Cardiovascular complications of immunosuppressive agents in renal transplant recipients

De novo major cardiovascular events in kidney transplant recipients: a comparative matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although cardiovascular disease is known to be one of the leading causes of death after kidney transplantation (KT), evidence on the risk difference of de novo major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared with that in dialysis patients or the general population (GP) remains rare.

METHODS

We identified KTRs using the nationwide health insurance database in South Korea and then 1:1 matched them with the dialysis and GP controls without a pre-existing MACE. The primary endpoint was defined as de novo MACEs consisting of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization and ischemic stroke. The secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and death-censored graft failure (DCGF) in KTRs.

RESULTS

We included 4156 individuals in each of the three groups and followed them up for 4.7 years. De novo MACEs occurred in 3.7, 21.7 and 2.5 individuals per 1000 person-years in the KTRs, dialysis controls and GP controls, respectively. KTRs showed a lower MACE risk {adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.16 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.20], P < .001} than dialysis controls, whereas a similar MACE risk to GP controls [aHR 0.81 (95% CI 0.52-1.27), P = .365]. In addition, KTRs showed a similar MACE risk compared with the GP group, regardless of age, sex and the presence of comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia. Among KTRs, de novo MACEs were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, but not with DCGF.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo MACEs in KTRs were much lower than that in dialysis patients and had a similar risk to the GP, but once it occurred it caused elevated mortality risk in KTRs.

Hypertension: a new treatment for an old disease? Targeting the immune system

Arterial hypertension represents a serious public health problem, being a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The availability of many antihypertensive therapeutic strategies still fails to adequately treat around 20% of hypertensive patients, who are considered resistant to conventional treatment. In the pathogenesis of hypertension, immune system mechanisms are activated and both the innate and adaptive immune responses play a crucial role. However, what, when and how the immune system is triggered during hypertension development is still largely undefined. In this context, this review highlights scientific advances in the manipulation of the immune system in order to attenuate hypertension and end-organ damage. Here, we discuss the potential use of immunosuppressants and immunomodulators as pharmacological tools to control the activation of the immune system, by non-specific and specific mechanisms, to treat hypertension and improve end-organ damage. Nevertheless, more clinical trials should be performed with these drugs to establish their therapeutic efficacy, safety and risk-benefit ratio in hypertensive conditions. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Immune Targets in Hypertension. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.12/issuetoc.

Demethylation of the TSDR is a marker of squamous cell carcinoma in transplant recipients

Malignancy is an important cause of death in transplant recipients. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) causes significant morbidity and mortality as 30% of transplant recipients will develop cSCC within 10 years of transplantation. Previously we have shown that high numbers of regulatory T cells (Tregs) are associated with the development of cSCC in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Demethylation analysis of the Treg-specific demethylated region (TSDR) provides a more accurate association with cSCC risk after transplantation. Age, gender and duration of immunosuppression matched KTRs with (n=32) and without (n=27) cSCC, were re-analyzed for putative clinical and immunological markers of cancer risk. The proportion of FOXP3+ CD4+ cells was higher in the population with a previous SCC. Major T cell subsets remained stable over time; although B cell, CD8 and CD4 subpopulations demonstrated age-related changes. TSDR methylation analysis allowed clarification of Treg numbers, enhancing the association of high Treg levels in KTRs with cSCC compared to the cSCC-free cohort. These data validate and expand on previous findings in long-term KTRs, and show that immune markers remain stable over time. TSDR demethylation analysis provides a more accurate biomarker of cancer posttransplantation.

Validity and reliability of a novel immunosuppressive adverse effects scoring system in renal transplant recipients

Background

After renal transplantation, many patients experience adverse effects from maintenance immunosuppressive drugs. When these adverse effects occur, patient adherence with immunosuppression may be reduced and impact allograft survival. If these adverse effects could be prospectively monitored in an objective manner and possibly prevented, adherence to immunosuppressive regimens could be optimized and allograft survival improved. Prospective, standardized clinical approaches to assess immunosuppressive adverse effects by health care providers are limited. Therefore, we developed and evaluated the application, reliability and validity of a novel adverse effects scoring system in renal transplant recipients receiving calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) and mycophenolic acid based immunosuppressive therapy.

Methods

The scoring system included 18 non-renal adverse effects organized into gastrointestinal, central nervous system and aesthetic domains developed by a multidisciplinary physician group. Nephrologists employed this standardized adverse effect evaluation in stable renal transplant patients using physical exam, review of systems, recent laboratory results, and medication adherence assessment during a clinic visit. Stable renal transplant recipients in two clinical studies were evaluated and received immunosuppressive regimens comprised of either cyclosporine or tacrolimus with mycophenolic acid. Face, content, and construct validity were assessed to document these adverse effect evaluations. Inter-rater reliability was determined using the Kappa statistic and intra-class correlation.

Results

A total of 58 renal transplant recipients were assessed using the adverse effects scoring system confirming face validity. Nephrologists (subject matter experts) rated the 18 adverse effects as: 3.1 ± 0.75 out of 4 (maximum) regarding clinical importance to verify content validity. The adverse effects scoring system distinguished 1.75-fold increased gastrointestinal adverse effects (p = 0.008) in renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid compared to the cyclosporine regimen. This finding demonstrated construct validity. Intra-class correlation was 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.90) and Kappa statistic of 0.68 ± 0.25 for all 18 adverse effects and verified substantial inter-rater reliability.

Conclusions

This immunosuppressive adverse effects scoring system in stable renal transplant recipients was evaluated and substantiated face, content and construct validity with inter-rater reliability. The scoring system may facilitate prospective, standardized clinical monitoring of immunosuppressive adverse drug effects in stable renal transplant recipients and improve medication adherence.

Characteristics of extracoronary vascular disease in heart transplant recipient

BACKGROUND

Heart transplant candidates carry many of risk factors for vascular disease, and in addition, recipients continue to accumulate them following heart transplantation (HTx). However, very limited information is available on this entity. This study was designed to address characteristics of extracoronary vascular disease in heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

This is a nonconcurrent cohort study of 402 patients who received HTx at the University of Washington between 1985 and 2004. Pretransplant arterial evaluation included carotid, lower extremity, and renal artery duplex studies. CT angiogram was obtained when indicated. Patients with severe arterial disease were excluded from the transplant list. Posttransplant vascular evaluation was done with the patient's history and physical examination.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 5.5 years. Seventy vascular diseases were detected in 49 patients (12% of study population). Patients with pretransplant vascular disease, compared to those without, were older at the HTx, carried the diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy more commonly, and had more comorbidities including history of smoking, alcohol drinking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and prior heart operations. The prevalence of vascular disease was 6% prior to HTx and it cumulatively increased up to 17% at 17 years after HTx. Nineteen percent of these diseases were the result of arterial traumas mostly caused by medical interventions. Fourteen patients developed abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with two deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important for care providers to be aware of the high probability of vascular disease, to be familiar with vascular disease, and to provide appropriate prophylactic and therapeutic measures when evaluating this patient population.