Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Women: Current Evidence and Future Directions

Development of a novel tool: a nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality of patients in intensive care unit after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUNDS

Increased risk of in-hospital mortality is critical to guide medical decisions and it played a central role in intensive care unit (ICU) with high risk of in-hospital mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). At present，most predicting tools for in-hospital mortality after PCI were based on the results of coronary angiography, echocardiography, and laboratory results which are difficult to obtain at admission. The difficulty of using these tools limit their clinical application. This study aimed to develop a clinical prognostic nomogram to predict the in-hospital mortality of patients in ICU after PCI.

METHODS

We extracted data from a public database named the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC III). Adult patients with coronary artery stent insertion were included. They were divided into two groups according to the primary outcome (death in hospital or survive). All patients were randomly divided into training set and validation set randomly at a ratio of 6:4. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was performed in the training set to select optimal variables to predict the in-hospital mortality of patients in ICU after PCI. The multivariate logistical analysis was performed to develop a nomogram. Finally, the predictive efficiency of the nomogram was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC)，integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and net reclassification improvement (NRI), and clinical net benefit was assessed by Decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

A total of 2160 patients were recruited in this study. By using LASSO, 17 variables were finally included. We used multivariate logistic regression to construct a prediction model which was presented in the form of a nomogram. The calibration plot of the nomogram revealed good fit in the training set and validation set. Compared with the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and scale for the assessment of positive symptoms II (SAPS II) scores, the nomogram exhibited better AUROC of 0.907 (95% confidence interval [CI] was 0.880-0.933, p <  0.001) and 0.901 (95% CI was 0.865-0.936, P <  0.001) in the training set and validation set, respectively. In addition, DCA of the nomogram showed that it could achieve good net benefit in the clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

A new nomogram was constructed, and it presented excellent performance in predicting in-hospital mortality of patients in ICU after PCI.

Do Patients with Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries Have Similar Prognosis Compared to Ones with MI-CAD?

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and it is primarily caused by acute plaque disruption and coronary occlusion. Recent studies suggest that myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) also occurs but the underlying mechanisms have not been fully understood until recently. The evidence also suggests that the clinical outcomes of patients presenting with MINOCA are similar to AMI patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (MI-CAD), including all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. The present narrative review considers the risk factors, pathological changes, and outcomes associated with MINOCA and compares them with MI-CAD.

Sex Differences in Culprit Plaque Characteristics Among Different Age Groups in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

BACKGROUND

Despite the significant decline in cardiovascular mortality in women over the past several decades, sex differences in the underlying pathology of acute coronary syndromes remain poorly understood. Previous postmortem studies have demonstrated sex differences in coronary plaque morphology with a higher prevalence of plaque erosion in young women and more plaque rupture in older women after menopause, whereas men showed no increase in prevalence of plaque rupture with age. However, in vivo data are limited.

METHODS

This study included patients who presented with acute coronary syndrome and underwent preintervention optical coherence tomography imaging of the culprit lesion. The culprit plaque was categorized as plaque rupture, plaque erosion or culprit plaque with calcification, and stratified by age. Features of plaque vulnerability at culprit lesion were also analyzed.

RESULTS

In 1368 patients (women=286), women and men had a similar distribution of culprit plaque morphology (plaque rupture versus plaque erosion). However, significant sex differences were found in the underlying mechanisms of acute coronary syndrome among different age groups: women showed a significant ascending trend with age in plaque rupture (P<0.001) and the features of plaque vulnerability such as lipid plaque (P<0.001), thin-cap fibroatheroma (P=0.005), and microstructures including macrophages, cholesterol crystals, and calcification (P=0.026). No trend was observed in men.

CONCLUSIONS

Age related sex differences in culprit plaque morphology and vulnerability were identified in patients with acute coronary syndrome: prevalence of plaque rupture and vulnerability increased with age in women but not in men.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT01110538 and NCT03479723.

Symptomatology, prognosis and clinical findings of STEMI as a ramification of COVID-19: A systematic review and proportion meta-analysis

Background

There is an increasing COVID-19 population with concurrent STEMI. SARS-CoV-2 poses a significant risk of hypercoagulable and/or prothrombotic events due to the disturbance in hemostasis by affecting all three components of the Virchow's triad. These abnormalities in hemostasis are an increased risk factor for cardiovascular events, including acute thrombotic occlusion of coronary arteries leading to myocardial infarction.

Objective

The objective of this study is to collate the prognosis, symptomatology and clinical findings of COVID-19 adverse events causing STEMI.

Methods

Databases were queried with various keyword combinations to find applicable articles. Cardiovascular risk factors, symptomatology, mortality and rates of PCI were analyzed using random-effect model.

Results

15 studies with a total of 379 patients were included in the final analysis. Mean age of patients was 62.82 ± 36.01, with a male predominance (72%, n = 274). Hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus were the most common cardiovascular risk factors among these patients, with a pooled proportion of 72%, 59% and 40% respectively. Dyspnea (61%, n = 131) was the most frequent presenting symptom, followed by chest pain (60%, n = 101) and fever (56%, n = 104). 62% of the patients had obstructive CAD during coronary angiography. The primary reperfusion method used in the majority of cases was percutaneous coronary intervention (64%, n = 124). Mortality, which is the primary outcome in our study, was relatively high, with a rate of 34% across studies.

Conclusion

Our findings show that most cases have been found in males, while the most common risk factors were Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus. In most COVID-19 cases with ST-segment myocardial infarction, most hospitalized patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention instead of fibrinolysis. The in-hospital mortality was significantly higher, making this report significant. As the sample size and reported study are considerably less, it warrants a further large-scale investigation to generalize it.

Update on Management of Cardiovascular Diseases in Women

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) have a lower prevalence in women than men; although, a higher mortality rate and a poorer prognosis are more common in women. However, there is a misperception of CVD female risk since women have commonly been considered more protected so that the real threat is vastly underestimated. Consequently, female patients are more likely to be treated less aggressively, and a lower rate of diagnostic and interventional procedures is performed in women than in men. In addition, there are substantial sex differences in CVD, so different strategies are needed. This review aims to evaluate the main gender-specific approaches in CVD.