Concurrent Inflammation Augments Antimalarial Drugs-Induced Liver Injury in Rats

A pharmacovigilance study on drug-induced liver injury associated with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) based on the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the association between drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) by comprehensively evaluating spontaneous reports submitted to the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2004Q1 to 2022Q3.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

All DILI cases with ADCs as primary suspected drugs were extracted from the FAERS database from 2004Q1 to 2022Q3 using OpenVigil 2.1. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) for reporting the association between different drugs and DILI risk were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 504 DILI cases were attributed to ADCs during the study period. Patients with ADCs-related DILI (n = 504) had a mean age of 56.2 ± 18.4 years, with 167 cases not reporting patients' age. Females and males comprised 42.5% and 44.0% of the cases, respectively, while there was no information on gender in 13.5% of the cases. The DILI signals were detected in trastuzumab emtansine, enfortumab vedotin, brentuximab vedotin, polatuzumab vedotin, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, inotuzumab ozogamicin, and trastuzumab deruxtecan.

CONCLUSIONS

The FAERS data mining suggested an association between DILI and some ADCs. Further studies are warranted to unraveling the underlying mechanisms and taking preventive measures for ADCs-related DILI.

SARS-CoV-2-mediated liver injury: pathophysiology and mechanisms of disease

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2-induced severe inflammatory response can be associated with severe medical consequences leading to multi-organ failure, including the liver. The main mechanism behind this assault is the aggressive cytokine storm that induces cytotoxicity in various organs. Of interest, hepatic stellate cells (HSC) respond acutely to liver injury through several molecular mechanisms, hence furthering the perpetuation of the cytokine storm and its resultant tissue damage. In addition, hepatocytes undergo apoptosis or necrosis resulting in the release of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrogenic mediators that lead to chronic liver inflammation.

AIMS

The aim of this review is to summarize available data on SARS-CoV-2-induced liver inflammation in addition to evaluate the potential effect of anti-inflammatory drugs in attenuating SARS-CoV-2-induced liver inflammation.

METHODS

Thorough PubMed search was done to gather and summarize published data on SARS-CoV-2-induced liver inflammation. Additionally, various anti-inflammatory potential treatments were also documented.

RESULTS

Published data documented SARS-CoV-2 infection of liver tissues and is prominent in most liver cells. Also, histological analysis showed various features of tissues damage, e.g., hepatocellular necrosis, mitosis, cellular infiltration, and fatty degeneration in addition to microvesicular steatosis and inflammation. Finally, the efficacy of the different drugs used to treat SARS-CoV-2-induced liver injury, in particular the anti-inflammatory remedies, are likely to have some beneficial effect to treat liver injury in COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

SARS-CoV-2-induced liver inflammation is a serious condition, and drugs with potent anti-inflammatory effect can play a major role in preventing irreversible liver damage in COVID-19.

Characterisation of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Patients with COVID-19 Detected by a Proactive Pharmacovigilance Program from Laboratory Signals

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. An elevation of liver damage markers has been observed in numerous cases, which could be related to the empirical use of potentially hepatotoxic drugs. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and analytical characteristics and perform a causality analysis from laboratory signals available of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) detected by a proactive pharmacovigilance program in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 at La Paz University Hospital in Madrid (Spain) from 1 March 2020 to 31 December 2020. The updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) was employed to assess DILI causality. A lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) was performed on 10 patients. Ultimately, 160 patients were included. The incidence of DILI (alanine aminotransferase >5, upper limit of normal) was 4.9%; of these, 60% had previous COVID-19 hepatitis, the stay was 8.1 days longer and 98.1% were being treated with more than 5 drugs. The most frequent mechanism was hepatocellular (57.5%), with mild severity (87.5%) and subsequent recovery (88.1%). The most commonly associated drugs were hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, tocilizumab and ceftriaxone. The highest incidence rate of DILI per 10,000 defined daily doses (DDD) was with remdesivir (992.7/10,000 DDD). Some 80% of the LTTs performed were positive, with a RUCAM score of ≥4. The presence of DILI after COVID-19 was associated with longer hospital stays. An immune mechanism has been demonstrated in a small subset of DILI cases.

Drug-induced organ injury in coronavirus disease 2019 pharmacotherapy: Mechanisms and challenges in differential diagnosis and potential protective strategies

The world is currently facing an unprecedented pandemic caused by a newly recognized and highly pathogenic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19; induced by SARS‐CoV‐2 virus), which is a severe and ongoing threat to global public health. Since COVID‐19 was officially declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020, several drug regimens have rapidly undergone clinical trials for the management of COVID‐19. However, one of the major issues is drug‐induced organ injury, which is a prominent clinical challenge. Unfortunately, most drugs used against COVID‐19 are associated with adverse effects in different organs, such as the kidney, heart, and liver. These side effects are dangerous and, in some cases, they can be lethal. More importantly, organ injury is also a clinical manifestation of COVID‐19 infection. These adverse reactions are increasingly recognized as outcomes of COVID‐19 infection. Therefore, the differential diagnosis of drug‐induced adverse effects from COVID‐19‐induced organ injury is a clinical complication. This review highlights the importance of drug‐induced organ injury, its known mechanisms, and the potential therapeutic strategies in COVID‐19 pharmacotherapy. We review the potential strategies for the differential diagnosis of drug‐induced organ injury. This information can facilitate the development of therapeutic strategies, not only against COVID‐19 but also for future outbreaks of other emerging infectious diseases.

Adverse drug events are well‐known and common clinical problems in COVID‐19 patients.

The differential diagnosis of adverse drug effects and disease‐induced organ injury is a clinical challenge.

Obtaining a detailed history and biochemical analysis of blood‐based biomarkers from the patients as soon as they are admitted is critical for differential diagnosis of drug or disease‐induced organ injury.

Butterbur (Petasites hybridus) Extract Ameliorates Hepatic Damage Induced by Ovalbumin in Mice

The liver is the most vital organ that could be influenced by inducers of hypersensitivity such as ovalbumin. The current study was carried out to explore the effects of butterbur (Petasites hybridus) extract on the ovalbumin-induced liver hypersensitivity in Swiss albino male mice. Animals were divided into 4 groups, 1^st group served as a control group, 2^nd group treated with daily oral administration of 75 mg/kg of butterbur extract, 3^rd group received single oral dose 100 mg/kg of ovalbumin to induce hypersensitivity, and 4^th group treated with oral administration of butterbur extract one-day post to the hypersensitivity induction. Ovalbumin induces a significant increase in the activity of liver enzymes and MDA and decreased the activity of CAT after the ovalbumin treatment. Histopathological investigations revealed marked pathological alterations in liver tissues in the form of hyaline degeneration and fibrosis. Additionally, heavy immune response indicated by immunostaining of MDA and TNF-α could be observed. In contrast, posttreatment with butterbur extract after hypersensitivity induction resulted in a significant decrease of liver enzymes and oxidative stress and reduced the inflammation and fibrosis of liver tissues. These results suggest that butterbur extract is considered as anti-inflammatory and antioxidant therapeutic herb for hypersensitivity treatment of liver.

Implications of COVID-19 Pandemic on Evolution of Diabetes in Malaria-Endemic African Region

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to cause havoc to many countries of the globe, with no end in sight, due to nonavailability of a given vaccine or treatment regimen. The pandemic has so far had a relatively limited impact on the African continent, which contributes more than 93% of global malaria burden. However, the limited burden of COVID-19 pandemic on the African region could have long-term implications on the health and wellbeing of affected inhabitants due to its malaria-endemic status. Malaria causes recurrent insulin resistance with episodes of infection at relatively low parasitaemia. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) which is widely distributed in the human body is implicated in the pathogenesis of malaria, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and COVID-19. Use of ACE2 by the COVID-19 virus induces inflammation and oxidative stress, which can lead to insulin resistance. Although COVID-19 patients in malaria-endemic African region may not exhibit severe signs and symptoms of the disease, their risk of exhibiting heightened insulin resistance and possible future development of T2DM is high due to their prior exposure to malaria. African governments must double efforts at containing the continued spread of the virus without neglecting existing malarial control measures if the region is to avert the plausible long-term impact of the pandemic in terms of future development of T2DM.

Mechanisms and consequences of COVID-19 associated liver injury: What can we affirm?

Since the first reports of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases in December 2019 in China, numerous papers have been published describing a high frequency of liver injury associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, many of them proposing a link between these findings and patient outcomes. Increases in serum aminotransferase levels (ranging from 16% to 62%) and bilirubin levels (ranging from 5% to 21%) have been reported and seem to be more often observed in patients with severe forms of COVID-19. Although absolute changes in these parameters are frequently seen, other variables, such as the ratio above the upper limit of normal, the onset of liver injury as a complication in severe cases and histopathological findings, reinforce that liver changes are of dubious clinical relevance in the course of this disease. Other factors must also be considered in these analyses, such as the repercussions of hemodynamic changes, the presence of thrombotic events, and, mainly, the possible drug-induced liver injury with the current, yet off-label, treatment. This paper aimed to analyze the currently available data on liver injury in patients with COVID-19.

Case Report: Hepatotoxicity Associated with the Use of Hydroxychloroquine in a Patient with COVID-19

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been used for the treatment of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cases. However, evidence of efficacy remains limited, and adverse events can be associated with its use. Here, we report a case of a patient with severe COVID-19 who, after being administered HCQ, exhibited a 10-fold increase in serum levels of transaminases, followed by a rapid decrease after HCQ was withdrawn. Considering the significantly increased use of HCQ during the COVID-19 pandemic, this case alerts us to the potential for HCQ to be associated with hepatotoxicity and the need to monitor liver function during HCQ therapy.

What have we learned from animal models of idiosyncratic, drug-induced liver injury?

INTRODUCTION

Idiosyncratic, drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) continues to plague patients and restrict the use of drugs that are pharmacologically effective. Mechanisms of IDILI are incompletely understood, and a better understanding would reduce speculation and could help to identify safer drug candidates preclinically. Animal models have the potential to enhance knowledge of mechanisms of IDILI.

AREAS COVERED

Numerous hypotheses have emerged to explain IDILI pathogenesis, many of which center on the roles of the innate and/or adaptive immune systems. Animal models based on these hypotheses are reviewed in the context of their contributions to understanding of IDILI and their limitations.

EXPERT OPINION

Animal models of IDILI based on an activated adaptive immune system have to date failed to reproduce major liver injury that is of most concern clinically. The only models that have so far resulted in pronounced liver injury are based on the multiple determinant hypothesis or the inflammatory stress hypothesis. The liver pathogenesis in IDILI animal models involves various leukocytes and immune mediators such as cytokines. Insights from animal models are changing the way we view IDILI pathogenesis and are leading to better approaches to preclinical prediction of IDILI potential of new drug candidates.

Boldine Supplementation Regulates Mitochondrial Function and Oxidative Stress in a Rat Model of Hepatotoxicity

Background: The xenobiotics-induced liver injury is a clinical complication. Hence, finding new hepatoprotective strategies has clinical value. Oxidative stress and its subsequent complications are major mechanisms involved in xenobiotics-induced hepatotoxicity. Boldine is one of the most potent antioxidant molecules widely investigated for its protective properties in different experimental models. In the current study, the hepatoprotective properties of boldine and its potential mechanisms of hepatoprotection have been investigated. Methods: Rats received thioacetamide (TAA; 200 mg/kg, i.p) as a model of acute liver injury. Boldine (5, 10, 1nd 20 mg/kg; 24 hours intervals; oral) was administered as the hepatoprotective agent. Results: Liver injury was evident in TAA-treated animals (48 hours after TAA exposure) as a severe increase in serum level of liver injury biomarkers and histopathological alterations. Moreover, markers of oxidative stress were increased in liver tissue of TAA-treated rats. Assessment of mitochondrial indices of functionality revealed a significant decrease in mitochondrial dehydrogenases activity, the collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial swelling and depletion of ATP content. It was found that boldine supplementation mitigated liver tissue markers of oxidative stress and improved mitochondrial indices of functionality in TAA-treated animals. Conclusion: The hepatoprotective properties of boldine might primarily rely on antioxidant and mitochondria protecting effects of this alkaloid.

Exacerbated liver injury of antithyroid drugs in endotoxin-treated mice

Drug-induced liver injury is a major concern in clinical studies as well as in post-marketing surveillance. Previous evidence suggested that drug exposure during periods of inflammation could increase an individual's susceptibility to drug hepatoxicity. The antithyroid drugs, methimazole (MMI) and propylthiouracil (PTU) can cause adverse reactions in patients, with liver as a usual target. We tested the hypothesis that MMI and PTU could be rendered hepatotoxic in animals undergoing a modest inflammation. Mice were treated with a nonhepatotoxic dose of LPS (100 µg/kg, i.p) or its vehicle. Nonhepatotoxic doses of MMI (10, 25 and 50 mg/kg, oral) and PTU (10, 25 and 50 mg/kg, oral) were administered two hours after LPS treatment. It was found that liver injury was evident only in animals received both drug and LPS, as estimated by increases in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and TNF-α. An increase in liver myeloperoxidase (MPO) enzyme activity and tissue lipid peroxidation (LPO) in addition of liver glutathione (GSH) depletion were also detected in LPS and antithyroid drugs cotreated animals. Furthermore, histopathological changes including, endotheliitis, fatty changes, severe inflammatory cells infiltration (hepatitis) and sinusoidal congestion were detected in liver tissue. Methyl palmitate (2 g/kg, i.v, 44 hours before LPS), as a macrophage suppressor, significantly alleviated antithyroids hepatotoxicity in LPS-treated animals. The results indicate a synergistic liver injury from antithyroid drugs and bacterial lipopolysaccharide coexposure.