1
|
Farmani S, Sharifi K, Ghazizadeh A. Cortical and subcortical substrates of minutes and days-long object value memory in humans. Cereb Cortex 2024; 34:bhae006. [PMID: 38244576 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Obtaining valuable objects motivates many of our daily decisions. However, the neural underpinnings of object processing based on human value memory are not yet fully understood. Here, we used whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine activations due to value memory as participants passively viewed objects before, minutes after, and 1-70 days following value training. Significant value memory for objects was evident in the behavioral performance, which nevertheless faded over the days following training. Minutes after training, the occipital, ventral temporal, interparietal, and frontal areas showed strong value discrimination. Days after training, activation in the frontal, temporal, and occipital regions decreased, whereas the parietal areas showed sustained activation. In addition, days-long value responses emerged in certain subcortical regions, including the caudate, ventral striatum, and thalamus. Resting-state analysis revealed that these subcortical areas were functionally connected. Furthermore, the activation in the striatal cluster was positively correlated with participants' performance in days-long value memory. These findings shed light on the neural basis of value memory in humans with implications for object habit formation and cross-species comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepideh Farmani
- School of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran 19395-5746, Iran
| | - Kiomars Sharifi
- School of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran 19395-5746, Iran
- Bio-Intelligence Unit, Electrical Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 11365-11155, Iran
| | - Ali Ghazizadeh
- School of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran 19395-5746, Iran
- Bio-Intelligence Unit, Electrical Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 11365-11155, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vakhrushev R, Cheng FPH, Schacht A, Pooresmaeili A. Differential effects of intra-modal and cross-modal reward value on perception: ERP evidence. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287900. [PMID: 37390067 PMCID: PMC10313067 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023] Open
Abstract
In natural environments objects comprise multiple features from the same or different sensory modalities but it is not known how perception of an object is affected by the value associations of its constituent parts. The present study compares intra- and cross-modal value-driven effects on behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of perception. Human participants first learned the reward associations of visual and auditory cues. Subsequently, they performed a visual discrimination task in the presence of previously rewarded, task-irrelevant visual or auditory cues (intra- and cross-modal cues, respectively). During the conditioning phase, when reward associations were learned and reward cues were the target of the task, high value stimuli of both modalities enhanced the electrophysiological correlates of sensory processing in posterior electrodes. During the post-conditioning phase, when reward delivery was halted and previously rewarded stimuli were task-irrelevant, cross-modal value significantly enhanced the behavioral measures of visual sensitivity, whereas intra-modal value produced only an insignificant decrement. Analysis of the simultaneously recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) of posterior electrodes revealed similar findings. We found an early (90-120 ms) suppression of ERPs evoked by high-value, intra-modal stimuli. Cross-modal stimuli led to a later value-driven modulation, with an enhancement of response positivity for high- compared to low-value stimuli starting at the N1 window (180-250 ms) and extending to the P3 (300-600 ms) responses. These results indicate that sensory processing of a compound stimulus comprising a visual target and task-irrelevant visual or auditory cues is modulated by the reward value of both sensory modalities, but such modulations rely on distinct underlying mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Vakhrushev
- Perception and Cognition Lab, European Neuroscience Institute Goettingen- A Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Goettingen and the Max-Planck-Society, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Felicia Pei-Hsin Cheng
- Perception and Cognition Lab, European Neuroscience Institute Goettingen- A Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Goettingen and the Max-Planck-Society, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Anne Schacht
- Affective Neuroscience and Psychophysiology Laboratory, Georg-Elias-Müller-Institute of Psychology, Georg-August University, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Arezoo Pooresmaeili
- Perception and Cognition Lab, European Neuroscience Institute Goettingen- A Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Goettingen and the Max-Planck-Society, Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Antono JE, Vakhrushev R, Pooresmaeili A. Value-driven modulation of visual perception by visual and auditory reward cues: The role of performance-contingent delivery of reward. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:1062168. [PMID: 36618995 PMCID: PMC9816136 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1062168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Perception is modulated by reward value, an effect elicited not only by stimuli that are predictive of performance-contingent delivery of reward (PC) but also by stimuli that were previously rewarded (PR). PC and PR cues may engage different mechanisms relying on goal-driven versus stimulus-driven prioritization of high value stimuli, respectively. However, these two modes of reward modulation have not been systematically compared against each other. This study employed a behavioral paradigm where participants' visual orientation discrimination was tested in the presence of task-irrelevant visual or auditory reward cues. In the first phase (PC), correct performance led to a high or low monetary reward dependent on the identity of visual or auditory cues. In the subsequent phase (PR), visual or auditory cues were not followed by reward delivery anymore. We hypothesized that PC cues have a stronger modulatory effect on visual discrimination and pupil responses compared to PR cues. We found an overall larger task-evoked pupil dilation in PC compared to PR phase. Whereas PC and PR cues both increased the accuracy of visual discrimination, value-driven acceleration of reaction times (RTs) and pupillary responses only occurred for PC cues. The modulation of pupil size by high reward PC cues was strongly correlated with the modulation of a combined measure of speed and accuracy. These results indicate that although value-driven modulation of perception can occur even when reward delivery is halted, stronger goal-driven control elicited by PC reward cues additionally results in a more efficient balance between accuracy and speed of perceptual choices.
Collapse
|
4
|
Using Neural Networks to Uncover the Relationship between Highly Variable Behavior and EEG during a Working Memory Task with Distractors. MATHEMATICS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/math10111848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Value-driven attention capture (VDAC) occurs when previously rewarded stimuli capture attention and impair goal-directed behavior. In a working memory (WM) task with VDAC-related distractors, we observe behavioral variability both within and across individuals. Individuals differ in their ability to maintain relevant information and ignore distractions. These cognitive components shift over time with changes in motivation and attention, making it difficult to identify underlying neural mechanisms of individual differences. In this study, we develop the first participant-specific feedforward neural network models of reaction time from neural data during a VDAC WM task. We used short epochs of electroencephalography (EEG) data from 16 participants to develop the feedforward neural network (NN) models of RT aimed at understanding both WM and VDAC. Using general linear models (GLM), we identified 20 EEG features to predict RT across participants (r=0.53±0.08). The linear model was compared to the NN model, which improved the predicted trial-by-trial RT for all participants (r=0.87±0.04). We found that right frontal gamma-band activity and fronto-posterior functional connectivity in the alpha, beta, and gamma bands explain individual differences. Our study shows that NN models can link neural activity to highly variable behavior and can identify potential new targets for neuromodulation interventions.
Collapse
|
5
|
Pütz C, van den Berg B, Lorist MM. Dynamic modulation of neural feedback processing and attention during spatial probabilistic learning. iScience 2022; 25:104302. [PMID: 35602968 PMCID: PMC9118728 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Learned stimulus-reward associations can modulate behavior and the underlying neural processing of information. We investigated the cascade of these neurocognitive mechanisms involved in the learning of spatial stimulus-reward associations. Using electroencephalogram recordings while participants performed a probabilistic spatial reward learning task, we observed that the feedback-related negativity component was more negative in response to loss feedback compared to gain feedback but showed no modulation by learning. The late positive component became larger in response to losses as the learning set progressed but smaller in response to gains. In addition, feedback-locked alpha frequency oscillations measured over occipital sites were predictive of N2pc amplitudes—a marker of spatial attention orienting—observed on the next trial. This relationship was found to become stronger with learning set progression. Taken together, we elucidated neurocognitive dynamics underlying feedback processing during spatial reward learning, and the subsequent effects of these learned spatial stimulus-reward associations on spatial attention. We can learn which spatial location relates to the highest probability of reward Neural processing of feedback valence was not influenced by learning LPC amplitude was dynamically modulated by learning, reflecting context updating Feedback-locked alpha power was predictive of ensuing orientation of attention
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celina Pütz
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, Groningen 9712TS, the Netherlands.,Department of Neurobiology, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 11103, Groningen 9700CC, the Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, Postbus 30001, Groningen 9700RB, the Netherlands
| | - Berry van den Berg
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, Groningen 9712TS, the Netherlands
| | - Monicque M Lorist
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, Groningen 9712TS, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yu G, Liu C, Liu X, Wang A, Zhang M. Reward reduces the fission illusion in the sound-induced flash illusion. Perception 2022; 51:388-402. [DOI: 10.1177/03010066221093479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Pairing a single visual stimulus with multiple auditory stimuli will lead to the illusory perception of multiple visual stimuli, which is known as sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI). The present study adopted the classic SIFI paradigm to investigate whether value-associated tasks could affect the SIFI. By adjusting the sequence of reward and nonreward conditions, we also examined the effect of reward history on SIFI. The results showed that the fission illusion was reduced when associated with momentary reward, demonstrating significantly higher accuracy and discriminability than the nonreward condition. However, the fusion illusion was not affected by the momentary reward, and the explanation was that the fusion illusion was not as stable as the fission illusion and disappeared across different trials and conditions. Moreover, the robustness of reward history in the present study was not as strong as previous studies have suggested, indicating that the effect of sound on the perceptual representation of visual stimuli is strong and robust to reward history. These findings demonstrated that the reward could reduce the SIFI and broaden the existing dichotomy of SIFI. New evidence for the operation of value-driven attention mechanisms is also provided, suggesting that the underlying value-driven attention operates across multiple sensory systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaoxin Yu
- Department of Psychology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Chunmei Liu
- Jiangsu Provincial Key Constructive Laboratory for Big Data of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, China
| | - Xiaole Liu
- Department of Psychology, Research Center for Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Aijun Wang
- Department of Psychology, Research Center for Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China; Laboratory, Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering In Health Systems, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ming Zhang
- Department of Psychology, Research Center for Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China; Laboratory, Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering In Health Systems, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang A, Lu F, Gao W, Zhang T, Zhang M. Reward Weakened Inhibition of Return (IOR) in the Near Depth Plane. Perception 2022; 51:114-130. [PMID: 35098807 DOI: 10.1177/03010066211073855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
In attentional orienting, researchers have proposed that reward history is a component of attentional control, as the reward value might enhance the spatial attention process to achieve more efficient goal-directed behavior and to improve target-detection performance. Although the effect of reward-induced motivation on attentional orienting has been studied in two-dimensional (2-D) space, the specific mechanisms underlying the influence of reward on inhibition of return (IOR) of attentional orienting in three-dimensional space (3-D) remain unclear. In the present study, by incorporating the Posner spatial-cueing paradigm into a virtual 3-D environment, we aimed to investigate the influence of reward on IOR in 3-D space. The results showed the following: (1) IOR size in the rewarded conditions was smaller than IOR size in the unrewarded condition in the near depth plane, resulting in an IOR difference with or without reward. (2) Reward weakened IOR in the near depth plane because the response to the uncued location was delayed, not because the response to the cued location was accelerated. The present study indicated that the different depth planes of the target location in 3-D space could influence the interaction between reward and IOR, and reward weakened IOR in the near depth plane.
Collapse
|
8
|
Shashidhara S, Erez Y. Reward motivation increases univariate activity but has limited effect on coding of task-relevant information across the frontoparietal cortex. Neuropsychologia 2021; 160:107981. [PMID: 34332993 PMCID: PMC8434417 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 07/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Selection and integration of information based on current goals is fundamental for goal-directed behavior. Reward motivation has been shown to improve behavioral performance, yet the neural mechanisms that link motivation and control processes, and in particular its effect on context-dependent information processing, remain unclear. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 24 human volunteers (13 females) to test whether reward motivation enhances the coding of task-relevant information across the frontoparietal cortex, as would be predicted based on previous experimental evidence and theoretical accounts. In a cued target detection task, participants detected whether an object from a cued visual category was present in a subsequent display. The combination of the cue and the object visual category determined the behavioral status of the objects. To manipulate reward motivation, half of all trials offered the possibility of a monetary reward. We observed an increase with reward in overall univariate activity across the frontoparietal control network when the cue and subsequent object were presented. Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) showed that behavioral status information for the objects was conveyed across the network. However, in contrast to our prediction, reward did not increase the discrimination between behavioral status conditions in the stimulus epoch of a trial when object information was processed depending on a current context. In the high-level general-object visual region, the lateral occipital complex, the representation of behavioral status was driven by visual differences and was not modulated by reward. Our study provides useful evidence for the limited effects of reward motivation on task-related neural representations and highlights the necessity to unravel the diverse forms and extent of these effects. Reward motivation leads to increased activity in the frontoparietal control network. Task-relevant information is coded across the control network. Reward does not increase coding of behavioral relevance of task information. Visual category coding in the general-object region does not increase with reward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sneha Shashidhara
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
| | - Yaara Erez
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Grahek I, Schettino A, Koster EHW, Andersen SK. Dynamic Interplay between Reward and Voluntary Attention Determines Stimulus Processing in Visual Cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 2021; 33:2357-2371. [PMID: 34272951 DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Reward enhances stimulus processing in the visual cortex, but the mechanisms through which this effect occurs remain unclear. Reward prospect can both increase the deployment of voluntary attention and increase the salience of previously neutral stimuli. In this study, we orthogonally manipulated reward and voluntary attention while human participants performed a global motion detection task. We recorded steady-state visual evoked potentials to simultaneously measure the processing of attended and unattended stimuli linked to different reward probabilities, as they compete for attentional resources. The processing of the high rewarded feature was enhanced independently of voluntary attention, but this gain diminished once rewards were no longer available. Neither the voluntary attention nor the salience account alone can fully explain these results. Instead, we propose how these two accounts can be integrated to allow for the flexible balance between reward-driven increase in salience and voluntary attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonio Schettino
- Erasmus University Rotterdam.,Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education (IGDORE)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Birch J, Heyes C. The cultural evolution of cultural evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2021; 376:20200051. [PMID: 33993760 PMCID: PMC8126465 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
What makes fast, cumulative cultural evolution work? Where did it come from? Why is it the sole preserve of humans? We set out a self-assembly hypothesis: cultural evolution evolved culturally. We present an evolutionary account that shows this hypothesis to be coherent, plausible, and worthy of further investigation. It has the following steps: (0) in common with other animals, early hominins had significant capacity for social learning; (1) knowledge and skills learned by offspring from their parents began to spread because bearers had more offspring, a process we call CS1 (or Cultural Selection 1); (2) CS1 shaped attentional learning biases; (3) these attentional biases were augmented by explicit learning biases (judgements about what should be copied from whom). Explicit learning biases enabled (4) the high-fidelity, exclusive copying required for fast cultural accumulation of knowledge and skills by a process we call CS2 (or Cultural Selection 2) and (5) the emergence of cognitive processes such as imitation, mindreading and metacognition-'cognitive gadgets' specialized for cultural learning. This self-assembly hypothesis is consistent with archaeological evidence that the stone tools used by early hominins were not dependent on fast, cumulative cultural evolution, and suggests new priorities for research on 'animal culture'. This article is part of the theme issue 'Foundations of cultural evolution'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Birch
- Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK
| | - Cecilia Heyes
- All Souls College and Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Molinero S, Giménez-Fernández T, López FJ, Carretié L, Luque D. Stimulus-response learning and expected reward value enhance stimulus cognitive processing: An ERP study. Psychophysiology 2021; 58:e13795. [PMID: 33604885 DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Reward affects our attention to stimuli, prioritizing those that lead to high-value outcomes. Recently, it has been suggested that such reward-related cognitive prioritization might be associated with the process of learning new stimulus-response (S-R) associations, because both are acquired through extended reward training, and once established, they are hard to overcome. We used event-related potentials (ERP) to analyze the contribution of S-R links to the formation of reward-related cognitive prioritization during reinforcement learning. Reward-related cognitive prioritization was measured by comparing the ERP signals for stimuli predicting high-value and low-value outcomes. In addition, we compared a strong S-R link (same stimulus, same response), with a weak S-R link condition (same stimulus, two different responses). The participants' performance was more accurate and faster when the procedure allowed for establishing strong S-R links and for high-value outcomes. Furthermore, those stimuli associated with strong S-R links showed a larger P3 amplitude at parietal sites. Value effects (larger ERP activity for those stimuli predicting a high-value outcome) were obtained at parietal and occipital sites in the P3 time window. However, value effects did not benefit from strong S-R links in either the P1 or the P3 components. These results suggest that strong S-R learning is not necessary to develop reward-related modulations of ERP activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Molinero
- Departamento de Psicología Básica, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Departamento de Psicología Básica, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Tamara Giménez-Fernández
- Departamento de Psicología Básica, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco J López
- Departamento de Psicología Básica, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - Luis Carretié
- Departamento de Psicología Básica, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Luque
- Departamento de Psicología Básica, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Departamento de Psicología Básica, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Driel J, Olivers CNL, Fahrenfort JJ. High-pass filtering artifacts in multivariate classification of neural time series data. J Neurosci Methods 2021; 352:109080. [PMID: 33508412 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditionally, EEG/MEG data are high-pass filtered and baseline-corrected to remove slow drifts. Minor deleterious effects of high-pass filtering in traditional time-series analysis have been well-documented, including temporal displacements. However, its effects on time-resolved multivariate pattern classification analyses (MVPA) are largely unknown. NEW METHOD To prevent potential displacement effects, we extend an alternative method of removing slow drift noise - robust detrending - with a procedure in which we mask out all cortical events from each trial. We refer to this method as trial-masked robust detrending. RESULTS In both real and simulated EEG data of a working memory experiment, we show that both high-pass filtering and standard robust detrending create artifacts that result in the displacement of multivariate patterns into activity silent periods, particularly apparent in temporal generalization analyses, and especially in combination with baseline correction. We show that trial-masked robust detrending is free from such displacements. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S) Temporal displacement may emerge even with modest filter cut-off settings such as 0.05 Hz, and even in regular robust detrending. However, trial-masked robust detrending results in artifact-free decoding without displacements. Baseline correction may unwittingly obfuscate spurious decoding effects and displace them to the rest of the trial. CONCLUSIONS Decoding analyses benefit from trial-masked robust detrending, without the unwanted side effects introduced by filtering or regular robust detrending. However, for sufficiently clean data sets and sufficiently strong signals, no filtering or detrending at all may work adequately. Implications for other types of data are discussed, followed by a number of recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joram van Driel
- Institute for Brain and Behaviour Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology - Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian N L Olivers
- Institute for Brain and Behaviour Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology - Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes J Fahrenfort
- Institute for Brain and Behaviour Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology - Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1001 NK, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition (ABC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1001 NK, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|