The Pathophysiology of Dystonic Tremors and Comparison With Essential Tremor

Exploring White Matter Microstructure with Symptom Severity and Outcomes Following Deep Brain Stimulation in Tremor Syndromes

Background

Essential tremor (ET) and dystonic tremor (DT) are movement disorders that cause debilitating symptoms, significantly impacting daily activities and quality of life. A poor understanding of their pathophysiology, as well as the mediators of clinical outcomes following deep brain stimulation (DBS), highlights the need for biomarkers to accurately characterise and optimally treat patients.

Objectives

We assessed the white matter microstructure of pathways implicated in the pathophysiology and therapeutic intervention in a retrospective cohort of patients with DT (n = 17) and ET (n = 19). We aimed to identity associations between white matter microstructure, upper limb tremor severity, and tremor improvement following DBS.

Methods

A fixel-based analysis pipeline was implemented to investigate white matter microstructural metrics in the whole brain, cerebello-thalamic pathways and tracts connected to stimulation volumes following DBS. Associations with preoperative and postoperative severity were analysed within each disorder group and across combined disorder groups.

Results

DBS led to significant improvements in both groups. No group differences in stimulation positions were identified. When white matter microstructural data was aligned according to the maximally affected upper limb, increased fiber density, and combined fiber density & cross-section of fixels in the left cerebellum were associated with greater tremor severity across DT and ET patients. White matter microstructure did not show associations with postoperative changes in cerebello-thalamic pathways, or tracts connected to stimulation volumes.

Discussion

Diffusion changes of the cerebellum are associated with the severity of upper limb tremor and appear to overlap in essential or dystonic tremor disorders.

Tremor in Spinocerebellar Ataxia: A Scoping Review

Background

Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) denotes an expanding list of autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias. Although tremor is an important aspect of the clinical spectrum of the SCAs, its prevalence, phenomenology, and pathophysiology are unknown.

Objectives

This review aims to describe the various types of tremors seen in the different SCAs, with a discussion on the pathophysiology of the tremors, and the possible treatment modalities.

Methods

The authors conducted a literature search on PubMed using search terms including tremor and the various SCAs. Relevant articles were included in the review after excluding duplicate publications.

Results

While action (postural and intention) tremors are most frequently associated with SCA, rest and other rare tremors have also been documented. The prevalence and types of tremors vary among the different SCAs. SCA12, common in certain ethnic populations, presents a unique situation, where the tremor is typically the principal manifestation. Clinical manifestations of SCAs may be confused with essential tremor or Parkinson's disease. The pathophysiology of tremors in SCAs predominantly involves the cerebellum and its networks, especially the cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit. Additionally, connections with the basal ganglia, and striatal dopaminergic dysfunction may have a role. Medical management of tremor is usually guided by the phenomenology and associated clinical features. Deep brain stimulation surgery may be helpful in treatment-resistant tremors.

Conclusions

Tremor is an elemental component of SCAs, with diverse phenomenology, and emphasizes the role of the cerebellum in tremor. Further studies will be useful to delineate the clinical, pathophysiological, and therapeutic aspects of tremor in SCAs.

Dystonic Tremor: Time to Change

BACKGROUND

The term dystonic tremor is being increasingly used in neurological publications despite uncertainties about its meaning. We provide here a historical reconstruction from its original introduction in 1984 to help distinguish dystonia from essential tremor.

METHODS

A comprehensive Pubmed search of MeSH terms "dystonia", "tremor", and "essential tremor" provided the information base for reconstructing historical usage of the term "dystonic tremor".

RESULTS

Over the years, this expression was enriched of additional meanings and sided by companion descriptors, such as tremor associated with dystonia. Dystonic tremor has been considered characteristically coarse, jerky, irregular, directional and asymmetrical. These characteristics, however, are not included in the most recent definitions of tremor. The relationship between tremor and dystonia is not easy to untangle, as the two phenomena are often recognized in association. Tremor and dystonia experts have developed different visions of dystonic tremor that have been variably implemented. There are currently two independent consensus definitions, which are not coincident and imply different pathophysiological interpretations.

CONCLUSIONS

This historical reappraisal highlights that usage of the expression dystonic tremor has evolved over time to lose its original meaning. Notwithstanding inconsistencies of current definitions, its usage has steadily increased and it is time now to agree on an updated terminology.

Comparing Essential Tremor with and without Soft Dystonic Signs and Tremor Combined with Dystonia: The TITAN Study

BACKGROUND

Tremor disorders remain as clinical diagnoses and the rate of misdiagnosis between the commonest non-parkinsonian tremors is relatively high.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical features of Essential Tremor without other features (pure ET), ET plus soft dystonic signs (ET + DS), and tremor combined with dystonia (TwD).

METHODS

We compared the clinical features of patients with pure ET, ET + DS, and TwD enrolled in The ITAlian tremor Network (TITAN). Linear regression models were performed to determine factors associated with health status and quality of life.

RESULTS

Three-hundred-eighty-three patients were included. Sex distribution was significantly different between the groups with males being more represented in pure ET and females in TwD. The initial site of tremor was different between the groups with about 40% of TwD having head tremor and ET + DS unilateral upper limb tremor at onset. This pattern mirrored the distribution of overt dystonia and soft dystonic signs at examination. Sensory trick, task-specificity, and position-dependence were more common, but not exclusive, to TwD. Pure ET patients showed the lowest degree of alcohol responsiveness and ET + DS the highest. Midline tremor was more commonly encountered and more severe in TwD than in the other groups. Regression analyses demonstrated that tremor severity, sex, age, and to a lesser degree the variable "group", independently predicted health status and quality of life, suggesting the existence of other determinants beyond tremor.

CONCLUSIONS

Pure ET and TwD manifest with a phenotypic overlap, which calls for the identification of diagnostic biomarkers. ET + DS shared features with both syndromes, suggesting intra-group heterogeneity.

Interdisciplinary insights into tremor in dystonia: Navigating clinical controversies, definitional challenges, and pathophysiological complexities

This review delves into the historical evolution and ongoing controversy surrounding the relationship between tremor and dystonia. The Dystonia Consensus Panel and the International Parkinson's and Movement Disorders Society's Tremor Taskforce have attempted to define these entities, but the complexity arises when patients have a combination of both dystonia and tremor. The term "dystonic tremor" has sparked diverse interpretations, with debates over its clinical features and the need for more objectively defined characteristics. Logistic regression analyses in a large cohort of dystonia patients identified determinants such as body region affected by dystonia, dystonia severity, age, and recruitment site, with unexpected associations emphasizing the subjectivity in detecting and classifying tremor. The study further discovered diverse prevalence of "dystonic tremor" based on different definitions, revealing substantial variability among investigators. The recently convened Dystonia-Tremor panel aimed to address these challenges by proposing a more uniform nomenclature, emphasizing precise and descriptive terms. Despite the complexity, instrumented measures, such as electromyography, temporal discrimination threshold, blink reflex, and trajectory shape analysis, seem to be useful in distinguishing between tremor and dystonia. The pathophysiology debate centers around the involvement of the cerebello-thalamo-cortical and basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuits. Evidence supports the role of both circuits in driving the pathophysiology of dystonic tremor, challenging the notion of a clear dichotomy. The review concludes by emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding, highlighting the intricate interplay between tremor and dystonia, and the potential of instrumental measures in advancing diagnostic accuracy.

Essential Tremor and Essential Tremor Plus Are Essentially Similar Electrophysiologically

BACKGROUND

The merits of classifying the heterogeneous group of essential tremors into essential tremor (ET) and essential tremor plus (ETP) are debated.

OBJECTIVES

We studied the electrophysiological and spiral characteristics of tremor in ET and ETP.

METHODS

We reviewed standardized videos from a tremor database and clinically classified patients into ET, ETP, or dystonic tremor (DT). The following variables were derived from combined tri-axial accelerometry-surface electromyography (EMG)-peak frequency, total power, peak power, full width half maximum, tremor stability index and EMG-coherence. We analyzed hand-drawn spirals to derive mean deviation, tremor variability, inter-, and intra-loop widths. We compared these variables among the groups.

RESULTS

We recruited 72 participants (81.9% male) with mean age 47.7 ± 16.1 years and Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale total score 31.1 ± 14.1. Patients with ET were younger (P = 0.014) and had less severe tremor (P = 0.020) compared to ETP and DT. In ETP group, 48.6% had subtle dystonia. Peak frequency was greater in ETP (7.3 ± 0.3 Hz) compared to DT (6.1 ± 0.4 Hz; P = 0.024). Peak power was greater in ETP and DT for postural tremor. Rest tremor was recordable on accelerometry in 26.7% of ET. Other variables were similar among the groups.

CONCLUSION

Electrophysiological evaluation revealed postural tremor of frequency 6 to 7 Hz in ET, ETP, and DT with subtle differences more severe tremor in ETP and DT, and higher frequency in ETP compared to DT. Our findings suggest a similar tremor oscillator in these conditions, supporting the view that these entities are part of a spectrum of tremor disorders, rather than distinct etiological entities.

Optimizing Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential Tremor: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Target Consideration

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) is a well-established target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of essential tremor (ET). Increasing data indicate that the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) may be superior, but high-level evidence is limited. We aimed at further comparing the intraindividual efficacy and side effect profile of PSA vs VIM DBS in ET.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, 4-contact DBS leads were bilaterally implanted with single-trajectory covering the VIM and PSA. Patients were randomized postsurgery to 2 groups, receiving VIM stimulation (4-7 months) and then PSA stimulation (8-11 months) or vice versa. The primary end point was the difference in improvement from baseline to the end of the VIM vs PSA DBS period in the total score of the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS).

RESULTS

Ten patients with medically refractory ET were enrolled, and 9 completed the study. The difference between reduction of FTM-TRS total score in the PSA vs VIM DBS period was -7.4 (95% CI: -28.5 to 13.7, P = .328). Clinical benefit was achieved at significantly lower stimulation intensity under PSA DBS. Furthermore, PSA DBS provided greater improvement in head tremor subscore of FTM-TRS (PSA vs VIM: -2.2, P = .020) and disease-specific quality of life (PSA vs VIM: -13.8, P = .046) and induced fewer speech (Dysphonia Severity Index score: P = .043; diadochokinetic rate: P = .007; VDI score: P = .005) and gait disturbances compared with VIM DBS. Seven patients remained with PSA DBS after the crossover phase.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms that PSA-DBS is comparable with VIM-DBS in suppressing tremors, superior in improving disease-specific quality of life, and possibly more effective in reducing head tremor.

The role of laboratory investigations in the classification of tremors

INTRODUCTION

Tremor is the most common movement disorder. Although clinical examination plays a significant role in evaluating patients with tremor, laboratory tests are useful to classify tremors according to the recent two-axis approach proposed by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society.

METHODS

In the present review, we will discuss the usefulness and applicability of the various diagnostic methods in classifying and diagnosing tremors. We will evaluate a number of techniques, including laboratory and genetic tests, neurophysiology, and neuroimaging. The role of newly introduced innovative tremor assessment methods will also be discussed.

RESULTS

Neurophysiology plays a crucial role in tremor definition and classification, and it can be useful for the identification of specific tremor syndromes. Laboratory and genetic tests and neuroimaging may be of paramount importance in identifying specific etiologies. Highly promising innovative technologies are being developed for both clinical and research purposes.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, laboratory investigations may support clinicians in the diagnostic process of tremor. Also, combining data from different techniques can help improve understanding of the pathophysiological bases underlying tremors and guide therapeutic management.

Multimodal Care of a Patient With Functional Movement Disorders Following a Motor Vehicle Accident: A Case Report

Objective

The purpose of this case report was to describe the multimodal care of a patient with the sudden onset of truncal tremors.

Clinical Features

A 30-year-old female patient presented for chiropractic care with truncal tremors following a motor vehicle accident. Initial outcome measures included the Neck Disability Index (50%) and Oswestry Disability Index (62). The patient's truncal tremors became worse during spinal cord compression testing that included passive cervical flexion and slouched posture. The Romberg test was positive for swaying. Assessments of active range of motions of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine were moderately reduced in all ranges. Case history, physical examinations, diagnostic imaging, and neurology consultations led to a diagnosis of functional truncal tremors. The patient was being concurrently managed by other health care providers. Magnetic resonance imaging studies were ordered by a neurologist and primary medical physician, which showed no structural abnormalities in brain neuroanatomy or spine.

Intervention and Outcome

The multimodal chiropractic care included whole-body vibration therapy (WBVT), spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), and acupuncture therapy. The treatment plan included 8 weekly appointments in which the patient received WBVT and SMT. During treatment weeks 2 to 6, the patient received acupuncture therapy, which occurred immediately following their treatment appointment for WBVT and SMT. The patient practiced stress reduction techniques, as advised by the neurologist, eliminated caffeine, and performed daily yoga exercises for 30 minutes. The Romberg test was negative after the third treatment. The patient was discharged after chiropractic visit 12, 95 days post-accident, as she reached maximal medical improvement. Truncal tremors were still present, but the patient described them as "barely noticeable."

Conclusion

The patient reported improvement under a course of chiropractic care using a multimodal approach, including behavioral, pharmacological, and manual therapies. This case study suggests that WBVT, SMT, and acupuncture therapy may assist some patients with functional movement disorders.

The use of digital outcome measures in clinical trials in rare neurological diseases: a systematic literature review

Developing drugs for rare diseases is challenging, and the precision and objectivity of outcome measures is critical to this process. In recent years, a number of technologies have increasingly been used for remote monitoring of patient health. We report a systematic literature review that aims to summarize the current state of progress with regard to the use of digital outcome measures for real-life motor function assessment of patients with rare neurological diseases. Our search of published literature identified 3826 records, of which 139 were included across 27 different diseases. This review shows that use of digital outcome measures for motor function outside a clinical setting is feasible and employed in a broad range of diseases, although we found few outcome measures that have been robustly validated and adopted as endpoints in clinical trials. Future research should focus on validation of devices, variables, and algorithms to allow for regulatory qualification and widespread adoption.

Cerebellar Brain Inhibition Is Associated With the Severity of Cervical Dystonia

PURPOSE

Cerebellar connectivity is thought to be abnormal in cervical dystonia (CD) and other dystonia subtypes, based on evidence from imaging studies and animal work. The authors investigated whether transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI), a measure of cerebellar efficiency at inhibiting motor outflow, is abnormal in patients with CD and/or is associated with clinical features of CD. Because of methodological heterogeneity in CBI reporting, the authors deployed additional controls to reduce potential sources of variability in this study.

METHODS

Cerebellar brain inhibition was applied in 20 CD patients and 14 healthy control subjects. Cerebellar brain inhibition consisted of a cerebellar conditioning stimulus delivered at four different interstimulus intervals (ISIs) before a test stimulus delivered to hand muscle representation in the motor cortex. The average ratio of conditioned to unconditioned motor evoked potential was computed for each ISI. Cervical dystonia clinical severity was measured using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale. Control experiments involved neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation, neck postural control in patients, and careful screening for noncerebellar pathway inhibition via cervicomedullary evoked potentials.

RESULTS

There was no difference between CBI measured in healthy control subjects and CD patients at any of the four ISIs; however, CBI efficiency was significantly correlated with worsening CD clinical severity at the 5 ms ISI.

CONCLUSIONS

Cerebellar brain inhibition is a variable measure in both healthy control subjects and CD patients; much of this variability may be attributed to experimental methodology. Yet, CD severity is significantly associated with reduced CBI at the 5 ms ISI, suggestive of cerebello-thalamo-cortical tract dysfunction in this disorder.

Dystonia and tremor: Do they have a shared biology?

Dystonia and tremor are the two most commonly encountered hyperkinetic movement disorders encountered in clinical practice. While there has been substantial progress in the research on these two disorders, there also exists a lot of gray areas. Entities such as dystonic tremor and tremor associated with dystonia occupy a major portion of the "gray zone". In addition, there is a marked clinical heterogeneity and overlap of several clinical and epidemiological features among dystonia and tremor. These facts raise the possibility that dystonia and tremor could be having shared biology. In this chapter, we revisit critical aspects of this possibility that may have important clinical and research implications in the future. We comprehensively review the points in favor and against the theory that dystonia and tremor have shared biology from clinical, epidemiological, genetic and neuroimaging studies.

Pallidal Recordings in Chronically Implanted Dystonic Patients: Mitigation of Tremor-Related Artifacts

Low-frequency oscillatory patterns of pallidal local field potentials (LFPs) have been proposed as a physiomarker for dystonia and hold the promise for personalized adaptive deep brain stimulation. Head tremor, a low-frequency involuntary rhythmic movement typical of cervical dystonia, may cause movement artifacts in LFP signals, compromising the reliability of low-frequency oscillations as biomarkers for adaptive neurostimulation. We investigated chronic pallidal LFPs with the PerceptTM PC (Medtronic PLC) device in eight subjects with dystonia (five with head tremors). We applied a multiple regression approach to pallidal LFPs in patients with head tremors using kinematic information measured with an inertial measurement unit (IMU) and an electromyographic signal (EMG). With IMU regression, we found tremor contamination in all subjects, whereas EMG regression identified it in only three out of five. IMU regression was also superior to EMG regression in removing tremor-related artifacts and resulted in a significant power reduction, especially in the theta-alpha band. Pallido-muscular coherence was affected by a head tremor and disappeared after IMU regression. Our results show that the Percept PC can record low-frequency oscillations but also reveal spectral contamination due to movement artifacts. IMU regression can identify such artifact contamination and be a suitable tool for its removal.

Tremor is associated with familial clustering of dystonia

INTRODUCTION

Dystonia is a movement disorder of variable etiology and clinical presentation and is accompanied by tremor in about 50% of cases. Monogenic causes in dystonia are rare, but also in the group of non-monogenic dystonias 10-30% of patients report a family history of dystonia. This points to a number of patients currently classified as idiopathic that have at least in part an underlying genetic contribution. The present study aims to identify clinical and demographic features associated with heritability of yet idiopathic dystonia.

METHODS

Seven hundred thirty-three datasets were obtained from the DysTract dystonia registry, patients with acquired dystonia or monogenic causes were excluded. Affected individuals were assigned to a familial and sporadic group, and clinical features were compared across these groups. Additionally, the history of movement disorders was also counted in family members.

RESULTS

18.2% of patients reported a family history of dystonia. Groups differed in age at onset, disease duration and presence of tremor on a descriptive level. Logistic regression analysis revealed that tremor was the only predictor for a positive family history of dystonia (OR 2.49, CI = 1.54-4.11, p < 0.001). Tremor turned out to be the most common movement disorder in available relatives of patients, and presence of tremor in relatives was associated with tremor in index patients (X²(1) = 16.2, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Tremor is associated with an increased risk of familial clustering of dystonia and with a family history of tremor itself. This indicates a hereditable dystonia-tremor syndrome with a clinical spectrum ranging from tremor-predominant diseases to dystonia.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy-associated tremor: Phenotype and pathogenesis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Tremor in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is underrecognized, and the pathophysiology remains incompletely understood. This study evaluated tremor in CIDP and tested the hypothesis, established in other demyelinating neuropathies, that tremor occurs due to mistimed peripheral inputs affecting central motor processing. Additionally, the tremor stability index (TSI) was calculated with the hypothesis that CIDP-related tremor is more variable than other tremor disorders.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with typical CIDP were prospectively recruited from neuromuscular clinics. Alternative causes of neuropathy and tremor were excluded. Cross-sectional clinical assessment and extensive tremor study recordings were undertaken. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to compare nerve conduction studies and tremor characteristics, and t-test was used for comparisons between groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients with CIDP were included. Upper limb postural and action tremor was present in 66% and was mild according to the Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale. Tremor did not significantly impact disability. Surface electromyography (EMG) found high-frequency spectral peaks in deltoid (13.73 ± 0.66 Hz), biceps brachii (11.82 ± 0.91 Hz), and extensor carpi radialis (11.87 ± 0.91 Hz) muscles, with lower peaks in abductor pollicis brevis EMG (6.07 ± 0.45 Hz) and index finger accelerometry (6.53 ± 0.42 Hz). Tremor was unchanged by weight loading but correlated with ulnar nerve F-wave latency and median nerve sensory amplitude. TSI (2.3 ± 0.1) was significantly higher than essential tremor.

CONCLUSIONS

Postural tremor is a common feature in CIDP. Tremor was unaffected by weight loading, typical of centrally generated tremors, although there was a correlation with peripheral nerve abnormalities. The high beat-to-beat variability on TSI and gradation of peak frequencies further suggest a complex pathophysiology. These findings may assist clinicians with the diagnosis of neuropathic tremor.

Inter-muscular coherence in speed skaters with skater's cramp

INTRODUCTION

Skater's cramp is a career-ending movement disorder in expert speed skaters noted to be a likely task-specific dystonia. In other movement disorders, including task-specific dystonia, studies have found evidence of central dysregulation expressed as higher inter-muscular coherence. We looked at whether inter-muscular coherence was higher in affected skaters as a possible indicator that it is centrally driven, and by extension further evidence it is a task-specific dystonia.

METHODS

In 14 affected and 14 control skaters we calculated inter-muscular coherence in the theta-band in a stationary task where tonic muscle activation was measured at 10%, 20% and 50% of maximum voluntary contraction. Additionally, we calculated wavelet coherence while skating at key moments in the stroke cycle.

RESULTS

Coherence did not differ in the stationary activation task. While skating, coherence was higher in the impacted leg of affected skaters compared to their non-impacted leg, p = .05, η² = 0.031, and amplitude of electromyography correlated with coherence in the impacted leg, p = .009, R²_adjusted = 0.41. A sub-group of severely affected skaters (n = 6) had higher coherence in the impacted leg compared to the left and right leg of controls, p = .02, Cohen's d = 1.59 and p = .01, Cohen's d = 1.63 respectively. Results were less clear across the entire affected cohort probably due to a diverse case-mix.

CONCLUSION

Our results of higher coherence in certain severe cases of skater's cramp is preliminary evidence of a central dysregulation, making the likelihood it is a task-specific dystonia higher.

Applications of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Understanding and Treating Dystonia

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-based studies have led to an advanced understanding of the pathophysiology of dystonia. This narrative review summarizes the TMS data contributed to the literature so far. Many studies have shown that increased motor cortex excitability, excessive sensorimotor plasticity, and abnormal sensorimotor integration are the core pathophysiological substrates for dystonia. However, an increasing body of evidence supports a more widespread network dysfunction involving many other brain regions. Repetitive TMS pulses (rTMS) in dystonia have therapeutic potential as they can induce local and network-wide effects through modulation of excitability and plasticity. The bulk of rTMS studies has targeted the premotor cortex with some promising results in focal hand dystonia. Some studies have targeted the cerebellum for cervical dystonia and the anterior cingulate cortex for blepharospasm. We believe that therapeutic potential could be leveraged better when rTMS is implemented in conjunction with standard-of-care pharmacological treatments. However, due to several limitations in the studies conducted to date, including small samples, heterogeneous populations, variability in the target sites, and inconsistencies in the study design and control arm, it is hard to draw a definite conclusion. Further studies are warranted to determine optimal targets and protocols yielding the most beneficial outcomes that will translate into meaningful clinical changes.

Multimodal imaging of essential tremor and dystonic tremor

Despite recent advances in tremor and dystonia classification, it remains difficult to discriminate essential tremor from dystonic tremor as they are similar in appearance and no biomarker exists. Further, tremor can appear in the same or a different body part than the dystonia. The aim of the current study was to better understand the differential pathophysiology of these tremors. We designed a cross-sectional case-control study and recruited 16 patients with essential tremor, 16 patients with dystonic tremor, and 17 age-matched healthy volunteers. We used multi-modal imaging combining resting-state functional MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy. We measured functional connectivity of resting-state fMRI to assess connectivity in the tremor network, fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity with diffusion tensor imaging, and GABA+, Glutamate/Glutamine, Choline, and N-Acetylaspartate with spectroscopy (adjusted to Creatine). Our results showed reduced functional connectivity of resting-state fMRI between the cerebellum and dentate nucleus bilaterally for the essential tremor group, but not the dystonic tremor group, compared to healthy volunteers. There was higher fractional anisotropy in the middle cerebellar peduncle bilaterally for the dystonic tremor group compared to the essential tremor group as well as for essential tremor group compared to healthy volunteers. There was also higher fractional anisotropy in the red nucleus and corticospinal tract for essential tremor and dystonic tremor groups compared to healthy volunteers. We also showed reduced mean diffusivity in the cerebellum of both essential tremor and dystonic tremor groups compared to healthy volunteers. Finally, we found elevated GABA+/Cr in the cerebellum of the essential tremor and dystonic tremor groups compared to healthy volunteers, but no difference emerged between essential tremor and dystonic tremor groups. We did not find group differences in the other metabolites. Our results indicate cerebellar alterations in essential tremor and dystonic tremor patients compared to healthy volunteers, and further changes in the cerebellum network for the dystonic tremor patients. suggesting that the cerebellum is affected differently in both tremors.

Connecting tremors - a circuits perspective

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tremor is one of the most prevalent movement disorders in clinical practice. Here, we review new insights in the pathophysiology of tremor. We focus on the three most common tremor disorders: essential tremor (ET), dystonic tremor syndrome (DTS), and Parkinson's disease (PD) tremor.

RECENT FINDINGS

Converging evidence suggests that ET, DTS, and PD tremor are all associated with (partly) overlapping cerebral networks involving the basal ganglia and cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit. Recent studies have assessed the role of these networks in tremor by measuring tremor-related activity and connectivity with electrophysiology and neuroimaging, and by perturbing network components using invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation. The cerebellum plays a more dominant and causal role in action tremors than in rest tremor, as exemplified by recent findings in ET, DTS, and re-emergent tremor in PD. Furthermore, the role of the cerebellum in DTS is related to clinical differences between patients, for example, whether or not the tremor occurs in a dystonic limb, and whether the tremor is jerky or sinusoidal.

SUMMARY

Insight into the pathophysiological mechanisms of tremor may provide a more direct window into mechanism-based treatment options than either the etiology or the clinical phenotype of a tremor syndrome.

Functional abnormalities in the cerebello-thalamic pathways in a mouse model of DYT25 dystonia

Dystonia is often associated with functional alterations in the cerebello-thalamic pathways, which have been proposed to contribute to the disorder by propagating pathological firing patterns to the forebrain. Here, we examined the function of the cerebello-thalamic pathways in a model of DYT25 dystonia. DYT25 (Gnal^+/−) mice carry a heterozygous knockout mutation of the Gnal gene, which notably disrupts striatal function, and systemic or striatal administration of oxotremorine to these mice triggers dystonic symptoms. Our results reveal an increased cerebello-thalamic excitability in the presymptomatic state. Following the first dystonic episode, Gnal^+/- mice in the asymptomatic state exhibit a further increase of the cerebello-thalamo-cortical excitability, which is maintained after θ-burst stimulations of the cerebellum. When administered in the symptomatic state induced by a cholinergic activation, these stimulations decreased the cerebello-thalamic excitability and reduced dystonic symptoms. In agreement with dystonia being a multiregional circuit disorder, our results suggest that the increased cerebello-thalamic excitability constitutes an early endophenotype, and that the cerebellum is a gateway for corrective therapies via the depression of cerebello-thalamic pathways.

Clinical features, pathophysiology, treatment, and controversies of tremor in dystonia

Dystonia and tremor frequently co-occur. In some cases, they have shared biological mechanisms, while in others dystonia and tremor are two comorbid conditions. The term "dystonic tremor" is used to describe tremor in those who have dystonia. Two mutually exclusive definitions of "dystonic tremor" were proposed. According to one definition, dystonic tremor is the tremor in the dystonic body part. An alternate definition of dystonic tremor entails irregular and jerky oscillations that have saw tooth appearance with or without overt dystonia. This paper outlines the differences in two definitions of dystonic tremor and identifies their limitations. Given the diverse views defining "dystonic tremor", this paper will use the term "tremor in dystonia". In addition, we will outline different ways to separate the subtypes of tremor in dystonia. Then we will discuss pathophysiological mechanisms derived from the objective measures and single neuron physiology analyses of tremor in dystonia. This article is part of the Special Issue "Tremor" edited by Daniel D. Truong, Mark Hallett, and Aasef Shaikh.

The MDS consensus tremor classification: The best way to classify patients with tremor at present

In 2018, the new Consensus Statement on the Classification of Tremors, by the Task Force on Tremor of the International Parkinson Movement Disorder Society, was published. So far, the article has been cited more than 400 times in peer-reviewed international journals and commonly debated in conferences and meetings due to an enthusiastic welcome from the community. Compared to the previous Consensus Statement (1998), the main novelties are: 1) the classification of tremor according to clinical manifestation (Axis 1) and etiology (Axis 2), and therefore the use of a syndromic approach; 2) the definition of essential tremor as a syndrome; 3) the recognition of the new category essential tremor plus, that derives from the uncertain significance of the soft neurological signs often associated with essential tremor. In this paper, we summarise and explain the most important aspects of the new classification of tremors, highlighting the main novelties, their relevance, and application in clinical practice. Moreover, we discuss its possible weakness and reflect on the critical comments made so far. We believe that this new tremor classification is comprehensive, rigorous, and consistent and, considering our current knowledge of tremor syndromes, it is the best we can do at present. This article is part of the Special Issue "Tremor" edited by Daniel D. Truong, Mark Hallett, and Aasef Shaikh.

Essential tremor: Clinical perspectives and pathophysiology

Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common neurological disorders and can be highly disabling. In recent years, studies on the clinical perspectives and pathophysiology have advanced our understanding of ET. Specifically, clinical heterogeneity of ET, with co-existence of tremor and other neurological features such as dystonia, ataxia, and cognitive dysfunction, has been identified. The cerebellum has been found to be the key brain region for tremor generation, and structural alterations of the cerebellum have been extensively studied in ET. Finally, four main ET pathophysiologies have been proposed: 1) environmental exposures to β-carboline alkaloids and the consequent olivocerebellar hyper-excitation, 2) cerebellar GABA deficiency, 3) climbing fiber synaptic pathology with related cerebellar oscillatory activity, 4) extra-cerebellar oscillatory activity. While these four theories are not mutually exclusive, they can represent distinctive ET subtypes, indicating multiple types of abnormal brain circuitry can lead to action tremor. This article is part of the Special Issue "Tremor" edited by Daniel D. Truong, Mark Hallett, and Aasef Shaikh.

Brain iron deposition and movement disorders in hereditary haemochromatosis without liver failure: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Hereditary haemochromatosis (HH) is the most common inherited disorder of systemic iron excess in Northern Europeans. Emerging evidence indicates that brain iron overload occurs in HH. Despite this observation, there is a paucity of literature regarding central neurological manifestations, in particular movement disorders, in HH. The current study documents deep gray matter (DGM) nuclei iron deposition, movement disorders, and clinicoradiological correlations in HH without liver failure.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study. Consecutive subjects with HFE-haemochromatosis without liver disease were recruited from an outpatient gastroenterology clinic. Age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. Iron content in individual DGM nuclei was measured as mean susceptibility on magnetic resonance imaging using quantitative susceptibility mapping-based regions of interest analysis. Occurrence and phenotype of movement disorders were documented and correlated with patterns of DGM nuclei iron deposition in subjects with HH.

RESULTS

Fifty-two subjects with HH and 47 HCs were recruited. High magnetic susceptibility was demonstrated in several DGM nuclei in all HH subjects compared to HCs. Thirty-five subjects with HH had movement disorders. Magnetic susceptibility in specific DGM nuclei correlated with individual movement disorder phenotypes. Serum ferritin, phlebotomy frequency, and duration were poor predictors of brain iron deposition.

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal brain iron deposition can be demonstrated on imaging in all subjects with HH without liver failure. A significant proportion of these subjects manifest movement disorders. Peripheral iron measurements appear not to correlate with brain iron deposition. Therefore, routine neurological examination and quantitative brain iron imaging are recommended in all subjects with HH.

Bayesian Interpretation of Essential Tremor Plus

Essential tremor (ET) plus is a new tremor classification that was introduced in 2018 by a task force of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. Patients with ET plus meet the criteria for ET but have one or more additional systemic or neurologic signs of uncertain significance or relevance to tremor (“soft signs”). Soft signs are not sufficient to diagnose another tremor syndrome or movement disorder, and soft signs in ET plus are known to have poor interrater reliability and low diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the clinical significance of ET plus must be interpreted probabilistically when judging whether a patient is more likely to have ET or a combined tremor syndrome, such as dystonic tremor. Such a probabilistic interpretation is possible with Bayesian analysis. This review presents a Bayesian analysis of ET plus in patients suspected of having ET versus a dystonic tremor syndrome, which is the most common differential diagnosis in patients referred for ET. Bayesian analysis of soft signs provides an estimate of the probability that a patient with possible ET is more likely to have an alternative diagnosis. ET plus is a distinct tremor classification and should not be viewed as a subtype of ET. ET plus covers a more-comprehensive phenotyping of people with possible ET, and the clinical interpretation of ET plus is enhanced with Bayesian analysis of associated soft signs.

Cerebello-thalamic activity drives an abnormal motor network into dystonic tremor

Dystonic tremor syndromes are highly burdensome and treatment is often inadequate. This is partly due to poor understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. Several lines of research suggest involvement of the cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit and the basal ganglia in dystonic tremor syndromes, but their role is unclear. Here we aimed to investigate the contribution of the cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit and the basal ganglia to the pathophysiology of dystonic tremor syndrome, by directly linking tremor fluctuations to cerebral activity during scanning. In 27 patients with dystonic tremor syndrome (dystonic tremor: n = 23; tremor associated with dystonia: n = 4), we used concurrent accelerometery and functional MRI during a posture holding task that evoked tremor, alternated with rest. Using multiple regression analyses, we separated tremor-related activity from brain activity related to (voluntary) posture holding. Using dynamic causal modelling, we tested for altered effective connectivity between tremor-related brain regions as a function of tremor amplitude fluctuations. Finally, we compared grey matter volume between patients (n = 27) and matched controls (n = 27). We found tremor-related activity in sensorimotor regions of the bilateral cerebellum, contralateral posterior and anterior ventral lateral nuclei of the thalamus (VLp and VLa), contralateral primary motor cortex (hand area), contralateral pallidum, and the bilateral frontal cortex (laterality with respect to the tremor). Grey matter volume was increased in patients compared to controls in the portion of contralateral thalamus also showing tremor-related activity, as well as in bilateral medial and left lateral primary motor cortex, where no tremor-related activity was present. Effective connectivity analyses showed that inter-regional coupling in the cerebello-thalamic pathway, as well as the thalamic self-connection, were strengthened as a function of increasing tremor power. These findings indicate that the pathophysiology of dystonic tremor syndromes involves functional and structural changes in the cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit and pallidum. Deficient input from the cerebellum towards the thalamo-cortical circuit, together with hypertrophy of the thalamus, may play a key role in the generation of dystonic tremor syndrome.

Predictive modeling of spread in adult-onset isolated dystonia: Key properties and effect of tremor inclusion

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Several clinical and demographic factors relate to anatomic spread of adult-onset isolated dystonia, but a predictive model is still lacking. The aims of this study were: (i) to develop and validate a predictive model of anatomic spread of adult-onset isolated dystonia; and (ii) to evaluate whether presence of tremor associated with dystonia influences model predictions of spread.

METHODS

Adult-onset isolated dystonia participants with focal onset from the Dystonia Coalition Natural History Project database were included. We developed two prediction models, one with dystonia as sole disease manifestation ("dystonia-only") and one accepting dystonia OR tremor in any body part as disease manifestations ("dystonia OR tremor"). Demographic and clinical predictors were selected based on previous evidence, clinical plausibility of association with spread, or both. We used logistic regressions and evaluated model discrimination and calibration. Internal validation was carried out based on bootstrapping.

RESULTS

Both predictive models showed an area under the curve of 0.65 (95% confidence intervals 0.62-0.70 and 0.62-0.69, respectively) and good calibration after internal validation. In both models, onset of dystonia in body regions other than the neck, older age, depression and history of neck trauma were predictors of spread.

CONCLUSIONS

This predictive modeling of spread in adult-onset isolated dystonia based on accessible predictors (demographic and clinical) can be easily implemented to inform individuals' risk of spread. Because tremor did not influence prediction of spread, our results support the argument that tremor is a part of the dystonia syndrome, and not an independent or coincidental disorder.

The Role of the Cerebellum in Tremor - Evidence from Neuroimaging

Background

Neuroimaging research has played a key role in identifying which cerebral changes are associated with tremor. Here we will focus on the cerebellum, which may drive tremor oscillations, process tremor-related afferents, modulate activity in remote brain regions, or a combination.

Methods

On the 6th of October 2021, we conducted a PubMed search to select articles providing neuroimaging evidence for cerebellar involvement in essential tremor (ET), Parkinson's disease (PD) tremor, and dystonic tremor (DT).

Results

In ET, tremor-related activity is found in motor areas of the bilateral cerebellum, and altered functional connectivity within and outside the cerebellum correlates with tremor severity. Furthermore, ET is associated with cerebellar atrophy, but also with compensatory structural changes outside the cerebellum (e.g. supplementary motor area). In PD, tremor-related cerebellar activity and increased cerebello-thalamic coupling has been found. Emerging evidence suggests that the cerebellum plays a key role in dopamine-resistant rest tremor and in postural tremor. Cerebellar structural alterations have been identified in PD, but only some relate to tremor. DT is associated with more widespread cerebral networks than other tremor types.

Discussion

In ET, the cerebellum likely acts as an oscillator, potentially due to loss of inhibitory mechanisms. In contrast, in PD the cerebellum may be a modulator, which contributes to tremor oscillations by influencing the thalamo-cortical system. The precise role of the cerebellum in DT remains unclear. We recommend that future research measures tremor-related activity directly by combining electrophysiology with neuroimaging, while brain stimulation techniques may be used to establish causality.

Highlights

This review of neuroimaging studies has provided convincing evidence that the cerebellum plays a key role in the pathophysiology of ET, PD tremor, and dystonic tremor syndromes. This contribution may consist of driving tremor oscillations, processing tremor-related afferents, modulating activity in remote brain regions, or all the above.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Tremor Syndromes: Pathophysiologic Insights and Therapeutic Role

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a painless, non-invasive, and established brain stimulation technique to investigate human brain function. Over the last three decades, TMS has shed insight into the pathophysiology of many neurological disorders. Tremor is an involuntary, rhythmic oscillatory movement disorder commonly related to pathological oscillations propagated via the cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway. Although tremor is the most common movement disorder and recent imaging studies have enhanced our understanding of the critical pathogenic networks, the underlying pathophysiology of different tremor syndromes is complex and still not fully understood. TMS has been used as a tool to further our understanding of tremor pathophysiology. In addition, repetitive TMS (rTMS) that can modulate brain functions through plasticity effects has been targeted to the tremor network to gain potential therapeutic benefits. However, evidence is available for only a few studies that included small patient samples with limited clinical follow-up. This review aims to discuss the role of TMS in advancing the pathophysiological understanding as well as emerging applications of rTMS for treating individual tremor syndromes. The review will focus on essential tremor, Parkinson's disease tremor, dystonic tremor syndrome, orthostatic tremor, and functional tremor.

The diagnostic value of clinical neurophysiology in hyperkinetic movement disorders: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

To guide the neurologist and neurophysiologist with interpretation and implementation of clinical neurophysiological examinations, we aim to provide a systematic review on evidence of electrophysiological features used to differentiate between hyperkinetic movement disorders.

METHODS

A PRISMA systematic search and QUADAS quality evaluation has been performed in PubMed to identify diagnostic test accuracy studies comparing electromyography and accelerometer features. We included papers focusing on tremor, dystonia, myoclonus, chorea, tics and ataxia and their functional variant. The features were grouped as 1) basic features (e.g., amplitude, frequency), 2) the influence of tasks on basic features (e.g., entrainment, distraction), 3) advanced analyses of multiple signals, 4) and diagnostic tools combining features.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight cross-sectional articles were included discussing tremor (n = 28), myoclonus (n = 5), dystonia (n = 5) and tics (n = 1). Fifteen were rated as 'high quality'. In tremor, the basic and task-related features showed great overlap between clinical tremor syndromes, apart from rubral and enhanced physiological tremor. Advanced signal analyses were best suited for essential, parkinsonian and functional tremor, and cortical, non-cortical and functional jerks. Combinations of electrodiagnostic features could identify essential, enhanced physiological and functional tremor.

CONCLUSION

Studies into the diagnostic accuracy of electrophysiological examinations to differentiate between hyperkinetic movement disorders have predominantly been focused on clinical tremor syndromes. No single feature can differentiate between them all; however, a combination of analyses might improve diagnostic accuracy.

Tapping the Potential of Multimodal Non-invasive Brain Stimulation to Elucidate the Pathophysiology of Movement Disorders

This mini-review provides a detailed outline of studies that have used multimodal approaches in non-invasive brain stimulation to investigate the pathophysiology of the three common movement disorders, namely, essential tremor, Parkinson’s disease, and dystonia. Using specific search terms and filters in the PubMed^® database, we finally shortlisted 27 studies in total that were relevant to this review. While two-thirds (Brittain et al., 2013) of these studies were performed on Parkinson’s disease patients, we could find only three studies that were conducted in patients with essential tremor. We clearly show that although multimodal non-invasive brain stimulation holds immense potential in unraveling the physiological mechanisms that are disrupted in movement disorders, the technical challenges and pitfalls of combining these methods may hinder their widespread application by movement disorder specialists. A multidisciplinary team with clinical and technical expertise may be crucial in reaping the fullest benefits from such novel multimodal approaches.

Deep-Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor and Other Tremor Syndromes: A Narrative Review of Current Targets and Clinical Outcomes

Tremor is a prevalent symptom associated with multiple conditions, including essential tremor (ET), Parkinson's disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), stroke and trauma. The surgical management of tremor evolved from stereotactic lesions to deep-brain stimulation (DBS), which allowed safe and reversible interference with specific neural networks. This paper reviews the current literature on DBS for tremor, starting with a detailed discussion of current tremor targets (ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim), prelemniscal radiations (Raprl), caudal zona incerta (Zi), thalamus (Vo) and subthalamic nucleus (STN)) and continuing with a discussion of results obtained when performing DBS in the various aforementioned tremor syndromes. Future directions for DBS research are then briefly discussed.