Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of elbasvir and grazoprevir in the treatment of hepatitis C

Serologic, Virologic and Pathologic Features of Cats with Naturally Occurring Feline Infectious Peritonitis Enrolled in Antiviral Clinical Trials

Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is a multisystemic, generally lethal immuno-inflammatory disease of domestic cats caused by an infection with a genetic variant of feline coronavirus, referred to as the FIP virus (FIPV). We leveraged data from four different antiviral clinical trials performed at the University of California, Davis. Collectively, a total of 60 client-owned domestic cats, each with a confirmed diagnosis of naturally occurring FIP, were treated with a variety of antiviral compounds. The tested therapies included the antiviral compounds GS-441524, remdesivir, molnupiravir and allogeneic feline mesenchymal stem/stroma cell transfusions. Four client-owned cats with FIP did not meet the inclusion criteria for the trials and were not treated with antiviral therapies; these cats were included in the data set as untreated FIP control cats. ELISA and Western blot assays were performed using feline serum/plasma or ascites effusions obtained from a subset of the FIP cats. Normalized tissue/effusion viral loads were determined in 34 cats by a quantitative RT-PCR of nucleic acids isolated from either effusions or abdominal lymph node tissue. Twenty-one cats were PCR "serotyped" (genotyped) and had the S1/S2 region of the coronaviral spike gene amplified, cloned and sequenced from effusions or abdominal lymph node tissue. In total, 3 untreated control cats and 14 (23.3%) of the 60 antiviral-treated cats died or were euthanized during (13) or after the completion of (1) antiviral treatment. Of these 17 cats, 13 had complete necropsies performed (10 cats treated with antivirals and 3 untreated control cats). We found that anticoronaviral serologic responses were persistent and robust throughout the treatment period, primarily the IgG isotype, and focused on the viral structural Nucleocapsid and Membrane proteins. Coronavirus serologic patterns were similar for the effusions and serum/plasma of cats with FIP and in cats entering remission or that died. Viral RNA was readily detectable in the majority of the cats in either abdominal lymph node tissue or ascites effusions, and all of the viral isolates were determined to be serotype I FIPV. Viral nucleic acids in cats treated with antiviral compounds became undetectable in ascites or abdominal lymph node tissue by 11 days post-treatment using a sensitive quantitative RT-PCR assay. The most common pathologic lesions identified in the necropsied cats were hepatitis, abdominal effusion (ascites), serositis, pancreatitis, lymphadenitis, icterus and perivasculitis. In cats treated with antiviral compounds, gross and histological lesions characteristic of FIP persisted for several weeks, while the viral antigen became progressively less detectable.

Mechanisms and Clinical Significance of Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions Mediated by FDA and EMA-approved Hepatitis C Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents

The treatment of patients infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been revolutionised by the development of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) that target specific HCV proteins involved in viral replication. The first DAAs were associated with clinical problems such as adverse drug reactions and pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Current FDA/EMA-approved treatments are combinations of DAAs that simultaneously target the HCV N5A-protein, the HCV N5B-polymerase and the HCV NS3/4A-protease. Adverse events and DDIs are less likely with these DAA combinations but several DDIs of potential clinical significance remain. Much of the available information on the interaction of DAAs with CYP drug-metabolising enzymes and influx and efflux transporters is contained in regulatory summaries and is focused on DDIs of likely clinical importance. Important DDIs perpetrated by current DAAs include increases in the pharmacokinetic exposure to statins and dabigatran. Some mechanistic information can be deduced. Although the free concentrations of DAAs in serum are very low, a number of these DDIs are likely mediated by the inhibition of systemic influx transporters, especially OATP1B1/1B3. Other DDIs may arise by DAA-mediated inhibition of intestinal efflux transporters, which increases the systemic concentrations of some coadministered drugs. Conversely, DAAs are victims of DDIs mediated by cyclosporin, ketoconazole, omeprazole and HIV antiretroviral drug combinations, especially when boosted by ritonavir and, to a lesser extent, cobicistat. In addition, concurrent administration of inducers, such as rifampicin, carbamazepine and efavirenz, decreases exposure to some DAAs. Drug-drug interactions that increase the accumulation of HCV N3/4A-protease inhibitors like grazoprevir may exacerbate hepatic injury in HCV patients.

Investigation of monotherapy and combined anticoronaviral therapies against feline coronavirus serotype II in vitro

OBJECTIVES

Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP), caused by genetic mutants of feline enteric coronavirus known as FIPV, is a highly fatal disease of cats with no currently available vaccine or US Food and Drug Administration-approved cure. Dissemination of FIPV in affected cats results in a range of clinical signs, including cavitary effusions, anorexia, fever and lesions of pyogranulomatous vasculitis and perivasculitis, with or without central nervous system or ocular involvement. The objectives of this study were to screen an array of antiviral compounds for anti-FIPV (serotype II) activity, determine cytotoxicity safety profiles of identified compounds with anti-FIPV activity and strategically combine identified monotherapies to assess compound synergy against FIPV in vitro. Based upon clinically successful combination treatment strategies for human patients with HIV and hepatitis C virus infections, we hypothesized that a combined anticoronaviral therapy approach featuring concurrent multiple mechanisms of drug action would result in an additive or synergistic antiviral effect.

METHODS

This study screened 90 putative antiviral compounds for efficacy and cytotoxicity using a multimodal in vitro strategy, including plaque bioassays, real-time RT-PCR viral inhibition and cytotoxicity assays.

RESULTS

Through this process, we identified 26 compounds with effective antiviral activity against FIPV, representing a variety of drug classes and mechanisms of antiviral action. The most effective compounds include GC376, GS-441524, EIDD2081 and EIDD2931. We documented antiviral efficacy for combinations of antiviral agents, with a few examined drug combinations demonstrating evidence of limited synergistic antiviral activity.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Although evidence of compound synergy was identified for several combinations of antiviral agents, monotherapies were ultimately determined to be the most effective in the inhibition of viral transcription.

Development and validation of a highly sensitive second derivative synchronous fluorescence spectroscopic method for the simultaneous determination of elbasvir and grazoprevir in pharmaceutical preparation and human plasma

Elbasvir and grazoprevir combination has been newly approved for the treatment of patients infected with hepatitis C virus.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Drug-Drug Interactions of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir

Elbasvir and grazoprevir, in a fixed-dose combination of 50 and 100 mg, respectively, have received approval to be administered orally once daily, with or without ribavirin, for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. The absorption characteristics of elbasvir and grazoprevir have been adequately summarized, although differences were observed for grazoprevir (e.g., increased exposure at steady state in patients), but not elbasvir, between healthy and HCV-infected subjects. Inconsistencies with respect to absorption were also reported on the effects of food or acid reducers (famotidine or pantoprazole) in the literature. Many distribution characteristics of elbasvir and grazoprevir have been obtained from in vitro models, using incubation conditions that were in many cases inconsistent with normal physiological conditions in humans. Elbasvir and grazoprevir appear to undergo modest hepatic metabolism and are excreted primarily unchanged (~ 80% parent drug found) in feces. Both elbasvir and grazoprevir are substrates of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 enzyme, but mechanistic experiments were lacking to demonstrate the role of other enzymes and the precise relative % contribution of CYP3A4. The pharmacokinetics of elbasvir and grazoprevir have been characterized in various special populations (elderly, male vs. female, Caucasian vs. Asian, renal impairment, and hepatic impairment). Other than moderate and severe hepatic impairment where administrations are contraindicated, no dose adjustments are required for both drugs in these special patient populations. The available drug-drug interaction data provided some consistency between in vitro and in vivo observations and, in some instances, can provide predictions of likely clinically relevant scenarios.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions and Safety of Coadministration of Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir are pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral agents for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the drug-drug interaction and safety of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir coadministration in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomized, multiple-dose, Phase 1 study in 72 subjects, glecaprevir (100-1200 mg once daily) and pibrentasvir (40-200 mg once daily) were administered alone for 7 days and then in combination for another 7 days. Intensive blood sampling was performed on Days 1, 7, 8, and 14, and pharmacokinetic interactions were assessed using a repeated measures analysis of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir maximum plasma concentration (C _max) and area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Coadministration of glecaprevir 400 mg increased pibrentasvir 120 and 40 mg steady-state C _max and AUC values to 2.9-6.3-fold, and coadministration of glecaprevir 700 mg increased pibrentasvir 160 mg steady-state C _max and AUC₂₄ values to up to sevenfold of the values when pibrentasvir was administered alone. Glecaprevir C _max and AUC values during coadministration were less than 1.5-fold of the values when glecaprevir was administered alone. The combination of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir at doses up to 400 mg was well tolerated by the healthy subjects in this study. High glecaprevir exposures at 700 and 1200 mg were associated with grade 2/3 elevations in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and/or bilirubin.

CONCLUSIONS

Coadministration of pibrentasvir 120 mg with glecaprevir doses up to 400 mg resulted in increases in pibrentasvir exposures without significant changes in glecaprevir exposures in the absence of any clinically significant laboratory abnormalities.

An update on the toxicological considerations for protease inhibitors used for hepatitis C infection

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus protease inhibitors (PIs) are important components of many direct acting antiviral regimens. Many clinical trials and real-world studies have described the safety data for individual PIs. We aimed to review the safety of both the first and second generation PIs in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Areas covered: The unique pharmacokinetic properties of PIs partly explain their toxicities. Second generation PIs, when used without interferon and ribavirin, are well-tolerated. Use of PIs in renal impaired patients or those on dialysis appears to be safe. Decompensated cirrhosis is a contraindication for PIs use due to increased drug exposure and risk of liver decompensation. Drug-drug interactions are common and should be always monitored; some drugs should not be co-administered with PIs. In patients with co-infected hepatitis B virus, reactivation after DAA (whether PI-containing or not) is a concern. Expert opinion: Second generation PIs are key players in the current DAA era. Post-marketing surveillance is essential to monitor unknown adverse events and drug-drug interactions. Non-PI based DAA should be used in decompensated liver disease. The use of these drugs should also be explored in the paediatric population.

Application of different spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of elbasvir and grazoprevir in pharmaceutical preparation

The first three UV spectrophotometric methods have been developed of simultaneous determination of two new FDA approved drugs namely; elbasvir and grazoprevir in their combined pharmaceutical dosage form. These methods include simultaneous equation, partial least squares with and without variable selection procedure (genetic algorithm). For simultaneous equation method, the absorbance values at 369 (λ_max of elbasvir) and 253nm (λ_max of grazoprevir) have been selected for the formation of two simultaneous equations required for the mathematical processing and quantitative analysis of the studied drugs. Alternatively, the partial least squares with and without variable selection procedure (genetic algorithm) have been applied in the spectra analysis because the synchronous inclusion of many unreal wavelengths rather than by using a single or dual wavelength which greatly increases the precision and predictive ability of the methods. Successfully assay of the drugs in their pharmaceutical formulation has been done by the proposed methods. Statistically comparative analysis for the obtained results with the manufacturing methods has been performed. It is noteworthy to mention that there was no significant difference between the proposed methods and the manufacturing one with respect to the validation parameters.

The frequency of acute kidney injury in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection treated with sofosbuvir-based regimens

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend withholding sofosbuvir (SOF) in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 30 mL/min.

AIM

To assess the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with no renal contraindications for SOF-based treatment.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective observational study included all consecutive patients that were treated with SOF-based or telaprevir/boceprevir (TVR/BOC)-based regimens at two tertiary university centers in North America. AKI was defined as an increase of ≥0.3 mg/dL (≥26.5 μmol/L) in serum creatinine level. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for the occurrence of AKI.

RESULTS

In total, 426 patients were included and treated with a SOF-based regimen (n=233, 54.7%) or TVR/BOC-based regimen (n=193, 45.3%). Among patients treated with a TVR/BOC-based regimen 34 (18%) of 193 patients experienced AKI compared to 26 (11%) of 233 patients treated with SOF-based regimens (P=.056). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of ascites (OR: 4.44, 95%CI: 1.46-13.54, P=.009) and the use of NSAIDs (OR: 4.47, 95%CI: 1.32-15.19, P=.016) were associated with a risk of AKI during SOF-based antiviral therapy. Creatinine levels returned to normal at end of follow-up in 23 (88%) of the 26 patients who experienced AKI with a SOF-based regimen and had a creatinine level available during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the risk for AKI was lower than for patients treated with TVR/BOC-based regimens, AKI was seen during 11% of SOF-based regimens and was mostly reversible. Patients with ascites and patients using NSAIDs have an increased risk for AKI during SOF-based antiviral therapy.

Anti-hepatitis C virus drugs and kidney

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) mainly targets the liver but can also induce extrahepatic manifestations. The kidney may be impacted via an immune mediated mechanism or a cytopathic effect. HCV patients are clearly at a greater risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) than uninfected patients are, and the presence of CKD increases mortality. Interferon-based therapies and ribavirin are difficult to manage and are poorly effective in end-stage renal disease and hemodialysis. These patients should be given priority treatment with new direct anti-viral agents (DAAs) while avoiding peginterferon and ribavirin. The first results were convincing. To aid in the correct use of these drugs in patients with renal insufficiency, their pharmacokinetic properties and potential renal toxicity must be known. The renal toxicity of these new drugs was not a safety signal in clinical trials, and the drugs are generally efficient in these frail populations. These drugs are usually well tolerated, but recent cohort studies have demonstrated that these new regimens may be associated with renal side effects, especially when using sofosbuvir combinations. HCV, renal diseases and comorbidities are intimately linked. The close monitoring of renal function is required, particularly for at-risk patients (transplanted, HIV-coinfected, CKD, hypertensive or diabetic patients). New DAA regimens, which will soon be approved, will probably change the landscape.

Elbasvir and grazoprevir for chronic hepatitis C genotypes 1 and 4

INTRODUCTION

During the last few years, treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) revolutionized with the appearance of direct antiviral agents especially for patients with HCV genotypes 1 and 4 infections. Elbasvir (NS5A inhibitor) and grazoprevir (NS3/4A protease inhibitor) are newly developed drugs that are presented in fixed dose combination tablets. Areas covered: This review covers the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties, clinical uses, safety and efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir in managing a wide variety of easy and difficult to treat populations (such as presence of cirrhosis, treatment experienced, co-infection with HIV and patients with inherited blood disorders). Expert commentary: Elbasvir/grazoprevir combination showed great efficacy with high rates of sustained virological response rates in genotypes 1 and 4 HCV infection. In addition, it retained a good safety profile and is generally well tolerated.