Deferiprone for transfusional iron overload and its roles in developing countries

How do we translate gaps and unmet needs of blood management for thalassemia into a collaborative implementation framework?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The mainstay of management for thalassemia is regular blood transfusions. However, gaps and unmet needs of blood services for thalassemia are still not clearly identified and addressed in Thailand, a country prevalent with thalassemia. What can be a collaborative implementation framework that helps advance practices and policies relating to blood management for thalassemia?

METHODS

The first Blood & Beyond Roundtable Discussion was held in July 2022 to gather the current situation, gaps, and unmet needs of blood services for thalassemia from multidisciplinary experts and thalassemic patients. The Implementation Guide as suggested by the Centre for Effective Services was applied as a tool to consolidate information from the discussions and construct the collaborative implementation framework.

RESULTS

The National Blood Center and hospitals in Thailand followed the missions specified in the National Blood Policy and the standard guidelines to ensure the best practice of blood management for thalassemia. However, there were six gaps and unmet needs identified from the discussions. After all discussion points were mapped onto the framework, an implementation plan comprised of five specific activities became clear and actionable.

CONCLUSION

Without the complete information from both experts and patients, the implementation plan would not have been successfully constructed. The method that we employed to translate all information into the framework can be adapted by other countries to develop their own specific framework efficiently.

Changing patterns in the epidemiology of β-thalassemia

β‐thalassemia major is an inherited hemoglobinopathy that requires lifelong red blood cell transfusions and iron chelation therapy to prevent complications due to iron overload. Traditionally, β‐thalassemia has been more common in certain regions of the world such as the Mediterranean, Middle East, and Southeast Asia. However, the prevalence of β‐thalassemia is increasing in other regions, including Northern Europe and North America, primarily due to migration. This review summarizes the available data on the changing incidence and prevalence of β‐thalassemia as well as factors influencing disease frequency. The data suggest that the epidemiology of β‐thalassemia is changing: Migration has increased the prevalence of the disease in regions traditionally believed to have a low prevalence, while, at the same time, prevention and screening programs in endemic regions have reduced the number of affected individuals. Various approaches to prevention and screening have been used. Region‐specific prevention and treatment programs, customized to align with local healthcare resources and cultural values, have been effective in identifying patients and carriers and providing information and care. Significant challenges remain in universally implementing these programs.

Impact of splenectomy on outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia

BACKGROUND

The role of splenectomy prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is controversial. Only few studies compared the outcomes of splenectomized and nonsplenectomized children with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) undergoing allogeneic HSCTs.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was undertaken on a transplantation cohort of TDT patients; August 1987-December 2014 to compare transplant outcomes between splenectomized and nonsplenectomized groups.

RESULTS

Ninety-six transplants in 86 TDT patients were analyzed. Sixteen patients were splenectomized before HSCTs. The splenectomized patients were significantly older (8.0 ± 1.9 vs 4.7 ± 0.6 years; P = 0.001), had larger livers and spleens (P = 0.001), and had a significantly shorter neutrophil engraftment time (absolute neutrophil count > 500/mm³ ; 15.0 ± 2.3 vs 19.2 ± 1.3 days; P = 0.004). Graft rejection occurred in 13.8% of the nonsplenectomized group, but not among the splenectomized patients. Though the splenectomized group's mortality rate was higher (25.0% vs 8.8%), this was not statistically significant (P = 0.491). The main causes of death in both groups were severe infections. The five-year overall survival (OS) rate was better for the nonsplenectomized group (91.78% vs 75.00%; P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Although splenectomies prior to HSCT for the TDT patients in our cohort were associated with faster neutrophil engraftments and lower rejection rates, they did not produce significantly better OS or affect the mortality. As the splenectomies did not provide any distinct advantages, this procedure should not be routinely performed as a pre-HSCT regimen for TDT patients with splenomegaly. Better pre-HSCT preparation for TDT patients, including early and adequate blood transfusions to avoid splenomegaly, is recommended.