Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of degarelix for prostate cancer

Physiological and Pharmacological overview of the Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone

Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) is a decapeptide responsible for the control of the reproductive functions. It shows C- and N-terminal aminoacid modifications and two other distinct isoforms have been so far identified. The biological effects of GnRH are mediated by binding to high-affinity G-protein couple receptors (GnRHR), showing characteristic very short C tail. In mammals, including humans, GnRH-producing neurons originate in the embryonic nasal compartment and during early embryogenesis they undergo rapid migration towards the hypothalamus; the increasing knowledge of such mechanisms improved diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to infertility. The pharmacological use of GnRH, or its synthetic peptide and non-peptide agonists or antagonists, provides a valid tool for reproductive disorders and assisted reproduction technology (ART). The presence of GnRHR in several organs and tissues indicates additional functions of the peptide. The identification of a GnRH/GnRHR system in the human endometrium, ovary, and prostate has extended the functions of the peptide to the physiology and tumor transformation of such tissues. Likely, the activity of a GnRH/GnRHR system at the level of the hippocampus, as well as its decreased expression in mice brain aging, raised interest in its possible involvement in neurogenesis and neuronal functions. In conclusion, GnRH/GnRHR appears to be a fascinating biological system that exerts several possibly integrated pleiotropic actions in the complex control of reproductive functions, tumor growth, neurogenesis, and neuroprotection. This review aims to provide an overview of the physiology of GnRH and the pharmacological applications of its synthetic analogs in the management of reproductive and non-reproductive diseases.

Androgen deprivation therapy and cardiovascular risk in prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), with or without palliative local treatments, is the standard of care for many patients with locally-advanced and/or metastatic prostate cancer. However, the possible cardiovascular (CV) risks associated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists and agonists continue to be the subject of concern, especially in a patient population that may already be at increased CV risk.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The present review provides a narrative summary of the evidence regarding the CV risks associated with GnRH antagonists and agonists from randomized clinical trials (RCTs), real-world evidence, and meta-analyses.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

From RCTs, it appears clear that there is a direct class effect for CV risk in patients with prostate cancer being administered GnRH agonists and antagonists, with the latter being associated with reduced CV risk. Real-world data and the available meta-analyses largely indicate that CV risk is lower with GnRH antagonists than with GnRH agonists.

CONCLUSIONS

A review of the pathophysiological mechanisms of gives further support to the possibility that GnRH antagonists are associated with lower CV risk than agonists. It can be highlighted that when treating patients with advanced or metastatic prostate cancer it is important to screen for underlying comorbidities prior to choosing the most appropriate therapy; moreover, patients should be closely monitored for factors associated with CV risk in order to optimize outcomes. Further studies are needed to define the most appropriate treatment according to the individual patient characteristics.

Preparation of Long-acting Somatostatin and GnRH Analogues and their Applications in Tumor Therapy

Hormonal drugs are essential treatment options for some hormone-dependent or hormone-sensitive tumors. The common dosage forms of hormonal drugs have a short half-life. Hence, frequent administration is needed, which results in poor patient compliance. Nevertheless, using drug delivery technology, somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues are prepared into long-acting formulations that can significantly prolong the action time of these drugs, reducing medication frequency and increasing patient compliance. Such drugs are advantageous when treating acromegaly, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), breast cancer, prostate cancer, and other diseases having a relatively long course. SSAs and GnRH analogues are two typical hormonal drugs, the long-acting formulations of which are essential in clinical practice. This review summarized the preparation methods and clinical application of long-acting formulations in cancer. Further, the action mechanism and new research of SSAs and GnRH analogues were discussed, and suggestions related to the development of long-acting SSAs and GnRH analogues were provided.

Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for the treatment of prostate cancer

Androgen deprivation therapy using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues is standard treatment for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer. GnRH agonist therapy results in an initial testosterone flare, and increased metabolic and cardiovascular risks. The GnRH antagonist relugolix is able to reduce serum testosterone levels in men with prostate cancer without inducing testosterone flare. In the HERO Phase III trial, relugolix was superior to leuprolide acetate at rapidly reducing testosterone and continuously suppressing testosterone, with faster post-treatment recovery of testosterone levels. Relugolix was associated with a 54% lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events than leuprolide acetate. As the first oral GnRH antagonist approved for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, relugolix offers a new treatment option.

Current and emerging gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists for the treatment of prostate cancer

Introduction:Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is currently the backbone treatment of metastatic prostate cancer and is also used in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Castration may be achieved either by bilateral orchiectomy or by administration of LHRH agonists or GnRH antagonists.Areas covered: In this article, the authors assess the current and emerging role of GnRH antagonists for the treatment of prostate cancer focusing on oncological results and safety (i.e. cardiovascular risk). In addition, updated data regarding the first orally administered GnRH antagonist, relugolix, is presented.Expert opinion: Studies demonstrate that GnRH antagonists are at least equal with LHRH agonists in terms of testosterone suppression and PSA progression free survival with a major advantage being rapid testosterone suppression. Thus, the optimal group of patients included symptomatic metastatic prostate cancer patients especially if cardiovascular comorbidities or LUTS are also present. Emerging data regarding benefit of the use of GnRH antagonists in patients with concomitant cardiovascular disease are of great interest. Relugolix has emerged as the first orally administered GnRH antagonist able to achieve and maintain testosterone castration levels and it is associated with a profound reduction of major cardiovascular events.

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone and GnRH Receptor: Structure, Function and Drug Development

BACKGROUND

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) is a key element in sexual maturation and regulation of the reproductive cycle in the human organism. GnRH interacts with the pituitary cells through the activation of the Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Receptors (GnRHR). Any impairments/dysfunctions of the GnRH-GnRHR complex lead to the development of various cancer types and disorders. Furthermore, the identification of GnRHR as a potential drug target has led to the development of agonist and antagonist molecules implemented in various treatment protocols. The development of these drugs was based on the information derived from the functional studies of GnRH and GnRHR.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims at shedding light on the versatile function of GnRH and GnRH receptor and offers an apprehensive summary regarding the development of different agonists, antagonists and non-peptide GnRH analogues.

CONCLUSION

The information derived from these studies can enhance our understanding of the GnRH-GnRHR versatile nature and offer valuable insight into the design of new more potent molecules.

Changes in body composition and lipid profile in prostate cancer patients without bone metastases given Degarelix treatment: the BLADE prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-agonists in prostate cancer (PCa) patients induce sarcopenic obesity. The effect of LHRH-antagonist on body composition has never been explored. We evaluated changes in fat (FBM) and lean body mass (LBM) in PCa patients undergoing Degarelix.

METHODS

This is a single-center prospective study, enrolling 29 non-metastatic PCa patients eligible to LHRH-antagonist from 2017 to 2019. All patients received monthly subcutaneous injection of Degarelix for 12 months. Changes in FBM and LBM between baseline and 12-month Degarelix, as measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, were the co-primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints were changes in serum lipids, glucose profile and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Appendicular lean mass index (ALMI) and ALMI/FBM ratio were assessed as post-hoc analyses. Linear mixed models with random intercept tested for estimated least squared means differences (EMD).

RESULTS

FBM significantly increased after 12 months (EMD +2920.7, +13.8%, p < 0.001), whereas LBM remained stable (EMD -187.1, -0.3%, p = 0.8). No differences occurred in lipid profile. Glycated hemoglobin significantly increased and serum FSH significantly decreased. A significant inverse relationship was found between serum FSH and ALMI/FBM ratio after 12 month (r = -0.44, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The BLADE study prospectively evaluated changes in body composition after LHRH-antagonist. LHRH-antagonist therapy is associated to an increased risk of obesity and diabetes, but lean body mass and serum lipids are not affected. This may represent an additional evidence supporting the reduced cardiovascular risk associated with LHRH-antagonist. The role of FSH in influencing sarcopenic obesity in PCa after androgen deprivation deserves to be further explored.

Pharmacodynamic Activity of the Novel Neurokinin-3 Receptor Antagonist SJX-653 in Healthy Men

CONTEXT

SJX-653 is a novel neurokinin 3 receptor (NK3R) antagonist. The NK3 pathway is a central regulator of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion and has also been implicated in the generation of hot flashes. Therefore, decreases of luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone in men serve as sensitive pharmacodynamic (PD) markers of central NK3 antagonism.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic activity of SJX-653 in healthy men.

DESIGN

A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single ascending dose study.

SETTING

Phase 1 unit.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Seven cohorts of 6 healthy men 18-45 years of age (4:2 randomization to SJX-653/placebo per cohort).

INTERVENTION(S)

Single oral doses of 0.5-90 mg SJX-653.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Safety assessments and serial pharmacokinetic (PK)/PD measurements.

RESULTS

SJX-653 was well tolerated at all dose levels. Cmax and AUC0-24 increased in a dose-proportional manner. The terminal elimination half-life ranged between 9.8 and 12.5 hours independent of dose. A statistically significant, dose-dependent, reversible reduction of LH and testosterone was observed with near maximal effect after 15 mg and little to no effect at 4.5 mg. Maximal LH reduction was 70 ± 7% (mean ± sd) at 6 hours after 30 mg SJX-653 versus 10 ± 43% for placebo (P = 0.0006); maximal T reduction was of 68 ± 5% at 8 hours after 60 mg SJX-653 versus 18 ± 11% for placebo (P < 0.0001). The plasma IC50 for LH reduction was 33 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate clinical proof-of-mechanism for SJX-653 as a potent centrally-acting NK3R antagonist.

Muscle Strength, Size, and Composition Following 12 Months of Gender-affirming Treatment in Transgender Individuals

CONTEXT

As many sports are divided in male/female categories, governing bodies have formed regulations on the eligibility for transgender individuals to compete in these categories. Yet, the magnitude of change in muscle mass and strength with gender-affirming treatment remains insufficiently explored.

OBJECTIVE

This study explored the effects of gender-affirming treatment on muscle function, size, and composition during 12 months of therapy.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, PARTICIPANTS

In this single-center observational cohort study, untrained transgender women (TW, n = 11) and transgender men (TM, n = 12), approved to start gender-affirming medical interventions, underwent assessments at baseline, 4 weeks after gonadal suppression of endogenous hormones but before hormone replacement, and 4 and 12 months after treatment initiation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Knee extensor and flexor strength were assessed at all examination time points, and muscle size and radiological density (using magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography) at baseline and 12 months after treatment initiation.

RESULTS

Thigh muscle volume increased (15%) in TM, which was paralleled by increased quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) (15%) and radiological density (6%). In TW, the corresponding parameters decreased by -5% (muscle volume) and -4% (CSA), while density remained unaltered. The TM increased strength over the assessment period, while the TW generally maintained their strength levels.

CONCLUSIONS

One year of gender-affirming treatment resulted in robust increases in muscle mass and strength in TM, but modest changes in TW. These findings add new knowledge on the magnitude of changes in muscle function, size, and composition with cross-hormone therapy, which could be relevant when evaluating the transgender eligibility rules for athletic competitions.

Androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer: a focus on pharmacokinetics

INTRODUCTION

Medical therapy has undergone many changes as our understanding of prostate cancer cell biology has improved. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the mainstay of therapy for metastatic disease. Metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is an important concern since we are unable to stop progression with currently available agents. Areas covered: Pharmacologic ADT is the most commonly used treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. Multiple agents are available for both first-line and second-line use: antiandrogens, estrogens, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists/antagonists, and CYP17 inhibitors. With adoption of these drugs, it is important to consider their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Many undergo metabolism through cytochrome P450. Levels may be altered with co-administration of drugs acting as enzyme inhibitors or inducers. Understanding mechanism of action, metabolism, and excretion of these drugs allows clinicians to provide the best therapeutic care while minimizing adverse events. Expert opinion: Many men with metastatic prostate cancer will progress to castration resistance. An understanding of resistance mechanisms at the cellular level has revealed new drug targets with hopes of halting or reversing progression of metastatic disease. Second-line agents, traditionally reserved for CRPC, are being studied in metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer, and may offer practice-changing evidence supporting their use.

Degarelix versus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists for the treatment of prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the mainstay for advanced, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, and options include surgical castration, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist, and more recently, gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist therapy. Our understanding of the mechanisms and adverse effects of ADT has increased substantially, including the class-specific adverse effects of ADT. Areas covered: This review will summarize the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of the GnRH antagonist degarelix and its role in the management of advanced prostate cancer, the clinical evidence supporting its regulatory approval, as well as potential benefits and disadvantages over traditional LHRH agonist therapy. Expert opinion: Degarelix represents a newer class of ADT that results in a rapid and reliable decline in serum testosterone, a quality that makes it particularly advantageous in men presenting with symptomatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Due to differences in mechanism of action, there is observational data suggesting a potential cardiovascular and even oncologic benefit over traditional LHRH agonist therapy. Further research is ongoing to more clearly define this potential benefit.

Discovery of LHRH and development of LHRH analogs for prostate cancer treatment

The discovery, isolation, elucidation of structure, synthesis, and initial testing of the neuropeptide hypothalamic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), which regulates reproduction, is briefly described. The design, synthesis, and experimental and clinical testing of agonistic analogs of LHRH is extensively reviewed focusing on the development of new methods for the treatment of prostate cancer. Subsequent development of antagonistic analogs of LHRH is then faithfully recounted with special emphasis on therapy of prostate cancer and BPH. The concepts of targeted therapy to peptide receptors on tumors are re-examined and the development of the cytotoxic analogs of LHRH and their status is reviewed. The endeavor to develop better therapies for prostate cancer, based on LHRH analogs, guided much of our work.

Androgen deprivation therapy with Leuprolide acetate for treatment of advanced prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Hormone sensitive advanced prostate cancer (PCa) is an incurable disease that is treated with a variety of hormonal therapies targeting the androgen/androgen receptor signaling axis. For decades androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) by surgical or chemical castration is the gold standard for the treatment of advanced PCa. Areas covered: This review discusses the pharmacological features of Leuprolide, a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists/analog and the most commonly used drug in ADT. Expert opinion: Although Leuprolide has been on the market for more than 30 years it is still the leading option for ADT and serves as a basis for most multimodal therapy concepts. The fact that with the onset of castration-resistance in late stage metastatic disease, a prolongation of ADT in combination with a second line hormonal manipulation is recommended supports the importance of the compound for daily clinical practice.