Abatacept: a costimulatory inhibitor for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Covalent inhibitors: An ambitious approach for the discovery of newer oncotherapeutics

Covalent inhibitors have been used to treat several diseases for over a century. However, strategic approaches for the rational design of covalent drugs have taken a definitive shape in recent times. Since the first appearance of covalent inhibitors in the late 18th century, the field has grown tremendously and around 30% of marketed drugs are covalent inhibitors especially, for oncology indications. However, the off-target toxicity and safety concerns can be significant issues related to the covalent drugs. Covalent kinase inhibitor (CKI) targeted oncotherapeutics has advanced dramatically over the last two decades since the discovery of afatinib (Gilotrif®), an EGFR inhibitor. Since then, US FDA has approved 10 CKIs for diverse cancer targets. The present review broadly summarizes the ongoing development in the discovery of newer CKIs from 2016 till the end of 2022. We believe that these efforts will assist the modern medicinal chemist actively working in the field of CKI discovery for varied indications.

Research Advances in Fusion Protein-Based Drugs for Diabetes Treatment

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disease characterized by elevated blood glucose levels, resulting in multi-organ dysfunction and various complications. Fusion proteins can form multifunctional complexes by combining the target proteins with partner proteins. It has significant advantages in improving the performance of the target proteins, extending their biological half-life, and enhancing patient drug compliance. Fusion protein-based drugs have emerged as promising new drugs in diabetes therapeutics. However, there has not been a systematic review of fusion protein-based drugs for diabetes therapeutics. Hence, we conducted a comprehensive review of published literature on diabetic fusion protein-based drugs for diabetes, with a primary focus on immunoglobulin G (IgG) fragment crystallizable (Fc) region, albumin, and transferrin (TF). This review aims to provide a reference for the subsequent development and clinical application of fusion protein-based drugs in diabetes therapeutics.

Cutaneous immune-related phenomena in patients with inflammatory arthritides treated with biological therapies: Clinical and pathophysiological considerations

In recent years, identifying the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying autoimmune arthritides and systematic diseases has led to the use of biological drugs. The primary targets of those biological therapies are cytokines, B cells, and co-stimulation molecules. So far, these targeted therapies have shown good clinical improvement and an acceptable toxicity profile. However, by blocking components of an intact immune system, autoimmune phenomena and paradoxical inflammation have emerged, and among them many cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In this article, we review the current state of knowledge on the clinical features and mechanisms of specific cutaneous irAEs observed during treatment with biological therapies. Among those, psoriatic skin lesions are the most commonly observed. Herein, we also report new cases of cutaneous irAEs recently seen in our clinic to help physicians treating inflammatory arthritides recognize cutaneous irAEs early and better manage patients receiving biologic therapies.

CTLA4-Ig alleviates the allogeneic immune responses against insulin-producing cells in a murine model of cell transplantation

The adoptive transfer of insulin-producing cells (IPCs) is one of the promising treatments for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. While the use of allogeneic cell resources is inevitable in the case of a series of patients, alloimmune responses are a major barrier ahead of the successful implementation of allogeneic therapeutic cells. This study is aimed at evaluating the potential of CTLA4-Ig, as an approved immunomodulatory biologic, in protecting the IPCs against allogeneic immune responses. The C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were used to establish a murine model of allogeneic cell transplantation. The mouse bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells were in vitro differentiated into IPCs, and the in vitro as well as the in vivo immune responses against IPCs were evaluated in the presence and absence of CTLA4-Ig. The allogeneic IPCs induced the in vitro activation of CD4+ T-cells, IFN-γ release, and the proliferation of lymphocytes, which all were controlled by CTLA4-Ig. Upon in vivo transfer of IPC into an allogeneic host, the splenic CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells exhibited a significant activation, and there was a significant donor-specific antibody response. Either of the mentioned cellular and humoral responses were modulated by a CTLA4-Ig regimen. This regimen also reduced the infiltration of CD3+ T-cells into the IPC injection site along with the improved overall survival of diabetic mice. CTLA4-Ig could be a complementary therapy for improving the efficacy of allogeneic IPC therapy through modulating the cellular and humoral responses that can lead to prolonged durability of IPCs within an allogeneic host.

Targeted Therapy for Primary Sjögren's Syndrome: Where are We Now?

Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) is an autoimmune exocrinopathy characterized by dryness symptoms. This review briefly describes recent advances in the targeted therapies for pSS. Biologics evaluated for pSS treatment mainly include B cell-depleting agents, inhibitors of B cell activation, and agents that target co-signaling molecules or proinflammatory cytokines. Small molecule inhibitors that target signaling pathways have also been evaluated. However, current evidence for the efficacy of targeted therapies in pSS is still sparse. Although ianalumab (an anti-B cell-activating factor [BAFF]-receptor antibody) and iscalimab (an anti-CD40 antibody) are promising biologics for pSS, their efficacy still needs to be evaluated in larger clinical trials. For other biologics, clinical trials have found no differences versus placebo in the change from baseline in European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) score and fatigue score. Possible causes of the disappointing outcomes mainly include the inefficacy of those evaluated biologics in treating pSS, the high heterogeneous nature of pSS, irreversible exocrine glandular failure at advanced disease stages, inappropriate recruitment strategy in clinical trials, and outcome measures. Early diagnosis and glandular function-centered outcome measures may help to improve the current situation in the systemic therapy of pSS.

CTLA4-Ig-Based Bifunctional Costimulation Inhibitor Blocks CD28 and ICOS Signaling to Prevent T Cell Priming and Effector Function

CTLA4-Ig/abatacept dampens activation of naive T cells by blocking costimulation via CD28. It is an approved drug for rheumatoid arthritis but failed to deliver efficacy in a number of other autoimmune diseases. One explanation is that activated T cells rely less on CD28 signaling and use alternate coreceptors for effector function. ICOS is critical for activation of T-dependent humoral immune responses, which drives pathophysiology of IgG-mediated autoimmune diseases. In this study, we asked whether CD28 and ICOS play nonredundant roles for maintenance of T-dependent responses in mouse models. Using a hapten-protein immunization model, we show that during an ongoing germinal center response, combination treatment with CTLA4-Ig and ICOS ligand (ICOSL) blocking Ab completely dissolves ongoing germinal center responses, whereas single agents show only partial activity. Next, we took two approaches to engineer a therapeutic molecule that blocks both pathways. First, we engineered CTLA4-Ig to enhance binding to ICOSL while retaining affinity to CD80/CD86. Using a library approach, binding affinity of CTLA4-Ig to human ICOSL was increased significantly from undetectable to 15-42 nM; however, the affinity was still insufficient to completely block binding of ICOSL to ICOS. Second, we designed a bispecific costimulation inhibitor with high-affinity CTLA4 extracellular domains fused to anti-ICOSL Ab termed bifunctional costimulation inhibitor. With this bispecific approach, we achieved complete inhibition of CD80 and CD86 binding to CD28 as well as ICOS binding to ICOSL. Such bispecific molecules may provide greater therapeutic benefit in IgG-mediated inflammatory diseases compared with CTLA4-Ig alone.

Biological agents: what they are, how they affect oral health and how they can modulate oral healthcare

Biological agents - biologics, biologicals or biopharmaceuticals - are any medicinal product manufactured in, or extracted from, a biological source. They are often generated by DNA recombinant biotechnology and several dozen therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are now marketed for a variety of indications, increasingly in the management of inflammatory immune-mediated disorders, transplantation rejection and cancer treatments. Immunomodulatory mAbs are expensive, must be given by injection or infusion and can have adverse effects but are increasingly used and can be highly effective agents. This paper reviews these agents and their increasing relevance to oral science and healthcare.

Update on pharmacotherapies for cholestatic liver disease

Cholestatic liver diseases are conditions with impaired bile formation and/or flow due to genetic, immunologic, environmental, or other causes. Unless successfully treated, this can lead to chronic liver injury and end‐stage liver disease. Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) embody the most prominent adult cholestatic liver diseases with regard to incidence, morbidity, and mortality. A considerable proportion of patients with PBC and PSC experience progressive liver disease and ultimately liver‐related death due to a paucity of effective pharmacotherapy; however, novel pharmacologic developments offer substantial promise in this regard. Here, we provide a brief review and update on current and emerging pharmacotherapies for PBC and PSC. (Hepatology Communications 2017;1:7–17)

Proposed therapies in primary biliary cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), previously known as primary biliary cirrhosis, is a model autoimmune disease with chronic cholestasis characterized by the hallmark of anti-mitochondrial antibodies and treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). However, approximately 20-40% of patients incompletely respond to UDCA and have an increased risk of disease progression. Although there have been significant advances in the immunobiology of PBC, these have yet to be translated into newer therapeutic modalities. Current approaches to controlling the immune response include broad immunosuppression with corticosteroids as well as targeted therapies directed against T and B cells. In contrast, ameliorating cholestasis is the focus of other therapies in development, including obeticholic acid. In this article the authors will discuss ongoing clinical trials and, in particular, the rationale for choosing agents that may effectively target the aberrant immune response.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis

INTRODUCTION

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune chronic disease of the liver that can progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. It affects approximately 1 in 4,000 with a 10:1 female to male ratio. The diagnosis of PBC can be made based on serum antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) in a patient with abnormally high serum alkaline phosphatase after ruling out other causes of cholestasis and biliary obstruction. Genome-wide association studies have revealed several human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA risk loci in PBC, and complex environmental-host immunogenetic interactions are believed to underlie the etiopathogenesis of the disease. Fatigue and pruritus are the most common and often problematic symptoms; although often mild, these can be severe and life-alternating in a subset of patients. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the only drug approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of PBC. Clinical trials have shown that UDCA significantly improves transplant-free survival. However, nearly 40% of PBC patients do not respond adequately to PBC and are at higher risk for serious complications when compared to PBC patients with complete response to UDCA.

AREAS COVERED

Here we provide a detailed discussion regarding novel therapeutic agents and potential areas for further investigation in PBC-related research.

EXPERT OPINION

Results of ongoing clinical trials and emerging treatment paradigms for PBC will likely further improve medical management of this disorder in the near future.

Calcium, TRPC channels, and regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in podocytes: towards a future of targeted therapies

With more than 6,000 new pediatric patients with treatment-resistant nephrotic syndrome in the US each year alone, the unmet need for novel, podocyte-specific therapies is substantial. Recently, the established therapeutic benefit of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) was used as a starting point to gain insight into the pathomechanism of primary podocytopathies. A calcium (Ca(2+))-mediated pathway has been identified that connects the angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R) to podocyte cytoskeletal dynamics, essential for a functioning glomerular filtration barrier. This discovery provided an important missing piece in our understanding of the pathomechanism of filter barrier damage, revealing Ca(2+) signaling as critical for podocyte health and disease. The identification of the two Ca(2+) permeant channels TRPC5 and TRPC6 as mediators of this pathway not only bolstered the importance of podocyte cytoskeleton dynamics but also revealed promising drug targets for treatment-resistant nephrotic syndrome. This review will focus on this novel signaling pathway in primary podocytopathies and its implications for next-generation therapies for glomerular disease.

New therapies for primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a rare inflammatory liver disease for which ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the only therapy approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Patients with a biochemical response to UDCA therapy have a similar survival rate compared to the general population. However, up to 40% of PBC patients do not achieve a complete response to UDCA, have an increased risk of liver-related death and liver transplantation, and represent a persistent medical need for new therapies. Several novel drugs have recently been studied and show potential efficacy in PBC. Obeticholic acid, a farnesoid X receptor agonist, has been tested in phase II trials and initial results after 1 year in a phase III international trial suggest that it may be effective in achieving a biochemical response in approximately 40% of patients who do not completely respond to UDCA. Several small studies on fibrates have suggested that they may have efficacy, but larger studies are needed. Surprisingly, results of immunomodulators and biologics have not yet been able to demonstrate efficacy, but new approaches have shown promise in animal models and their translation to human clinical trials are awaited.

Immunological potential of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin in murine autoimmune cholangitis

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) immunoglobulin (Ig) is an important regulator of T cell activation and a fusion protein directed at CD80 and CD86; it blocks co-stimulatory signalling and T cell activation. We have taken advantage of a murine model of human primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), mice expressing a transforming growth factor (TGF)-β receptor II dominant negative (dnTGF-βRII) transgene to address the potential therapeutic efficacy of CTLA-4 Ig. To mimic patients with PBC at different stages or duration of disease, we treated mice with either CTLA-4 Ig or control IgG three times weekly from 3 to 12 or 24 weeks of age, or from 12 to 24 weeks of age. CTLA-4 Ig treatment from 3 weeks of age significantly reduced liver inflammation to 12 weeks of age. Treatment initiated at 12 weeks of age also ameliorated the autoimmune cholangitis at 24 weeks of age. However, in mice treated at 3 weeks of age, suppression of liver inflammation was not sustained and colitis was aggravated when treatment was extended to 24 weeks of age. Our data indicate that, in dnTGF-βRII mice, CTLA-4 Ig treatment has short-term beneficial effects on autoimmune cholangitis, but the effect varies according to duration of treatment and the time in which therapy was initiated. Further dissection of the events that lead to the reduction in therapeutic effectiveness of CTLA-4 Ig will be critical to determining whether such efforts can be applied to human PBC.

Update on the use of abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Abatacept is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with inadequate response to one or more disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including methotrexate or a TNF antagonist, and can be used either as monotherapy or concomitantly with nonbiologic DMARDs. It can be administered either intravenously or subcutaneously. It has demonstrated to improve signs and symptoms of RA, physical function and health-related quality of life, and it inhibits radiographic progression of structural damage across a wide range of early and long-standing RA populations. The safety profile appears good and close to RA patients treated with nonbiologic DMARDs. Meta-analysis and real-world studies support these findings. This article reviews published data on clinical and radiographic efficacy as well as the safety of this drug, incorporating recent relevant information reported at scientific meetings.

Abatacept: a review of its use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis

The biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug abatacept (Orencia) has a novel mechanism of action; its activity is mediated via the selective modulation of T cell co-stimulation. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of intravenous and subcutaneous abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and intravenous abatacept in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), as well as summarizing its pharmacological properties. In patients with RA, the beneficial effects of intravenous or subcutaneous abatacept on signs and symptoms, disease activity, the progression of structural damage, physical function and/or health-related quality of life were seen in a number of well-designed trials, including in methotrexate-naive patients with early RA and poor prognostic factors and in patients with established RA and an inadequate response to either methotrexate or anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy. Subcutaneous abatacept plus methotrexate was also noninferior to subcutaneous adalimumab plus methotrexate in patients with active RA who were naive to biological therapy and had an inadequate response to methotrexate. In paediatric patients with JIA, intravenous abatacept improved signs and symptoms and delayed the time to flare. Abatacept was generally well tolerated in RA and JIA and was associated with low rates of immunogenicity. In conclusion, abatacept is an important option for use in the treatment of RA and JIA.

Therapeutic effect of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4/immunoglobulin on a murine model of primary biliary cirrhosis

Collectively, the data in both humans and murine models of human primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) suggest that activated T cells, particularly CD8 T cells, play a critical role in biliary cell destruction. Under physiological conditions, T-cell activation involves two critical signals that involve the major histocompatibility complex and a set of costimulatory molecules, which include a receptor on T cells termed cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4). Germane to the studies reported herein, signaling by CTLA-4 has the potential to modulate costimulation and induce inhibitory signals. In this study, we have taken advantage of our well-defined murine model of PBC, in which mice are immunized with 2-octynoic acid coupled to bovine serum albumin (2OA-BSA), leading to the production of high-titer antimitochondrial autoantibodies (AMAs) and portal cellular infiltrates. To investigate the potential of CTLA-4-Ig (immunoglobulin) as an immunotherapeutic agent, we treated mice both before and after induction of autoimmune cholangitis. First, we demonstrate that CTLA-4-Ig treatment, begun 1 day before 2OA-BSA immunization, completely inhibits the manifestations of cholangitis, including AMA production, intrahepatic T-cell infiltrates, and bile duct damage. However, and more critically, treatment with CTLA-4-Ig, initiated after the development of autoimmune cholangitis in previously immunized mice, also resulted in significant therapeutic benefit, including reduced intrahepatic T-cell infiltrates and biliary cell damage, although AMA levels were not altered.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that an optimized regimen with CTLA-4-Ig has the potential to serve as an investigative therapeutic tool in patients with PBC.

Neutrophil function in inflammation and inflammatory diseases

In inflammatory conditions such as RA, the neutrophil has tended to be dismissed as a short-lived, terminally differentiated, irrelevant bystander cell. However, this is clearly not the case. A better understanding of the complex heterogeneous pathways and processes that constitute RA, in parallel with a more sophisticated knowledge of neutrophil biology has identified many potential roles for these cells in the persistence of inflammation and progression of joint damage, which should not be underestimated. Not only are neutrophils found in high numbers within the rheumatoid joint, both in synovial tissue and in joint fluid, they have a huge potential to directly inflict damage to tissue, bone and cartilage via the secretion of proteases and toxic oxygen metabolites, as well as driving inflammation through antigen presentation and secretion of cytokines, chemokines, prostaglandins and leucotrienes. Drugs already used to treat RA down-regulate many neutrophil functions, including migration to the joint, degranulation and production of inflammatory mediators, and these cells should be considered as important targets for the development of new therapies in the future.

Abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis: a Cochrane systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of efficacy and safety of abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ACP Journal Club, and Biosis Previews for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing abatacept alone or in combination with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD)/biologics to placebo or other DMARD/biologics in patients with RA. Two reviewers independently assessed search results, risk of bias, and extracted data.

RESULTS

Seven trials with 2908 patients were included. Compared with placebo, patients with RA treated with abatacept were 2.2 times more likely to achieve an American College of Rheumatology 50% response (ACR50) at one year (relative risk 2.21, 95% CI 1.73, 2.82) with a 21% (95% CI 16%, 27%) absolute risk difference between groups. The number needed to treat to achieve an ACR50 response was 5 (95% CI 4, 7). Significantly greater improvements in physical function, disease activity, pain, and radiographic progression were noted in abatacept-treated patients compared to placebo. Total adverse events (AE) were greater in the abatacept group (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01, 1.08). Other harm outcomes were not significant, with the exception of serious infections at 12 months, which were more common in the abatacept group versus control group (Peto odds ratio 1.91, 95% CI 1.07, 3.42). Serious AE were more numerous in the abatacept + etanercept group versus the placebo + etanercept group (RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.15, 4.62).

CONCLUSION

Abatacept seems to be efficacious and safe in the treatment of RA. Abatacept should not be used in combination with other biologics to treat RA. Further longterm studies and postmarketing surveillance are required to assess for longer-term harms and sustained efficacy.

Abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Abatacept inhibits the co-stimulation of T cells and disrupts the inflammatory chain of events that leads to joint inflammation, pain, and damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of abatacept in reducing disease activity, pain, and improving function in people with rheumatoid arthritis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1), MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1980), ACP Journal Club (from 2000), and Biosis Previews (from 1990) in March 2007 and December 2008. We contacted authors of included studies and the abatacept manufacturer.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing abatacept alone, or in combination with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or biologics, to placebo or other DMARDs or biologics in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed search results and risk of bias, and extracted data. We obtained adverse event data from trials, long-term extension studies, and regulatory agencies.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven trials with 2908 patients were included. Compared with placebo, patients in the abatacept group were 2.2 times more likely to achieve an ACR 50 response at one year (RR 2.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.73 to 2.82) with a 21% (95% CI 16% to 27%) absolute risk difference between groups. The number needed to treat to achieve an ACR 50 response was 5 (95% CI 4 to 7). Significant improvements in physical function and a reduction in disease activity and pain were found in abatacept-treated patients compared to placebo. One RCT found abatacept significantly slowed the radiographic progression of joint damage at 12 months compared to placebo, although it is not clear what the clinical relevance of this difference may be. There may be a risk of attrition bias. Total adverse events were greater in the abatacept group (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.08). Other harm outcomes were not significant with the exception of a greater number of serious infections at 12 months in the abatacept group (Peto odds ratio 1.91 (95% CI 1.07 to 3.42). Serious adverse events were increased when abatacept was given in combination with other biologics (RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.62).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate-level evidence that abatacept is efficacious and safe in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Abatacept should not be used in combination with other biologics to treat rheumatoid arthritis. The withdrawal and toxicity profile appears acceptable at the present time but further long-term studies and post-marketing surveillance are required to assess harms and sustained efficacy.

Modulation of T-cell co-stimulation in rheumatoid arthritis: clinical experience with abatacept

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), characterized by progressive joint destruction, deformity, disability and impaired quality of life (QOL), is a prevalent autoimmune disease affecting 1% of adults in the US. The goal of therapy in patients with RA is to arrest the disease and to achieve remission by preventing or controlling joint damage, preventing loss of function and providing pain relief, thereby improving QOL. Non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been the mainstay of early intervention in RA, of which methotrexate has been used most frequently. However, in the long term, patients treated with non-biological DMARDs (including methotrexate) may experience joint deterioration and subclinical inflammation even after clinical remission, emphasizing the need for alternative therapies. Several biological therapies, such as anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha agents, have been developed in the last decade and may be used either as monotherapy or in combination with non-biological DMARDs. Although anti-TNFalpha therapy is generally associated with an improvement in symptoms of RA, some patients may experience inadequate response to or may not tolerate these agents. The new biological agent abatacept, a recombinant protein consisting of the extracellular region of the human cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA)-4 receptor fused to the constant fragment (Fc) region of IgG1, binds to the CD80/CD86 molecules on antigen-presenting cells and modulates T-cell activation. Clinical trials have shown that abatacept is effective in reducing disease activity, structural joint damage and improving QOL in patients with RA who had inadequate response to prior methotrexate or anti-TNFalpha therapy. Pooled analysis of these trials showed that abatacept was also generally well tolerated in these patients. Thus, abatacept therapy may be an option for the treatment of RA in patients who have had an inadequate response to prior DMARD therapy.

Abatacept: A review of a new biologic agent for refractory rheumatoid arthritis for dermatologists

Abatacept is a newly approved treatment for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to other agents. Abatacept is a fusion protein of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA) molecule and immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 that blocks CD28. Specifically, abatacept blocks the CD80 and CD86 ligands on the surface of antigen-presenting cells that must interface with the T-cell's CD28 receptor to activate T cells. Abatacept seems to be more immunosuppressive than tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers. The combination of abatacept and a tumor necrosis factor alpha blocking agent does not seem more effective than either agent alone. Because abatacept has the ability to suppress T-cell function, it has the potential to be a treatment for psoriasis and other autoimmune conditions involving pathologic processes driven by T cells.

Use of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: Where are we going?

PURPOSE

The pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and costs of biologic agents that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration or are under review for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are discussed. Biologic therapies that are currently under investigation in early- and late-phase clinical trials are summarized at the end of this report.

SUMMARY

The use of biologic agents for the treatment of RA has significantly improved the management of this disease. Experimental and clinical studies have shown that these agents ameliorate the signs and symptoms of RA, slow radiographic progression of disease, and improve physical function and quality of life. Data also support that early initiation of therapy with these agents improves long-term outcomes. However, biologic agents are associated with adverse effects that health care providers need to recognize and manage.

CONCLUSION

Biologic agents have revolutionized the treatment of RA by reducing the signs and symptoms of RA, slowing radiographic progression of joint destruction, and improving physical function and quality of life in affected patients.