Pharmacokinetic evaluation of fingolimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

An update on the use of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated disorder of the CNS manifested by recurrent attacks of neurological symptoms (related to focal inflammation) and gradual disability accrual (related to progressive neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation). Sphingosine-1-phosphate-receptor (S1PR) modulators are a class of oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing MS. The first S1PR modulator developed and approved for MS was fingolimod, followed by siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod. All are S1P analogues with different S1PR-subtype selectivity. They restrain the S1P-dependent lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes by binding the lymphocytic S1P-subtype-1-receptor. Depending on their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, they can also interfere with other biological functions.

AREAS COVERED

Our narrative review covers the PubMed English literature on S1PR modulators in MS until August 2022. We discuss their pharmacology, efficacy, safety profile, and risk management recommendations based on the results of phase II and III clinical trials. We briefly address their impact on the risk of infections and vaccines efficacy.

EXPERT OPINION

S1PR modulators decrease relapse rate and may modestly delay disease progression in people with relapsing MS. Aside their established benefit, their place and timing within the long-term DMT strategy in MS, as well as their immunological effects in the new and evolving context of the post-COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination campaigns warrant further study.

Fingolimod does not prevent syndecan-4 shedding from the endothelial glycocalyx in a cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cell model of vascular injury

Background

Shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx (EG) is associated with poor outcomes in a range of conditions including sepsis. Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) restores the damaged EG to baseline thickness, however the mechanism for this effect is unknown, and some components of FFP have adverse effects unrelated to the EG. There is some limited evidence that sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) within FFP restores the EG by activating the endothelial cell S1P receptor 1 (S1PR₁). However, there are disadvantages to using S1P clinically as an EG restorative therapy. A potential alternative is the S1PR agonist fingolimod (FTY720). The aim of this study was to assess whether FTY720 prevents EG shedding in injured cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells.

Methods

Shedding of the EG was induced in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) by exposure to adrenaline, TNF-α and H₂O₂. The cells were then assigned to one of six conditions for 4 h: uninjured and untreated, injured and untreated, injured and treated with FTY720 with and without the S1PR₁ inhibitor W146, and injured and treated with 25% FFP with and without W146. Syndecan-4, a component of the EG, was measured in cell supernatants, and syndecan-4 and thrombomodulin mRNA expression was quantitated in cell lysates.

Results

The injury resulted in a 2.1-fold increase in syndecan-4 (p < 0.001), consistent with EG shedding. Syndecan-4 and thrombomodulin mRNA expression was increased (p < 0.001) and decreased (p < 0.05), respectively, by the injury. Syndecan-4 shedding was not affected by treatment with FTY720, whereas FFP attenuated syndecan-4 shedding back to baseline levels in the injured cells and this was unaffected by W146. Neither treatment affected syndecan-4 or thrombomodulin mRNA expression.

Conclusions

FTY720 did not prevent syndecan-4 shedding from the EG in the HUVEC model of endothelial injury, suggesting that activation of S1PR does not prevent EG damage. FFP prevented syndecan-4 shedding from the EG via a mechanism that was independent of S1PR₁ and upregulation of SDC-4 production. Further studies to examine whether FTY720 or another S1PR agonist might have EG-protective effects under different conditions are warranted, as are investigations seeking the mechanism of EG protection conferred by FFP in this experimental model.

A Validated HPLC-MS/MS Method for Quantification of Fingolimod and Fingolimod-Phosphate in Human Plasma: Application to Patients with Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Fingolimod is a sphingosine 1-phosphate-receptor modulator approved for the oral treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), a form of MS characterized by a pattern of exacerbation of neurological symptoms followed by recovery. Here, we validated a simple and rapid liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the measurement of the concentrations of Fingolimod and its active metabolite Fingolimod-Phosphate (Fingolimod-P) in human plasma. The lower limits of quantification were set at 0.3 and 1.5 ng/mL for Fingolimod and Fingolimod-P, respectively, and the linearity was in the range 0.3–150 ng Fingolimod/mL and 1.5–150 ng Fingolimod-P/mL. After protein precipitation, the extraction recoveries of both analytes were always above 60% with minimal matrix effect. The method was accurate and precise, satisfying the criteria set in the European Medicine Agency guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. The method was then applied to measure Fingolimod and Fingolimod-P concentrations in the plasma of 15 RRMS patients under chronic treatment with Fingolimod, administered daily at the dose of 0.5 mg for up to 24 months. No significant differences were observed between samples collected at 6, 12 and 24 months for both analytes, indicating that the drug’s bioavailability was unaffected by multiple daily doses up to 24 months. The levels of Fingolimod-P were about two-fold higher than the levels of the parent compound. The availability of this analytical method can allow the monitoring of the impact of plasma levels of the drug and its metabolite on inter-individual variability in clinical responses.

Monomethyl Fumarate (MMF, Bafiertam) for the Treatment of Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a prevalent neurologic autoimmune disorder affecting two million people worldwide. Symptoms include gait abnormalities, perception and sensory losses, cranial nerve pathologies, pain, cognitive dysfunction, and emotional aberrancies. Traditional therapy includes corticosteroids for the suppression of relapses and injectable interferons. Recently, several modern therapies-including antibody therapy and oral agents-were approved as disease-modifying agents. Monomethyl fumarate (MMF, Bafiertam) is a recent addition to the arsenal available in the fight against MS and appears to be well-tolerated, safe, and effective. In this paper, we review the evidence available regarding the use of monomethyl fumarate (Bafiertam) in the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS.

Bioequivalence Study of 2 Capsule Formulations of Fingolimod 0.5 mg Assessing Both Parent Drug and Active Metabolite in New Zealand Healthy Subjects (Truncated Design)

Fingolimod is indicated for the treatment of patients with the relapsing-remitting form of multiple sclerosis. The primary study objective was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a test formulation, 0.5 mg fingolimod HCl capsule (Lebrina, Asofarma Sociedad Anónima Industrial y Comercial, Argentina) relative to a reference formulation, 0.5 mg fingolimod capsule (Gilenya, Novartis Pharmaceutical, Australia). In a single-center, randomized, single-dose, single-blinded, 2-way crossover study, 33 New Zealand healthy subjects of both sexes were enrolled to receive a 0.5-mg dose of 3 capsules of each fingolimod formulation under fasting conditions, with a 42-day washout period between administrations. Additional pharmacokinetic information regarding its main active metabolite, fingolimod phosphate, was also provided. The point estimate and 90% confidence intervals of the ratios of maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 72 hours were 99.07 (95.83-102.41) and 97.64 (95.33-100.00) for fingolimod, and 95.60 (90.95-100.49) and 98.54 (96.19-100.96), for fingolimod phosphate. Primary parameters, maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 72 hours for fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate were found to have no significant difference when test and reference formulations were compared. Fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate of both formulations were within the accepted 90% confidence interval limits of 80.00% and 125.00%. No significant differences between the test and reference drug products were detected in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters estimated. Notwithstanding the primary conclusion of bioequivalence is focused on the measurement of the parent compound, compliance with the same criteria by the active metabolite reinforces the comparability between the pharmacokinetic profiles of both formulations (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03757338).

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and its soluble receptors are associated with disability, disability progression and clinical forms of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The association between tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, soluble TNF receptor (sTNFR)1 and sTNFR2 with clinical characteristics of multiple sclerosis (MS) remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether TNF-α, sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 are associated with MS diagnosis, disability, disability progression and clinical forms of MS.

MATERIALS AND SUBJECTS

The study included 147 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 21 with progressive clinical forms (ProgMS) and 70 controls. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) evaluated disability as mild (EDSS < 3.0) or moderate/high (EDSS ≥ 3.0). Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score (MSSS) evaluated disability progression as no progression (MSSS < 5) and progression (MSSS ≥ 5). Baseline data of subjects and plasma levels of TNF-α, sTNFR1, sTNFR2 were obtained.

RESULTS

The MS diagnosis explained 44.6% and 12.3% of TNF-α and sTNFR2 levels, respectively. Moderate/high disability and disability progression were best predicted by sTNFR1 and age (positively) and ProgMS were best predicted by sTNFR1 (positively) and sTNFR2 (negatively), coupled with age and sex. A composite score reflecting the sTNFR1/sTNFR2 ratio showed a positive association with ProgMS after adjusting for age and sex.

CONCLUSION

Increased sTNFR1 and age were positively associated with disability and disability progression, whereas increased sTNFR1 (positively) and sTNFR2 (negatively) were associated with ProgMS, suggesting a distinct role of them in the immunopathological mechanisms of MS.

TNFR1 inhibition with a Nanobody protects against EAE development in mice

TNF has as detrimental role in multiple sclerosis (MS), however, anti-TNF medication is not working. Selective TNF/TNFR1 inhibition whilst sparing TNFR2 signaling reduces the pro-inflammatory effects of TNF but preserves the important neuroprotective signals via TNFR2. We previously reported the generation of a Nanobody-based selective inhibitor of human TNFR1, TROS that will be tested in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). We specifically antagonized TNF/TNFR1 signaling using TROS in a murine model of MS, namely MOG_35-55-induced EAE. Because TROS does not cross-react with mouse TNFR1, we generated mice expressing human TNFR1 in a mouse TNFR1-knockout background (hTNFR1 Tg), and we determined biodistribution of ^99mTc-TROS and effectiveness of TROS in EAE in those mice. Biodistribution analysis demonstrated that intraperitoneally injected TROS is retained more in organs of hTNFR1 Tg mice compared to wild type mice. TROS was also detected in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of hTNFR1 Tg mice. Prophylactic TROS administration significantly delayed disease onset and ameliorated its symptoms. Moreover, treatment initiated early after disease onset prevented further disease development. TROS reduced spinal cord inflammation and neuroinflammation, and preserved myelin and neurons. Collectively, our data illustrate that TNFR1 is a promising therapeutic target in MS.

Fingolimod hydrochloride for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Fingolimod was the first oral and the first in class disease modifying treatment in multiple sclerosis that acts as sphingosine-1-phospathe receptor agonist. Since approval in 2010 there is a growing experience with fingolimod use in clinical practice, but also next-generation sphingosin-1-receptor agonists in ongoing clinical trials. Growing evidence demonstrates additional effects beyond impact on lymphocyte circulation, highlighting further promising targets in multiple sclerosis therapy. Areas covered: Here we present a systematic review using PubMed database searching and expert opinion on fingolimod use in clinical practice. Long-term data of initial clinical trials and post-marketing evaluations including long-term efficacy, safety, tolerability and management especially within growing disease modifying treatment options and pre-treatment constellation in multiple sclerosis patients are critically discussed. Furthermore novel findings in mechanism of actions and prospective on additional use in progressive forms in multiple sclerosis are presented. Expert opinion: There is an extensive long-term experience on fingolimod use in clinical practice demonstrating the favorable benefit-risk of this drug. Using a defined risk management approach experienced MS clinicians should apply fingolimod after critical choice of patients and review of clinical aspects. Further studies are essential to discuss additional benefit in progressive forms in multiple sclerosis.

Effect of Fingolimod on Brain Volume Loss in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Brain atrophy occurs at a faster rate in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) than in healthy individuals. In three randomized, controlled, phase III trials, fingolimod reduced the annual rate of brain volume loss (BVL) in patients with relapsing MS (RMS) by approximately one-third relative to that in individuals receiving placebo or intramuscular interferon beta-1a. Analysis of brain volume changes during study extensions has shown that this reduced rate of BVL is sustained in patients with RMS receiving fingolimod continuously. Subgroup analyses of the core phase III and extension studies have shown that reductions in the rate of BVL are observed irrespective of levels of inflammatory lesion activity seen by magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and on study; levels of disability at baseline; and treatment history. The rate of BVL in these studies was predicted independently by T2 lesion and gadolinium-enhancing lesion burdens at baseline, and correlations observed between BVL and increasing levels of disability strengthened over time. In another phase III trial in patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS), fingolimod did not reduce BVL overall relative to placebo; however, consistent with findings in RMS, there was a treatment effect on BVL in patients with PPMS with gadolinium-enhancing lesion activity at baseline. The association between treatment effects on BVL and future accumulation of disability argues in favor of measuring BVL on a more routine basis and with a more structured approach than is generally the case in clinical practice. Despite several practical obstacles, progress is being made in achieving this goal.