1
|
Gao GF, Li P, Leonard WJ. Co-localization of clusters of TCR-regulated genes with TAD rearrangements. BMC Genomics 2023; 24:650. [PMID: 37898735 PMCID: PMC10613383 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09693-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gene expression has long been known to be influenced by the relative proximity of DNA regulatory elements. Topologically associating domains (TADs) are self-interacting genomic regions involved in regulating gene expression by controlling the proximity of these elements. Prior studies of TADs and their biological roles have revealed correlations between TAD changes and cellular differentiation. Here, we used Hi-C and RNA-seq data to correlate TCR-induced changes in TAD structure and gene expression in human CD4+ T cells. RESULTS We developed a pipeline, Differentially Expressed Gene Enrichment Finder (DEGEF), that identifies regions of differentially expressed gene enrichment. Using DEGEF, we found that TCR-regulated genes cluster non-uniformly across the genome and that these clusters preferentially localized in regions of TAD rearrangement. Interestingly, clusters of upregulated genes preferentially formed new Hi-C contacts compared to downregulated clusters, suggesting that TCR-activated CD4+ T cells may regulate genes by changing stimulatory contacts rather than inhibitory contacts. CONCLUSIONS Our observations support a significant relationship between TAD rearrangements and changes in local gene expression. These findings indicate potentially important roles for TAD rearrangements in shaping their local regulatory environments and thus driving differential expression of nearby genes during CD4+ T cell activation. Moreover, they provide new insights into global mechanisms that regulate gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Galen F Gao
- Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and the Immunology Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1674, USA
| | - Peng Li
- Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and the Immunology Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1674, USA
| | - Warren J Leonard
- Laboratory of Molecular Immunology and the Immunology Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1674, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fleck K, Raj R, Erceg J. The 3D genome landscape: Diverse chromosomal interactions and their functional implications. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022; 10:968145. [PMID: 36036013 PMCID: PMC9402908 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.968145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Genome organization includes contacts both within a single chromosome and between distinct chromosomes. Thus, regulatory organization in the nucleus may include interplay of these two types of chromosomal interactions with genome activity. Emerging advances in omics and single-cell imaging technologies have allowed new insights into chromosomal contacts, including those of homologs and sister chromatids, and their significance to genome function. In this review, we highlight recent studies in this field and discuss their impact on understanding the principles of chromosome organization and associated functional implications in diverse cellular processes. Specifically, we describe the contributions of intra-chromosomal, inter-homolog, and inter-sister chromatid contacts to genome organization and gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Fleck
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| | - Romir Raj
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| | - Jelena Erceg
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
King TD, Johnson JE, Bateman JR. Position Effects Influence Transvection in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2019; 213:1289-1299. [PMID: 31611231 PMCID: PMC6893391 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.302583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Transvection is an epigenetic phenomenon wherein regulatory elements communicate between different chromosomes in trans, and is thereby dependent upon the three-dimensional organization of the genome. Transvection is best understood in Drosophila, where homologous chromosomes are closely paired in most somatic nuclei, although similar phenomena have been observed in other species. Previous data have supported that the Drosophila genome is generally permissive to enhancer action in trans, a form of transvection where an enhancer on one homolog activates gene expression from a promoter on a paired homolog. However, the capacity of different genomic positions to influence the quantitative output of transvection has yet to be addressed. To investigate this question, we employed a transgenic system that assesses and compares enhancer action in cis and in trans at defined chromosomal locations. Using the strong synthetic eye-specific enhancer GMR, we show that loci supporting strong cis-expression tend to support robust enhancer action in trans, whereas locations with weaker cis-expression show reduced transvection in a fluorescent reporter assay. Our subsequent analysis is consistent with a model wherein the chromatin state of the transgenic insertion site is a primary determinant of the degree to which enhancer action in trans will be supported, whereas other factors such as locus-specific variation in somatic homolog pairing are of less importance in influencing position effects on transvection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas D King
- Biology Department, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine 04011
| | | | - Jack R Bateman
- Biology Department, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine 04011
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
AlHaj Abed J, Erceg J, Goloborodko A, Nguyen SC, McCole RB, Saylor W, Fudenberg G, Lajoie BR, Dekker J, Mirny LA, Wu CT. Highly structured homolog pairing reflects functional organization of the Drosophila genome. Nat Commun 2019; 10:4485. [PMID: 31582763 PMCID: PMC6776532 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12208-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Trans-homolog interactions have been studied extensively in Drosophila, where homologs are paired in somatic cells and transvection is prevalent. Nevertheless, the detailed structure of pairing and its functional impact have not been thoroughly investigated. Accordingly, we generated a diploid cell line from divergent parents and applied haplotype-resolved Hi-C, showing that homologs pair with varying precision genome-wide, in addition to establishing trans-homolog domains and compartments. We also elucidate the structure of pairing with unprecedented detail, observing significant variation across the genome and revealing at least two forms of pairing: tight pairing, spanning contiguous small domains, and loose pairing, consisting of single larger domains. Strikingly, active genomic regions (A-type compartments, active chromatin, expressed genes) correlated with tight pairing, suggesting that pairing has a functional implication genome-wide. Finally, using RNAi and haplotype-resolved Hi-C, we show that disruption of pairing-promoting factors results in global changes in pairing, including the disruption of some interaction peaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jumana AlHaj Abed
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Jelena Erceg
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Anton Goloborodko
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - Son C Nguyen
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Genetics, Penn Epigenetics Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6145, USA
| | - Ruth B McCole
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Wren Saylor
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Geoffrey Fudenberg
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
- Gladstone Institutes of Data Science and Biotechnology, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Bryan R Lajoie
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Program in Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01605-0103, USA
- Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Job Dekker
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Program in Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01605-0103, USA
| | - Leonid A Mirny
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
- Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
| | - C-Ting Wu
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Transvection Arising from Transgene Interactions in Zebrafish. Zebrafish 2017; 14:8-9. [DOI: 10.1089/zeb.2016.1312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
6
|
A Drosophila LexA Enhancer-Trap Resource for Developmental Biology and Neuroendocrine Research. G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS 2016; 6:3017-3026. [PMID: 27527793 PMCID: PMC5068927 DOI: 10.1534/g3.116.031229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Novel binary gene expression tools like the LexA-LexAop system could powerfully enhance studies of metabolism, development, and neurobiology in Drosophila However, specific LexA drivers for neuroendocrine cells and many other developmentally relevant systems remain limited. In a unique high school biology course, we generated a LexA-based enhancer trap collection by transposon mobilization. The initial collection provides a source of novel LexA-based elements that permit targeted gene expression in the corpora cardiaca, cells central for metabolic homeostasis, and other neuroendocrine cell types. The collection further contains specific LexA drivers for stem cells and other enteric cells in the gut, and other developmentally relevant tissue types. We provide detailed analysis of nearly 100 new LexA lines, including molecular mapping of insertions, description of enhancer-driven reporter expression in larval tissues, and adult neuroendocrine cells, comparison with established enhancer trap collections and tissue specific RNAseq. Generation of this open-resource LexA collection facilitates neuroendocrine and developmental biology investigations, and shows how empowering secondary school science can achieve research and educational goals.
Collapse
|
7
|
Joyce EF, Erceg J, Wu CT. Pairing and anti-pairing: a balancing act in the diploid genome. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2016; 37:119-128. [PMID: 27065367 DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2016.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2015] [Revised: 03/02/2016] [Accepted: 03/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The presence of maternal and paternal homologs appears to be much more than just a doubling of genetic material. We know this because genomes have evolved elaborate mechanisms that permit homologous regions to sense and then respond to each other. One way in which homologs communicate is to come into contact and, in fact, Dipteran insects such as Drosophila excel at this task, aligning all pairs of maternal and paternal chromosomes, end-to-end, in essentially all somatic tissues throughout development. Here, we reexamine the widely held tenet that extensive somatic pairing of homologous sequences cannot occur in mammals and suggest, instead, that pairing may be a widespread and significant potential that has gone unnoticed in mammals because they expend considerable effort to prevent it. We then extend this discussion to interchromosomal interactions, in general, and speculate about the potential of nuclear organization and pairing to impact inheritance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric F Joyce
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
| | - Jelena Erceg
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - C-Ting Wu
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cis-acting determinants of paramutation. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2015; 44:22-32. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2015] [Accepted: 08/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
9
|
Schiavone D, Guilbaud G, Murat P, Papadopoulou C, Sarkies P, Prioleau MN, Balasubramanian S, Sale JE. Determinants of G quadruplex-induced epigenetic instability in REV1-deficient cells. EMBO J 2014; 33:2507-20. [PMID: 25190518 PMCID: PMC4282387 DOI: 10.15252/embj.201488398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2014] [Revised: 07/23/2014] [Accepted: 08/13/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
REV1-deficient chicken DT40 cells are compromised in replicating G quadruplex (G4)-forming DNA. This results in localised, stochastic loss of parental chromatin marks and changes in gene expression. We previously proposed that this epigenetic instability arises from G4-induced replication fork stalls disrupting the accurate propagation of chromatin structure through replication. Here, we test this model by showing that a single G4 motif is responsible for the epigenetic instability of the BU-1 locus in REV1-deficient cells, despite its location 3.5 kb from the transcription start site (TSS). The effect of the G4 is dependent on it residing on the leading strand template, but is independent of its in vitro thermal stability. Moving the motif to more than 4 kb from the TSS stabilises expression of the gene. However, loss of histone modifications (H3K4me3 and H3K9/14ac) around the transcription start site correlates with the position of the G4 motif, expression being lost only when the promoter is affected. This supports the idea that processive replication is required to maintain the histone modification pattern and full transcription of this model locus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Schiavone
- Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Pierre Murat
- Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Peter Sarkies
- Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK The Gurdon Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Julian E Sale
- Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|