Anastrozole in the management of breast cancer

Theoretical Study on the Aggregation and Adsorption Behaviors of Anticancer Drug Molecules on Graphene/Graphene Oxide Surface

Graphene and its derivatives are frequently used in cancer therapy, and there has been widespread interest in improving the therapeutic efficiency of targeted drugs. In this paper, the geometrical structure and electronic effects of anastrozole(Anas), camptothecin(CPT), gefitinib (Gefi), and resveratrol (Res) on graphene and graphene oxide(GO) were investigated by density functional theory (DFT) calculations and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. Meanwhile, we explored and compared the adsorption process between graphene/GO and four drug molecules, as well as the adsorption sites between carriers and payloads. In addition, we calculated the interaction forces between four drug molecules and graphene. We believe that this work will contribute to deepening the understanding of the loading behaviors of anticancer drugs onto nanomaterials and their interaction.

[Central nervous system complications in patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted therapies]

Anti-cancer treatments (cytotoxic chemotherapies, targeted therapies and hormonotherapies) are known to induce early and delayed neurological toxicities. Acute encephalopathies and posterior reversible encephalopathies are better known and described, physiopathological hypotheses are emerging. It is difficult to discriminate what drug is causing the symptoms in patients treated with multiple cytotoxic drugs. Methotrexate and ifosfamide are responsible for acute encephalopathies. L-asparaginase and methotrexate or targeted therapies may induce cerebrovascular complications. As life expectancy increases and more complex regimen including innovative targeted therapies are developed, new toxicity profiles can be expected. To be able to provide an early diagnosis, prevention, and treatment (when existing) of these pathologies remains a tremendous challenge that would allow a good quality of life with social and professional life after their cancer is cured.

Controversies in breast cancer: adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy

Initial randomised studies of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy showed that systemic treatments had a substantial impact on the survival of women with early breast cancer. The original assumption was that the efficacy of these treatments was limited to those patients presenting with more adverse prognostic features. Subsequently, meta-analyses of randomised trials revealed that the benefits of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy are not mutually exclusive and extend to all the prognostic subgroups. However, the absolute benefit varies according to baseline characteristics such as tumour stage and other biological factors. Over the last 10 years, considerable progress has been made with the introduction of new drugs into the adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of women with breast cancer. Taxanes and third-generation aromatase inhibitors are providing proof of additional benefits compared with standard reference treatments. In parallel, research on the biology of breast cancer is establishing novel prognostic and predictive factors, which may allow better treatment tailoring. Currently, however, women with early breast cancer and their doctors face the difficult task of making therapeutic decisions often based on early results from positive studies. In a disease where follow up is crucial to fully assess the benefit and long-term toxicities of an intervention, current knowledge leaves unanswered questions that generate debate and controversy. This review will summarise recent results from randomised trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy in women with early breast cancer and focus on the current controversies.