A safety assessment of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy for treatment of Crohn's disease

Clinical use of biologics for Crohn's disease in adults: lessons learned from real-world studies

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic armamentarium for managing Crohn's disease (CD) has expanded significantly in recent decades. Several biologics with three different mechanisms of action [anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, anti-integrin α4β7, and anti-IL 12/23] are currently available to manage CD.

AREA COVERED

This narrative review aims to summarize the most significant efficacy and safety data on the use of infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) for the treatment of CD obtained from studies conducted in the real world (RW), compared to the results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

EXPERT OPINION

RW studies reported that biologic agents included in this analysis have higher remission rates and lower adverse event rates than findings from RCTs for treating patients with CD. All biological agents have proven effective and safe in RW studies, even when using biosimilars or switching to subcutaneous administration of the molecules for which they are available. Finally, anti-TNF-α agents, particularly IFX, have a higher rate of adverse events (AEs) than VDZ and UST. Therefore, patients at higher risk of AEs may benefit from other biologics than anti-TNF-α. However, further long-term RW studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Optimized Infliximab Induction Predicts Better Long-Term Clinical and Biomarker Outcomes Compared to Standard Induction Dosing

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of standard and optimized infliximab induction dosing in attaining corticosteroid (CS) free clinical remission at week 52 and the effect that post-induction trough levels have on long-term outcome.

METHODS

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients ≤18 years commenced on infliximab between August 1, 2016, and August 1, 2018, from Vancouver, Canada, and Glasgow, Scotland, were included. The Glasgow cohort followed standard induction while the Vancouver cohort undertook induction optimization based on clinical, biomarker, and proactive infliximab trough levels. Baseline characteristics and laboratory values were documented.

RESULTS

In total, 140 children were included [median age 14.1 years (interquartile range (IQR) 12.0-16.0)]; 54% male. CS-free clinical remission at week 52 was higher in the optimized group compared to the standard cohort [65/78 (83%) vs. 32/62 (52%), P < 0.001]. Combined CS-free clinical and biomarker remission (CRP < 5 mg/L) was also higher in the optimized compared to the standard cohort [65/78 (83%) vs 25/62 (40%), P < 0.001]. The median post-induction trough level was higher in children who were in CS-free clinical remission at week 52 [3.6 mg/L (1.5-7.1)] vs. those who were not [2.0 mg/L (0.8-4.1), P = 0.04]. The odds of attaining a therapeutic post-induction trough level were almost 4-fold higher in the optimized group than the standard cohort (OR 3.97, 95% CI: 1.89-8.68, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard infliximab induction resulted in less favorable long-term outcomes for pediatric IBD patients. Optimizing induction using clinical, biomarker, and proactive trough levels resulted in higher post-induction trough levels and a greater odds of attaining long-term clinical remission.

Validation and update of a prediction model for risk of relapse after cessation of anti-TNF treatment in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy is effective for the treatment of Crohn's disease. Cessation may be considered in patients with a low risk of relapse. We aimed to externally validate and update our previously developed prediction model to estimate the risk of relapse after cessation of anti-TNF therapy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study in 17 Dutch hospitals. Crohn's disease patients in clinical, biochemical or endoscopic remission were included after anti-TNF cessation. Primary outcome was a relapse necessitating treatment. Discrimination and calibration of the previously developed model were assessed. After external validation, the model was updated. The performance of the updated prediction model was assessed in internal-external validation and by using decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

486 patients were included with a median follow-up of 1.7 years. Relapse rates were 35 and 54% after 1 and 2 years. At external validation, the discriminative ability of the prediction model was equal to that found at the development of the model [c-statistic 0.58 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.62)], though the model was not well-calibrated on our cohort [calibration slope: 0.52 (0.28-0.76)]. After an update, a c-statistic of 0.60 (0.58-0.63) and calibration slope of 0.89 (0.69-1.09) were reported in internal-external validation.

CONCLUSION

Our previously developed and updated prediction model for the risk of relapse after cessation of anti-TNF in Crohn's disease shows reasonable performance. The use of the model may support clinical decision-making to optimize patient selection in whom anti-TNF can be withdrawn. Clinical validation is ongoing in a prospective randomized trial.

Proactive infliximab optimisation using a pharmacokinetic dashboard versus standard of care in patients with Crohn's disease: study protocol for a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label study (the OPTIMIZE trial)

INTRODUCTION

Preliminary data indicates that proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is associated with better outcomes compared with empiric dose escalation and/or reactive TDM, and that pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling can improve the precision of individual dosing schedules in Crohn's disease (CD). However, there are no data regarding the utility of a proactive TDM combined PK-dashboard starting early during the induction phase, when disease activity and drug clearance are greatest. The aim of this randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a proactive TDM combined PK dashboard-driven infliximab dosing compared with standard of care (SOC) dosing in patients with moderately to severely active CD.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Eligible adolescent and adult (aged ≥16-80 years) patients with moderately to severely active CD will be randomised 1:1 to receive either infliximab monotherapy with proactive TDM using a PK dashboard (iDose, Projections Research) or SOC infliximab therapy, with or without a concomitant immunomodulator (IMM) (thiopurine or methotrexate) at the discretion of the investigator. The primary outcome of the study is the proportion of subjects with sustained corticosteroid-free clinical remission and no need for rescue therapy from week 14 throughout week 52. Rescue therapy is defined as any IFX dose escalation other than what is forecasted by iDose either done empirically or based on reactive TDM; addition of an IMM after week 2; reintroduction of corticosteroids after initial tapering; switch to another biologic or need for CD-related surgery. The secondary outcomes will include both efficacy and safety end points, such as endoscopic and biological remission, durability of response and CD-related surgery and hospitalisation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board Committee of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (IRB#:2021P000391). Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04835506.

Stopping Anti-TNF in Crohn’s Disease Remitters: Pros and Cons: The Pros

<b><i>Background:</i></b> There is no cure for Crohn’s disease (CD). Available treatments and treatment strategies, particularly anti-TNF, allow healing intestinal lesions and maintaining steroid-free remission in a subset of patients. Having in mind the remitting/relapsing nature of the disease, patients and health care providers often ask themselves whether the treatment could be withdrawn. Several studies have demonstrated a risk of relapse of CD after anti-TNF withdrawal, which varies from 20 to 50% at 1 year and from 50 to 80% beyond 5 years. These numbers clearly highlight that stopping therapy should not be a systematically proposed strategy in those remitting patients. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> Nobody would argue for anti-TNF withdrawal in patients with a high risk of short-term relapse. Nevertheless, they also indicate that a minority of patients may not relapse over midterm and that those who have relapsed may have benefited from a drug-free period before being again treated for a new cycle of treatment. The most relevant question is thus whether in those patients with a low to medium risk of disease relapse, treatment withdrawal could be contemplated. In this specific setting, there may be pros and cons for anti-TNF withdrawal. Among the pros are the potential side effects and toxicity of anti-TNF, the risk of loss of response over time, the patient preference allowing the patient to regain control of one’s health and investing in it, also improving adherence, the absence of a negative impact on disease evolution of a transient anti-TNF withdrawal, and finally the cost. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> Although anti-TNF withdrawal in patients with sustained clinical remission is associated with a high risk of relapse, this risk seems to be much lower in a subgroup of patients, particularly in endoscopic and biologic remission. Stopping anti-TNF in this subgroup of patients may be associated with a favorable benefit/risk ratio.

Safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab in Crohn's disease: Interim results of post-marketing surveillance in Japan

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Ustekinumab, a human anti-interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, has been approved in Japan for the treatment of Crohn's disease. Here, we report the findings from an 8-week interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Patients initiating ustekinumab treatment were prospectively evaluated from May 2017 to June 2020 at 91 medical centers in Japan. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and serious ADRs (SADRs) were monitored. Effectiveness was evaluated by clinical response, clinical remission, and changes in Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and C-reactive protein (CRP) from baseline to week 8. Presence of perianal disease was documented at baseline and week 8.

RESULTS

In total, 341 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 339 were included in the safety analysis while 334 were included in the effectiveness analysis. The overall incidences of ADRs and SADRs were 5.3% and 2.1%, respectively. Worsening of Crohn's disease was the most common event. The clinical response and clinical remission rate at week 8 were 40.0% and 48.5%, respectively. Significant improvements in CDAI and serum CRP (P < 0.001) were observed at week 8. CDAI decreased significantly (mean difference: -31.4; 95% confidence interval: -61.1, -1.7; P = 0.038) in biologics-naïve patients versus patients who had received two or more biologics.

CONCLUSIONS

This 8-week interim analysis of the real-world study confirmed the effectiveness of ustekinumab-based therapy in Japanese patients with Crohn's disease. No new safety concerns were found during 8-week induction period in the Japanese clinical settings.

Infliximab-induced optic neuritis

Antitumour necrosis factor alpha agents are important treatments in many inflammatory conditions including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and the inflammatory bowel diseases. However, there have been case reports of optic neuritis and other demyelinating diseases as complications of these agents. This case report presents a patient with ulcerative colitis on infliximab who presented with sudden onset mono-ocular visual field loss and highlights the diagnosis and management of infliximab-induced optic neuritis.

Adalimumab and myositis: A case report and review of the French and international Pharmacovigilance Databases

TNFα inhibitors, including adalimumab, are widely used in inflammatory rheumatologic and bowel diseases. Well-known adverse effects include: opportunistic infections, immunogenicity and new inflammatory manifestations. Myositis is an inflammatory disease, which manifests with muscle symptoms and can be life-threatening. Little is known about drug-induced myositis. We aimed to describe a case of myositis induced by adalimumab and reviewed national and international pharmacovigilance databases for other cases until 01/02/2019. This was a 63 years old woman with Crohn's disease, who developed muscle weakness, and rhabdomyolysis 3 months after starting adalimumab. Diagnosis of myositis was suspected and confirmed with electromyography and muscle biopsy. Improvement in muscle symptoms was observed after stopping adalimumab and starting corticosteroids. Muscular adverse effects are well-known and usually benign with adalimumab. However, five cases of myositis during treatment with adalimumab were registered in French PharmacoVigilance Database (FPVD) with muscle symptoms observed 3 months to 7 years after starting adalimumab. In VigiBase^Ⓡ, 90 cases of myositis associated with adalimumab with some similar characteristics were registered. When a patient treated with adalimumab complains of muscular symptoms, inflammatory myopathies should be considered. This adverse effect should be mentioned in a 'Summary of Product Characteristics' to alert healthcare professionals.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: comparative risk of lymphoma with anti-tumour necrosis factor agents and/or thiopurines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

The risk of lymphoma in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti-TNF agents remains unclear.

AIM

To assess the comparative risk of lymphoma with anti-TNF agents and/or thiopurines in IBD METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library to identify studies that evaluated lymphoproliferative disorders associated with anti-TNF agents with or without thiopurines. The risk of lymphoma was assessed through four comparator groups: combination therapy (anti-TNF plus thiopurine), anti-TNF monotherapy, thiopurine monotherapy and control group. Pooled incidence rate ratios (IRR) were estimated through Poisson-normal models.

RESULTS

Four observational studies comprising 261 689 patients were included. As compared with patients unexposed to anti-TNF and thiopurines, those exposed to anti-TNF monotherapy, thiopurine monotherapy or combination therapy had pooled IRR (per 1000 patient-years) of lymphoma of 1.52 (95% CI: 1.06-2.19; P = 0.023), 2.23 (95% CI: 1.79-2.79; P < 0.001) and 3.71 (95% CI: 2.30-6.00; P ≤ 0.01), respectively. The risk of lymphoma associated with combination therapy was higher than with thiopurines or anti-TNF alone with pooled IRR of 1.70 (95% CI: 1.03-2.81; P = 0.039) and 2.49 (95% CI: 1.39-4.47; P = 0.002), respectively. The risk did not differ between anti-TNF monotherapy and thiopurine monotherapy with pooled IRR of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.48-1.07; P = 0.107). All observational studies were of high quality according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an increased risk of lymphoma in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF agents, either alone or when combined with thiopurines.

Potential of Electrical Neuromodulation for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a common chronic inflammatory disease of the digestive tract that is often debilitating. It affects patients' quality of life and imposes a financial burden. Despite advances in treatment with medications such as biologics, a large proportion of patients do not respond to medical therapy or develop adverse events. Therefore, alternative treatment options such as electrical neuromodulation are currently being investigated. Electrical neuromodulation, also called bioelectronic medicine, is emerging as a potential new treatment for IBD. Over the past decade, advancements have been made in electrical neuromodulation. A number of electrical neuromodulation methods, such as vagus nerve stimulation, sacral nerve stimulation, and tibial nerve stimulation, have been tested to treat IBD. A series of animal and clinical trials have been performed to evaluate efficacy with promising results. Although the exact underlying mechanisms of action for electrical neuromodulation remain to be explored, this modality is promising. Further randomized controlled trials and basic experiments are needed to investigate efficacy and clarify intrinsic mechanisms.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in patients on biologics: lessons from gastroenterology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To give an overview on the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Numerous prospective exposure-response relationship studies and post-hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show a positive correlation between biologic drug concentrations and favorable clinical outcomes in IBD. These studies also demonstrate that higher drug concentrations appear to be needed to achieve more stringent objective therapeutic outcomes. Reactive TDM rationalizes the management of primary nonresponse and secondary loss of response to antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy and is more cost-effective when compared with empiric dose optimization. Furthermore, recent data suggest that proactive TDM, with the goal of targeting a threshold drug concentration, is associated with better therapeutic outcomes when compared with empiric dose escalation and/or reactive TDM of infliximab or adalimumab. Finally, proactive TDM can also efficiently guide infliximab de-escalation or discontinuation in patients with IBD in remission.

SUMMARY

Reactive TDM is currently considered as standard of care, whereas proactive TDM is emerging as a new therapeutic strategy for better optimizing anti-TNF therapy in IBD. However, more data from prospective studies are needed before a wide implementation of TDM-based algorithms in real life clinical practice for newer biologics.

Tailoring Biologic or Immunomodulator Treatment Withdrawal in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

There is currently no cure for inflammatory bowel disease. Most recent treatments and treatment strategies allow for healing intestinal lesions and maintaining steroid-free remission in a subset of patients. These patients and their doctors often ask themselves whether the treatment could be withdrawn. Several studies in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis have demonstrated a risk of relapse, which varies between 20 and 50% at 1 year and between 50 and 80% beyond 5 years. These numbers clearly highlight that stopping therapy should not be a systematically proposed strategy in those remitting patients. Nevertheless, they also indicate that a minority of patients may not relapse over mid-term and that those who have relapsed may have benefited from a drug-free period before being treated again for a new cycle of treatment. In this context, it would be good to optimally select patients who can be candidates for a successful treatment withdrawal. The criteria impacting this decision are as follows: the risk of relapse (linked to factors like mucosal healing and biomarkers), the consequence of a potential relapse, the tolerance and potential side effects of therapy, patients' priorities and preferences, and the costs. Integration of these parameters allows for the proposal of a decisional algorithm that may help the patients and doctors to make an appropriate decision for their individual case.

Safety of drugs used for the treatment of Crohn’s disease

INTRODUCTION

Medications in treating Crohn's disease (CD) have evolved over the last two decades, particularly with the use of biologic agents. There are, however, concerns about the safety and adverse events associated with these medications. The authors review the safety profile of immunosuppressive medications used in Crohn's disease in adult patients.

AREAS COVERED

The authors performed a literature search until October 2018 to examine safety data on thiopurines, methotrexate, anti-TNFα agents, vedolizumab and ustekinumab. The authors focused on 'trial' and 'real-world' data for the biologic agents. Safety in pregnancy and the elderly are also presented.

EXPERT OPINION

Available data in CD suggest that immunosuppressive medications are relatively safe, although there are concerns about an elevated risk of serious infections, skin cancer and lymphoma particularly with thiopurines and anti-TNFα agents. Data on vedolizumab and ustekinumab suggest these newer biologic agents are well tolerated; however, longer term data in CD are required to identify risks with extended use. Apart from methotrexate, there appear to be no adverse congenital outcomes with exposure of drugs during pregnancy.

Effectiveness and Safety of Reference Infliximab and Biosimilar in Crohn Disease: A French Equivalence Study

BACKGROUND

CT-P13 is a biosimilar of the reference product (RP) infliximab, with demonstrated efficacy and safety for some inflammatory arthritides. It was approved for the treatment of Crohn disease (CD) on that basis, without specific studies examining its effects in CD.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of CT-P13 and RP in infliximab-naive patients with CD.

DESIGN

Comparative equivalence cohort study.

SETTING

Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS), a French nationwide health administrative database (1 March 2015 to 30 June 2017).

PATIENTS

5050 infliximab-naive patients with CD who were older than 15 years, had started treatment with RP (n = 2551) or CT-P13 (n = 2499), and had no other indications for infliximab.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was a composite end point of death, CD-related surgery, all-cause hospitalization, and reimbursement of another biologic therapy. Equivalence was defined as a 95% CI of the hazard ratio (HR) of CT-P13 versus RP in a multivariable marginal Cox model situated within prespecified margins (0.80 to 1.25).

RESULTS

Overall, 1147 patients in the RP group and 952 patients in the CT-P13 group met the composite end point (including 838 and 719 hospitalizations, respectively). In multivariable analysis of the primary outcome, CT-P13 was equivalent to RP (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.85 to 0.99]). No differences in safety outcomes were observed between the 2 groups: serious infections (HR, 0.82 [CI, 0.61 to 1.11]), tuberculosis (HR, 1.10 [CI, 0.36 to 3.34]), and solid or hematologic cancer (HR, 0.66 [CI, 0.33 to 1.32]).

LIMITATION

The SNDS does not contain all relevant clinical data (for example, disease activity).

CONCLUSION

This analysis of real-world data indicates that the effectiveness of CT-P13 is equivalent to that of RP for infliximab-naive patients with CD. No difference was observed for safety outcomes.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Caisse Nationale de l'Assurance Maladie.

Crohn's disease treatment practices in France in1999-2013: A prospective survey in non-academic hospitals

AIMS

To describe the characteristics of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) in non-academic hospitals in France and to evaluate how therapeutic practices changed between 1999 and 2013.

METHODS

During 2 weeks in September 2013, we solicited disease and treatment information for CD patients seen by gastroenterologists in 57 French non-academic hospitals. In four groups of patients defined according to the date of CD diagnosis (<1999, 1999-2003, 2004-2008, and 2009-2013), the use of immunosuppressor (IS) and anti-TNF treatments during the first 5 years following diagnosis of CD was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

739 consecutive CD patients (median age at diagnosis 25.4 years) were included in the survey. CD location was ileal for 31%, colonic for 21%, and ileocolonic for 45%. CD phenotypes were non-penetrating/non-stricturing (58.7%), stricturing (26.9%), and penetrating (12.7%), with perianal lesions in 26.1%. The proportions of patients who began IS or anti-TNF treatment within 5 years of diagnosis increased significantly from 18% and 0%, respectively, in <1999 (n=170) to 52% and 23% in 1999-2003 (n=120), 66% and 70% in 2004-2008 (n=155), and 75% and 100% in 2009-2013 (n=294; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this French non-academic hospital cohort of CD patients, the proportions of patients being treated with anti-TNF or IS therapy in the first 5 years after diagnosis both increased sharply since 1999.

The state of the art on treatment of Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, progressive, and destructive disease of the gastrointestinal tract. Although its incidence appears to be stable or decreasing in most countries in the North America and Europe, the incidence is rising rapidly in Asian countries. Immunomodulators and biologics are increasingly used to avoid long-term bowel damage and subsequent disability. Therapeutic drug monitoring facilitates optimizing thiopurines and anti-TNFs use. New biologic agents targeting various pathological pathways of CD are blooming in recent years, and the high cost of biologics and expiration of patents for several biologic agents have driven the utility of biosimilars for CD treatment. Here, the literature regarding the efficacy, safety, and withdrawal of the drugs, as well as the evolution of therapeutic targets will be reviewed.

Impact of superimposed Clostridium difficile infection in Crohn's or ulcerative colitis flares in the outpatient setting

PURPOSE

The prospective assessment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) impact in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) flare in outpatient setting has been poorly investigated. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and the associated factors with CDI in IBD outpatients presenting colitis flares as well as the outcomes following treatment.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, conducted from October, 2014, to July, 2016, 120 IBD patients (55% presenting colitis flare) and 40 non-IBD controls were assessed for CDI. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of CDI. Outcome analysis was estimated for recurrent CDI, hospitalization, colectomy, and CDI-associated mortality.

RESULTS

The number of patients with CDI was significantly higher in IBD patients experiencing flares than in both inactive IBD and non-IBD groups (28.8 vs. 5.6 vs. 0%, respectively; p = 0.001). Females (OR = 1.39, 95% CI, 1.13-17.18), younger age (OR = 0.77, 95% CI, 0.65-0.92), steroid treatment (OR = 7.42, 95% CI, 5.17-40.20), and infliximab therapy (OR = 2.97, 95% CI, 1.99-24.63) were found to be independently associated with CDI. There was a dose-related increase in the risks of CDI on patients which had taken prednisone. Those treated with vancomycin had a satisfactory response to therapy, but 21% presented recurrent CDI and 16% were hospitalized. Neither necessity of colectomy nor mortality was noticed in any patient during the investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

In IBD outpatients presenting colitis flares, CDI is highly prevalent. Females, younger age, infliximab, and notably steroid therapy were independently associated with CDI. Most patients with CDI experienced mild-to-moderate disease, and prompt treatment with vancomycin was highly effective, which seems to reduce the serious complication risks.

Ustekinumab in the management of Crohn's disease: Expert opinion

This expert-opinion paper reviews available evidence for the use of ustekinumab, a human interleukin 12/23 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of Crohn's disease and discusses its potential role in the current treatment scenario for the condition. Ustekinumab appears to be associated with rapid and sustained clinical effect, as reported from the clinical research program, with additional support for potential mucosal healing. These characteristics are paralleled by a favorable safety profile, lack of immunogenicity and the presence of systemic anti-inflammatory activity. Importantly, ustekinumab requires only one single intravenous administration, while subsequent dosing is administered subcutaneously, with potential advantages for home-based therapy. Lastly, the dosage of ustekinumab is flexible. On the basis of the evidence, ustekinumab has a role in patients with primary failure or secondary loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, as well as in those who have adverse events on front-line biologics or are reinitiating therapy after a treatment holiday. Current evidence suggests that ustekinumab may be particularly suitable in patients who present extra-intestinal manifestations of the disease or are at risk of infections. Ustekinumab may also be considered in the first-line setting, especially in frail patients, in young subjects or in those who have concomitant immune-mediated diseases.

Current Practice for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biopharmaceuticals in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Since the late 90s, biopharmaceuticals targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha have revolutionized the treatment of moderately to severely active inflammatory bowel disease. The robust efficacy witnessed in many patients stands in stark contrast with the observation of a proportion of patients who fail to respond or who lose response over time. Therapeutic drug monitoring has been proposed as a means to understand and respond to the variability in clinical response and remission. Various treatment algorithms have been proposed, but optimal use of these measurements in daily practice awaits additional prospective validation trials. This review provides an updated overview on the subject of therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals for the management of inflammatory bowel disease and how we could implement its concepts in a changing landscape.

Safety of treatments for inflammatory bowel disease: Clinical practice guidelines of the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD)

Inflammatory bowel diseases are chronic conditions of unknown etiology, showing a growing incidence and prevalence in several countries, including Italy. Although the etiology of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis is unknown, due to the current knowledge regarding their pathogenesis, effective treatment strategies have been developed. Several guidelines are available regarding the efficacy and safety of available drug treatments for inflammatory bowel diseases. Nevertheless, national guidelines provide additional information adapted to local feasibility, costs and legal issues related to the use of the same drugs. These observations prompted the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) to establish Italian guidelines on the safety of currently available treatments for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. These guidelines discuss the use of aminosalicylates, systemic and low bioavailability corticosteroids, antibiotics (metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, rifaximin), thiopurines, methotrexate, cyclosporine A, TNFα antagonists, vedolizumab, and combination therapies. These guidelines are based on current knowledge derived from evidence-based medicine coupled with clinical experience of a national working group.

Switching from Remicade® to Remsima® is well Tolerated and Feasible: A Prospective, Open-label Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A biosimilar version of infliximab [CT-P13/Remsima®] recently entered the European market. The clinical data on its use in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] are sparse, especially on switching from the originator Remicade®. In this study, we aimed to prospectively investigate the feasibility, safety and immunogenicity of switching from Remicade to Remsima in a real-life IBD population.

METHODS

All adult patients who were treated with Remicade in the Department of Gastroenterology at Oslo University Hospital were switched to Remsima. The follow-up lasted for 6 months. In addition, a retrospective registration was performed with a start time of 6 months before switching drugs. The primary endpoints were [i] the proportion of patients remaining on medication 6 months after switching and [ii] adverse events during the 6 months after switching. The secondary endpoints included [i] disease activity scores [Harvey-Bradshaw Index and Partial Mayo Score], C-reactive protein, haemoglobin, faecal calprotectin, infliximab dose and interval, and p-infliximab and [ii] the development of antidrug antibodies.

RESULTS

In total, 143 IBD patients were switched, 99 with Crohn's disease and 44 with ulcerative colitis. The large majority [97%] remained on the medication throughout follow-up. A low number of adverse events were observed. No change in disease activity, C-reactive protein, haemoglobin, faecal calprotectin, infliximab dose and interval or p-infliximab was detected. Three patients developed new detectable antidrug antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from Remicade to Remsima was feasible and with few adverse events, including very limited antidrug antibody formation and loss of response.

A Rare Adverse Effect of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Therapy: Sarcoidosis

Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-a) therapy has been widely used for the management of rheumatologic diseases. The most frequent adverse effects of anti-TNF-a therapy are infections and malignancies while sarcoidosis is a rare condition. On the other hand, anti-TNF-a therapy has been used in the treatment of sarcoidosis. Elucidation of this paradoxical issue is unclear. In this article, we report an ankylosing spondylitis patient who was diagnosed as sarcoidosis during the period of etanercept usage. Sarcoidosis as a possible adverse effect should be kept in mind during anti-TNF-a therapy.

Effect of Anti-TNF Agents on Postoperative Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: a Single Institution Experience

BACKGROUND

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents have been an integral part in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. However, a subset of inflammatory bowel disease patients ultimately requires surgery and up to 30 % of them have undergone treatment with anti-TNF agents. Studies assessing the effect of anti-TNF agents on postoperative outcomes have been inconsistent. The aim of this study is to assess postoperative morbidity in inflammatory bowel disease patients who underwent surgery with anti-TNF therapy prior to surgery.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 282 patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing intestinal surgery between 2013 and 2015 at the Mount Sinai Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups based on treatment with anti-TNF agents (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab) within 8 weeks of surgery. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were recorded. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were carried out.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were treated with anti-TNF therapy within 8 weeks of surgery while 209 patients did not have exposure. Thirty-day anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal abscess, wound infection, extra-abdominal infection, readmission, and mortality rates were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of anti-TNF medications in inflammatory bowel disease patients within 2 months of intestinal surgery is not associated with an increased risk of 30-day postoperative complications.

Considerations, challenges and future of anti-TNF therapy in treating inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic disabling conditions. Monoclonal antibody therapy directed against tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF) has revolutionized the care of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

AREAS COVERED

Considerations before starting anti-TNF therapy are highlighted: the best time to start with anti-TNF therapy, either alone or in combination with an immunomodulator, the choice of an anti-TNF agent and the contra-indications to anti-TNF therapy. Primary nonresponse and secondary loss of response are discussed. De-escalating therapy, the role of therapeutic drug monitoring and the use of biosimilars, are handled. Finally, the future directions of anti-TNF therapy are emphasized.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-TNF therapy remains the cornerstone in the treatment of IBD. When initiating long-term therapy, safety and cost issues are of great importance. The therapeutic armamentarium in the treatment of IBD is rapidly growing. Therefore, the challenge is to optimize the use and refine the exact position of anti-TNF therapy in the near future, with personalized medicine as the ultimate goal.