The use of mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplant recipients

Effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on anti-HLA antibodies and de novo donor specific antibodies incidence in lung transplant recipients

PURPOSE

There are no clear guidelines on how to handle immunosuppression in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) infected by SARS-CoV-2. Antimetabolite reduction with corticosteroid escalation is the most frequent strategy. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of this therapeutic approach on the incidence of de novo donor specific-antibodies (dnDSA).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed a cohort of 27 LTRs diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection between September 2020 and April 2021 with available anti-HLA antibodies screening before and after infection. Managed as per the centre's SARS-CoV-2 protocol, the treatment modalities included specific virostatic treatment, convalescent plasma administration, reduction or discontinuation of mycophenolate and transient corticosteroid escalation initiated in the second week post-infection.

RESULTS

All 27 patients received virostatics: 15 (55.6%) remdesivir and 12 (44.4%) favipiravir. In addition, 18 patients (66.7%) underwent convalescent plasma therapy. Of the 27 patients, 25 (92.6%) received mycophenolate as a part of their maintenance immunosuppressive regimen, which was temporarily reduced in 10 (37%) and discontinued in 15 LTRs (55.6%), the median resumption times for mycophenolate daily doses of at least 1000 mg being 13 days (IQR 11.0-63.5) and 59 days (IQR 26.0-130.0), respectively. Corticosteroids were escalated in 25 patients (92.6%), of whom 9 (33.3%) received IV methylprednisolone (median 80 mg/day; IQR 80-187.5) and 16 (59.3%) had oral prednisone adjusted (median 20 mg/day; IQR 16.3-38.8). The median time to revert to the corticosteroid dosage of ≤20 mg/day was 42 days (IQR 36.0-87.0). Notably, no dnDSA were detected in any LTR between 1 and 9 months from the onset of the SARS-CoV-2 infection.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that antimetabolite cessation with a transient corticosteroid escalation is a safe therapeutic strategy regarding anti-HLA dynamics in SARS-CoV-2 infected LTRs.

Mycophenolate mofetil in organ transplantation: focus on metabolism, safety and tolerability

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) received its first approval for the prevention of renal allograft rejection in 1995 and has now become the most frequently used antiproliferative agent in maintenance immunosuppressive therapy for kidney, pancreas, liver and heart transplantation. In addition, its use for the treatment of autoimmune diseases steadily increases. This review focuses on the miscellaneous pharmacodynamic properties of the drug, its pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects, recipients of different organ transplants and combination therapy with other pharmaceuticals, as well as its safety profile. The immunosuppressive activity of MMF is thought to derive mainly from the potent and selective inhibition of purine synthesis in both T and B lymphocytes. In contrast to other immunosuppressants on the market, it is metabolised primarily by glucuronidation and lacks nephrotoxicity, cardiovascular toxicity or diabetogenic potential, thus making it a suitable candidate for combination regimens. The most important side effects under MMF include gastrointestinal disorders, of which the underlying mechanisms are not yet fully understood, but seem to be complex and related to both effects of mycophenolic acid and its acyl glucuronide, as well as to decreased -immunity due to general immunosuppression after transplantation.

Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium Experience in Liver Transplant Patients

Mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) has been shown to be as effective and as safe as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in renal transplant patients. Nevertheless, compared to MMF its use in liver transplant patients has been limited. The purpose of this study was to analyze the efficacy of EC-MPS as a primary immunosuppressant or as a replacement for MMF in liver transplant patients. Ninety among 470 liver transplant recipients were receiving or had added an antimetabolite to their immunosuppressant therapy. The most common reason for this change was renal dysfunction (47.8%) or diabetes (32.2%). EC-MPS was started at a median of 30 months after liver transplantation. The mean administered daily dose was 720 mg/d. At least one gastrointestinal symptom was reported by 25 patients. Abdominal pain (16.6%) and diarrhea (14.5%) were the most frequent. EC-MPS had to be discontinued in two patients, while six others required dose reduction to resolve the symptoms. Hematological adverse events were infrequent: three patients had leukopenia and one, anemia, all of which responded to dosage reduction. There was a creatinine reduction within 6 months of drug commencement and maintenance of the lower creatinine levels at 1 year among patients who began EC-MPS for renal dysfunction. Serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels were significantly lower among patients on EC-MPS than on MMF. In conclusion, EC-MPS appears to have a similar efficacy and safety profile as MMF in liver transplant patients. Hematological and gastrointestinal adverse events were infrequent; seldom had the drug to be discontinued.

An exploratory study on pharmacogenetics of inosine-monophosphate dehydrogenase II in peripheral mononuclear cells from liver-transplant recipients

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressant used for the prophylaxis of rejection in renal, pancreas, and liver transplantation. It inhibits the inducible isoform of the enzyme inosine-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH II) via its active metabolite mycophenolic acid (MPA). IMPDH II is necessary for de novo purine synthesis in activated lymphocytes. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the feasibility of a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) quantitative assessment of IMPDH II gene expression in liver transplant recipients as well as to provide a preliminary evaluation of possible correlations with drug tolerability. RNA was extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of liver recipients after at least 6 months of MMF administration. IMPDH II gene expression was assessed using quantitative, real-time PCR and normalized using glyceraldheyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Finally, adverse events associated with MMF administration were recorded. Real-time PCR quantitation of IMPDH II gene expression was reliable, sensitive, and specific. The intrapatient variability for both IMPDH II and GAPDH assays was lower than 0.6% in all patients. The results demonstrated a wide interpatient variability, with the mean value +/- standard deviation of 0.949 +/- 0.525 (95% confidence interval, 0.669-1.229) and a median value of 0.797. Patients with treatment-related toxicities displayed a trend to a higher level of IMPDH II expression than those without toxicity (mean, 1.126 vs 0.771). In conclusion, pharmacogenetic analysis of IMPDH II may represent a novel approach to MMF therapeutic monitoring.

Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in liver transplant recipients: a single center experience

The long-term use of calcineurin inhibitors (CIs) is associated with significant morbidity in liver transplant recipients. Although mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is well tolerated, two small studies reported an unacceptable rate of acute allograft rejection in liver transplant recipients receiving MMF monotherapy. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the safety and efficacy of MMF monotherapy in liver transplant recipients. We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent liver transplant at our institution. Sixteen patients were identified who received MMF either as monotherapy (n = 13) or with corticosteroids (n = 3; 2 of them for other comorbid conditions), and these patients were studied to determine the efficacy and complications. Fifteen (15/16) patients were converted from a CI to MMF because of renal insufficiency. Patients were converted to MMF monotherapy after a median of 2,056 days (range, 606-5,893) after liver transplantation. The median postconversion follow-up was 668 days (range, 60-1,509). Four patients required dialysis despite conversion; of those patients not requiring dialysis, serum creatinine stabilized and showed a trend toward improvement (2.51 +/- 1.12 mg/dL to 1.85 +/- .58 mg/dL, P = .1). However, there were 3 episodes (47, 107, and 1,203 days after conversion) of severe, irreversible allograft rejection after conversion resulting in death in 2 patients and necessitating retransplantation in 1 patient. There were no patient characteristics, except perhaps African-American race, that predicted the development of rejection. In conclusion, MMF monotherapy was associated with a significant risk (19%) of unpredictable, severe, and irreversible allograft rejection even among long-term transplant survivors. Caution should be exercised before converting patients to MMF monotherapy.