First-line treatment in the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Genetic stratification of inherited and sporadic phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma: implications for precision medicine

Over the past two decades advances in genomic technologies have transformed knowledge of the genetic basis of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL). Though traditional teaching suggested that inherited cases accounted for only 10% of all phaeochromocytoma diagnosis, current estimates are at least three times this proportion. Inherited PPGL is a highly genetically heterogeneous disorder but the most frequently results from inactivating variants in genes encoding subunits of succinate dehydrogenase. Expanding knowledge of the genetics of PPGL has been translated into clinical practice by the provision of widespread testing for inherited PPGL. In this review, we explore how the molecular stratification of PPGL is being utilized to enable more personalized strategies for investigation, surveillance and management of affected individuals and their families. Translating recent genetic research advances into clinical service can not only bring benefits through more accurate diagnosis and risk prediction but also challenges when there is a suboptimal evidence base for the clinical consequences or significance of rare genotypes. In such cases, clinical, biochemical, pathological and functional imaging assessments can all contribute to more accurate interpretation and clinical management.

Targeted Cancer Therapy: What's New in the Field of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous family of neoplasms of increasing incidence and high prevalence due to their relatively indolent nature. Their wide anatomic distribution and their characteristic ability to secrete hormonally active substances pose unique challenges for clinical management. They are also characterized by the common expression of somatostatin receptors, a target that has been extremely useful for diagnosis and treatment (i.e., somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)). Chemotherapy is of limited use for NETs of non-pancreatic origin, and the only approved targeted agents for advanced progressive NETs are sunitinib for those of pancreatic origin, and everolimus for lung, gastrointestinal and pancreatic primaries. Despite recent therapeutic achievements, thus, systemic treatment options remain limited. In this review we will discuss the state-of-the-art targeted therapies in the field of NETs, and also future perspectives of novel therapeutic drugs or strategies in clinical development, including recently presented results from randomized trials of yet unapproved antiangiogenic agents (i.e., pazopanib, surufatinib and axitinib), PRRT including both approved radiopharmaceuticals (177Lu-Oxodotreotide) and others in development (177Lu-Edotreotide, 177Lu-Satoreotide Tetraxetan), immunotherapy and other innovative targeted strategies (antibody-drug conjugates, bites,…) that shall soon improve the landscape of personalized treatment options in NET patients.

Systemic therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Emerging challenges in therapeutic choice

The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has undergone a substantial evolution in the past decade, with a dramatic increase in the number of available systemic therapies. Although this offers promise for improved patient outcomes, this rapid pace in development has led to new challenges in therapeutic choice. For instance, the absence of direct comparative evidence across all therapeutic options has led to a critical gap in evidence to clearly define preferred systemic therapy choice. Additionally, the rising cost of systemic therapies being evaluated for mRCC necessitates demonstration of cost-effectiveness prior to widespread adoption. This review provides an overview of the current treatment landscape in mRCC to highlight the emerging challenges faced by clinicians and health policy-makers. In addition, this review summarizes the currently available evidence that aims to address the above challenges.

Molecular targeted and immune checkpoint therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Molecular targeted therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has changed markedly. Although sorafenib was used in clinical practice as the first molecular targeted agent in 2007, the SHARPE and Asian-Pacific trials demonstrated that sorafenib only improved overall survival (OS) by approximately 3 months in patients with advanced HCC compared with placebo. Molecular targeted agents were developed during the 10-year period from 2007 to 2016, but every test of these agents from phase II or phase III clinical trial failed due to a low response rate and high toxicity. In the 2 years after, 2017 through 2018, four successful novel drugs emerged from clinical trials for clinical use. As recommended by updated Barcelona Clinical Liver cancer (BCLC) treatment algorithms, lenvatinib is now feasible as an alternative to sorafenib as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC. Regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab are appropriate supplements for sorafenib as second-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC who are resistant, show progression or do not tolerate sorafenib. In addition, with promising outcomes in phase II trials, immune PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab have been applied for HCC treatment. Despite phase III trials for nivolumab and pembrolizumab, the primary endpoints of improved OS were not statistically significant, immune PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint therapy remains to be further investigated. This review summarizes the development and progression of molecular targeted and immune-based checkpoint therapies in HCC.

[Interdisciplinary recommendations for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma]

Due to novel therapies, the prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma has improved significantly. A median overall survival of more than two years is a realistic goal. Immunotherapies with checkpoint inhibitors are new first-line and second-line options. Sunitinib, Pazopanib, Tivozanib and the combination of Bevacizumab + interferon alpha are approved for first-line therapy, regardless of the progression risk score. The use of both the combination Nivolumab + Ipilimumab and Cabozantinib is limited to intermediate and high-risk patients. In this subgroup, the immunotherapy combination was more effective in terms of overall survival compared with Sunitinib. Temsirolimus is only approved for high-risk patients. Sunitinib and Pazopanib can also be used as second-line options, with the use of Pazopanib being limited to the event of cytokine failure. Nivolumab and Cabozantinib demonstrated superior overall survival compared to Everolimus. Furthermore, the combination of Lenvatinib + Everolimus and Axitinib are approved treatment options in second-line and further settings. Everolimus monotherapy has been replaced by the new options. The question regarding the optimal sequence of treatments is still unanswered. An interdisciplinary expert meeting aimed to discuss the criteria that should be used for therapy. The members discussed several aspects of treating patients with RCC. As in previous years, the experts intended to provide recommendations for clinical practice. The results are presented here.

The current state of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the first-line treatment of renal cancer

Until recently, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) were the only approved drugs for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Emerging trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-based regimens have shown survival benefits over the standard TKI. These studies challenge a paradigm shift in the management of mRCC concerning the identification of the subgroup of patients that would benefit from ICI in treatment-naive mRCC, the possibility of treatment discontinuation between TKI and ICI, and the sequencing of surgery and systemic treatment. This paper reviews the currently available data and discusses the paradigm shift concerning first-line treatments of mRCC.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Treatment for Metastatic Renal Carcinoma in Romania

Rationale: In recent years, the cost of several treatment options for renal cancer have been supported by the Romanian healthcare system for both first- and second-line therapies. First-line alternatives through real-life efficacy and amplitude of adverse reactions may influence the efficacy and costs of patients treated with second-line treatment.

Objective: Estimation of the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit ratio for first-line treatment alternatives: Sunitinib and Pazopanib from the payer’s perspective in the Romanian healthcare system.

Methods and Results: We developed a Markov model to calculate the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit ratio for 2 cohorts of patients using the results from the COMPARZ study for efficacy (progression-free survival, general survivability and quality of life) and safety and costs from national hospital databases. For an estimated population of 800 patients, Pazopanib has a quantified benefit of 7.19 years in progression-free survival, 11.71 life years gained and 8.97 years of quality-adjusted life-years compared to Sunitinib. The analysis is limited by the accuracy of the national data used and the transposition of general data on efficacy and safety at the local level.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sunitinib versus Interferon-Alfa for First-Line Treatment of Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Singapore

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sunitinib versus interferon-alfa for the treatment of advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Singapore.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model with three health states (progression-free, progressive disease, and death) was developed from a healthcare payer perspective over a 10-year time horizon. Survival curves from the pivotal trial of sunitinib versus interferon-alfa were extrapolated beyond the trial period to estimate the underlying progression-free survival and overall survival parametric distributions. Health state utilities were derived from the literature and direct costs were sourced from local public healthcare institutions. The sunitinib dose in the model reflected local prescribing practices whereby a combination of 50 mg (28 percent) and 37.5 mg (72 percent) strengths are used.

RESULTS

The base-case analysis comparing sunitinib versus interferon-alfa resulted in an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SGD191,061 (USD139,757) per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the ICER was most sensitive to variations in the utility value assumed for the progression-free health state and the price of sunitinib.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of any price reduction, sunitinib had an exceedingly high ICER and was not considered a cost-effective use of healthcare resources in Singapore's context for the first-line treatment of advanced RCC. The findings from our evaluation will be useful to inform local healthcare decision making and resource allocations for tyrosine kinase inhibitors when appraised alongside comparative clinical effectiveness data and payer affordability considerations.

Contemporary treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma is the 14th most common cancer worldwide. It is a heterogeneous group of histopathological entities, of which the most common is clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Approximately 20-30% of patients present initially with metastatic disease and an additional 20% will progress after radical surgical treatment. Metastatic disease that is non-feasible for surgical treatment remains incurable. Numerous studies have demonstrated that-with the introduction of new drugs-the treatment outcomes of metastatic disease have improved. The development of new therapies as well as the optimization and individualization of procedures allow us to hope for further progress in this area.

Variable response of CNS hemangioblastomas to Pazopanib in a single patient with von Hippel-Lindau disease: Case report

Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is a multisystem genetic disease, the cardinal manifestations of which include central nervous system hemangioblastomas (CNS HB), renal cell carcinomas (RCC), and pheochromocytoma. Tumorigenesis in VHL of both RCC and CNS HB occurs secondary to downstream effects of a mutated or absent VHL protein. Treatment of RCCs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as Pazopanib is now first line therapy, but their effect on VHL-associated CNS HBs remains unknown. We report the use of Pazopanib in a patient with VHL disease for treatment of RCC who also harbored multiple CNS HBs. Following initiation of treatment, a large cervical and a lumbar spinal HB regressed in size while the remaining CNS HBs exhibited stable or progressive disease. These findings highlight the multiplicity of factors contributing to hemangioblastoma development, even among tumors with a common germline mutation, and the potential limitations of TKIs, but additionally this report supports the conservative management of asymptomatic VHL patients with spinal HBs whereby tumor response to TKI treatment may alleviate or postpone the need for surgery.

Network meta-analysis of second-line treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: efficacy and safety

This paper aims to compare the approved second-line treatment options in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A network meta-analysis (NMA) using the frequentist approach and generalized pairwise modeling was computed for the approved drugs in this setting. The results of this NMA showed that the combination of lenvatinib and everolimus yielded the lowest hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (HR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.21–0.75) and overall survival (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.30–1.00). The great efficacy of this combination is limited by the prevalence of grade 3–4 adverse events (70.6%) leading to treatment discontinuation in 17.6%. This NMA is to the best of our knowledge, the first analysis of the approved regimens for the second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Laparoscopic total pancreatectomy for multiple metastasis of renal cell carcinoma of the pancreas: a case report and literature review

Advances in surgical techniques and laparoscopic instruments have resulted in the development of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. Total pancreaticoduodenectomy is performed for treating benign and borderline pancreatic disease involving the whole pancreas. Here, we report a case of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the pancreas, treated by laparoscopic pylorus-preserving total pancreaticoduodenectomy. A 59-year-old woman was diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Multiple metastatic lesions were found on routine follow-up. She had a history of radical video-assisted right-nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (conventional type, pT1) in November 2003, without any recurrence. However, in 2014, a routine health checkup revealed multiple enhancing lesions throughout the pancreas. Positron emission tomography showed a suspicious 4-cm lesion in her left thyroid. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving total pancreaticoduodenectomy with splenectomy was performed, along with simultaneous left total thyroidectomy with central compartment node dissection for metastatic renal cell carcinomas. The total operation time was 441 min, with an estimated blood loss of 150 ml; no transfusion was administered. Her hospital stay was 12 days. The histopath report confirmed metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the pancreas and left thyroid. Based on literature reviews, we further tried to estimate the oncologic outcome of total pancreatectomy in multiple pancreatic metastasis of renal cell carcinoma. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving total pancreaticoduodenectomy is feasible and safe, even in cases of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Sunitinib in kidney cancer: 10 years of experience and development

INTRODUCTION

Sunitinib is a multi-target, anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor and a key molecule in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Since it first demonstrated its efficacy ten years ago, overall survival of mRCC has more than doubled, in part due to sunitinib. In most recent years, progress has been made in the comprehension of its mechanism of action and resistance. Areas Covered: In this article, clinical trials involving sunitinib in kidney cancer have been reviewed, defining its different indications in metastatic and localized RCC. The rationale of sunitinib's efficacy, preclinical trials, past-clinical trials and ongoing clinical trials are summarized. Dose and scheme base are discussed, as the recommended dosage is frequently not well tolerated. Combination therapies appear to be toxic. Novel immunotherapies are changing the landscape of mRCC treatment and challenging sunitinib. Special attention has been paid towards cancer cell biology and immunity involved in treatment response. Expert Commentary: Sunitinib's place in the therapeutic arsenal is being redefined with the arrival of major challengers. Dosage and scheduling of sunitinib remains a major challenge.

Prognostic Value of Plasma and Urine Glycosaminoglycan Scores in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) vastly improved since the introduction of antiangiogenic-targeted therapy. However, it is still unclear which biological processes underlie ccRCC aggressiveness and affect prognosis. Here, we checked whether a recently discovered systems biomarker based on plasmatic or urinary measurements of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) aggregated into diagnostic scores correlated with ccRCC prognosis.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with a diagnosis of ccRCC (23 metastatic) were prospectively enrolled, and their urine and plasma biomarker scores were correlated to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as either a dichotomous ("Low" vs. "High") or a continuous variable in a multivariate survival analysis.

RESULTS

The survival difference between "High"- vs. "Low"-scored patients was significant in the case of urine scores (2-year PFS rate = 53.3 vs. 100%, p = 3 × 10-4 and 2-year OS rate = 73.3 vs. 100%, p = 0.0078) and in the case of OS for plasma scores (2-year PFS rate = 60 vs. 84%, p = 0.0591 and 2-year OS rate = 66.7 vs. 90%, p = 0.0206). In multivariate analysis, the urine biomarker score as a continuous variable was an independent predictor of PFS [hazard ratio (HR): 4.62, 95% CI: 1.66-12.83, p = 0.003] and OS (HR: 10.13, 95% CI: 1.80-57.04, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

This is the first report on an association between plasma or urine GAG scores and the prognosis of ccRCC patients. Prospective trials validating the prognostic and predictive role of this novel systems biomarker are warranted.

Novel investigational therapies for treating biliary tract carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an epithelial cell malignancy arising from bile ducts and/or peribiliary glands. Even though it is considered as a rare neoplasm, its incidence is raising, particularly in developed countries. Prognosis is generally poor with few patients who present the inclusion criteria for surgery (the mainstay treatment for this tumour). Several genetic alterations potentially driving tumour progression have been described, representing a possible target for new compounds. Areas covered: A clinical trial search in Clinicaltrials.gov encompassing a literature search in PubMed and ASCO/ESMO Websites was undertaken in March 2016. Expert opinion: Notwithstanding a large number of drug tested, results are still disappointing. The main reasons could be the low number of patients enrolled in trials, and the lack of a patient selection based on the biological profile of the tumours. Potential active drugs could have been discharged simply because beneficial in a particular subgroup of patients and not in un unselected population. The future direction of the research should consider biomarker evaluation in order to describe the genetic alteration/s that drive tumour progression and aggressiveness and the mechanisms of drug resistance. Finally, it will be of great interest to consider the results of immunotherapy whenever available.

The evolving role of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

While the majority of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors currently used for the therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are small molecule agents inhibiting multiple targets, monoclonal antibodies are inhibitors of specific targets, which may decrease off-target effects while preserving on-target activity. A few monoclonal antibodies have already been approved for mRCC (bevacizumab, nivolumab), while many others may play an important role in the therapeutic scenario of mRCC.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes emerging monoclonal antibodies for treating RCC. Currently, bevacizumab, a VEGF monoclonal antibody, is approved in combination with interferon for the therapy of metastatic RCC, while nivolumab, a Programmed Death (PD)-1 inhibitor, is approved following prior VEGF inhibitor treatment. Other PD-1 and PD-ligand (L)-1 inhibitors are undergoing clinical development.

EXPERT OPINION

Combinations of inhibitors of the PD1/PD-L1 axis with VEGF inhibitors or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 inhibitors have shown promising efficacy in mRCC. The development of biomarkers predictive for benefit and rational tolerable combinations are both important pillars of research to improve outcomes in RCC.