Distal CA1 Maintains a More Coherent Spatial Representation than Proximal CA1 When Local and Global Cues Conflict

Histone methyltransferase SETD2 is required for proper hippocampal lamination and neuronal maturation

Proper formation of the hippocampus is crucial for the brain to execute memory and learning functions. However, many questions remain regarding how pyramidal neurons (PNs) of the hippocampus mature and precisely position. Here we revealed that Setd2, the methyltransferase for histone 3 lysine 36 trimethylation (H3K36me3), is essential for the precise localization and maturation of PNs in the hippocampal CA1. The ablation of Setd2 in neural progenitors leads to irregular lamination of the CA1 and increased numbers of PNs in the stratum oriens. Setd2 deletion in postmitotic neurons causes mislocalization and immaturity of CA1 PNs. Transcriptome analyses revealed that SETD2 maintains the expressions of clustered protocadherin (cPcdh) genes. Together, Setd2 is required for proper hippocampal lamination and maturation of CA1 PNs.

Multiplexing of temporal and spatial information in the lateral entorhinal cortex

Episodic memory involves the processing of spatial and temporal aspects of personal experiences. The lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC) plays an essential role in subserving memory. However, the specific mechanism by which LEC integrates spatial and temporal information remains elusive. Here, we recorded LEC neurons while rats performed foraging and shuttling behaviors on one-dimensional, linear or circular tracks. Unlike open-field foraging tasks, many LEC cells displayed spatial firing fields in these tasks and demonstrated selectivity for traveling directions. Furthermore, some LEC neurons displayed changes in the firing rates of their spatial rate maps during a session, a phenomenon referred to as rate remapping. Importantly, this temporal modulation was consistent across sessions, even when the spatial environment was altered. Notably, the strength of temporal modulation was found to be greater in LEC compared to other brain regions, such as the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC), CA1, and CA3. Thus, the spatial rate mapping observed in LEC neurons may serve as a coding mechanism for temporal context, allowing for flexible multiplexing of spatial and temporal information.

Distinct spatial maps and multiple object codes in the lateral entorhinal cortex

The lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC) is a major cortical input area to the hippocampus, and it is crucial for associative object-place-context memories. An unresolved question is whether these associations are performed exclusively in the hippocampus or also upstream of it. Anatomical evidence suggests that the LEC processes both object and spatial information. We describe here a gradient of spatial selectivity along the antero-posterior axis of the LEC. We demonstrate that the LEC generates distinct spatial maps for different contexts that are independent of object coding and vice versa, thus providing evidence for pure spatial and pure object codes upstream of the hippocampus. While space and object coding occur by and large separately in the LEC, we identified neurons that encode for space and objects conjunctively. Together, these findings point to a scenario in which the LEC sustains both distinct space and object coding and associative space-object coding.

Superficial-layer versus deep-layer lateral entorhinal cortex: Coding of allocentric space, egocentric space, speed, boundaries, and corners

Entorhinal cortex is the major gateway between the neocortex and the hippocampus and thus plays an essential role in subserving episodic memory and spatial navigation. It can be divided into the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) and the lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC), which are commonly theorized to be critical for spatial (context) and non-spatial (content) inputs, respectively. Consistent with this theory, LEC neurons are found to carry little information about allocentric self-location, even in cue-rich environments, but they exhibit egocentric spatial information about external items in the environment. The superficial and deep layers of LEC are believed to mediate the input to and output from the hippocampus, respectively. As earlier studies mainly examined the spatial firing properties of superficial-layer LEC neurons, here we characterized the deep-layer LEC neurons and made direct comparisons with their superficial counterparts in single unit recordings from behaving rats. Because deep-layer LEC cells received inputs from hippocampal regions, which have strong selectivity for self-location, we hypothesized that deep-layer LEC neurons would be more informative about allocentric position than superficial-layer LEC neurons. We found that deep-layer LEC cells showed only slightly more allocentric spatial information and higher spatial consistency than superficial-layer LEC cells. Egocentric coding properties were comparable between these two subregions. In addition, LEC neurons demonstrated preferential firing at lower speeds, as well as at the boundary or corners of the environment. These results suggest that allocentric spatial outputs from the hippocampus are transformed in deep-layer LEC into the egocentric coding dimensions of LEC, rather than maintaining the allocentric spatial tuning of the CA1 place fields.

Dynamic Hippocampal CA2 Responses to Contextual Spatial Novelty

Hippocampal place cells are functional units of spatial navigation and are present in all subregions: CA1, CA2, CA3, and CA4. Recent studies on CA2 have indicated its role in social and contextual memories, but its contribution to spatial novelty detection and encoding remains largely unknown. The current study aims to uncover how CA2 processes spatial novelty and to distinguish its functional role towards the same from CA1. Accordingly, a novel 3-day paradigm was designed where animals were introduced to a completely new environment on the first day, and on subsequent days, novel segments were inserted into the existing spatial environment while the other segments remained the same, allowing us to compare novel and familiar parts of the same closed-loop track on multiple days. We found that spatial novelty leads to dynamic and complex hippocampal place cell firings at both individual neuron and population levels. Place cells in both CA1 and CA2 had strong responses to novel segments, leading to higher average firing rates and increased pairwise cross correlations across all days. However, CA2 place cells that fired for novel areas had lower spatial information scores than CA1 place cells active in the same areas. At the ensemble level, CA1 only responded to spatial novelty on day 1, when the environment was completely novel, whereas CA2 responded to it on all days, each time novelty was introduced. Therefore, CA2 was more sensitive and responsive to novel spatial features even when introduced in a familiar environment, unlike CA1.

The impact of stress on the hippocampal spatial code

Hippocampal function is severely compromised by prolonged, uncontrollable stress. However, how stress alters neural representations of our surroundings and events that occur within them remains less clear. We review hippocampal place cell studies that examine how spatial coding is affected by acute and chronic stress, as well as by stress accompanying fear conditioning. Emerging data suggest that chronic stress disrupts the acuity and specificity of CA1 spatial coding, both in familiar and novel contexts, and alters hippocampal oscillations. By contrast, acute stress may have a facilitatory impact on spatial representations. These findings encourage a fresh look at the documented stress-induced changes in hippocampal anatomy and in vitro excitability, and offer a new perspective on the links between stress and memory.