Amputation with median nerve redirection (targeted reinnervation) reactivates forepaw barrel subfield in rats

Lower jaw-to-forepaw rapid and delayed reorganization in the rat forepaw barrel subfield in primary somatosensory cortex

We used the forepaw barrel subfield (FBS), that normally receives input from the forepaw skin surface, in rat primary somatosensory cortex as a model system to study rapid and delayed lower jaw-to-forepaw cortical reorganization. Single and multi-unit recording from FBS neurons was used to examine the FBS for the presence of "new" lower jaw input following deafferentations that include forelimb amputation, brachial plexus nerve cut, and brachial plexus anesthesia. The major findings are as follows: (1) immediately following forelimb deafferentations, new input from the lower jaw becomes expressed in the anterior FBS; (2) 7-27 weeks after forelimb amputation, new input from the lower jaw is expressed in both anterior and posterior FBS; (3) evoked response latencies recorded in the deafferented FBS following electrical stimulation of the lower jaw skin surface are significantly longer in both rapid and delayed deafferents compared to control latencies for input from the forepaw to reach the FBS or for input from lower jaw to reach the LJBSF; (4) the longer latencies suggest that an additional relay site is imposed along the somatosensory pathway for lower jaw input to access the deafferented FBS. We conclude that different sources of input and different mechanisms underlie rapid and delayed reorganization in the FBS and suggest that these findings are relevant, as an initial step, for developing a rodent animal model to investigate phantom limb phenomena.

Targeted muscle reinnervation in upper extremity amputation in military hand surgery: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) is a surgical technique utilized to alleviate post-amputation neuroma pain, reduce reliance on narcotic pain medication, and enhance control of prosthetic devices. Motor targets for upper extremity TMR vary depending on injury patterns and amputation levels, with conventional transfer patterns serving as general guides. This study aims to summarize the common patterns of TMR in transradial and transhumeral amputations, focusing on anatomic and surgical considerations.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review of TMR literature was conducted by two independent physician reviewers (M.H.A. and D.M.G.R.) to identify the prevailing motor targets, while considering injury patterns and amputation levels.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

1) TMR techniques, outcomes, or advancements; 2) Original research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or clinical trials; 3) Peer-reviewed journal articles or reputable conference proceedings.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

non-English resources, editorials, opinion pieces, and case reports. The databases utilized include MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (Scopus) and Cochrane CENTRAL, last searched 01APR2023.

RESULTS

The reviewed literature revealed multiple motor targets described for upper extremity TMR out of our included 51 studies. However, the selection of motor targets is influenced by the availability of viable options based on injury patterns and amputation levels. Conventional transfer patterns provide useful guidance for determining appropriate motor targets in transradial and transhumeral amputations.

DISCUSSION

TMR has played a significant role in military medicine, particularly in addressing the impact of blast-related injuries. The energy associated with such injuries often results in substantial soft tissue defects, higher amputation levels, and increased post-amputation pain. TMR, in conjunction with advancements in prosthetic technology and ongoing military research, offers improved outcomes to help achieve the goals of active-duty service members. The capabilities and applications of TMR continue to expand rapidly due to its high surgical success rate, technological innovations in prosthetic care, and favorable patient outcomes. As technology evolves to include implantable devices, osseointegration techniques, and bidirectional neuroprosthetic devices, the future of amputation surgery and TMR holds immense promise, offering innovative solutions to optimize patient outcomes. It is important to note, this review was limited to the data available in the included resources which was mostly qualitative; thus, it did not involve primary data analysis.

Targeted muscle reinnervation prevents and reverses rat pain behaviors after nerve transection

ABSTRACT

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a clinical intervention that is rapidly becoming common in major limb amputation to prevent or reduce amputation-related pain. However, TMR is much less effective when applied long after injury compared with acute TMR. Since the mechanisms governing pain relief in TMR of amputated nerves are unknown, we developed a preclinical model as a platform for mechanistic examination. Following spared nerve injury (SNI), rats underwent either TMR, simple neuroma excision, or a sham manipulation of the injury site. These interventions were performed immediately or delayed (3 or 12 weeks) after SNI. Pain behavior was measured as sensitivity to mechanical stimuli (pin, von Frey, and dynamic brush) and thermal stimuli (acetone and radiant heat). Spared nerve injury produced hypersensitivity to all mechanical stimuli and cold, which persisted after sham surgery. Targeted muscle reinnervation at the time of SNI prevented the development of pain behaviors and performing TMR 3 weeks after SNI reversed pain behaviors to baseline. By contrast, TMR performed at 12 weeks after SNI had no effect on pain behaviors. Neuroma excision resulted in significantly less reduction in hyperalgesia compared with TMR when performed 3 weeks after SNI but had no effect at 12 weeks after SNI. In this model, the pain phenotype induced by nerve transection is reduced by TMR when performed within 3 weeks after injury. However, TMR delayed 12 weeks after injury fails to reduce pain behaviors. This replicates clinical experience with limb amputation, supporting validity of this model for examining the mechanisms of TMR analgesia.

Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review

For those individuals with upper-extremity amputation, a daily normal living activity is no longer possible or it requires additional effort and time. With the aim of restoring their sensory and motor functions, theoretical and technological investigations have been carried out in the field of neuroprosthetic systems. For transmission of sensory feedback, several interfacing modalities including indirect (non-invasive), direct-to-peripheral-nerve (invasive), and cortical stimulation have been applied. Peripheral nerve interfaces demonstrate an edge over the cortical interfaces due to the sensitivity in attaining cortical brain signals. The peripheral nerve interfaces are highly dependent on interface designs and are required to be biocompatible with the nerves to achieve prolonged stability and longevity. Another criterion is the selection of nerves that allows minimal invasiveness and damages as well as high selectivity for a large number of nerve fascicles. In this paper, we review the nerve-machine interface modalities noted above with more focus on peripheral nerve interfaces, which are responsible for provision of sensory feedback. The invasive interfaces for recording and stimulation of electro-neurographic signals include intra-fascicular, regenerative-type interfaces that provide multiple contact channels to a group of axons inside the nerve and the extra-neural-cuff-type interfaces that enable interaction with many axons around the periphery of the nerve. Section Current Prosthetic Technology summarizes the advancements made to date in the field of neuroprosthetics toward the achievement of a bidirectional nerve-machine interface with more focus on sensory feedback. In the Discussion section, the authors propose a hybrid interface technique for achieving better selectivity and long-term stability using the available nerve interfacing techniques.

Cutaneous sensory outcomes from three transhumeral targeted reinnervation cases

BACKGROUND

Although targeted muscle reinnervation has been shown to be effective in enhancing prosthetic control for upper limb amputees, restored hand sensations have been variable. An understanding of possible sensory feedback channels is crucial in working toward more effective closed-loop prosthetic control.

OBJECTIVES

To compare sensory outcomes of different targeted sensory reinnervation approaches.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series, cross-sectional, and retrospective.

METHODS

Three transhumeral amputees that had undergone different sensory reinnervation approaches were recruited. Skin pressure sensitivity thresholds and anatomic sensory mapping were performed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. The clinical charts of the subjects were reviewed to compare the sensory maps performed during the earlier post-reinnervation period.

RESULTS

While the first two subjects achieved return of hand sensations on the stump skin in early follow-up, the maps showed attenuation over time. The last subject developed discrete sensations of all digits in the recipient cutaneous nerve territories away from the reinnervated muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm that it is feasible to restore hand sensation after transhumeral targeted reinnervation, but there is a significant intersubject variability. The intrafascicular approach may be particularly effective in restoring digit sensation and deserves further exploration, as do factors affecting stability of the hand maps over time.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In addition to enabling intuitive motor control of myoelectric prosthesis, targeted reinnervation can also result in sensory restoration of the hand. Documentation of sensory mapping present after reinnervation may assist with exploring future techniques for sensory enhancement, with the goal of working toward closed-loop prosthetic control.