Myeloid neoplasms after chemotherapy and PRRT: myth and reality

177 Lu-DOTATATE PRRT Safety and Organ-at-Risk Dosimetry in Patients With Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors : Data From the Prospective Phase 2 LUMEN Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the association among toxicity, dosimetry of organs-at-risk, and disease progression in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with GEP-NETs underwent 177 Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in a single-arm, prospective, phase 2 study, where patients were followed up with blood tests, isotopic glomerular filtration rate (iGFR), and imaging examinations (CT/MRI and PET) every 6 months until disease progression. Adverse events (AEs) graded per CTCAEv4.03 and occurring during treatment were collected and followed up until resolution. Dosimetry, including biologically effective doses (BEDs) to kidneys, BED to bone marrow, and absorbed dose (AD) to spleen, was performed after each PRRT cycle. Statistical analyses explored associations among dosimetry, toxicity, and patient progression free-survival.

RESULTS

The most common AEs were anemia and lymphopenia (65%), followed by thrombocytopenia and fatigue (each 51%), alopecia (46%), and nausea (41%). The most common grade ≥3 AE was lymphopenia (43%). There was no grade ≥3 nephrotoxicity. The median iGFR % decrease was 11% ( P < 0.001), at a median follow-up of 23 months. iGFR %decrease and renal BED did not correlate (Spearman ρ = -0.09). Similarly, no significant association was found between bone marrow BED or spleen AD and the grades of hematological toxicities. We observed no association between progression free-survival and either the decline of renal function or the occurrence of hematological toxicities during PRRT.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the safety profile of 177 Lu-DOTATATE PRRT in patients with GEP-NETs irrespective of the dosimetry of organs at risk. Kidney, bone marrow, and spleen dosimetry measures were not associated with renal or hematological toxicity.

Essentials of Theranostics: A Guide for Physicians and Medical Physicists

Radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) are gaining increased interest with the recent emergence of novel safe and effective theranostic agents, improving outcomes for thousands of patients. The term theranostics refers to the use of diagnostic and therapeutic agents that share the same molecular target; a major step toward precision medicine, especially for oncologic applications. The authors dissect the fundamentals of theranostics in nuclear medicine. First, they explain the radioactive decay schemes and the characteristics of emitted electromagnetic radiation used for imaging, as well as particles used for therapeutic purposes, followed by the interaction of the different types of radiation with tissue. These concepts directly apply to clinical RPTs and play a major role in the efficacy and toxicity profile of different radiopharmaceutical agents. Personalized dosimetry is a powerful tool that can help estimate patient-specific absorbed doses, in tumors as well as normal organs. Dosimetry in RPT is an area of active investigation, as most of what we know about the relationship between delivered dose and tissue damage is extrapolated from external-beam radiation therapy; more research is needed to understand this relationship as it pertains to RPTs. Tumor heterogeneity is increasingly recognized as an important prognostic factor. Novel molecular imaging agents, often in combination with fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose, are crucial for assessment of target expression in the tumor and potential hypermetabolic disease that may lack the molecular target expression. ©RSNA, 2023 Test Your Knowledge questions are available in the supplemental material.

Radiotheranostics in oncology: current challenges and emerging opportunities

Structural imaging remains an essential component of diagnosis, staging and response assessment in patients with cancer; however, as clinicians increasingly seek to noninvasively investigate tumour phenotypes and evaluate functional and molecular responses to therapy, theranostics - the combination of diagnostic imaging with targeted therapy - is becoming more widely implemented. The field of radiotheranostics, which is the focus of this Review, combines molecular imaging (primarily PET and SPECT) with targeted radionuclide therapy, which involves the use of small molecules, peptides and/or antibodies as carriers for therapeutic radionuclides, typically those emitting α-, β- or auger-radiation. The exponential, global expansion of radiotheranostics in oncology stems from its potential to target and eliminate tumour cells with minimal adverse effects, owing to a mechanism of action that differs distinctly from that of most other systemic therapies. Currently, an enormous opportunity exists to expand the number of patients who can benefit from this technology, to address the urgent needs of many thousands of patients across the world. In this Review, we describe the clinical experience with established radiotheranostics as well as novel areas of research and various barriers to progress.

ACR-ACNM-ASTRO-SNMMI Practice Parameter for Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) DOTATATE Therapy

OBJECTIVES

This practice parameter (PP) for Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) aims to guide authorized users in selection of appropriate adult candidates with gastroeneropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) from foregut, midgut, and hindgut. The essential selection criteria include somatostatin receptor-positive GEP-NETs, which are usually inoperable and progressed despite standard therapy. Lu-177 DOTATATE is a radiopharmaceutical with high avidity for somatostatin receptors that are overexpressed by these tumors. This document ensures safe handling of Lu-177 DOTATATE by the authorized users and safe management of affected patients.

METHODS

The document was developed according to the systematic process developed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and described on the ACR Web site (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards). The PP development was led by 2 ACR Committees on Practice Parameters (Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology) collaboratively with the American College of Nuclear Medicine, American Society of Radiation Oncology, and Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

RESULTS

The Lu-177 DOTATATE PP reviewed pharmacology, indications, adverse effects, personnel qualifications, and required clinical evaluation before starting the treatment, as well as the recommended posttherapy monitoring, quality assurance, documentation, and appropriate radiation safety instructions provided in written form and explained to the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lu-177 DOTATATE is available for therapy of inoperable and/or advanced GEP-NETs when conventional therapy had failed. It can reduce tumor size, improve symptoms, and increase the progression free survival. The PP document provides clinical guidance for authorized users to assure an appropriate, consistent, and safe practice of Lu-177 DOTATATE.

ACR-ACNM-ASTRO-SNMMI Practice Parameter for Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) DOTATATE Therapy

OBJECTIVES

This practice parameter (PP) for Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) aims to guide authorized users in selection of appropriate adult candidates with gastroeneropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) from foregut, midgut, and hindgut. The essential selection criteria include somatostatin receptor-positive GEP-NETs, which are usually inoperable and progressed despite standard therapy. Lu-177 DOTATATE is a radiopharmaceutical with high avidity for somatostatin receptors that are overexpressed by these tumors. This document ensures safe handling of Lu-177 DOTATATE by the authorized users and safe management of affected patients.

METHODS

The document was developed according to the systematic process developed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and described on the ACR Web site (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards). The PP development was led by 2 ACR Committees on Practice Parameters (Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology) collaboratively with the American College of Nuclear Medicine, American Society of Radiation Oncology, and Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

RESULTS

The Lu-177 DOTATATE PP reviewed pharmacology, indications, adverse effects, personnel qualifications, and required clinical evaluation before starting the treatment, as well as the recommended posttherapy monitoring, quality assurance, documentation, and appropriate radiation safety instructions provided in written form and explained to the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lu-177 DOTATATE is available for therapy of inoperable and/or advanced GEP-NETs when conventional therapy had failed. It can reduce tumor size, improve symptoms, and increase the progression free survival. The PP document provides clinical guidance for authorized users to assure an appropriate, consistent, and safe practice of Lu-177 DOTATATE.

Long-term survival and toxicity in patients with neuroendocrine tumors treated with 177 Lu-octreotate peptide radionuclide therapy

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has shown favorable results in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Long-term safety and efficacy data for ¹⁷⁷ Lu-octreotate PRRT, particularly in combination with chemotherapy, is lacking.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of the long-term toxicity and survival outcomes of 104 patients with advanced NETs treated on 4 phase 2 clinical trials with Lutetium-177-octreotate (¹⁷⁷ Lu-octreotate) PRRT, mostly in combination with chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 68 months, which represents the longest follow-up study of ¹⁷⁷ Lu-octreotate PRRT for NETs to date.

RESULTS

Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 37 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 71 months. Five- and 10-year OS were 62% and 29%, and 5- and 10-year PFS were 36% and 21%, respectively, demonstrating ¹⁷⁷ Lu-octreotate can provide durable responses. PRRT was well tolerated with 1.9% of patients developing chronic renal impairment and 1% of patients developing long-term thrombocytopenia. Interestingly, there was a relatively high rate of myelodysplasia (MDS)/leukemia (6.7%), possibly attributable to the longer follow-up (with all except 1 case occurring more than 4 years after PRRT treatment) or to the addition of concurrent chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Lutetium-177-Octreotate PRRT remains an efficacious and well tolerated treatment in long-term follow-up. For clinicians deciding on the timing of PRRT for individual patients, the 6.7% long-term risk of MDS/leukemia needs to be balanced against the 21% PFS at 10 years.

Treatment patterns and oncological outcome of patients with advanced small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors: real-world data from the Medical University of Vienna

Background:

Different oncological therapies have been approved for small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs), but relatively little is known about efficacy and long-term outcome outside of phase III trials.

Methods:

This retrospective analysis assessed patients with well-differentiated, metastatic SI-NETs treated at the Medical University of Vienna, an approved European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Center of Excellence for neuroendocrine tumors. The primary objective was to assess progression-free survival (PFS) following approved therapies, that is, octreotide, lanreotide, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and everolimus, in a representative real-world collective.

Results:

A total of 77 patients receiving systemic treatment for advanced SI-NETs between 2010 and 2021 were included, with a median follow-up time of 82.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 57.8–106.8 months]. In the entire collective, the estimated median PFS following first-line therapy was 32.0 months (95% CI, 23.5–40.5 months). Peritoneal carcinomatosis was significantly associated with worse PFS ( p = 0.016). Regarding therapeutic strategies and outcome, 59 patients received somatostatin analogs first line and no significant difference in PFS was observed between lanreotide and octreotide (29.3 versus 35.5 months, p = 0.768). Across all treatment lines, 42 patients underwent PRRT (estimated median PFS: 32.0 months; 95% CI, 25.6–38.3 months) and a small subgroup of 7 patients received everolimus (estimated median PFS: 9.2 months; 95% CI, 1.6–17.0 months). For the total cohort, the estimated median OS following first-line therapy was 100.6 months (95% CI, 82.3–118.8 months), but the high proportion of deaths attributed to NET (77.8%) underlines the lethal nature of the disease. No unexpected toxicities were observed.

Conclusions:

While peritoneal carcinomatosis emerged as an adverse prognostic factor for PFS in this collective, the long-term outcome of patients treated at a specialized NET center using approved therapies appeared comparable to pivotal studies in SI-NET.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Targeting the Somatostatin Receptor: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Optimization Strategies

Simple Summary

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a systemic treatment consisting of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. This will subsequently cause lethal DNA damage to the tumor cell. The only target that is currently used in widespread clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor, which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical applications of PRRT, and discusses several PRRT-optimization strategies.

Abstract

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) consists of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. The only target that is currently used in clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor (SSTR), which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review provides a summary of the treatment efficacy (e.g., response rates and symptom-relief), impact on patient outcome and toxicity profile of PRRT performed with different generations of SSTR-targeting radiopharmaceuticals, including the landmark randomized-controlled trial NETTER-1. In addition, multiple optimization strategies for PRRT are discussed, i.e., the dose–effect concept, dosimetry, combination therapies (i.e., tandem/duo PRRT, chemoPRRT, targeted molecular therapy, somatostatin analogues and radiosensitizers), new radiopharmaceuticals (i.e., SSTR-antagonists, Evans-blue containing vector molecules and alpha-emitters), administration route (intra-arterial versus intravenous) and response prediction via molecular testing or imaging. The evolution and continuous refinement of PRRT resulted in many lessons for the future development of radionuclide therapy aimed at other targets and tumor types.

Theragnostic in neuroendocrine tumors

In the last few decades, the incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine tumors has been increasing. The theragnostic approach, that allows the diagnosis and treatment of different neoplasms with the same ligand, is a typical nuclear medicine tool. Applied for years, is also pivotal in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) where it has improved the diagnostic accuracy and the therapeutic efficacy with impact on patient's survival. Theragnostic also allows the identification of important prognostic factors such as tumor location and burden, presence of liver metastases and intensity of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) expression to consider in new and possibly combined studies to ameliorate patient's outcome. Moreover, the possibility to evaluate receptor expression even in non-NET malignancies has de facto widened the possible indications for PRRT. We believe that this innovative therapeutic approach will be implemented in next years by radiomics and biological tumors characterization to better address PRRT applications.

What's new in the pathogenesis and treatment of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms

Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) include diseases onsetting in patients treated with chemo- and/or radiotherapy for a primary cancer, or an autoimmune disorder. Genomic variants, in particular in familial cancer genes, may play a predisposing role. Recent advances in deep sequencing techniques have shed light on the pathogenesis of t-MN, identifying clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) as a frequent first step in the multi-hit model of t-MN. CHIP is often detectable prior to any cytotoxic treatment, probably setting the fertile genomic background for secondary leukemogenesis. The evolution pattern towards t-MN is then a complex process, shaped by the type of cancer therapy, the aging process, and the individual exposures, that favor additional hits, such as the acquisition of TP53 mutations and unfavorable karyotype abnormalities. The pathogenesis of t-MN differs from MN associated with environmental exposure. Indeed, the genetic aberration patterns of MN developing in atomic bomb survivors show few mutations in classical DNA methylation genes, and a high prevalence of 11q and ATM alterations, together with TP53 mutations. Survival in t-MN is poor. In addition to the biology of t-MN, the patient's previous disease history and the remission status at t-MN diagnosis are significant factors contributing to unfavorable outcome. New drugs active in secondary leukemias include CPX-351, or venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents, monoclonal antibodies as magrolimab, or targeted drugs against pathogenic mutations. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the best currently available therapeutic option with curative intent for fit patients with unfavorable genetic profiles.

Targeted Cancer Therapy: What's New in the Field of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous family of neoplasms of increasing incidence and high prevalence due to their relatively indolent nature. Their wide anatomic distribution and their characteristic ability to secrete hormonally active substances pose unique challenges for clinical management. They are also characterized by the common expression of somatostatin receptors, a target that has been extremely useful for diagnosis and treatment (i.e., somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)). Chemotherapy is of limited use for NETs of non-pancreatic origin, and the only approved targeted agents for advanced progressive NETs are sunitinib for those of pancreatic origin, and everolimus for lung, gastrointestinal and pancreatic primaries. Despite recent therapeutic achievements, thus, systemic treatment options remain limited. In this review we will discuss the state-of-the-art targeted therapies in the field of NETs, and also future perspectives of novel therapeutic drugs or strategies in clinical development, including recently presented results from randomized trials of yet unapproved antiangiogenic agents (i.e., pazopanib, surufatinib and axitinib), PRRT including both approved radiopharmaceuticals (177Lu-Oxodotreotide) and others in development (177Lu-Edotreotide, 177Lu-Satoreotide Tetraxetan), immunotherapy and other innovative targeted strategies (antibody-drug conjugates, bites,…) that shall soon improve the landscape of personalized treatment options in NET patients.

γ-Tocotrienol-Loaded Liposomes for Radioprotection from Hematopoietic Side Effects Caused by Radiotherapeutic Drugs

With the successful development and increased use of targeted radionuclide therapy for treating cancer comes the increased risk of radiation injury to bone marrow-both direct suppression and stochastic effects, leading to neoplasia. Herein, we report a novel radioprotector drug, a liposomal formulation of γ-tocotrienol (GT3), or GT3-Nano for short, to mitigate bone marrow radiation damage during targeted radionuclide therapy. Methods: GT3 was loaded into liposomes using passive loading. 64Cu-GT3-Nano and 3H-GT3-Nano were synthesized to study the in vivo biodistribution profile of the liposome and GT3 individually. The radioprotection efficacy of GT3-Nano was assessed after acute 137Cs whole-body irradiation at a sublethal (4 Gy), a lethal (9 Gy), or a single high-dose administration of 153Sm-ethylenediamine-N,N,N',N'-tetrakis(methylene phosphonic acid) (EDTMP). Flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy were used to analyze hematopoietic cell population dynamics and the cellular site of GT3-Nano localization in the spleen and bone marrow, respectively. Results: Bone marrow uptake and retention (percentage injected dose per gram of tissue) at 24 h was 6.98 ± 2.34 for 64Cu-GT3-Nano and 7.44 ± 2.52 for 3H-GT3-Nano. GT3-Nano administered 24 h before or after 4 Gy of total-body irradiation (TBI) promoted rapid and complete hematopoietic recovery, whereas recovery of controls stalled at 60%. GT3-Nano demonstrated dose-dependent radioprotection, achieving 90% survival at 50 mg/kg against lethal 9-Gy TBI. Flow cytometry of the bone marrow indicated that progenitor bone marrow cells MPP2 and CMP were upregulated in GT3-Nano-treated mice. Immunohistochemistry showed that GT3-Nano accumulates in CD105-positive sinusoid epithelial cells. Conclusion: GT3-Nano is highly effective in mitigating the marrow-suppressive effects of sublethal and lethal TBI in mice. GT3-Nano can facilitate rapid recovery of hematopoietic components in mice treated with the endoradiotherapeutic agent 153Sm-EDTMP.

Therapy-related myeloid neoplasm after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in 1631 patients from our 20 years of experiences: prognostic parameters and overall survival

PURPOSE

To determine prognostic factors and overall survival (OS) in therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (t-MN) of patients after receiving peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

METHODS

All patients treated from February 1999 until September 2019 at our center who had bone marrow biopsy-proven t-MN after PRRT were included. Patient characteristics, laboratory results, and all tumor-directed therapies before t-MN diagnosis were collected. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify parameters associated with OS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to define cutoff values as well as sensitivity and specificity of the parameters.

RESULTS

Out of 1631 patients treated with PRRT, 30 patients developed t-MN comprising myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in 23 patients (77%) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 7 patients (23%). The median OS of t-MN patients was 13 months (range 9.1-16.9 months): 6 months for AML and 15 months for the MDS subgroup, respectively. Higher platelet level was a significant prognostic parameter for longer OS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.99, P < 0.05). Using ROC analysis, the best cutoff value for thrombocyte count was 183.5 Gpt/L, resulting in a sensitivity of 92.3% and a specificity of 50%. Other factors, such as hemoglobin level, did not show a significant correlation with OS.

CONCLUSION

Even rarely occurred, the OS is gravely compromised in t-MN patients after PRRT, and even less in the AML subgroup (6 months). Higher platelet value was a significant prognostic parameter for longer OS in t-MN patients.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Small Bowel and Pancreas

The traditionally promulgated perspectives of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) as rare, indolent tumours are blunt and have been outdated for the last 2 decades. Clear increments in their incidence over the past decades render them increasingly clinically relevant, and at initial diagnosis many present with nodal and/or distant metastases (notably hepatic). The molecular pathogenesis of these tumours is increasingly yet incompletely understood. Those arising from the small bowel (SB) or pancreas typically occur sporadically; the latter may occur within the context of hereditary tumour predisposition syndromes. NENs can also be associated with endocrinopathy of hormonal hypersecretion. Tangible advances in the development of novel biomarkers, functional imaging modalities and therapy are especially applicable to this sub-set of tumours. The management of SB and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET) may be challenging, and often comprises a multidisciplinary approach wherein surgical, medical, interventional radiological and radiotherapeutic modalities are implemented. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of SB and pancreatic NETs. Moreover, we provide an outlook of the future in these tumour types which will include the development of precision oncology frameworks for individualised therapy, multi-analyte predictive biomarkers, artificial intelligence-derived clinical decision support tools and elucidation of the role of the microbiome in NEN development and clinical behaviour.

Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in the era of genomic characterization of disease subgroups

In recent years, advancement in genetics has profoundly helped to gain a more comprehensive molecular, pathogenic, and prognostic picture of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs). Newly discovered molecular targets, particularly those that target cell membranes or signaling pathways have helped move nuclear medicine in the forefront of PPGL precision medicine. This is mainly based on the introduction and increasing experience of various PET radiopharmaceuticals across PPGL genotypes quickly followed by implementation of novel radiotherapies and revised imaging algorithms. Particularly, 68Ga-labeled-SSAs have shown excellent results in the diagnosis and staging of PPGLs and in selecting patients for PRRT as a potential alternative to 123/131I-MIBG theranostics. PRRT using 90Y/177Lu-DOTA-SSAs has shown promise for treatment of PPGLs with improvement of clinical symptoms and/or disease control. However, more well-designed prospective studies are required to confirm these findings, in order to fully exploit PRRT's antitumoral properties to obtain the final FDA approval. Such an approval has recently been obtained for high-specific-activity 131I-MIBG for inoperable/metastatic PPGL. The increasing experience and encouraging preliminary results of these radiotherapeutic approaches in PPGLs now raises an important question of how to further integrate them into PPGL management (e.g. monotherapy or in combination with other systemic therapies), carefully taking into account the PPGLs locations, genotypes, and growth rate. Thus, targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) should preferably be performed at specialized centers with an experienced interdisciplinary team. Future perspectives include the introduction of dosimetry and biomarkers for therapeutic responses for more individualized treatment plans, α-emitting isotopes, and the combination of TRT with other systemic therapies.

Characteristics and outcomes of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms after peptide receptor radionuclide/chemoradionuclide therapy (PRRT/PRCRT) for metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasia: a single-institution series

PURPOSE

Peptide receptor radionuclide/chemoradionuclide therapy (PRRT/PRCRT) is an effective therapy for metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN), but therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) remain of concern. The study reviewed the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients who developed t-MN.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with t-MN by 2016 WHO classification, from a cohort of 521 patients who received PRRT/PRCRT over a 12-year period. Molecular next-generation sequencing using an in-house 26-gene panel was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-five of 521 (4.8%) patients were diagnosed with t-MN, including six acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and 19 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The median time from first cycle PRRT/PRCRT to diagnosis of t-MN was 26 months (range 4-91). Twenty-two of 25 (88%) patients had grade 1-2 pancreatic or small bowel NEN with moderate metastatic liver burden. Six patients (24%) had prior chemotherapy. Median number of PRRT cycles = 5 (22/25 (88%) with concomitant radiosensitising chemotherapy). All 25 patients achieved disease stabilisation (68%) or partial response (32%) on RECIST 1.1 at 3 months post-PRRT. At t-MN diagnosis, all patients presented with thrombocytopenia (median nadir 33 × 10⁹/L, range 3-75) and 17 (68%) remained NEN progression-free. Marrow genetic analysis revealed unfavourable karyotype in 16/25 (66%) patients with tumour protein 53 (TP53) mutation in nine (36%). Azacitidine therapy was utilised in ten eligible patients, while four received induction chemotherapy for AML. The median overall survival from first PRRT was 62 months (19-94), but from t-MN diagnosis was only 13 months (1-56), with death due primarily to haematological disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of t-MN after PRRT/PRCRT is an infrequent but serious complication with poor overall survival. Most patients present with thrombocytopenia; unfavourable genetic mutations have a poor response to t-MN treatment. Prospective data are needed to explore potential pre-existing genetic factors and predictive biomarkers to minimise the risk of t-MN.

Advanced neuroendocrine tumours of the small intestine and pancreas: clinical developments, controversies, and future strategies

In this Review, we discuss clinical developments and controversies in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) that are relevant for clinicians and clinical researchers. We describe advances in genetics, blood-based biomarkers, functional imaging, and systemic therapy of advanced NETs and discuss results of recent phase 3 studies, systemic treatment of advanced disease with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, biotherapy, chemotherapy, and molecularly targeted therapy, and the potential role of immunotherapy in the treatment of NETs. Suggested treatment algorithms for NETs of ileal or jejunal origin and of pancreatic origin are presented.

Prospective observational study of 177Lu-DOTA-octreotate therapy in 200 patients with advanced metastasized neuroendocrine tumours (NETs): feasibility and impact of a dosimetry-guided study protocol on outcome and toxicity

PURPOSE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumours has yielded promising results. This prospective study investigated the feasibility of dosimetry of the kidneys and bone marrow during therapy and its impact on efficacy and outcome.

METHODS

The study group comprised 200 consecutive patients with metastasized somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumours progressing on standard therapy or not suitable for other therapeutic options. A treatment cycle consisted of 7.4 GBq ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-octreotate with co-infusion of a mixed amino acid solution, and cycles were repeated until the absorbed dose to the kidneys reached 23 Gy or there were other reasons for stopping therapy. The Ki-67 index was ≤2% in 47 patients (23.5%), 3-20% in 121 (60.5%) and >20% in 16 (8%).

RESULTS

In 123 patients (61.5%) the absorbed dose to the kidneys reached 23 Gy with three to nine cycles during first-line therapy; in no patient was a dose to the bone marrow of 2 Gy reached. The best responses (according to RECIST 1.1) were a complete response (CR) in 1 patient (0.5%), a partial response (PR) in 47 (23.5%), stable disease (SD) in 135 (67.5%) and progressive disease (PD) in 7 (3.5%). Median progression-free survival was 27 months (95% CI 22-30 months) in all patients, 33 months in those in whom the absorbed dose to the kidneys reached 23 Gy and 15 months in those in whom it did not. Median overall survival (OS) was 43 months (95% CI 39-53 months) in all patients, 54 months in those in whom the absorbed dose to the kidneys reached 23 Gy and 25 months in those in whom it did not. Median OS was 60 months in patients with a best response of PR or CR, 42 months in those with SD and 16 months in those with PD. Three patients (1.5%) developed acute leukaemia, 1 patient (0.5%) chronic leukaemia (unconfirmed) and 30 patients (15%) grade 3 or 4 bone marrow toxicity. Eight patients (4%) developed grade 2 kidney toxicity and one patient (0.5%) grade 4 kidney toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Dosimetry-based therapy with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-octreotate is feasible. Patients in whom the absorbed dose to the kidneys reached 23 Gy had a longer OS than those in whom it did not. Patients with CR/PR had a longer OS than those with SD. Bone marrow dosimetry did not predict toxicity.

Results and adverse events of personalized peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 90Yttrium and 177Lutetium in 1048 patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms

Introduction

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of patients with somatostatin receptor expressing neuroendocrine neoplasms has shown promising results in clinical trials and a recently published phase III study.

Methods

In our center, 2294 patients were screened between 2004 and 2014 by ⁶⁸Ga somatostatin receptor (SSTR) PET/CT. Intention to treat analysis included 1048 patients, who received at least one cycle of ⁹⁰Yttrium or ¹⁷⁷Lutetium-based PRRT. Progression free survival was determined by ⁶⁸Ga SSTR-PET/CT and EORTC response criteria. Adverse events were determined by CTCAE criteria.

Results

Overall survival (95% confidence interval) of all patients was 51 months (47.0-54.9) and differed significantly according to radionuclide, grading, previous therapies, primary site and functionality. Progression free survival (based on PET/CT) of all patients was 19 months (16.9-21), which was significantly influenced by radionuclide, grading, and origin of neuroendocrine neoplasm. Progression free survival after initial progression and first and second resumption of PRRT after therapy-free intervals of more than 6 months were 11 months (9.4-12.5) and 8 months (6.4-9.5), respectively. Myelodysplastic syndrome or leukemia developed in 22 patients (2.1%) and 5 patients required hemodialysis after treatment, other adverse events were rare.

Conclusion

PRRT is effective and overall survival is favorable in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms depending on the radionuclide used for therapy, grading and origin of the neuroendocrine neoplasm which is not exactly mirrored in progression free survival as determined by highly sensitive ⁶⁸Ga somatostatin receptor PET/CT using EORTC criteria for determining response to therapy.

The role of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in advanced/metastatic thoracic neuroendocrine tumors

Bronchopulmonary (BP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) comprise a spectrum of tumors that develop from respiratory neuroendocrine cells and represent ~20% of all lung neoplasia and ~30% of all NETs. The only curative treatment is surgical resection. For well-differentiated forms (typical and atypical carcinoids), medical therapy ranges from bioactive agents (e.g., somatostatin analogs), to biotherapy (e.g., everolimus), standard chemotherapy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). PRRT with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs is an innovative treatment for inoperable or metastasized, well/moderately differentiated, NET. Initially developed for gastroenteropancreatic tumors, it is also used in BP-NET because these tumors express the target receptor. Two decades of clinical trials with either ⁹⁰Y-octreotide or ¹⁷⁷Lu-octreotate, have demonstrated the efficacy of PRRT, as measured by tumor response, symptom relief and quality of life (QoL) improvement. PRRT with ⁹⁰Y- and ¹⁷⁷Lu-peptides is generally well-tolerated and adverse events (kidney and bone marrow) are modest. The paper illustrates the history, technique and results of this treatment in the few dedicated studies and the many BP NET cases embedded within larger NET series. The limitations of the present body of information are addressed, and the future perspectives, in terms of prospective studies required to define the position of PRRT in the therapeutic algorithm of BP-NETs and the need for predictive molecular biomarkers to guide future studies, are discussed.

Impact of prior therapies on everolimus activity: an exploratory analysis of RADIANT-4

Background

Recently, everolimus was shown to improve median progression-free survival (PFS) by 7.1 months in patients with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated, nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of lung or gastrointestinal (GI) tract compared with placebo (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.35–0.67; P<0.00001) in the Phase III, RADIANT-4 study. This post hoc analysis evaluates the impact of prior therapies (somatostatin analogs [SSA], chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) on everolimus activity.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01524783.

Patients and methods

Patients were randomized (2:1) to everolimus 10 mg/day or placebo, both with best supportive care. Subgroups of patients who received prior SSA, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy (including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy) were analyzed and reported.

Results

A total of 302 patients were enrolled, of whom, 163 (54%) had any prior SSA use (mostly for tumor control), 77 (25%) received chemotherapy, and 63 (21%) were previously exposed to radiotherapy. Patients who received everolimus had longer median PFS compared with placebo, regardless of previous SSA (with SSA: 11.1 vs 4.5 months [HR, 0.56 {95% CI, 0.37–0.85}]; without SSA: 9.5 vs 3.7 months [0.57 {0.36–0.89}]), chemotherapy (with chemotherapy: 9.2 vs 2.1 months [0.35 {0.19–0.64}]; without chemotherapy: 11.2 vs 5.4 months [0.60 {0.42–0.86}]), or radiotherapy (with radiotherapy: 9.2 vs 3.0 months [0.47 {0.24–0.94}]; without radiotherapy: 11 vs 5.1 months [0.59 {0.42–0.83}]) exposure. The most frequent drug-related adverse events included stomatitis (59%–65%), fatigue (27%–35%), and diarrhea (24%–34%) among the subgroups.

Conclusion

These results suggest that everolimus improves PFS in patients with advanced, progressive lung or GI NET, regardless of prior therapies. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of everolimus in NET.

Persistent Hematologic Dysfunction after Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE: Incidence, Course, and Predicting Factors in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) may induce long-term toxicity to the bone marrow (BM). The aim of this study was to analyze persistent hematologic dysfunction (PHD) after PRRT with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NETs). Methods: The incidence and course of PHD were analyzed in 274 GEP NET patients from a group of 367 patients with somatostatin receptor-positive tumors. PHD was defined as diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), MDS/MPN, or otherwise unexplained cytopenia (for >6 mo). Using data from The Netherlands Cancer Registry, the expected number of hematopoietic neoplasms (MDS, AML, MPN, and MDS/MPN) was calculated and adjusted for sex, age, and follow-up period. The following risk factors were assessed: sex, age over 70 y, bone metastasis, prior chemotherapy, prior external-beam radiotherapy, uptake on the [¹¹¹In-DTPA⁰]octreotide scan, tumor load, grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity during treatment, estimated absorbed BM dose, elevated plasma chromogranin A level, baseline blood counts, and renal function. Results: Eleven (4%) of the 274 patients had PHD after treatment with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE: 8 patients (2.9%) developed a hematopoietic neoplasm (4 MDS, 1 AML, 1 MPN, and 2 MDS/MPN) and 3 patients (1.1%) developed BM failure characterized by cytopenia and BM aplasia. The median latency period at diagnosis (or first suspicion of a PHD) was 41 mo (range, 15-84 mo). The expected number of hematopoietic neoplasms based on The Netherlands Cancer Registry data was 3.0, resulting in a relative risk of 2.7 (95% confidence interval, 0.7-10.0). No risk factors for PHD could be identified for the GEP NET patients, not even bone metastasis or estimated BM dose. Seven patients with PHD developed anemia in combination with a rise in mean corpuscular volume. Conclusion: The prevalence of PHD after PRRT with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE was 4% in our patient population. The median time at which PHD developed was 41 mo after the first PRRT cycle. The relative risk for developing a hematopoietic neoplasm was 2.7. No risk factors were found for the development of PHD in GEP NET patients.

Long-Term Efficacy, Survival, and Safety of [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic and Bronchial Neuroendocrine Tumors

Purpose: Bronchial and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are slow-growing tumors, which frequently express somatostatin receptors on their cell membranes. These receptors are targets for therapy with Lutetium-177-labeled somatostatin analogues. We have treated over 1,200 patients with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA⁰,Tyr³]octreotate (¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE) since the year 2000 and present the results on efficacy, survival, and toxicity of this therapy.Experimental Design: For safety analysis, 610 patients treated with a cumulative dose of at least 100 mCi (3.7 GBq) ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE were included. A subgroup of 443 Dutch patients who were treated with a cumulative dose of at least 600 mCi (22.2 GBq) ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE before 2013 was further analyzed for efficacy and survival.Results: The objective response rate of the total group of patients was 39%. Stable disease was reached in 43% of patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all NET patients were 29 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 26-33 months] and 63 months (95% CI, 55-72 months). Long-term toxicity included acute leukemia in four patients (0.7%) and myelodysplastic syndrome in nine patients (1.5%). No therapy-related long-term renal or hepatic failure occurred.Conclusions: PRRT with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE is a favorable therapeutic option in patients with metastatic bronchial and gastroenteropancreatic NETs that express somatostatin receptors. PRRT with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE is safe with few side-effects and shows good response rates with PFS of 29 months and OS of 63 months. Clin Cancer Res; 23(16); 4617-24. ©2017 AACR.

ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogues

The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians caring for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasia in considering eligibility criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and in defining the minimum requirements for PRRT. It is not these guidelines' aim to give recommendations on the use of specific radiolabelled somatostatin analogues for PRRT as different analogues are being used, and their availability is governed by varying international regulations. However, a recent randomized controlled trial, NETTER-1, has provided evidence that may establish ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-octreotate (LutaThera®) as the first widely approved agent. It also makes recommendations on what minimal patient, tumour, and treatment outcome characteristics should be reported for PRRT to facilitate robust comparisons between studies.