 54.19% to 65.41%, which was similar to the free fraction in the mouse plasma. The respective concentration ratio of E7389 in UCM vs E7389 in plasma after a 2mg/kg i.v. of E7389-LF ranged from 0.07% to 0.59%, and the exposure, expressed as AUC, of UCM/plasma ratio was determined to be 0.2%. Pharmacokinetic modeling was performed to estimate the release kinetics of E7389 from E7389-LF, and the release was best described by a first order rate constant k(rel) 0.078 h(-1). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that further decrease the release rate constant by adjusting liposome formulation would lead to decreased C(max) and much longer half-life of UCM E7389, which might result in better efficacy and lower toxicity.

Current status on marine products with reversal effect on cancer multidrug resistance

The resistance of tumor cells to a broad range of anticancer agents continues to be a problem for the success of cancer chemotherapy. Multidrug resistance (MDR) is due in part to three drug transporter proteins: ABCB1/P-glycoprotein (P-gp), ABCC1/multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1) and ABCG2/breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). These transporters are part of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily, whose members function as ATP-dependent drug-efflux pumps. Their activity can be blocked by various drugs such as verapamil (calcium channel blocker) and cyclosporin A (immunosuppressive agent), etc. These compounds are called MDR modulators or reversals. This review highlights several marine natural products with reversal effect on multidrug resistance in cancer, including agosterol A, ecteinascidin 743, sipholane triterpenoids, bryostatin 1, and welwitindolinones.