In active acromegaly, IGF1 bioactivity is related to soluble Klotho levels and quality of life

Questionnaire and tools: clinical powerful instrument in acromegaly diagnosis and management

PURPOSE

Acromegaly is a rare chronic disease characterized by systemic comorbidity and reduced quality of life. Although achieving biochemical control has always been the primary goal of acromegaly therapy, recent evidence has shown that the traditional assessment does not adequately capture the complexity of symptoms and patients' perception. These findings result in the need to improve a fast decision-making process of the clinician, who should not only take into account biochemical-instrumental criteria, but also patients' symptoms. With the aim of supporting the clinician in the diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making process several disease-specific tools have been developed. The aim of this review is to provide a description of the acromegaly-specific tools, presenting their main features, their application in daily practice, and their efficacy and utility.

METHODS

A systematic search of Medline/PubMed, ISI-Web of Knowledge, and Google Scholar databases was done.

RESULTS

Specific instruments and questionnaires have recently been developed to assist clinicians in the assessment of acromegaly. These are either Patient-Reported Outcome tools, such as Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL) and Pain Assessment Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ), or Clinician-Reported Outcome tools, such as ACROSCORE, SAGIT^® and Acromegaly Disease Activity Tool (ACRODAT^®). Such tools are extremely flexible and, therefore, have been widely adopted by endocrinologists and other professionals, so much so that they have also been included as recommendations in the 2018 international guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Questionnaires and tools are useful in the management of acromegaly patients. They help clinicians evaluate patients' symptoms and could assist in the evaluation of disease activity.

Association of pre- and postoperative αKlotho levels with long-term remission after pituitary surgery for acromegaly

Soluble αKlotho (sKl) is a disease-specific biomarker that is elevated in patients with acromegaly and declines after surgery for pituitary adenoma. Approximately 25% of patients do not achieve remission after surgery, therefore a risk stratification for patients early in the course of their disease may allow for the identification of patients requiring adjuvant treatment. Growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) have been assessed as biomarker for disease activity, however the value of sKl as a predictive biomarker of surgical success has not been evaluated yet. In this study, we measured serum biomarkers before and after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery in 55 treatment-naïve patients. Based on biochemical findings at follow-up (7–16 years), we divided patients into three groups: (A) long-term cure (defined by normal IGF-1 and random low GH (< 1 μg/l) or a suppressed GH nadir (< 0.4/μg/l) on oral glucose testing); (B) initial remission with later disease activity; (C) persistent clinical and/or biochemical disease activity. sKl levels positively related to GH, IGF-1 levels and tumor volume. Interestingly, there was a statistically significant difference in pre- and postoperative levels of sKl between the long-term cure group and the group with persistent disease activity. This study provides first evidence that sKl may serve as an additional marker for surgical success, decreasing substantially in all patients with initial clinical remission while remaining high after surgery in patients with persistent disease activity.

Soluble Alpha Klotho in Acromegaly: Comparison With Traditional Markers of Disease Activity

CONTEXT

Soluble alpha klotho (sαKL) has been linked to growth hormone (GH) action, but systematic evaluation and comparisons with traditional biomarkers in acromegaly are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential of sαKL to aid classification of disease activity.

METHODS

This retrospective study at 2 academic centers included acromegaly patients before surgery (A, n = 29); after surgery (controlled, discordant, or uncontrolled) without (B1, B2, B3, n = 28, 11, 8); or with somatostatin analogue treatment (C1, C2, C3, n = 17, 11, 5); nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (n = 20); and healthy controls (n = 31). sαKL was measured by immunoassay and compared with traditional biomarkers (random and nadir GH, insulin-like growth factor I [IGF-I], IGF binding protein 3). Associations with disease activity were assessed.

RESULTS

sαKL was correlated to traditional biomarkers, particularly IGF-I (rs=0.80, P <0.0001). High concentrations before treatment (A, median, interquartile range: 4.04 × upper limit of normal [2.26-8.08]) dropped to normal after treatment in controlled and in most discordant patients. A cutoff of 1548 pg/mL for sαKL discriminated controlled (B1, C1) and uncontrolled (B3, C3) patients with 97.8% (88.4%-99.9%) sensitivity and 100% (77.1%-100%) specificity. sαKL was below the cutoff in 84% of the discordant subjects. In the remaining 16%, elevated sαKL and IGF-I persisted, despite normal random GH. Sex, age, body mass index, and markers of bone and calcium metabolism did not significantly affect sαKL concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Our data support sαKL as a biomarker to assess disease activity in acromegaly. sαKL exhibits close association with GH secretory status, large dynamic range, and robustness toward biological confounders. Its measurement could be helpful particularly when GH and IGF-I provide discrepant information.

Pilot study assessing the use of cabergoline for the treatment of cats with hypersomatotropism and diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVES

An affordable and effective treatment is needed to manage feline hypersomatotropism. The aim of this study was to assess whether treatment with oral cabergoline for 90 days in cats with hypersomatotropism and diabetes mellitus improved diabetic and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) control.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort non-blinded pilot study enrolling client-owned cats with spontaneously occurring diabetes mellitus and hypersomatotropism. Cats received oral cabergoline (5-10 µg/kg q24h) for 90 consecutive days. Serum IGF-1 and fructosamine concentrations were measured on days 1, 30 and 90. Quality of life was determined using the DIAQoL-pet questionnaire on days 1 and 90.

RESULTS

Nine cats were enrolled and eight completed the study. There was no significant change in the following: IGF-1 (day 1 median 2001 ng/ml [range 890-2001 ng/ml]; day 30 median 2001 ng/ml [range 929-2001 ng/ml]; day 90 median 1828 ng/ml [range 1035-2001 ng/ml]; χ2(2) = 0.667, P = 0.805); fructosamine (day 1 median 499 µmol/l [range 330-887 µmol/l], day 30 median 551 µmol/l [range 288-722 µmol/l], day 90 median 503 [range 315-851 µmol/l]; χ2(2) = 0.581, P = 0.764); or DIAQoL-pet score (median on day 1 -2.79 [range -4.62 to -0.28], median on day 90 -3.24 [range -4.41 to -0.28]; P = 0.715). There was a significant change of insulin dose (χ2(2) = 8.667, P = 0.008) with cats receiving higher insulin doses at day 90 compared with day 1 (median on day 1 was 0.98 [range 0.63-1.49] and median on day 90 was 1.56 [range 0.49-2.55] units/kg q12h; P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Cabergoline did not improve diabetic control or normalise insulin-like growth factor concentration, or improve patient quality of life.

Soluble Klotho: a possible predictor of quality of life in acromegaly patients

PURPOSE

Although quality of life (QoL) is improved in patients with acromegaly after disease control, QoL correlates only weakly with traditional biomarkers. Our objective is to investigate a potential relation between the new serum biomarker soluble Klotho (sKlotho), GH and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels, and QoL.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, we investigated 54 acromegaly patients biochemically well-controlled on combination treatment with first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) and pegvisomant (PEGV) at baseline and 9 months after switching to pasireotide LAR (PAS-LAR; either as monotherapy, n = 28; or in combination with PEGV, n = 26). QoL was measured by the Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ) and Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Switching to PAS-LAR treatment significantly improved QoL without altering IGF-1 levels. QoL did not correlate with GH or IGF-1 levels, but sKlotho correlated with the observed improvements in QoL by the AcroQoL global (r = -0.35, p = 0.012) and physical subdimension (r = -0.34, p = 0.017), and with PASQ headache (r = 0.28, p = 0.048), osteoarthralgia (r = 0.46, p = 0.00080) and soft tissue swelling score (r = 0.29, p = 0.041). Parallel changes in serum sKlotho and IGF-1 (r = 0.31, p = 0.023) suggest sKlotho and IGF-1 to be similarly dependent on GH. Comparing the PAS-LAR combination therapy and the monotherapy group we did not observe a significant difference in improvement of QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients experienced improved QoL during PAS-LAR, either as monotherapy or in combination with PEGV. Soluble Klotho concentrations appear to be a useful marker of QoL in acromegaly patients but the underlying mechanisms remain to be investigated.

Mechanisms of putative IGF-I receptor resistance in active acromegaly

Acromegaly is a disease characterized by overproduction of growth hormone (GH). As a consequence of excessive GH secretion, circulating insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) is elevated in active (untreated) acromegaly. IGF-I is often used as a marker of disease activity and growth hormone status in acromegaly. Although IGF-I can directly improve insulin sensitivity and glucose uptake in muscles, the excessive GH secretion in active acromegaly frequently leads to insulin resistance, glucose intolerance and even diabetes. In this review evidence will be discussed that in active acromegaly chronically elevated IGF-I, insulin and soluble Klotho (S-Klotho) levels play a pathophysiological role in the development of IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) resistance. It is postulated that as soon as circulating IGF-I, insulin and S-Klotho rise above a certain level the IGF-IR becomes relatively resistant to actions of IGF-I. The development of a degree of IGF-IR resistance for metabolic actions may help to explain why in active acromegaly diabetogenic effects of GH predominate and are not completely counteracted and neutralized by elevated circulating levels of IGF-I. Further studies are necessary in order to support this hypothesis.

The insulin-like growth factor-I receptor stimulating activity (IRSA) in health and disease

Determination of true IGF-I bioactivity in serum and other biological fluids is still a substantial challenge. The IGF-IR Kinase Receptor Activation assay (IGF-IR KIRA assay) is a novel tool to asses IGF-IR stimulating activity (IRSA) and has opened a new era in studying the IGF system. In this paper we discuss many studies showing that measuring IRSA by the IGF-IR KIRA assay often provides fundamentally different information about the IGF system than the commonly used total IGF-I immunoassays. With the IGF-IR KIRA assay phosphorylation of tyrosine residues of the IGF-IR is used as read out to quantify IRSA in unknown (serum) samples. The IGF-IR KIRA assay gives information about net overall effects of circulating IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBPs and IGFBP-proteases on IGF-IR activation and seems especially superior to immunoreactive total IGF-I in monitoring therapeutic interventions. Although the IRSA as measured by the IGF-IR KIRA assay probably more closely reflects true bioactive IGF-I than measurements of total IGF-I in serum, the IGF-IR KIRA assay in its current form does not give information about all the post-receptor intracellular events mediated by the IGF-IR. Interestingly, in several conditions in health and disease IRSA measured by the IGF-IR KIRA assay is considerably higher in interstitial fluid and ascites than in serum. This suggests that both the paracrine (local) and endocrine (circulating) IRSA should be measured to get a complete picture about the role of the IGF system in health and disease.

Soluble delta-like 1 homolog decreases in patients with acromegaly following pituitary surgery: A potential mediator of adipogenesis suppression by growth hormone?

OBJECTIVE

GH excess in acromegaly leads to lower fat mass and insulin resistance; both reverse following pituitary surgery. Soluble delta like-1 homolog (sDlk1) inhibits adipocyte differentiation and may mediate the antiadipogenic effects of GH. It is released into the circulation by ectodomain shedding through 'A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase domain 17' (ADAM17), which also sheds soluble α-Klotho (sKlotho). Klotho is a transmembrane protein, which influences life span. sKlotho inhibits insulin signalling, and is markedly elevated in acromegaly and decreases after surgery. Therefore, we examined if sDlk1 parallels the course of sKlotho, which could explain the well-known changes in fat mass in patients with acromegaly after surgery.

DESIGN

We measured serum levels of GH, IGF-1, sDlk1 and sKlotho (both by ELISA) in 42 treatment-naïve acromegaly patients (20 females/22 males) before and 1-3 months after transsphenoidal surgery. Data are presented as median(interquartile range).

RESULTS

GH decreased in all patients postoperatively (in 32/42 to <1 ng/ml during oral glucose tolerance testing). Likewise, IGF-1 and sKlotho decreased in all patients, from 587 (432-708) to 195 (133-270) ng/ml, and from 4.0 (2.7-5.9) to 0.7 (0.6-1.2) ng/ml, respectively; sDlk1 fell in 40/42 subjects, from 10.7 (5.8-13.4) to 7.1 (3.7-10.4) ng/ml following pituitary surgery. P < 0.0001 for all parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

sDlk1 declined after pituitary surgery in our patients with acromegaly, but to a lesser extent than sKlotho. It remains to be seen whether this may contribute to the well-known postoperative changes in body composition. Our findings may extend beyond the scope of acromegaly, and thus further elucidate mechanisms in the fields of obesity and anti-ageing.

Predictors of Quality of Life in Acromegaly: No Consensus on Biochemical Parameters

BACKGROUND

Quality of life (QoL) in patients with acromegaly is reduced irrespective of disease state. The contributions of multifactorial determinants of QoL in several disease stages are presently not well known.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review predictors of QoL in acromegalic patients.

METHODS

Main databases were systematically searched using predefined search terms for potentially relevant articles up to January 2017. Inclusion criteria included separate acromegaly cohort, non-hereditary acromegaly, QoL as study parameter with clearly described method of measurement and quantitative results, N ≥ 10 patients, article in English and adult patients only. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers; studies were included using the PRISMA flow diagram.

RESULTS

We identified 1,162 studies; 51 studies met the inclusion criteria: 31 cross-sectional observational studies [mean AcroQoL score 62.7 (range 46.6-87.0, n = 1,597)], 9 had a longitudinal component [mean baseline AcroQoL score 61.4 (range 54.3-69.0, n = 386)], and 15 were intervention studies [mean baseline AcroQoL score 58.6 (range 52.2-75.3, n = 521)]. Disease-activity reflected by biochemical control measures yielded mixed, and therefore inconclusive results with respect to their effect on QoL. Addition of pegvisomant to somatostatin analogs and start of lanreotide autogel resulted in improvement in QoL. Data from intervention studies on other treatment modalities were too limited to draw conclusions on the effects of these modalities on QoL. Interestingly, higher BMI and greater degree of depression showed consistently negative associations with QoL. Hypopituitarism was not significantly correlated with QoL in acromegaly.

CONCLUSION

At present, there is insufficient published data to support that biochemical control, or treatment of acromegaly in general, is associated with improved QoL. Studies with somatostatin receptor ligand treatment, i.e., particularly lanreotide autogel and pegvisomant have shown improved QoL, but consensus on the correlation with biochemical control is missing. Longitudinal studies investigating predictors in treatment-naive patients and their follow-up after therapeutic interventions are lacking but are urgently needed. Other factors, i.e., depression and obesity were identified from cross-sectional cohort studies as consistent factors associated with poor QoL. Perhaps treatment strategies of acromegaly patients should not only focus on normalizing biochemical markers but emphasize improvement of QoL by alternative interventions such as psychosocial or weight lowering interventions.

Need for improved monitoring in patients with acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare and insidious disease characterized by the overproduction of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and is most commonly due to a pituitary adenoma. Patients with acromegaly who experience prolonged exposure to elevated levels of GH and IGF1 have an increased mortality risk and progressive worsening of disease-related comorbidities. Multimodal treatment with surgery, medical therapy, and radiotherapy provides biochemical control, defined by recent acromegaly clinical guidelines from the Endocrine Society as a reduction of GH levels to <1.0 ng/ml and normalization of IGF1 levels, to a substantial proportion of patients and is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Patients with acromegaly, even those without clinical symptoms of disease, require long-term monitoring of GH and IGF1 levels if the benefits associated with biochemical control are to be maintained and the risk of developing recurrent disease is to be abated. However, suboptimal monitoring is common in patients with acromegaly, and this can have negative health effects due to delays in detection of recurrent disease and implementation of appropriate treatment. Because of the significant health consequences associated with prolonged exposure to elevated levels of GH and IGF1, optimal monitoring in patients with acromegaly is needed. This review article will discuss the biochemical assessments used for therapeutic monitoring in acromegaly, the importance of monitoring after surgery and medical therapy or radiotherapy, the consequences of suboptimal monitoring, and the need for improved monitoring algorithms for patients with acromegaly.