Adrenal incidentaloma - follow-up results from a Swedish prospective study

Tumor enlargement in adrenal incidentaloma is related to glaucoma: a new prognostic feature?

PURPOSE

The uncertainty on the management of small adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) still represents a challenge in real clinical practice. Considering the lack of knowledge on risk factors implicated in tumour enlargement, the aim of this study was to identify risk factors for morphological changes during follow-up of adrenal incidentalomas (AIs).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated demographic, clinical, radiological and biochemical parameters of 153 AIs (2007-2021). Patients with histological diagnosis of metastases or pheochromocytoma were excluded. To detect risk factors for tumor enlargement, diseases associated with AIs were included if their prevalence was higher than 2%. Patients were divided into two groups (A: radiological stability; B: tumor enlargement defined as > 5 mm/year in the main diameter).

RESULTS

Group A: 89.5% and group B: 10.5%, mean follow-up 38.6 ± 6.9 months (range 6-240). Tumor enlargement when occurred was within 36 months of follow-up. In group B high body weight (p < 0.03), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) (p < 0.05) and direct renin concentration (DRC) (p < 0.04) were higher than group A, while aldosterone levels were lower; moreover, considering comorbidities, glaucoma and dysglycemia (p < 0.01 for both) had higher prevalence in group B. Glaucoma and dysglycemia were independent predictors of enlargement. Patients affected by glaucoma, atrial fibrillation, dysglycemia had a lower dimensional change-free survival than non-affected.

CONCLUSIONS

Glaucoma might be a novel risk factor for AI enlargement. If subtle undetectable cortisol hypersecretion has a role is a topic for further research.

Impact of Size Thresholds on the Diagnosis of Incidental Adrenal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Preferred size-threshold recommendations for management of incidental adrenal lesions remain controversial.

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of different size thresholds for detecting malignancy in patients with incidental adrenal lesions on imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and the gray literature, covering the period from inception to September 2021, was performed. Studies with >10 patients evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of imaging size thresholds for detecting malignancy in patients with incidental adrenal lesions and no prior history of cancer were included. Study, clinical, imaging, and accuracy data for eligible studies were independently acquired by two reviewers. Primary meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate mixed-effects regression model. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.

RESULTS

From 2,690 citations, 40 studies (9,794 patients with mean age ranging from 41 to 66 years) were included. Most (36 of 40) were retrospective single-center studies. CT with or without MRI served as the index test(s). Sensitivity and specificity values, respectively, by size threshold used in the included studies were as follows: 85% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74%-91%) and 39% (95% CI 23%-57%) for 3-cm thresholds; 85% (95% CI 78%-90%) and 75% (95% CI 62%-85%) for 4-cm thresholds; 70% (95% CI 56%-81%) and 74% (95% CI 59%-85%) for 5-cm thresholds; and 75% (95% CI 67%-82%) and 77% (95% CI 62%-87%) for 6-cm thresholds. No cause for variability in sensitivity or specificity was identified on subgroup analysis of the 4-cm threshold. Nearly half of the studies (19 of 40) had at least one QUADAS-2 domain with a high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

A 4-cm size threshold demonstrates the highest combined sensitivity and specificity, with a preserved specificity compared with higher size thresholds, but with a trend toward improved sensitivity. Future research reevaluating 4-5 cm size thresholds while excluding characteristically benign lesions by imaging may help redefine a size threshold that has improved specificity but preserved sensitivity, compared with the existing 4-cm threshold.

Predictive model for autonomous cortisol secretion development in non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas

PURPOSE

We aimed to develop a predictive model able to stratify patients with non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas (AIs), according to their risk for developing autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) during follow-up.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with non-functioning AIs consecutively evaluated at a single institution between 2013 and 2019 in whom hormonal follow-up information was available for at least 1 year. Clinical, biochemical, and radiological features were used to build a multivariate Cox regression model using the estimation of all possible equations.

RESULTS

We included 331 patients with non-functioning AIs. ACS (post-dexamethasone suppression test (DST) serum cortisol > 1.8 µg/dL) developed in 73 patients during a median follow-up time of 35.7 months [range 12.8-165.4]. The best predictive model for ACS development during follow-up combined age, post-DST serum cortisol, and bilaterality at presentation and showed good diagnostic accuracy (AUC-ROC 0.70 [95% CI 0.65-0.75]). The lowest risk for ACS development was found among patients < 50 years old with cortisol post-DST values < 0.45 µg/dL and with unilateral tumors (risk 2.42%). Baseline post-DST serum cortisol levels at diagnosis were the most important factor for the development of ACS during follow-up (hazard ratio 3.56 for each µg/dL, p < 0.001). The rate of ACS development was associated with post-DST cortisol levels, being 19.2, 32.3, and 68.1 cases/10,000 person-years for patients with baseline post-DST cortisol < 0.9 µg/dL, 0.9-1.3 µg/dL, and > 1.3 µg/dL, respectively.

CONCLUSION

After ruling out malignancy, follow-up visits for patients < 50 years old with unilateral non-functioning AIs and post-DST serum cortisol < 0.45 µg/dL are considered unnecessary given the low risk of developing ACS during follow-up.

Cardiometabolic profile and urinary metabolomic alterations in non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas: A review

BACKGROUND

The incidence of adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) has increased over the last 20 years, most of which are apparently non-functioning adrenal adenomas. However, increased evidence supports the existence of an association between non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas (NFAI) and an unfavourable cardio-metabolic profile.

METHODS

This study offers a comprehensive review of the available evidence supporting a higher cardiometabolic risk in NFAIs compared to controls without adrenal tumours. Moreover, it summarises the studies focused on the differential urinary metabolomic profile of NFAI and controls without adrenal lesions.

RESULTS

This adverse metabolic profile of patients with NFAI includes a higher prevalence of insulin resistance, obesity, hypertension, hyperglycaemia, dyslipidaemia, and cardiovascular alterations and mortality compared to healthy controls without adrenal tumours. Although the pathophysiology that explains the association between NFAI and the parameters of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk is a relatively unexplored field of study, some evidence supports that there are a series of incipient alterations in cortisol metabolism not detected with the classical tests that led to this detrimental profile. These alterations may be potentially detected by a comprehensive metabolomics approach. Several studies detected a shift towards an increase of urinary cortisol metabolites excretion in NFAIs compared to controls without adrenal tumours.

CONCLUSION

In view of the higher cardiometabolic risk in NFAI than in controls without adrenal tumours, and the detected alterations in metabolomics profile of NFAI, I propose that the term of NFAI should be changed for another term that best fits to its linked cardiometabolic profile.

Attenuation Value in Adrenal Incidentalomas: A Longitudinal Study

Context

A tendency to grow has been reported in adrenal incidentalomas. However, long-term data regarding attenuation value, a measure of lipid content, are not available.

Aim

This study aims to collect radiological data (diameter in mm and attenuation value in Hounsfield units, HU) with computed tomography (CT) in adrenal incidentalomas, in order to compare baseline characteristics with the last follow-up imaging.

Design

This is a longitudinal study which included patients with a new diagnosis of adrenal incidentaloma, evaluated from January 2002 to June 2020.

Setting

Referral University-Hospital center.

Patients

Two hundred seventy-seven patients with 355 different cortical adenomas (baseline group) were evaluated at the first outpatient visit; the follow-up cohort consists of 181 patients with 234 adenomas (12-175 months after baseline). Inclusion criteria were conservative management and radiological features able to minimize malignancy or risk of progression.

Main Outcome Measure

CT modification according to endocrine function: autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) if cortisol >50 nmol/L after 1-mg dexamethasone test (DST).

Results

At baseline CT, mean diameter was 18.7 mm and attenuation value was 0.8 HU (higher in ACS, 66 cases >10 HU), without modification in early imaging (12-36 months). The size increased over time (r = 0.289), achieving the largest differences after at least 60 months of follow-up (mean diameter, +2 mm; attenuation value, -4 HU), combined with a reduction in the attenuation value (r = -0.195, especially in patients with ACS). Lipid-poor adenomas (>10 HU) presented a reduced cortisol suppression after 1-mg DST, an increase in size and the largest decrease in attenuation value during follow-up. Univariate analysis confirmed that larger adenomas presented reduced suppression after DST and increase in size during follow-up.

Conclusions

Growth is clinically modest in adrenal incidentaloma: the first follow-up CT 5 years after baseline is a reasonable choice, especially in ACS. Mean density is increased in patients with ACS and overt hypercortisolism. Mean density reduces during follow-up in all adrenal adenomas, suggesting an increase in lipid content, especially in those with ACS.

Frequently asked questions and answers (if any) in patients with adrenal incidentaloma

PURPOSE

Adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) are incidentally discovered adrenal masses, during an imaging study undertaken for other reasons than the suspicion of adrenal disease. Their management is not a minor concern for patients and health-care related costs, since their increasing prevalence in the aging population. The exclusion of malignancy is the first question to attempt, then a careful evaluation of adrenal hormones is suggested. Surgery should be considered in case of overt secretion (primary aldosteronism, adrenal Cushing's Syndrome or pheochromocytoma), however the management of subclinical secretion is still a matter of debate.

METHODS

The aim of the present narrative review is to offer a practical guidance regarding the management of AI, by providing evidence-based answers to frequently asked questions.

CONCLUSION

The clinical experience is of utmost importance: a personalized diagnostic-therapeutic approach, based upon multidisciplinary discussion, is suggested.

Diagnostic accuracy of the different hormonal tests used for the diagnosis of autonomous cortisol secretion

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the different tests commonly used in the evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) for the identification of autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) and comorbidities potentially related to ACS. In a retrospective study of patients with AIs ≥ 1 cm, we evaluated the diagnostic reliability and validity of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST), urinary free cortisol (UFC), ACTH, late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC), and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate (DHEAS) for the diagnosis of comorbidities potentially related to ACS. Diagnostic indexes were also calculated for UFC, ACTH, LNSC, and DHEAS considering DST as the gold standard test for the diagnosis of ACS, using three different post-DST cortisol thresholds (138 nmol/L, 50 nmol/L and 83 nmol/L). We included 197 patients with AIs in whom the results of the five tests abovementioned were available. At diagnosis, 85.9% of patients with one or more AIs had any comorbidity potentially related to ACS, whereas 9.6% had ACS as defined by post-DST cortisol > 138 nmol/L. The reliability of UFC, ACTH, LNSC, and DHEAS for the diagnosis of ACS was low (kappa index < 0.30). Of them, LNSC reached the highest diagnosis accuracy for ACS identification (AUC = 0.696 [95% CI 0.626–0.759]). The diagnostic performances of these tests for comorbidities potentially related to ACS was poor; of them, the DST was the most accurate (AUC = 0.661 [95% CI 0.546–0.778]) and had the strongest association with these comorbidities (OR 2.6, P = 0.045). Patients presenting with increased values of both DST and LNSC had the strongest association with hypertension (OR 7.1, P = 0.002) and with cardiovascular events (OR 3.6, P = 0.041). In conclusion, LNSC was the test showing the highest diagnosis accuracy for the identification of ACS when a positive DST was used as the gold standard for its diagnosis. The DST test showed the strongest association with comorbidities potentially related to ACS. The definition of ACS based on the combination of elevated DST and LNSC levels improved the identification of patients with increased cardiometabolic risk.

DHEAS and Differential Blood Counts as Indirect Signs of Glucocorticoid Excess in Adrenal Non-Producing Adenomas

The majority of incidentally discovered adrenal tumors are later characterized as non-producing adrenocortical adenomas (NPA). We asked whether laboratory abnormalities in parameters that reflect glucocorticoid action can be found in patients with NPA despite their nature of being clinically unapparent. Since glucocorticoids are potent immunosuppressants we studied blood counts and differential blood counts along with corticotropin and dehydroepiandrostenedione sulfate (DHEAS) blood concentrations, as well as cortisol values before and after an overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test. We compared the results of normal individuals, of patients with adrenal adenomas and normal hormone profiles and with subclinical autonomous glucocorticoid hypersecretion, as well as overt cortisol excess. We found that almost all indices of the blood counts were significantly different between the patients groups. In particular, patients with adrenal non-producing adenomas already showed signs of glucocorticoid excess, including relative lymphocytopenia, lowered DHEAS, and ACTH concentrations than control individuals. We also found that the extent of lymphocytopenia correlated with the concentrations of DHEAS and ACTH, and DHEAS correlated well with ACTH. We conclude that the basal ACTH and DHEAS values along with the differential blood counts give good information on the extent of glucocorticoid excess and that silent adrenal adenomas seem to oversecrete glucocorticoids at concentrations that already alter these parameters.

The Quantitative Relationship Between Autonomous Cortisol Secretion, Dysglycemia and the Metabolic Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) is the most common endocrine abnormality in the evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas. The categorization of ACS is derived from a 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST). Impaired DST is associated with several metabolic derangements. In this study we analyzed the association between post-DST cortisol level, analyzed as a continuous parameter, and indices of glycemic metabolism.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data of 1,976 patients evaluated for adrenal incidentalomas in a large tertiary medical center between December 1, 2017, and August 31, 2019. Seventy-three patients completed the evaluation process. Post-DST cortisol levels were analyzed for correlation with various metabolic parameters, including fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) among the general cohort and for subgroups stratified by the number of metabolic syndrome (MS) criteria.

RESULTS

Post-DST cortisol demonstrated a linear association with FPG and HbA1c across its entire cortisol range (R = 0.51 and 0.41, respectively; P≤.01). The association between post-DST cortisol and FPG was strengthened with an increased number of metabolic syndrome criteria. Patients with 4 MS criteria show a stronger association (R = 0.92) compared to patients with only a single criterion (R = 0.509). Furthermore, mean post-DST cortisol levels increased as the number of MS criteria accumulated.

CONCLUSION

Post-DST cortisol should be viewed as a continuous parameter in risk stratification algorithms for the development of MS and particularly dysglycemia.

Clinical features, risk of mass enlargement, and development of endocrine hyperfunction in patients with adrenal incidentalomas: a long-term follow-up study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk of mass enlargement and endocrine function modification in patients with adrenal incidentaloma (AI).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we examined clinical and hormonal characteristics of 310 patients with AI (200 females and 110 males; age: 58.3 ± 12.9 years), followed up for a median (interquartile range) of 31.4 months (13.0-78.6) and evaluated for possible modification in adrenal mass size and hormonal function. The hormonal evaluation included morning serum cortisol and plasma ACTH at 8 a.m., aldosterone, plasma renin activity/direct renin concentration, and 24-h urine metanephrines/normetanephrines. One microgram overnight dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was performed. Autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) was diagnosed in the presence of cortisol after 1 mg DST > 5 μg/dl (138 nmol/l) or >1.8 and ≤5 μg/dl (50-138 nmol/l) and at least one of the following: (i) low ACTH; (ii) increased 24-h urinary-free cortisol; (iii) absence of cortisol rhythm; and (iv) post-LDDST cortisol level > 1.8 μg/dl (50 nmol/l). When there was no biochemical evidence of adrenal hormonal hyperactivity, AIs were classified as nonfunctioning (NFAIs). The mass was considered significantly enlarged when the size increase was more than 20% and at least 5 mm compared to baseline.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, NFAIs were found in 209 patients, while ACS and overt adrenal hyperfunction were diagnosed in 81 and 20 patients, respectively. During follow-up, 3.3% and 1.5% of patients with NFAI developed subtle and overt endocrine hyperfunction, respectively, while a significant mass enlargement was observed in 17.7% of all AIs. The risk of developing ACS was significantly higher in patients with adenoma >28 mm (hazard ratio [HR] 12.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33-66.52, P = 0.003), in those with bilateral adrenal tumors (HR: 5.36; 95% CI, 1.17-24.48, P = 0.030), and with low/suppressed ACTH values (HR: 11.2, 95% CI 2.06-60.77; P = 0.005). The risk of mass enlargement was lower for patients in the fourth quartile of body mass index than those in the first quartile (HR 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14-0.78; P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AI, the risk of developing hormonal hyperfunction and mass enlargement is overall low, although some tumor characteristics and anthropometric features might increase this risk. Taking account of all these aspects is important for planning a tailored follow-up in AI patients.

Hormonal Evaluation of Incidental Adrenal Masses: The Exception, Not the Rule

BACKGROUND

Incidental adrenal masses (IAMs) occur in approximately 4% of patients undergoing abdominal CT scans for any indication. Hormonal evaluation is recommended for all IAMs. The purpose of this study was to identify the rate of IAMs in a screening population and to determine the adequacy of endocrine evaluation of newly identified IAMs based on established guidelines.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 6913 patients undergoing a non-contrast screening CT colonography at a single academic medical center between June 2004 and July 2012.

RESULTS

The prevalence of IAMs in this asymptomatic screening population was 2.1% (n = 148). Of those patients, 8.8% (n = 11) underwent some form of hormonal evaluation and only 6.4% (n = 8) patients had a "complete" workup. Cortisol, metanephrines, and an aldosterone-renin ratio were evaluated in 8.0%, 7.2%, and 4.0% of patients, respectively. Of the patients (n = 11) who underwent hormonal evaluation, 27.3% had functional masses and 36.4% underwent surgery. Of those who did not have hormonal evaluation, 42.1% (n = 48) had comorbidities that should have prompted hormonal evaluation based on established guidelines. Hormonal evaluation was not performed in 89.4% of patients with hypertension and 21.1% of patients with diabetes. 88.9% of patients on three or more antihypertensive medications did not undergo any hormonal evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance with IAM workup guidelines is poor, which may result in missed diagnosis of functional adrenal masses. Establishment of a robust protocol and education on appropriate workup for IAMs is necessary for adequate hormonal evaluation.

Clinical Characteristics and Follow-Up Results of Adrenal Incidentaloma

It is recommended that adrenal incidentaloma patients should be monitored for radiological changes, increase in size and new functionality that may occur in the future, even if they are benign and nonfunctional at the initial evaluation. Our aim is to evaluate the key clinical characteristics of adrenal incidentaloma patients focusing on changes during follow-up and associated clinical outcomes. A total of 755 patients (median age: 56 years), with an adrenal incidentaloma > 1 cm and underwent functionality tests, were included in the study. Clinical characteristics, functionality status and follow-up durations were recorded. During the course of follow-up, any changes in size and development of new functionality, and clinical consequences thereof were evaluated. In 71.8% of patients, incidentalomas were non-functional. Most frequent functionality (15.8%, n=119) was subclinical hypercortisolemia (SH) [10.9% (n=82) possible autonomous cortisol secretion (PACS) and 4.9% (n=37) autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS)] of all incidentalomas. Frequencies of Cushing's syndrome (CS), pheochromacytoma and primary hyperaldosteronism were 4.9% (n=37), 3.8% (n=29) and 3.7% (n=28), respectively. Adrenocortical carcinoma frequency was 1.5% (n=11). Of 755 patients, 43% (n=325) were followed up regularly more than 6 months. Median follow-up duration was 24 months (6-120). A total of 17 (5.2%) patients, which had non-functional incidentalomas at baseline had developed new functionality during follow-up, of which 15 (4.6%) were SH [13 patients (4%) PACS and 2 patients (0.6%) ACS] and 2 (0.6%) were CS. During follow-up, 24% (n=78) of the patients had an increase in mass size between 5-9 mm, while 11.7% (n=38) of the patients had an increase of ≥10 mm. During follow-up, 4% (n=13) of the patients developed a new lesion with a diameter ≥10 mm on the opposite side. In patients with a follow-up duration of more than 2 years, frequencies of size increase and new lesion emerging at the opposite adrenal gland were higher. 14 patients (4.3% of the patients with regular follow-up) underwent surgery due to increase in size or development of new functionality during follow-up. Our study demonstrated that a necessity for surgery may arise due to increase in size and development of functionality during follow-up period in adrenal incidentaloma patients, and thus continuing patient follow-up, even with wider intervals, will be appropriate.

WFUMB position paper on the management incidental findings: adrenal incidentaloma

Focal lesions of the adrenal glands are incidentally detected in approximately 5% of cases by modern imaging techniques. Fewer than 5% of these adrenal incidentalomas are malignant and approximately 10% have endocrine activity. Reliable differentiation of malignant versus benign and hormonally active versus nonfunctional adrenal incidentalomas significantly influences therapeutic management and the outcome of affected individuals. Therefore, each adrenal incidentaloma should undergo a standardized diagnostic work-up to exclude malignancy and endocrine activity. This position statement of the World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) summarizes the available evidence on the management of adrenal incidentaloma and describes efficient management strategies with particular reference to the role of ultrasound techniques.

Tako-tsubo Syndrome as First Manifestation in a Case of Pheochromocytoma Developed From a Non-functional Adrenal Incidentaloma

Background: Pheochromocytoma is a catecholamine secreting tumor that, in extremely rare cases, may develop over time from a non-functional adrenal adenoma. Catecholamine excess can lead to a kind of cardiomyopathy similar to that seen in tako-tsubo syndrome (TTS). Case report: A 69 years old female with a history of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and a non-functional right adrenal adenoma diagnosed 3 years earlier was referred to our center for further investigations. During the evaluation, she had a hypertensive crisis with chest pain, tachycardia, and diaphoresis. Suspecting an acute coronary syndrome, she underwent coronary angiography, which showed the typical features of TTS. The high 24 h-urinary metanephrines excretion and abdominal MRI findings were suggestive of pheochromocytoma. Right laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed, with the resolution of all symptoms. Pathology findings confirmed the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. After 12 months, the patient was still asymptomatic, with the echocardiography displaying a complete recovery of the left-ventricular function. Conclusions: The development of a pheochromocytoma from an adrenal non functional adenoma is an extremely rare event, but potentially life-threating because of the catecholamine-associated cardiovascular toxicity. In particular, TTS is a form of cardiomyopathy that has been increasingly described as associated with catecholamine-secreting tumors. The exclusion of pheochromocytoma in a patient with TTS has important therapeutic implications, since the administration of β-blockers may be extremely harmful in patients with catecholamine surge in the absence of adequate α-blockage.

Cardiometabolic profile of non-functioning and autonomous cortisol-secreting adrenal incidentalomas. Is the cardiometabolic risk similar or are there differences?

OBJECTIVE

To study the differences in the cardiometabolic profile between patients with non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas (NFAI) and incidentalomas with autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS).

METHODS

A total of 149 patients with adrenal incidentalomas were retrospectively evaluated and followed-up for a mean time of 34.6 months at Departments of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases Units of four tertiary Spanish hospitals. Patients were grouped as NFAI or ACS adenomas based on two cutoffs in the dexamethasone suppression test (DST): 3.0 µg/dl (NFAI_DST3 or ACS_DST3) and 1.8 µg/dl (ACS_DST1.8 and NFAI_DST1.8).

RESULTS

The mean age of both groups was 62.0 (10.31) and was similar in ACS and NFAI. The prevalence of diabetes, high blood pressure, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular disease was higher in ACS than in NFAI, but differences only reached statistical significance for cerebrovascular disease using the 3.0 µg/dl cutoff (15.8% vs 2.3%, p = 0.01) and for diabetes using the 1.8 µg/dl cutoff (38.0% vs 22.0%, p = 0.04). No differences were found in the prevalence of dyslipidemia. The prevalence of obesity was lower in patients with ACS than in NFAI 26.3% vs 39.2%, p = 0.18 (NFAI_DST3 vs ACS_DST3) and 32.1% vs 40.6%, p = 0.56 (ACS_DST1.8 vs NFAI_DST1.8), but the differences did not reach statistical significance. Maximum adenoma diameter (R-squared = 0.15, p < 0.001) and cerebrovascular disease (OR = 1.59, p = 0.04) were the only parameters that could be predicted by the DST. The DST was an inadequate predictor of clinical (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index), hormonal (DHEAS, ACTH, UFC, and basal serum cortisol), biochemical (glucose, cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides), and other radiological (laterality, lipid content) parameters. Throughout the follow-up, patients did not develop overt Cushing's Syndrome; three NFAI_DST3 developed ACS_DST3, eight NFAI_DST1.8 developed ACS_DST1.8, and one NFAI_DST1.8 progressed to ACS_DST3. In both groups (NFAI and ACS) the metabolic profile remained stable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest higher prevalence of diabetes and cerebrovascular disease in ACS patients compared with NFAI. However, probably because of the small sample size, the differences only reached statistical significance using the cutoffs of 1.8 µg/dl for diabetes and 3.0 µg/dl for cerebrovascular disease. Patients with ACS and NFAI rarely progress to more aggressive forms of hypercortisolism, and the metabolic profile usually remains stable during the follow-up.

Autonomous cortisol secretion in adrenal incidentalomas

Adrenal incidentalomas (AI) are one of the most frequent reasons for consultation in Endocrinology, as they are present in 3-10% of the general population. Up to 20% of them may have autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS), a term that refers to AI carriers with biochemical evidence of excess cortisol, but without the "specific" clinical signs of Cushing's syndrome. As ACS is associated with an increased risk of diabetes, obesity, high blood pressure (HBP), osteoporosis, cardiovascular events, and global mortality; its correct identification is of great importance. There are different laboratory assays to detect ACS, but all of them have some limitations. The dexamethasone suppression test is the most accepted for screening. However, there is no consensus on the cutoff point that should be used. Low levels of ACTH and DHEA-S and high urinary free cortisol are also associated with ACS, but in isolation they are of little value to establish the diagnosis. Considering its clinical implications and the lack of consensus in the diagnosis and in which is the most appropriate management of these patients, this review offers a quick reference guide of ACS, presenting an exhaustive review of the topic: its definition, epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical implications, treatment, and follow-up.

Adrenal incidentaloma follow-up is influenced by patient, radiologic, and medical provider factors: A review of 804 cases

BACKGROUND

The majority of adrenal incidentalomas are benign, although some are large, functional, or malignant and may require surgery. Therefore all require follow-up. This study aimed to determine the pattern of adrenal incidentaloma follow-up in a level 1 trauma center, focusing on the factors that influence whether follow-up is facilitated.

METHODS

Patients with computed tomography-detected adrenal incidentalomas between January 2010 and September 2015 were included. A keyword search identified case files, which were reviewed for demographic characteristics, managing unit, computed tomography indication and findings, and follow-up arrangements. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata SE Version 14.

RESULTS

A total of 38,848 chest and abdominal computed tomographic scans were performed in the study period, revealing 804 patients with adrenal incidentalomas who met inclusion criteria (mean age 65, 58% male). The mean size of adrenal incidentaloma was 23 mm. Follow-up was organized in 30% of cases and was more likely to occur in younger patients (mean age 62 vs 66, P < .001); in larger lesions (mean size 26 mm vs 21 mm, P < .001); if the computed tomographic scan suggested follow-up (P < .001); or if the computed tomography report suggested a diagnosis (P < .001). Follow-up arrangements were most likely to be made by the trauma unit (39%, P = .01).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights that adrenal incidentalomas follow-up is often overlooked, and that follow-up is influenced by patient, radiologic, and medical provider factors. An adrenal lesion follow-up protocol may improve follow-up rates but requires further analysis.

A step by step approach in differential diagnosing of adrenal incidentaloma (epinephroma), (with comments on the new Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society of Endocrinology)

Objectives. To present a step by step approach for the diagnosis of adrenal incidentaloma (AI).

Method. An extensive review of the literature was conducted, searching the Pub-Med and Google Scholar using the Mesh terms; Adrenal; Incidentaloma; Adrenal tumours; Radiology; Diagnosis. We also did a cross-referencing search of the literature. Comments on the new European guidelines are presented.

Results. The majority of the tumours are non-functioning benign adenomas. The most important radiological characteristic of an adrenal incidentaloma is the radiation attenuation coefficient. Wash out percentage and the imaging characteristics of the tumour may help in diagnosis.

Conclusion. Density less than 10 HU is in most cases characteristic of a lipid rich benign adenoma. More than 10 HU or/and history of malignancy raise the possibility for cancer. 1 mg dexamethasone test and plasma metanephrines should be done in all patients. If there is history of hypokalemia and/or resistant hypertension we test the plasma aldosterone to plasma renin ratio (ARR). Newer studies have shown that tumours even nonfunctioning and less than 4 cm may increase the metabolic risks so we may consider surgery at an earlier stage.

Increased mortality in patients with adrenal incidentalomas and autonomous cortisol secretion: a 13-year retrospective study from one center

PURPOSE

To compare long-term outcomes in patients with adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) with the response to a 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test (DST).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with "non-functional" AIs (n = 365) were examined. Patients with overt hormone excess, adrenocortical cancer and known malignancy had been excluded. Patients were classified to normal cortisol secretion group (n = 204, DST ≤ 50 nmol/l), possible autonomous cortisol secretion group (n = 128, DST 51-138 nmol/l) and autonomous cortisol secretion group (n = 33, DST ≥ 138 nmol/l).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (10.1%) deceased during the follow-up period (5.2 ± 2.3 years): 16(7.8%) in the non-secreting group (time from diagnosis to death: 3.9 ± 2.9 years), 15 in the possible autonomous cortisol secretion group (11.7%, 3.2 ± 1.8 years) and 6 in the autonomous cortisol secretion group (18.2%, 2.3 ± 1.5 years), respectively (P = 0.019). Multivariate analysis only found significant association with age and the tumour size but if cortisol levels post-DST were analysed as a continuous variable it was significant as well. All deaths in autonomous cortisol secretion group were due to cancer not related to adrenal glands. Hypertension, cardiovascular disease and medications were more common in the possible and autonomous cortisol secretion group, especially in the former. More bilateral AIs and larger AI size were found in the two latter groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with autonomous cortisol secretion had higher mortality than those with non-functioning AIs though cortisol levels post-DST as a continuous variable, age and tumour size were better predictor of mortality. Cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis medication seemed more prevalent in the possible and autonomous cortisol secretion groups, especially in the former.

Radiology of the adrenal incidentalomas. Review of the literature

The term "adrenal incidentaloma" is a radiological term. Adrenal incidentalomas are adrenal tumors discovered in an imaging study that has been obtained for indications exclusive to adrenal conditions (Udelsman 2001; Linos 2003; Bulow et al. 2006; Anagnostis et al. 2009). This definition excludes patients undergoing imaging testing as part of staging and work-up for cancer (Grumbach et al. 2003; Anagnostis et al. 2009). Papierska et al. (2013) have added the prerequisite that the size of a tumor must be "greater than 1cm in diameter", in order to be called incidentaloma. Although in the most cases these masses are non-hypersecreting and benign, they still represent an important clinical concern because of the risk of malignancy or hormone hyperfunction (Barzon et al. 2003). Th e adrenal tumors belong to the commonest incidental findings having been discovered (Kanagarajah et al. 2012).

Concomitant alterations of metabolic parameters, cardiovascular risk factors and altered cortisol secretion in patients with adrenal incidentalomas during prolonged follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Adrenal incidentalomas (AI) are associated with metabolic and hormonal abnormalities, most commonly autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS). Data regarding alterations of insulin resistance (IR) and ACS after prolonged follow-up are limited. We investigated the evolution of IR, cortisol secretion and ACS development in patients with AI during prolonged follow-up.

DESIGN

Prospective study in a tertiary hospital.

PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS

Seventy-one patients with AI [51 nonfunctioning (NFAI) and 20 ACS] and 5·54 ± 1·7 years follow-up underwent testing for ACS and oral glucose tolerance test to determine IR indices and adrenal imaging.

RESULTS

At follow-up, 16/51 (31%) NFAI patients converted to ACS, while two with previous ACS reverted to NFAI; 21% (7/33) of patients who did not covert to ACS exhibited high urinary-free cortisol (H-UFC) levels. All AI patients developed deterioration of IR irrespective of their cortisol secretory status. Eight patients developed newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (9·8% NFAI and 15% ACS, respectively) and 14 IR (17·6% NFAI and 25% ACS, respectively). Adenoma size increased from 2·1 ± 0·8 to 2·3 ± 0·8 cm, whereas IR correlated with postdexamethasone cortisol level and adenoma size increase. IR showed an incremental continuum trend from normal UFC (Ν-UFC), to H-UFC, C-ACS and ACS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

New-onset ACS developed in 31% patients with NFAI, whereas 21% of NFAI patients had H-UFC levels. All AI patients as a group and the subgroups of N-UFC, H-UFC, C-ACS and ACS patients developed deterioration of metabolic parameters during follow-up that was more prominent in ACS patients.

Management of the Incidental Adrenal Mass

CONTEXT

Incidentally discovered adrenal masses are becoming more common in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To review the management of the incidental adrenal mass, including initial evaluation, surveillance, medical therapy, and surgical therapy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature search of English-language publications that included the keywords adrenal incidentaloma and incidental adrenal mass was performed through July 2015 using PubMed. Relevant original articles and guidelines on the management of the incidental adrenal mass were ultimately selected for analysis, with the consensus of all authors.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Data from the manuscripts included in this review were synthesized, and findings were categorized into metabolic evaluation, imaging, biopsy, surgical considerations, and follow-up recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Ideally, management of patients with adrenal incidentalomas should involve a multidisciplinary approach with experienced surgeons, radiologists, and endocrinologists to determine whether such lesions are benign or malignant and functional or nonfunctional and/or whether they require surgical resection.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Management of patients with adrenal incidentalomas should involve a multidisciplinary approach with surgeons, radiologists, and endocrinologists to determine whether such lesions are benign or malignant and functional or nonfunctional and/or whether they require surgical resection.

CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN ADRENAL INCIDENTALOMA: EXPERIENCE FROM ONE CENTER

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcome in patients with adrenal incidentaloma (AI).

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of 637 patients with AI referred to a tertiary center over 8 years. Radiologic and hormonal evaluations were performed at baseline. Follow-up imaging was carried out if necessary, and hormonal evaluation was performed at 24 months according to national guidelines.

RESULTS

The mean age was 62.7 ± 11.6 years, and the mean AI size was 25.3 ± 17.0 mm at presentation. Hormonal evaluation revealed that 85.4% of all tumors were nonfunctioning adenomas, 4.1% subclinical Cushing syndrome (SCS), 1.4% pheochromocytoma, 1.4% primary hyperaldosteronism, 0.8% Cushing syndrome, 0.6% adrenocortical carcinoma, 0.3% congenital adrenal hyperplasia, 2.2% metastasis to adrenals, and 3.8% other lesions of benign origin. Bilateral tumors were found in 11%, and compared to unilateral tumors, SCS was more prevalent. Only 2 cases were reclassified during follow-up, both as SCS, but neither had had a dexamethasone suppression test performed at initial work-up. In patients diagnosed with an adrenal metastasis, 92.9% were deceased within 2 years. Excluding those with malignant tumors, 12.9% of patients died during the study period of up to 11 years due to other causes than adrenal.

CONCLUSION

Most AIs were benign, but a small fraction of tumors were functional and malignant. The prognosis of patients with adrenal metastasis was extremely poor, but otherwise, the mortality rate was similar to that for the general population. Follow-up of AIs <4 cm with an initial nonfunctional profile and benign radiologic appearance appears unwarranted, but screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia should be considered.

Adrenal Mass in Patients who Underwent Abdominal Computed Tomography Examination

BACKGROUND

Adrenal masses are usually discovered incidentally (IAM) during abdominal computed tomography (CT).

AIMS

We aimed to describe the prevalence, management, and outcome of incidentally discovered adrenal mass on radiological investigation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted to look for IAM identified by abdominal CT performed for other reasons between 2004 and 2008 and were followed for 4 years. IAM patients with known malignancy or clinically evident adrenal disease or overt disease originally missed due to insufficient clinical examination were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 13,115 patients underwent abdominal CT, of which 136 were identified with adrenal mass (69 males and 67 females). Overall, 84 patients had benign IAM and six had primary adrenal carcinoma (all had tumor size ≥4 cm and five were males). Hormonal evaluation was performed in 80 cases, which revealed hypersecretion in 10 cases (six had Conn's syndrome and four had pheochromocytoma). Males had higher frequency of right-sided IAMs; whereas, left-sided IAM swere more common among females (P = 0.02). Seven patients underwent surgery and all were males (one Conn's syndrome, one pheochromocytoma, three primary adrenal adenocarcinoma, one benign nonfunctional adenoma, and one metastatic tumor). Only one patient died due to brain metastasis.

CONCLUSION

The overall prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma is 1% in Qatar. Unfortunately, hormonal evaluation, surgical referral, and follow-up are not appropriate in this study. Moreover, screening of IAM warrants more attention to rule out malignancy. This work could be of value as a local auditing for the current management.

Adrenal incidentalomas: a disease of modern technology offering opportunities for improved patient care

Adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) are found in approximately 4% of patients undergoing abdominal imaging, with peak prevalence in the sixth and seventh decades of life. Detection of AI warrants clinical, biochemical, and radiological evaluation to establish its secretory status and risk of malignancy. Careful review of the lipid content, size, and imaging phenotype of an adrenal mass is needed to evaluate the risk for malignancy. Identification of an AI may be an opportunity to identify an underlying secretory tumor that may have been otherwise unrecognized. A practical approach to investigation and follow-up of AIs is presented in this article.

Adrenal incidentaloma: evaluation and management

Adrenal incidentalomas are adrenal masses discovered incidental to imaging studies performed for reasons unrelated to adrenal pathology. Although most adrenal incidentalomas are non-functioning benign adenomas, their increasing prevalence presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The assessment of adrenal incidentalomas is aimed at deciding whether or not the tumour should be surgically removed. Adrenalectomy is indicated for phaeochromocytoma, other symptomatic hormone-secreting tumours and those with a high risk of malignancy. Biochemical screening for tumour hypersecretion is mandatory in all adrenal incidentalomas, since hormone secreting tumours may be clinically silent. The diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma is of paramount importance because of its life-threatening complications. Non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas need assessment for risk of malignancy, and this is based on the size of the tumour and its imaging characteristics. An observational policy with periodic radiological and biochemical reassessment is pursued in patients with non-functioning incidentalomas with low malignancy risk. The duration and frequency of reassessment remains unclear, as the natural history of adrenal incidentalomas has yet to be clearly defined, and there is a lack of controlled studies comparing surgical intervention with observation. However, the possibility of acquiring autonomous hypersecretion or conversion to malignancy in an incidentaloma diagnosed to be a benign non-functioning lesion is very low, and most patients may be safely discharged after an initial follow-up period of 2 years.

Improving patient notification of solid abdominal viscera incidental findings with a standardized protocol

Background

The increasing use of computed tomography (CT) scans in the evaluation of trauma patients has led to increased detection of incidental radiologic findings. Incidental findings (IFs) of the abdominal viscera are among the most commonly discovered lesions and can carry a risk of malignancy. Despite this, patient notification regarding these findings is often inadequate.

Methods

We identified patients who underwent abdominopelvic CTs as part of their trauma evaluation during a recent 1-year period (9/2011-8/2012). Patients with IFs of the kidneys, liver, adrenal glands, pancreas and/or ovaries had their charts reviewed for documentation of the lesion in their discharge paperwork or follow-up. A quality improvement project was initiated where patients with abdominal IFs were verbally informed of the finding, it was noted on their discharge summary and/or were referred to specialists for evaluation. Nine months after the implementation of the IF protocol, a second chart review was performed to determine if the rate of patient notification improved.

Results

Of 1,117 trauma patients undergoing abdominopelvic CT scans during the 21 month study period, 239 patients (21.4%) had 292 incidental abdominal findings. Renal lesions were the most common (146 patients, 13% of all patients) followed by hepatic (95/8.4%) and adrenal (38/3.4%) lesions. Pancreatic (10/0.9%) and ovarian lesions (3/0.3%) were uncommon. Post-IF protocol implementation patient notification regarding IFs improved by over 80% (32.4% vs. 17.7% pre-protocol, p = 0.02).

Conclusion

IFs of the solid abdominal organs are common in trauma patients undergoing abdominopelvic CT scan. Patient notification regarding these lesions is often inadequate. A systematic approach to the documentation and evaluation of incidental radiologic findings can significantly improve the rate of patient notification.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13032-014-0022-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Should the diagnostic and therapeutic protocols for adrenal incidentalomas be changed?

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of adrenal incidentalomas is increasing with the aging of the population and the use of high resolution imaging technics. Current protocols propose a comprehensive monitoring of their functional and morphological state, but with no conclusive clinical evidence that endorses it.

METHOD

Retrospective study of 96 patients diagnosed with adrenal incidentaloma between 2008 and 2012. We evaluated clinical, functional and imaging at baseline and during follow-up.

RESULTS

Initially, 9 cases were surgically removed: 4 due to hyperfunction (2 Cushing syndromes and 2 pheochromocytomas) and 5 due to size larger than 4cm. During follow-up one case of pheochromocytoma was diagnosed and another grew more than 1cm, needing surgery. In 98.86% of nonfunctional and benign lesions, there was no functional and/or morphological changes in the final evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study challenge the validity of current diagnostic-therapeutic protocols of incidentalomas, which should be reassessed in prospective studies taking into account efficiency characteristics.

Laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy: Our initial results

OBJECTIVE

To present the first 24 laparoscopic adrenalectomies performed in our clinic because of an adrenal mass.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The medical files of 24 patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy between December 2008 and March 2013 at Haseki Teaching and Research Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The demographic characteristics of the patients were recorded. Lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed in all patients. The operation time was defined as the interval between the first incision of the skin and closure of the skin. Intraoperative complications, estimated blood loss and hospital stays of the patients were evaluated. Final pathologies were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 44.2±8.58 years (range: 29-66 years). Nine patients were female and 15 were male. A total of 24 masses were identified in the right (n=11), and left (n=13) adrenal glands masses were identified., Eighteen patients (75%) had no symptoms, and the masses were identified incidentally. The mean operation time was 144±46.1 minutes (range: 90-320 minutes), and the mean blood loss was 74±12.3 mL (range: 50-130 mL). None of the patients required a blood transfusion. In one patient, liver injury was identified intraoperatively due to traction. The mean duration of hospitalization was 2.9±1.1 days (range: 2-5 days). Adrenocortical adenoma and pheochromocytoma were the most common pathologies.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe and effective method for the treatment of adrenal masses with low complication rates.

Biochemical and radiological relationships in patients with pheochromocytoma: lessons from a case control study

BACKGROUND

An elevation of fractionated plasma or urinary metanephrine (MN) or nor-metanephrine (NMN), collectively called metanephrines (MN and NMN), >4-fold above the upper limit of normal (ULN) is usually considered to be diagnostic for pheochromocytoma (PHEO). There are a greater number of false positive results when the elevations are more modest.

AIM

To identify biochemical and radiological features in PHEOs with modest elevations (<4-fold above ULN) of metanephrines.

METHODOLOGY

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 112 patients with PHEO (10% extra-adrenal) and 208 patients with a non-PHEO adrenal mass operated from 1997-2011, who had metanephrines measured pre-operatively. We divided PHEO into group 1 (n = 90) with metanephrines ≥4-fold ULN and group 2 (n = 22) with metanephrines <4-fold ULN. The non-PHEO group was designated as group 3.

RESULTS

The median (range) tumour size in group 1 and group 2 was 4·8 cm (1·7-22) and 3·0 cm (1·7-5) respectively (P < 0·001). All patients with PHEO in group 2 had a tumour <5 cm in size. The MN fraction was elevated in about 65% of groups 1 and 2; only 2 (1%) patients in group 3 had an elevated urinary MN fraction, and none were associated with an elevated plasma MN fraction. All PHEOs had a pre-contrast attenuation ≥17 Hounsfield Units (HU).

CONCLUSIONS

Modest elevations (<4-fold ULN) of the NMN fraction in an adrenal mass >5 cm are almost always falsely positive. Elevations in plasma and urinary MN fraction are less likely to be false positive. The CT pre-contrast attenuation of PHEOs is >10 HU.

Mutation screening in a Norwegian cohort with pheochromocytoma

Pheochromocytomas (PHEOs) are neuroendocrine tumours, originating from chromaffin cells in the adrenal medulla. They are either sporadic or hereditary. It is important to identify the hereditary cases, so that patients and relatives with germline mutations can be offered regular surveillance. The objective of this study was the detection of pathogenic germline mutations in a cohort of Norwegian PHEO patients. Blood samples and/or formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens, were collected from 60 patients who were operated upon between 1986 and 2004 at two university hospitals in Norway. DNA mutation analyses were performed successfully in the 42 blood samples and in one of the paraffin-embedded tissue specimen in VHL, RET, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD and NF1. In all, 32 different DNA variants were observed, of which 8 were classified as pathogenic (19 %), or possibly pathogenic; three in NF1, two in RET and VHL and one in SDHB. Two variants were observed in one patient, one in SDHB and one in NF1. Three of these variants are, to the best of our knowledge, new ones; two in NF1 [c.950_51insGCTGA, (p.Glu318LeufsX59) and c.1588G > A, (p.Val530Ile)] and one in VHL (c.308C > T, p.Pro103Leu). In conclusion the overall incidence of germline mutations in genes associated with familial PHEO was found to be of the same order of magnitude in the present Norwegian series as in those from other countries. Two new NF1 variants and one new VHL gene variant were detected.

Long-term follow-up in adrenal incidentalomas: an Italian multicenter study

CONTEXT

The long-term consequences of subclinical hypercortisolism (SH) in patients with adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) are unknown.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

In this retrospective multicentric study, 206 AI patients with a ≥5-year follow-up (median, 72.3 mo; range, 60-186 mo) were enrolled.

INTERVENTION AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adrenocortical function, adenoma size, metabolic changes, and incident cardiovascular events (CVEs) were assessed. We diagnosed SH in 11.6% of patients in the presence of cortisol after a 1 mg-dexamethasone suppression test >5 μg/dL (138 nmol/L) or at least two of the following: low ACTH, increased urinary free cortisol, and 1 mg-dexamethasone suppression test >3 μg/dL (83 nmol/L).

RESULTS

At baseline, age and the prevalence of CVEs and type 2 diabetes mellitus were higher in patients with SH than in patients without SH (62.2 ± 11 y vs 58.5 ± 10 y; 20.5 vs 6%; and 33.3 vs 16.8%, respectively; P < .05). SH and type 2 diabetes mellitus were associated with prevalent CVEs (odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-9.0; and OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.3, respectively), regardless of age. At the end of the follow-up, SH was diagnosed in 15 patients who were without SH at baseline. An adenoma size >2.4 cm was associated with the risk of developing SH (sensitivity, 73.3%; specificity, 60.5%; P = .014). Weight, glycemic, lipidic, and blood pressure control worsened in 26, 25, 13, and 34% of patients, respectively. A new CVE occurred in 22 patients. SH was associated with the worsening of at least two metabolic parameters (OR, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.6-6.9) and with incident CVEs (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.0-7.1), regardless of age and follow-up.

CONCLUSION

SH is associated with the risk of incident CVEs. Besides the clinical follow-up, in patients with an AI >2.4 cm, a long-term biochemical follow-up is also required because of the risk of SH development.

Patient-reported impacts of a conservative management programme for the clinically inapparent adrenal mass

The aim of this study was to assess patient-reported impacts and health-related quality of life (HRQL) of a 2-year follow-up programme in a large cohort of patients with stationary, non-functioning, adrenal incidentalomas (AIs) in western Sweden. 145 patients (mean age 68 years, 62 % females) with AI from a prospective study in western Sweden were studied. All had completed a 2-year follow-up programme by November 2007, without evidence of adrenal malignancy or hormone over-production. To evaluate patient-reported impacts and HRQL, an eight-item adrenal incidentaloma impact questionnaire was used retrospectively, together with the hospital anxiety and depression scale, and the short form-36. There were 111 patients (mean age 67 years, 63 % females) who responded to the questionnaire (response rate 77 %). 77 % reported that the AI diagnosis had caused them to be worried; however, fewer than 20 % had thought about the lesion often during the follow-up programme, and only 3 % had felt that it had a large impact on their current daily life. Only 4 % stated that the follow-up programme had been a negative experience, nevertheless 10 % reported a negative impact on their HRQL during the follow-up programme. Only 2 % stated that release from follow-up caused worry to any degree. In total, 29 % had possible anxiety, and 30 % had possible depression, probably reflecting significant co-morbidity. Possible anxiety correlated with a more negative experience of the follow-up programme. In conclusion, the 2-year follow-up programme for patients with AI was well tolerated. Nonetheless, a small number remained worried throughout follow-up, suggesting the need for tailored counselling in individual patients to ameliorate negative impacts of follow-up.

Evaluation of patients with adrenal incidentalomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adrenal incidentalomas are common in this era of ubiquitous imaging. There is a lack of consensus on the mode and extent of evaluation, and follow-up of adrenal incidentalomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is increasing evidence of morbidity associated with subclinical hormone excess from functioning adrenal masses. Improved radiological techniques and interpretation have helped identify lipid-rich adenomas more accurately and tailor the evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas.

SUMMARY

A practical outline in the investigation and follow-up of adrenal incidentalomas incorporating the recent evidence is presented.

Risk of concomitant malignancy in hyperfunctioning adrenal incidentalomas

BACKGROUND

Adrenal masses are common incidental findings on radiologic imaging. The association between malignancy and hormonal hyperactivity found in incidentally discovered adrenal tumors, however, remains unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent adrenalectomy for incidentally discovered adrenal tumors at a single institution. Outcomes and operative data were compared by univariate analysis. Area under the curve was used to analyze the effect of tumor size in predicting malignancy.

RESULTS

There were 49 patients who initially presented with adrenal incidentalomas that underwent adrenalectomy. Most patients were Caucasian women with an average age of 51 ± 14 years. Of this group, 24 patients underwent resection for hyperfunctioning adrenal glands. There were no significant differences in malignancy rates between hyperfunctional and nonfunctional tumors (4.1% vs. 12.0%, P = 0.32). On final histopathology, there were four patients with adrenal malignancies: two adrenocortical carcinomas and two metastatic from renal carcinoma. Only one patient with a hyperfunctioning adrenal tumor had underlying malignancy. Overall, invasion of adjacent structures (P < 0.001), presence of lymphadenopathy (P = 0.02), metastasis (P = 0.03), irregular tumor margins (P = 0.01), heterogeneity (P = 0.05), and tumor size >6 cm (P = 0.04) on radiologic imaging were strongly associated with malignancy in adrenal incidentalomas.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of concomitant malignancy and hormonal hyperactivity in adrenal incidentalomas is very low. Tumor size (>6 cm) and radiographic features remain the most important predictors of adrenal malignancy, regardless of tumor function.

An adrenal incidentaloma: how often is it detected and what are the consequences?

Objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate the detection rate of adrenal incidentalomas and subsequent workup. Design. Retrospective cohort study. Methods. Two investigators evaluated the adrenals on abdominal CT scans. Abnormalities were compared to the original radiology reports and an experienced abdominal radiologist reviewed the CT scans. All additional imaging and laboratory tests were assessed. Results. The investigators detected 44/356 adrenal incidentalomas (12%). In 25 patients an adrenal incidentaloma had been noted in the radiology report. The expert radiologist agreed on 19 incidentalomas in 17 patients, two with bilateral incidentalomas. Of the 25 incidentaloma patients, 4 (16%) patients were screened for hormonal overproduction and 2 (8%) patients had follow-up imaging studies. Conclusions. 12% of the patients had an adrenal incidentaloma (42 of 356). 17 (40%) had initially not been reported by the radiologist. When diagnosed with an adrenal incidentaloma, only a small percentage of patients (16%) is screened or undergoes repeated imaging (8%) as proposed in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines on adrenal incidentalomas.

Current status and controversies in adrenal incidentalomas

Adrenal incidentalomas (AI) are serendipitously discovered lesions during abdominal imaging studies that need to be investigated for evidence of hormonal hypersecretion and/or malignancy. Because imaging modalities can reliably identify lesions that carry a high risk of malignancy, we focus on the identification of hypersecretory lesions and those with subclinical activity, particularly Cushing syndrome. Because diverse diagnostic tests and cut-offs are employed, the prevalence of hypersecretory AI varies widely, and there is controversy regarding their long-term sequelae. In this article we provide information regarding current radiological means to define the nature of AI, and the most appropriate biochemical tests for delineating hypersecretory states. We also discuss the duration and intensity of AI follow-up as well as the identification of AI that require specific therapeutic intervention.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of adrenalectomy for nonfunctional adrenal incidentalomas: is there a size threshold for resection?

BACKGROUND

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare, but aggressive, malignancy. Current American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE)/American Association of Endocrine Surgeons (AAES) guidelines recommend resection of nonfunctional adrenal neoplasms ≥ 4 cm. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of this approach.

METHODS

A decision tree was constructed for patients with a nonfunctional, 4-cm adrenal incidentaloma with no radiographic suspicion for ACC. Patients were randomized to adrenalectomy, surveillance per AACE/AAES guidelines, or no follow-up ("sign-off"). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) includes health care costs, including missed ACC. ICER (dollar/life-year-saved [LYS]) was determined from the societal perspective. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis, assuming a 2.0% probability of ACC for a 4-cm tumor, surgery was more cost-effective than surveillance (ICER $25,843/LYS). Both surgery and surveillance were incrementally more cost-effective than sign-off ($35/LYS and $8/LYS, respectively). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the model was sensitive to patient age, tumor size, probability of ACC, mortality of ACC, and cost of hospitalization. The results of the model were stable across different cost and complications related to adrenalectomy, regardless of operative approach.

CONCLUSION

In our model, adrenalectomy was cost-effective for neoplasms >4 cm and in patients <65 years, primarily owing to the aggressiveness of ACC. Current AACE/AAES guideline recommendations for the resection of adrenal incidentalomas ≥ 4 cm seem to be cost-effective.

Adrenal incidentaloma

Adrenal incidentaloma is a common clinical problem and its prevalence, in radiological studies, comes close to that of autoptic data as a result of imaging technological advances. The diagnostic challenge is to distinguish the majority of benign lesions from other masses, either malignant or hormone secreting, which require further therapy. The imaging evaluation (unenhanced CT and MRI) can differentiate malignant to benign lesions because the benign lesions have high lipid content. All patients should be tested for hypercortisolism and pheochromocytoma whereas aldosteronism should be tested in hypertensive patients only. The optimal diagnostic management for adrenal incidentaloma is still controversial, and the endocrinologist must devise a cost-effective approach taking into account the extensive endocrine work-up and imaging investigations that may be necessary. A tailored strategy may be based on the selection of patients at increased risk who require a careful and extensive follow-up among the vast majority of patients who require a simplified follow-up.

Management of adrenal incidentaloma

The term adrenal incidentaloma covers a wide spectrum of adrenal pathologies sharing the method of discovery. The management of adrenal incidentaloma is controversial, and clinicians should determine whether the patient's health is affected by the presence of a tumor. Critical points in management include differentiating benign from malignant and hormonally active from nonfunctional adrenal masses. The probability of malignancy is related to tumor size and imaging phenotype. Masses smaller than 4 cm in diameter that exhibit low attenuation by unenhanced CT scan and rapid contrast washout by delayed contrast-enhanced CT scan are probably benign. All patients with adrenal incidentaloma should undergo biochemical evaluations for pheochromocytoma and subclinical or overt Cushing's syndrome, and hypertensive patients should undergo biochemical testing for hyperaldosteronism. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the treatment of choice in all hypersecretory tumors. If adrenocortical carcinoma is suspected, an open adrenalectomy is recommended. Patients who are not candidates for surgical resection of the tumor should be monitored radiographically for 2 years, and hormonal follow-up should be performed annually for 4 years.

Endocrine incidentalomas--challenges imposed by incidentally discovered lesions

Endocrine glands are among the organs that most frequently harbor incidentally discovered lesions. Pituitary, thyroid, parathyroid and adrenal incidentalomas are increasingly encountered in everyday practice with variable clinical implications. The major concerns are the risks of malignancy and hormonal hypersecretion mostly in the form of subclinically functioning tumors. Pituitary incidentalomas are usually microadenomas and most of the time clinically unimportant; however, incidentally discovered larger lesions require a more careful diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Thyroid incidentalomas are extremely common; exclusion of malignancy is the main concern in this clinical setting. Although parathyroid adenomas are not uncommon, these lesions are frequently missed owing to their small size and due to clinical unawareness. Adrenal incidentalomas carry a small but finite risk of malignancy. An intriguing challenge regarding incidentally discovered adrenal lesions is that a substantial proportion is associated with hormonal alterations, mainly in the form of subtle cortisol excess. Although still largely controversial, evidence is emerging that so-called subclinical hypercortisolism may not be completely harmless. The best biochemical criterion of subtle cortisol excess remains elusive. Surgical intervention in selected cases results in some beneficial effects, but more data are required in order to routinely support surgery in this clinical setting. This Review provides a brief overview of the prevalence, clinical effect and management of endocrine incidentalomas with a focus on data regarding the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges imposed by incidentally discovered adrenal lesions.

Cohort study of patients with adrenal lesions discovered incidentally

Background

This prospective cohort study investigated the incidence, clinical features and natural history of incidentally discovered adrenal mass lesions (adrenal incidentaloma, AI) in an unselected population undergoing radiological examination.

Methods

During an 18-month period, all patients with AI were reported prospectively from all 19 radiology departments in western Sweden. Inclusion criteria were: incidentally discovered adrenal enlargement or mass lesion in patients without extra-adrenal malignancy on detection. Clinical and biochemical evaluation was performed on inclusion and after 24 months. Computed tomography (CT) of the adrenals was scheduled at 4, 12 and 24 months. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed for lesions larger than 20 mm. The indications for surgical excision were: hormone activity, lesion diameter more than 30 mm, lesion growth or other radiological features suspicious of malignancy.

Results

Of 534 patients assessed for eligibility, 226 (mean age 67 years, 62·4 per cent women; mean lesion diameter 23·9 mm, 22·6 per cent bilateral) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 19·0 months. After baseline evaluation, 14 patients had surgery owing to primary hyperaldosteronism (3), catecholamine-producing tumour (1), tumour size (6), size and indication of subclinical hypercortisolism (3) and metastasis (1). No hypersecreting lesions were confirmed during follow-up; one patient underwent adrenalectomy for a suspected phaeochromocytoma (adrenocortical adenoma at histopathology). No primary adrenal malignancy was found.

Conclusion

In this prospective cohort study 6·6 per cent of patients with an AI had surgery and benign hormone-producing tumours were verified in 3·1 per cent. Repeat CT and hormone evaluation after 2 years did not increase the sensitivity for diagnosis of malignant or hormone-producing tumours.

The clinical significance of adrenal incidentalomas

BACKGROUND

The term adrenal incidentaloma (AI) indicates an adrenal mass lesion > 1 cm in diameter discovered during testing for conditions unrelated to adrenal disease. The overall prevalence of these lesions ranges between 3% and 10%. Their incidence increases with age, and it is clinically important to identify AI associated with hormonal activity and/or malignant potential.

DESIGN

A detailed Medline search of all English language articles related to AI was carried out, and the clinical implications related to their hormonal activity and malignant potential are discussed.

RESULTS

The subclinical hypercortisolism observed in a significant percentage of patients with AI is associated with some of the detrimental effects of continuous autonomous cortisol secretion, including a higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia, impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes mellitus and an increased risk for osteoporotic fractures. However, it remains to be proven whether treatment to reverse subtle glucocorticoid excess is beneficial. Clinically silent phaeochromocytomas and primary adrenal cancer are conditions associated with significantly high morbidity and mortality and require urgent treatment, while the prevalence and clinical significance of autonomous mineralocorticoid secretion are less clearly defined. Size and radiological features are the main predictors of malignant potential.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients harbouring AI should be evaluated for the possibility of malignancy and/or subclinical hypercortisolism which is associated with cardiovascular risk and bone loss. However, in the absence of prospective controlled studies correlating biochemical activity with end-organ complications, the long-term consequences of AI remain uncertain and their management remains largely pragmatic.

Disappearing adrenal masses

Adrenal incidentalomas are a common finding due to the increasing use and improved technology of imaging studies. The majority of these enlargements are non-functional and irreversible. Publications on reversible adrenal enlargement are sparse. Our patient, a 66-year-old man, was admitted to the hospital due to abdominal discomfort. He was treated for rectal carcinoma 3 years before, and was now free of disease. Computed tomography (CT) scan showed no abnormalities other than the incidental finding of bilateral adrenal enlargement. Metastasis was suspected. The CEA-level, however, was within normal range and there was no evidence of hormonal overproduction. After 1 month the patient was reviewed. Physical examination and laboratory testing were normal. Surprisingly, the CT-scan showed a decreased size of both adrenals and after 3 months even showed completely normalized adrenals. Reversible adrenal enlargements are rare. Commonly described causes of adrenal enlargement are haematomas, cystic lesions and infections of the adrenal glands. The patient in this case did not show any clinical, laboratory or radiological signs of any of these diagnoses. The current existing differential diagnosis for bilateral adrenal enlargement is not sufficient to explain the findings in our patient.

Approach to the patient with an adrenal incidentaloma

Unsuspected adrenal masses, or incidentalomas, are increasingly found with the widespread use of thoracic and abdominal imaging. These masses may be hormonally active or nonfunctional and malignant or benign. Clinicians must determine the nature of the mass to decide what treatment, if any, is needed. Measurement of precontrast Hounsfield units (HU) and contrast washout on computed tomography scan provide useful diagnostic information. All patients should undergo biochemical testing for pheochromocytoma, either with plasma or urinary catecholamine measurements. This is particularly important before surgical resection, which is routinely recommended for masses larger than 4 cm in diameter without a clear-cut diagnosis and for others with hormonal secretion or ominous imaging characteristics. Hypertensive patients should undergo biochemical testing for hyperaldosteronism. Patients with features consistent with Cushing's syndrome, such as glucose intolerance, weight gain, and unexplained osteopenia, should be evaluated for cortisol excess. Here, the dexamethasone suppression test and late-night salivary cortisol may be preferred over measurement of urine cortisol. The ability of surgical resection to reverse features of mild hypercortisolism is not well established. For masses that appear to be benign (<10 HU; washout, >50%), small (<3 cm), and completely nonfunctioning, imaging and biochemical reevaluation (pheochromocytoma and hypercortisolism only) at 1-2 yr (or more) is appropriate. For more indeterminate lesions, repeat evaluation for growth after 3-12 months is useful, with subsequent testing intervals based on the rate of growth.