Pioglitazone: an antidiabetic drug with the potency to reduce cardiovascular mortality

Development and Optimization of Nigella sativa Nanoemulsion Loaded with Pioglitazone for Hypoglycemic Effect

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder associated with an increased blood glucose level. The world health burden of DM has increased as a result of numerous causes that necessitates suitable treatment. Pioglitazone (PGZ) is a generally prescribed medication for managing type II diabetes. However, its low solubility creates complications for its formulation. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to incorporate PGZ into a nanoemulsion (NE) formulation prepared with Nigella sativa oil (NSO) to boost the action of PGZ. To our knowledge, no previous study has addressed the combination and synergistic effect of PGZ and NSO as a hypoglycemic NE formulation intended for oral administration. An experiment was designed to test several PGZ-loaded NE formulations, varying factors such as NSO, surfactant and co-surfactant concentrations. These factors were investigated for their influence on responses including particle size and in vitro release. An optimized PGZ-loaded NE was selected and examined for its morphology, kinetic activity and stability. Further, the anti-diabetic effect of the optimized formulation was evaluated using diabetically induced rats. The optimized formula exhibited a good particle size of 167.1 nm and in vitro release of 89.5%. A kinetic study revealed that the drug release followed the Korsmeyer–Peppas mechanism. Additionally, the PGZ-loaded NE formulation was found to be stable, showing non-significant variation in the evaluated parameters when stored at 4 and 25 °C for a period of 3 months. In vivo investigation of the PGZ-loaded NE formulation showed a significant reduction in blood glucose level, which appeared to be enhanced by the presence of NSO. In conclusion, NS-NE could be a promising nanocarrier for enhancing the hypoglycemic effect of PGZ.

Pioglitazone is superior to quetiapine, clozapine and tamoxifen at alleviating experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice

Recent evidence suggests that clozapine and quetiapine (atypical antipsychotics), tamoxifen (selective-estrogen receptor modulator) and pioglitazone (PPARγ agonist) may improve functional recovery in multiple sclerosis (MS). We have compared the effectiveness of oral administration of these drugs, beginning at peak disease, at reducing ascending paralysis, motor deficits and demyelination in mice subjected to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Mice were immunized with an immunogenic peptide corresponding to amino acids 35-55 of the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG_35-55) in complete Freund's adjuvant and injected with pertussis toxin to induce EAE. Unlike clozapine, quetiapine and tamoxifen, administration of pioglitazone beginning at peak disease decreased both clinical scores and lumbar white matter loss in EAE mice. Using kinematic gait analysis, we found that pioglitazone also maintained normal movement of the hip, knee and ankle joints for at least 44 days after MOG_35-55 immunization. This long-lasting preservation of hindleg joint movements was accompanied by reduced white matter loss, microglial and macrophage activation and the expression of pro-inflammatory genes in the lumbar spinal cords of EAE mice. These results support clinical findings that suggest pioglitazone may reduce the progressive loss of motor function in MS by decreasing inflammation and myelin damage.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between topiramate and pioglitazone and metformin

OBJECTIVE

To investigate potential drug-drug interactions between topiramate and metformin and pioglitazone at steady state.

METHODS

Two open-label studies were performed in healthy adult men and women. In Study 1, eligible participants were given metformin alone for 3 days (500 mg twice daily [BID]) followed by concomitant metformin and topiramate (titrated to 100mg BID) from days 4 to 10. In Study 2, eligible participants were randomly assigned to treatment with pioglitazone 30 mg once daily (QD) alone for 8 days followed by concomitant pioglitazone and topiramate (titrated to 96 mg BID) from days 9 to 22 (Group 1) or to topiramate (titrated to 96 mg BID) alone for 11 days followed by concomitant pioglitazone 30 mg QD and topiramate 96 mg BID from days 12 to 22 (Group 2). An analysis of variance was used to evaluate differences in pharmacokinetics with and without concomitant treatment; 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio of the geometric least squares mean (LSM) estimates for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under concentration-time curve for dosing interval (AUC12 or AUC24), and oral clearance (CL/F) with and without concomitant treatment were used to assess a drug interaction.

RESULTS

A comparison to historical data suggested a modest increase in topiramate oral clearance when given concomitantly with metformin. Coadministration with topiramate reduced metformin oral clearance at steady state, resulting in a modest increase in systemic metformin exposure. Geometric LSM ratios and 90% CI for metformin CL/F and AUC12 were 80% (75%, 85%) and 125% (117%, 134%), respectively. Pioglitazone had no effect on topiramate pharmacokinetics at steady state. Concomitant topiramate resulted in decreased systemic exposure to pioglitazone and its active metabolites, with geometric LSM ratios and 90% CI for AUC24 of 85.0% (75.7%, 95.6%) for pioglitazone, 40.5% (36.8%, 44.6%) for M-III, and 83.8% (76.1%, 91.2%) for M-IV, respectively. This effect appeared more pronounced in women than in men. Coadministration of topiramate with metformin or pioglitazone was generally well tolerated by healthy participants in these studies.

CONCLUSIONS

A modest increase in metformin exposure and decrease in topiramate exposure was observed at steady state following coadministration of metformin 500 mg BID and topiramate 100mg BID. The clinical significance of the observed interaction is unclear but is not likely to require a dose adjustment of either agent. Pioglitazone 30 mg QD did not affect the pharmacokinetics of topiramate at steady state, while coadministration of topiramate 96 mg BID with pioglitazone decreased steady-state systemic exposure to pioglitazone, M-III, and M-IV. While the clinical consequence of this interaction is unknown, careful attention should be given to the routine monitoring for adequate glycemic control of patients receiving this concomitant therapy. Concomitant administration of topiramate with metformin or pioglitazone was generally well tolerated and no new safety concerns were observed.

Limitations of the HOMA-B score for assessment of beta-cell functionality in interventional trials-results from the PIOglim study

BACKGROUND

Drugs with unspecific stimulating effects on beta-cell secretion increase the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-B score, indicating improved beta-cell "function." We investigated whether the beta-cell protection provided by adding pioglitazone (PIO) to glimepiride (GLIM) in comparison to up-titrating the GLIM dose alone is reflected by appropriate changes in several measures of beta-cell function, including HOMA-B score.

METHODS

This double-blind, parallel prospective 6-month study was performed with 82 patients (47 men, 35 women; age, 61 +/- 9 years; duration of disease, 5.3 +/- 4.4 years; body mass index, 32.6 +/- 6.0 kg/m(2); hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], 7.3 +/- 0.7%) with GLIM monotherapy (1-3 mg). They were randomized to receive a GLIM + PIO combination with up-titration (2 mg + 30 mg/4 mg + 30 mg/4 mg + 4 mg) or to remain on GLIM (up-titration 4/5/6 mg). Observation parameters determined at baseline and end point included HOMA-B, HOMA-IR, HbA1c, glucose, insulin, and intact proinsulin.

RESULTS

There was a slight increase in the HOMA-B score in the GLIM group but not in the GLIM + PIO arm (baseline/end point: for GLIM, 71 +/- 48/88 +/- 64; for PIO + GLIM, 74 +/- 56/69 +/- 52). Improvements in the other observation parameters were predominantly detected in the PIO + GLIM group (HbA1c, 7.20 +/- 0.61%/6.36 +/- 0.90%; HOMA-IR, 7.0 +/- 4.5/4.1 +/- 2.1; intact proinsulin, 12.4 +/- 10.3/7.6 +/- 4.8 pmol/L [all P < 0.05 vs. baseline]) compared with the GLIM group (HbA1c, 7.45 +/- 0.69%/7.15 +/- 0.97% [P < 0.05]; HOMA-IR, 7.4 +/- 4.5/7.5 +/- 4.3 [not significant]; intact proinsulin, 17.3 +/- 21.6/16.3 +/- 15.5 pmol/L [not significant]).

CONCLUSIONS

The PIO + GLIM combination led to overall improvement of laboratory biomarkers for beta-cell function, except for HOMA-B. Glimepiride up-titration had no such effects but increased the HOMA-B score. HOMA-B seems to provide misleading results when used as a diagnostic tool in patients treated with sulfonylurea drugs. A corrective term for consideration of proinsulin in the HOMA-B equation may address this limitation.

Concomitant therapy with pioglitazone and insulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

To prevent hyperinsulinemia, which may cause atherosclerosis, thiazolidinediones (TZDs), also known as insulin sensitizers, are often added to the therapeutic regimen of patients with type 2 diabetes who are receiving insulin. The combination of insulin with pioglitazone, a TZD, reduces glycoated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) by 0.6%-2.1%. The higher the HbA(1c) baseline the larger the therapeutic reduction of HbA(1c). This combination therapy has been shown to be beneficial even in lean Japanese patients with diabetes. It should be noted that such combination therapy is much more useful when the main clinical aim is lowering not postprandial, but fasting and nocturnal glycemia. The glycemic-lowering effects of pioglitazone alone occur slowly, whereas the addition of insulin to pioglitazone often shows a dramatic glucose-lowering effect. Thus, such combination therapy increases the possibility of frequent hypoglycemia within 1 to 2 months of combining the drugs. Severe hypoglycemia in patients using this therapy is rare. Patients treated with combination therapy who show a predominant reduction of glycemia often have severe edema; in 10%-20% of patients, combination therapy leads to drug-related congestive heart failure (CHF). However, this phenomenon is usually weakened if low doses of pioglitazone which are added to insulin therapy (ie, 15 mg/day or even 7.5 mg/day for women). It is well known that pioglitazone has an anti-atherosclerotic effect, although it is unclear if hyperinsulinemia induces atherogenic changes, either directly or indirectly, by the promotion of obesity. Until now, we have not confirmed whether the anti-atherosclerotic effects of pioglitazone exceed the supposed disadvantageous action of insulin when used in combination therapy. The addition of pioglitazone tends to reduce daily insulin dosages, but study findings have not been consistent. Improvement of lipid profiles has also been weak with this combination therapy. Long-term trials are needed before any conclusions can be reached concerning atherogenic effects of treatment for type 2 diabetes. Combination therapy of even small doses of pioglitazone with insulin should be primarily used for patients who achieve insufficient reduction in glycemia with insulin monotherapy.

Alteration of vascular reactivity in diabetic human mammary artery and the effects of thiazolidinediones

Vascular reactivity was investigated in endothelium-denuded human internal mammary artery (IMA) rings from type 2 diabetic patients. It was also investigated whether insulin sensitizer thiazolidinedione drugs, pioglitazone and rosiglitazone, can directly affect the reactivity of IMA. Using organ bath techniques, cumulative concentration-response curves to phenylephrine (PE), KCl, cromakalim (CRO) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were constructed in diabetic and non-diabetic IMA rings. Means of maximal responses (% Emax) and pEC50 values (sensitivity) were compared. Emax values and the sensitivity to PE and KCl were increased while KATP-channel-mediated relaxations were reduced significantly in diabetic rings compared with non-diabetic rings (n = 5–12, P &lt; 0.05). No changes were observed for SNP responses (n = 5, P &gt; 0.05). Incubations with pioglitazone (1 and 10 μM) and rosiglitazone (1 and 20 μM), for 30 min, did not affect KATP-channel-mediated relaxations (n = 5 each, P &gt; 0.05). Pioglitazone partly inhibited pre-contractions of PE and KCl at 10 μM, rosiglitazone did not. Vascular dysfunction observed in diabetic IMA may be of specific importance since they are widely used as coronary bypass material. Thiazolidinedione drugs may not worsen arterial dilatation through KATP channels in ischaemic or hypoxic insults in diabetic patients who are prone to such conditions. Pioglitazone has vasorelaxant property in the grafts.

Competact, a fixed combination of pioglitazone and metformin, improves metabolic markers in type 2 diabetes patients with insufficient glycemic control by metformin alone--results from a post-marketing surveillance trial under daily routine conditions

BACKGROUND

In patients with type 2 diabetes, glycemic control to target goals can only be achieved for a while by single-drug treatment. Antidiabetes therapy has to be adapted according to the individual course of the disease. This trial investigates the impact of Competact (Takeda Pharma, Aachen, Germany) (marketed as ActoplusMet in the United States)-a fixed combination of 850 mg of metformin with 15 mg of pioglitazone-for diabetes treatment in patients with insufficient glycemic control by metformin alone.

STUDY DESIGN

This observational drug monitoring trial was performed at 1,480 study sites in Germany, and 4,866 complete patient data sets were included into the final analyses. Mean +/- SD age was 60.8 +/- 9.6 years (2,171 women, 2,691 men; disease duration, 6.7 +/- 4.7 years; body mass index [BMI], 31.0 +/- 5.2 kg/m(2)). In total, 43.8% of the patients received lipid-lowering drugs (antihypertensive medication, 74.3%). Main inclusion criteria were type 2 diabetes, metformin monotherapy, and an initial hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) value between 6.6% and 9.9%. Parameters of glycemic control (HbA1c, fasting blood glucose [FBG]), blood pressure (BP), inflammation (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP]), and lipid metabolism (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein [HDL]-cholesterol, non-HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides) were collected at baseline and after 4 months.

RESULTS

All investigated parameters improved significantly (all P < 0.001) after 4 months of therapy with Competact (baseline vs. end point: systolic BP, 139.7 +/- 15.1 vs. 134.4 +/- 12.0 mm Hg; diastolic BP, 83.1 +/- 8.9 vs. 80.5 +/- 7.5 mm Hg; HbA1c, 7.8 +/- 1.0% vs. 7.0 +/- 0.8%; FBG, 9.0 +/- 2.6 vs. 7.0 +/- 1.7 mM; cholesterol, 5.7 +/- 1.1 mM vs. 5.3 +/- 0.9 mM; HDL-cholesterol, 1.2 +/- 0.4 mM vs. 1.3 +/- 0.4 mM; non-HDL-cholesterol, 4.5 +/- 1.2 mM vs. 4.0 +/- 0.9 mM; triglycerides, 2.5 +/- 1.0 mM vs. 2.1 +/- 0.8 mM; hsCRP, 3.2 +/- 2.6 mg/L vs. 2.7 +/- 2.3 mg/L). It is noteworthy that the BMI was not affected by Competact (31.0 +/- 5.2 kg/m(2) vs. 31.1 +/- 6.1 kg/m(2), P = 0.221).

CONCLUSIONS

These observational results, obtained from a non-selected patient population under daily routine conditions, show the beneficial effects of a pioglitazone/metformin combination for diabetes patients with insufficient glycemic control under daily routine conditions.

Successful switch from insulin therapy to treatment with pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes patients with residual beta-cell function: results from the PioSwitch study

AIM

Insulin treatment is considered to be the final option for patients with progressive type 2 diabetes. This study investigated, whether reconverting type 2 patients from insulin treatment to oral treatment using pioglitazone is possible without deterioration of blood glucose control.

METHODS

The PioSwitch study was a prospective, open label, proof of concept study. Thiazolidinedione-naïve patients with residual beta-cell function were switched from an existing insulin therapy to treatment with pioglitazone and glimepiride for 6 months. Efficacy was assessed by laboratory parameters and scores for evaluation of metabolic control, beta-cell function, insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk.

RESULTS

In total, 98 patients [66 men, 32 women, age (mean +/- s.d.): 59 +/- 9 years; disease duration: 5.6 +/- 3.6 years; Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): 6.9 +/- 0.8%; body mass index (BMI): 33.9 +/- 5.2 kg/m(2), initial daily insulin therapy dose: 0.36 +/- 0.3 U/kg body weight] out of 117 screened patients were treated. During the observation period, 23 patients were prematurely terminated because of an increase in HbA1c from baseline > 0.5% or other reasons. In 75 patients (76%), no deterioration of glucose metabolism occurred and additional improvements were seen in the majority of the observation parameters [baseline vs. endpoint; HbA1c: 6.79 +/- 0.74%/6.66 +/- 0.69% (p < 0.05), glucose: 6.4 +/- 1.5/5.2 +/- 1.4 mmol/l (p < 0.001), adiponectin: 7 +/- 3 mg/l/17 +/- 8 mg/l (p < 0.001), C-peptide: 987 +/- 493/1756 +/- 789 (p < 0.001), sensitivity index derived from the intravenous glucose tolerance test (SI(ivGTT)): 1.21 +/- 0.85/1.49 +/- 0.95 (p < 0.05), hsCRP: 3.3 +/- 2.4/2.6 +/- 2.4 mg/l (p < 0.01), macrophage chemo-attractant protein 1 (MCP1): 487 +/- 246/382 +/- 295 ng/l (p < 0.05)]. BMI increased from 33.8 +/- 5.1 to 34.4 +/- 5.3 kg/m(2) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The switch from insulin therapy resulting in a moderately HbA1c level, to oral treatment with pioglitazone was successful in a majority of patients with sufficient residual beta-cell function. It allows a simple and less expensive therapy with a better cardiovascular risk marker profile.

Investigation of the vascular and pleiotropic effects of atorvastatin and pioglitazone in a population at high cardiovascular risk

We investigated the effect of atorvastatin monotherapy and combined treatment with atorvastatin and pioglitazone on intima-media thickness, vascular function and the cardiovascular risk profile. In all, 148 patients (76 male, 72 female; aged 61.4+/-6.5 years; body mass index [BMI] 29.2+/-4.1 kg/m2; mean +/- SD) with increased cardiovascular (CV) risk factors were randomised. Intima-media thickness (IMT), the augmentation index (Aix@75), the microvascular response to acetylcholine (LDF), lipid status, and plasma levels of intact proinsulin, adiponectin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), sCD40L, P-selectin, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and blood lipids were monitored over six months. Atorvastatin treatment, alone and in combination with pioglitazone, revealed a significant regression in IMT (0.923+/-0.013 to 0.874+/-0.012 mm and 0.921+/-0.015 to 0.882+/-0.015 mm; mean +/- SEM; p<0.05 respectively) and Aix@75 (27.3+/-1.2 to 25.9+/-1.4; and 25.6+/-1.4 to 24.8+/-1.7%; p<0.05). The endothelial response to acetylcholine as measured by laser Doppler fluximetry (LDF) improved during combined treatment (373+/-57 to 576+/-153 AU; p<0.05). Addition of pioglitazone to atorva-statin resulted in significant further effects on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), t-PA, P-selectin, adiponectin, triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (p<0.05 respectively). Atorvastatin significantly improved IMT and vascular elasticity. Co-administration of pioglitazone provided additional effects on endothelial function, lipid profile and laboratory markers of inflammation.

The IRIS V study: pioglitazone improves systemic chronic inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes under daily routine conditions

BACKGROUND

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist pioglitazone is established as a drug to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In addition to lowering blood glucose levels, one of the favorable effects of pioglitazone is improvement of systemic chronic inflammation particularly affecting vessel walls. The effect can be monitored by the measurement of the biomarker C-reactive protein in the range of 0-10 mg/L (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP]). This observational trial was performed to evaluate the effects of pioglitazone on hsCRP values in a large population under daily life conditions.

METHODS

A total of 1,170 subjects could be included into the final analysis (633 men, 537 women; age [mean +/- SD], 63.5 +/- 10.4 years, body mass index, 31.0 +/- 5.5 kg/m2; duration of diabetes, 6.9 +/- 8.1 years; glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c], 7.5 +/- 1.1%). All patients were glitazone-naive prior to study entry. The patients received pioglitazone alone or in combination with their previous treatment (acarbose, sulfonylurea drugs, and/or metformin). Patients were evaluated at baseline and after 10 +/- 2 weeks and 20 +/- 2 weeks of treatment. Observation parameters were fasting blood glucose, lipids, and blood pressure. The level of hsCRP was determined in a central laboratory at baseline and at end point.

RESULTS

All markers showed a significant improvement at trial end point. A decrease of hsCRP (baseline 3.3 +/- 1.0 mg/L vs. end point 2.8 +/- 2.3 mg/L, P < 0.01), HbA1c (7.5 +/- 1.1% vs. 6.8 +/- 0.9%, P < 0.001), fasting blood glucose (8.7 +/- 2.6 mM vs. 7.2 +/- 2.1 mM, P < 0.001), low-density lipoproteins (3.3 +/- 1.0 mM vs. 3.2 +/- 0.9 mM, P < 0.001), and triglycerides (2.4 +/- 2.0 mM vs. 2.2 +/- 2.5 mM, P < 0.001) and an increase in high-density lipoproteins (1.3 +/- 0.4 mM vs. 1.4 +/- 0.4 mM, P < 0.001) was observed. Parallel to the metabolic improvement, both systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were reduced (141 +/- 17 mm Hg vs. 137 +/- 15 mm Hg and 83 +/- 9 mm Hg vs. 80 +/- 9 mm Hg, respectively; P < 0.001 in both cases).

CONCLUSIONS

These observational results, obtained from a nonselected patient population under daily routine conditions, confirm the benefits of pioglitazone treatment on blood glucose, lipid metabolism, and blood pressure. The results show that pioglitazone treatment improves chronic vascular inflammation, which may be associated with reduced cardiovascular risk.

Pioglitazone improves metabolic markers in patients with type 2 diabetes independently from physical activities: results from the IRIS III study

AIM

Pioglitazone is an established peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist for the treatment of insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This analysis of the observational IRIS III study was performed to evaluate the effects of pioglitazone treatment in relation to the degree of physical exercise activities in a large patient population under daily life conditions.

METHODS

A total of 1298 patients out of 2092 enrolled into the IRIS III study who had provided information about their exercise level could be included in the final analysis (622 female, 676 male; age: 63.1 +/- 10.4 years, diabetes duration: 6.6 +/- 5.0 years, mean +/- SD). All patients were glitazone naïve prior to study entry. They received pioglitazone in addition to their previous oral antidiabetic treatment. The patients were stratified according to their physical activity level (never, sometimes, and regularly). Data were evaluated at baseline and after 20 +/- 2 weeks of treatment. Observation parameters were fasting blood glucose, lipids, and blood pressure. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was determined in a central laboratory, and insulin sensitivity was assessed by the IRIS II score.

RESULTS

Glycemic control, blood pressure, and the lipid profile improved independently from the degree of physical activity (e.g., no exercise vs frequent exercise: DeltaHbA1c: -0.89 +/- 1.2% vs -0.72 +/- 1.1%, not significant). A positive impact of exercise on insulin resistance could be observed at baseline, which, however, was further decreased by pioglitazone treatment [IRIS II score (baseline/end point): no exercise vs frequent exercise: 74.0 +/- 15.9/62.5 +/- 20.2 vs 66.7 +/- 19.0/58.0 +/- 21.8, p < 0.001/not significant].

CONCLUSIONS

These observational results, obtained from a nonselected patient population under daily routine conditions, confirm that the benefits of pioglitazone treatment on glycemic control, lipid metabolism, and blood pressure are independent from physical activity. Exercise has a positive influence on insulin sensitivity, but pioglitazone shows additional favorable effects and is, therefore, recommended for use independently from the activity level of the patients.

Pleiotrophic and anti-inflammatory effects of pioglitazone precede the metabolic activity in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease

We investigated MMP-9 levels and inflammatory markers during pioglitazone treatment in type 2 diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease. In this randomized multicenter, double blinded, placebo controlled study, 92 type 2 diabetic patients with angiographically proven CHD were randomly assigned to pioglitazone or placebo treatment. At baseline and during a 28 days observational period MMP-9, MCP1, hsCRP, IL-6, sCD40, and P-selectin were monitored. During Pioglitazone treatment, a 12% reduction in MMP-9 and a 18% reduction in hsCRP levels (p<0.05, respectively) could be observed already after 3 days. MCP-1 levels were reduced by 14% after 10 days of treatment (p<0.0001). At the end of the study, these parameters were significantly lower in the pioglitazone group as compared to the placebo group (MMP-9: 392+/-286 versus 427+/-166 ng/ml; hsCRP: 1.9+/-1.7 versus 3.1+/-2.3 ng/L; MCP-1: 413+/-115 versus 471+/-146 pg/ml; p<0.05, respectively). sCD40 levels decreased by 32.5% (p<0.05) and P-selectin decreased by 3.2% (p=0.053) in the pioglitazone group. No change could be found with regard to the other study endpoints. No changes in these parameters could be observed during placebo treatment. Even before effects on glucose metabolism could be obtained, pioglitazone exerts immediate effects on plasma markers of plaque vulnerability and inflammation.

Pioglitazone: update on an oral antidiabetic drug with antiatherosclerotic effects

Pioglitazone, a member of the PPAR-gamma agonist drug family, has been demonstrated to improve both metabolic and vascular insulin resistance when applied to patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. The drug is well tolerated with fluid retention and weight gain being the most frequently described side effects. The observed effects (e.g., improvements in glucose and lipid metabolism, improvements of endothelial function and microcirculation, reduction of surrogate markers of atherosclerosis and inflammation and an improvement in hypertension) have made pioglitazone one of the frequently prescribed antidiabetic drugs in the US and Europe. Several trials have shown its potency to reduce carotid intima-media thickness, and outcome studies with pioglitazone have shown its potential to delay the progression of Type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis and even reduce cardiovascular mortality. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview about recently published clinical results with pioglitazone. They underline the value of this drug when used alone or in combination with other antidiabetic drugs for a successful management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Fixed-dose combination of pioglitazone and glimepiride in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes is characterized by impaired insulin sensitivity and disturbances in β-cell function. While glimepiride stimulates β-cell secretion and leads to a reduction of blood glucose levels, pioglitazone activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ and improves insulin resistance. Combining these two modes of action has been shown to improve glucose and lipid metabolism, and to improve the overall cardiovascular risk in patients with Type 2 diabetes. The combination of glimepiride and pioglitazone is generally well tolerated and a fixed combination may lead to an improved compliance in patients. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the clinical data that has been published on this combination, appearing to represent a convenient way to obtain therapeutic targets in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Pioglitazone Increases Gallbladder Volume in Insulin-Resistant Obese Mice

BACKGROUND

Both obesity and diabetes are associated with an increased incidence of gallstones. Recent animal and human data from our laboratory suggest that insulin resistance is associated with increased gallbladder volume and/or impaired gallbladder emptying. Pioglitazone is a thiazolidinedione that has been shown to improve insulin resistance. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that pioglitazone would improve insulin resistance, decrease resting gallbladder volume and improve gallbladder response to neurotransmitters in insulin-resistant obese mice fed a 25% carbohydrate diet.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty eight-week-old insulin-resistant obese (Lep(ob)) mice fed a 25% carbohydrate diet for 4 weeks. Half of the animals had 0.3 g/kg pioglitazone added to their diet. At 12 weeks all animals were fasted and underwent cholecystectomy. Gallbladder volume and weight were measured, and fresh gallbladders were placed in a muscle bath to assess response to acetylcholine (ACh 10(-5)M), neuropeptide Y (NPY 10(-8,-7,-6)M) and cholecystokinin (CCK 10(-10,-9,-8,-7)M). Serum glucose and insulin were measured, and HOMA Index, a measure of insulin resistance, was calculated.

RESULTS

Fasting serum insulin and HOMA Index were significantly decreased (P < 0.03), but gallbladder volume was significantly increased (P < 0.03) in the pioglitazone treated group. Pioglitazone did not alter gallbladder weight or response to ACh, NPY, or CCK.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that in insulin-resistant obese mice pioglitazone 1) lowers insulin-resistance, 2) increases resting gallbladder volume, and 3) does not alter gallbladder response to neurotransmitters. Therefore, we conclude that pioglitazone, while improving insulin resistance, paradoxically increases gallbladder volume and, thereby, may increase the propensity for gallstone formation by enhancing gallbladder stasis.