Comparisons of Daily Energy Intake vs. Expenditure Using the GeneActiv Accelerometer in Elite Australian Football Athletes

Methods to Assess Energy Expenditure of Resistance Exercise: A Systematic Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Nutrition guidance for athletes must consider a range of variables to effectively support individuals in meeting energy and nutrient needs. Resistance exercise is a widely adopted training method in athlete preparation and rehabilitation and therefore is one such variable that will influence nutrition guidance. Given its prominence, the capacity to meaningfully quantify resistance exercise energy expenditure will assist practitioners and researchers in providing nutrition guidance. However, the significant contribution of anaerobic metabolism makes quantifying energy expenditure of resistance exercise challenging.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this scoping review was to investigate the methods used to assess resistance exercise energy expenditure.

METHODS

A literature search of Medline, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and Web of Science identified studies that included an assessment of resistance exercise energy expenditure. Quality appraisal of included studies was performed using the Rosendal Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 19,867 studies were identified, with 166 included after screening. Methods to assess energy expenditure included indirect calorimetry (n = 136), blood lactate analysis (n = 25), wearable monitors (n = 31) and metabolic equivalents (n = 4). Post-exercise energy expenditure was measured in 76 studies. The reported energy expenditure values varied widely between studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Indirect calorimetry is widely used to estimate energy expenditure. However, given its limitations in quantifying glycolytic contribution, indirect calorimetry during and immediately following exercise combined with measures of blood lactate are likely required to better quantify total energy expenditure. Due to the cumbersome equipment and technical expertise required, though, along with the physical restrictions the equipment places on participants performing particular resistance exercises, indirect calorimetry is likely impractical for use outside of the laboratory setting, where metabolic equivalents may be a more appropriate method.

Research application of session-RPE in monitoring the training load of elite endurance athletes

Purpose

TRIMP and sRPE are both representative indicators of training load(TL), and the correlation between two has been widely demonstrated across various sports. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of sRPE-TRIMP correlation across different intensities/duration of training in cross-country skiing, and whether sRPE can serve as an validity supplement to TRIMP data in cases of lost heart rate data.

Method

10 athletes were used as the experimental objects. The intensity, duration and RPE of 273 different types of training sessions were collected, and statistical methods were used for data analysis.

Results

1. There was a significant correlation between sRPE and TRIMP (r = 0.68, p < 0.05), but the correlation differs among the LIT, MIT and HIT groups (r = 0.70, 0.46, r = 0.31, p < 0.05) 2. sRPE-TRIMP correlation among three different time duration in the LIT group (0-60 min, 60-120 min and 120-180 min), are all highly significant (r = 0.70, 0.67, 0.69, p < 0.05) and the LRsRPE-TRIMP of 3 duration have no significant differences (chow test, p > 0.05). 3. The difference in actual training duration between samples was the main reason for the difference in the application effect of sRPE, because the actual training duration ratio of LIT was 89.7 ± 16.4%; MIT, 98.5 ± 6.2%; and HIT, 94.4 ± 13.5%.

Conclusion

1. The linear relationship between sRPE and TRIMP (LRsRPE-TRIMP) is more significant in LIT compared to that in MIT and HIT. 2. Variations in the duration of LIT sessions do not affect the consistency of the relationship between sRPE and TRIMP. 3. Discrepancies between actual and planned training durations directly impact the significance of the LRsRPE-TRIMP.

Five-day evaluation of the acceptability and comfort of wearable technology at four anatomical locations during military training

INTRODUCTION

Wearable sensor technologies enable Defence to optimise human performance, remotely identify physiological abnormalities and enhance medical support. Maximising the acceptability of devices will ensure they are worn alongside other equipment. This study assessed the acceptability and comfort of four devices at different anatomical locations during military training.

METHOD

A cross-sectional pilot study during a live firing infantry exercise or adventurous training assessed four anatomical locations concurrently over 5 days: finger, wrist, upper arm and chest. Participants rated comfort, acceptability and preference using a standardised questionnaire after 12 hours and 5 days of wear.

RESULTS

Twenty-one regular British Army personnel soldiers participated, aged 24.4 (4.3) years. The upper arm location received the highest rating by participants for comfort, followed in order by wrist, finger and chest (p=0.002, Χ2=40.0). The finger was most commonly identified as uncomfortable during specific activities (76%), followed by chest (48%), wrist (23%) and upper arm devices (14%). There was no significant difference in participant confidence in the devices to collect data or allow movement, but there was a trend towards greater confidence in upper arm and wrist locations to stay in position than the others (p=0.059, Χ2=28.0). After 5 days of wear, 43% of participants said they preferred the upper arm for comfort, followed by wrist (36%), finger (24%) and chest (10%). 73% and 71% would wear the wrist and upper arm devices on deployed operations, compared with 29% and 24% for chest and finger devices, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The upper arm location offered greater acceptability and comfort than finger, wrist or chest locations. It is essential to consider such findings from occupationally relevant settings when selecting wearable technology. A larger service evaluation in diverse settings is recommended to guide the choice of the most acceptable wearable devices across different equipment, roles and environments.

Sleep patterns before and after competition: A real-world examination of elite athletes

Good sleep before and after competitions is crucial to cognitive, physiological performance and recovery. Yet, elite athletes face a unique set of challenges when acquiring good sleep before and after competitions, and indeed commonly report sleep problems when it matters most. This study examined the sleep of elite athletes before and after competition compared to before and after free days. A total of 1808 unique nights of actigraphy (n = 1495) and sleep diary (n = 1335) data from elite Australian Football League and National Rugby League male athletes (N = 85, M-age = 24.4 ± 3.6) were collected and analysed using multi-level mixed models. On nights before competitions, athletes advanced sleep timings (p < .001, d = 0.63) and increased total sleep time (p < .001, d = 0.65) compared to nights before free days. On nights after competitions, athletes delayed sleep timings (p < .001, d = 1.64), reduced total sleep time (p < .001, d = 1.28), and had significantly worse quality sleep (p < .001, d = 0.71) compared to nights after free days. Sleep was especially worse following night competitions. While elite athletes and organisations may be implementing effective sleep strategies to optimise sleep the night before competitions, strategies to improve sleep after competitions may be lacking. We discuss potential factors contributing to this asymmetry and propose areas for research moving forward.