1
|
Kim SW, Shin HJ, Park SH, Lee TC, Lee HJ, Moon OS, Nam KH, Yoon WK, Kim HC, Kwon HJ, Won YS. Microbiological survey of Korean mouse facilities from 2014 to 2019. Exp Anim 2021; 71:109-115. [PMID: 34707028 PMCID: PMC8828403 DOI: 10.1538/expanim.21-0083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
We surveyed mouse microbiological contamination rates by testing rates for common contaminants using serological, culture, and parasitological methods. A total of 21,292 experimentally
housed mice from 206 animal facilities, including hospitals, universities, companies, and research institutes, were tested over a 6-year period from 2014 to 2019. The most commonly found
contaminants were various species of nonpathogenic protozoa (47.2%). The most common pathogenic bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus (21.2%), Pasteurella
pneumotropica (12.5%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5.8%). Mouse hepatitis virus (6.1%) was detected, but no other viral or bacterial pathogens were found. These
results establish that the main pathogens that currently contaminate mouse facilities in Korea are opportunistic pathogens and that contamination with important pathogens, such as those in
Categories B or C, has decreased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Woon Kim
- Laboratory Animal Resource Center, Korea Research Institute for Biology and Biotechnology
| | - Hi Jo Shin
- Laboratory Animal Resource Center, Korea Research Institute for Biology and Biotechnology
| | - Se Hee Park
- Laboratory Animal Resource Center, Korea Research Institute for Biology and Biotechnology
| | - Teak Chang Lee
- Laboratory Animal Resource Center, Korea Research Institute for Biology and Biotechnology
| | - Hae Jin Lee
- Laboratory Animal Resource Center, Korea Research Institute for Biology and Biotechnology
| | - Ok Sung Moon
- Laboratory Animal Resource Center, Korea Research Institute for Biology and Biotechnology
| | - Ki Hoan Nam
- Laboratory Animal Resource Center, Korea Research Institute for Biology and Biotechnology
| | - Won Kee Yoon
- Laboratory Animal Resource Center, Korea Research Institute for Biology and Biotechnology
| | - Hyoung Chin Kim
- Laboratory Animal Resource Center, Korea Research Institute for Biology and Biotechnology
| | - Hyo Jung Kwon
- Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University
| | - Young Suk Won
- Laboratory Animal Resource Center, Korea Research Institute for Biology and Biotechnology
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Medical Management and Diagnostic Approaches. THE LABORATORY RAT 2020. [PMCID: PMC7153319 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-814338-4.00011-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
This chapter reviews the basic principles of medical management of rat colonies and diagnostic approaches to detect infectious diseases of rats. As is the case with all other species, rats are susceptible to a variety of injuries and diseases that can cause distress, morbidity, or mortality. Any facility that houses rats must develop monitoring programs designed to rapidly identify health-related problems so they can be communicated to appropriate veterinary or animal care personnel to be resolved. These programs generally consist of multiple components, some of which are directed toward individual animals and others that assess the health status of rat populations as a whole. Topics include individual animal monitoring and care, signs of illness and distress, colony health management, components of microbiological monitoring programs, including agents commonly targeted and sentinel programs, quarantine, biological material screening, diagnostic testing methodologies, including culture, serology, molecular diagnostic and histopathology, test profiles and interpretation, management of disease outbreaks, and treatment and prevention strategies for infectious agents.
Collapse
|
3
|
Nagamine CM, Shen Z, Luong RH, McKeon GP, Ruby NF, Fox JG. Co-infection of the Siberian hamster (Phodopus sungorus) with a novel Helicobacter sp. and Campylobacter sp. J Med Microbiol 2015; 64:575-581. [PMID: 25752854 DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.000051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2015] [Accepted: 03/06/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
We report the isolation of a novel helicobacter isolated from the caecum of the Siberian hamster (Phodopus sungorus). Sequence analysis showed 97% sequence similarity to Helicobacter ganmani. In addition, we report the co-infection of these Siberian hamsters with a Campylobacter sp. and a second Helicobacter sp. with 99% sequence similarity to Helicobacter sp. flexispira taxon 8 (Helicobacter bilis), a species isolated previously from patients with bacteraemia. Gross necropsy and histopathology did not reveal any overt pathological lesions of the liver and gastrointestinal tract that could be attributed to the Helicobacter or Campylobacter spp. infections. This is the first helicobacter to be identified in the Siberian hamster and the first report of co-infection of Helicobacter spp. and Campylobacter sp. in asymptomatic Siberian hamsters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claude M Nagamine
- Department of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Zeli Shen
- Division of Comparative Medicine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Richard H Luong
- Department of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Gabriel P McKeon
- Department of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Norman F Ruby
- Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - James G Fox
- Division of Comparative Medicine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Taharaguchi M, Takimoto K, Zamoto-Niikura A, Yamada YK. Effect of weak acid hypochlorous solution on selected viruses and bacteria of laboratory rodents. Exp Anim 2014; 63:141-7. [PMID: 24770639 PMCID: PMC4160982 DOI: 10.1538/expanim.63.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Weak acid hypochlorous solution (WAHS) is known to have efficacy for inactivating
pathogens and to be relatively safe with respect to the live body. Based on these
advantages, many animal facilities have recently been introducing WAHS for daily cleaning
of animal houses. In this study, we determined the effect of WAHS in inactivating specific
pathogens of laboratory rodents and pathogens of opportunistic infection. WAHS with an
actual chloride concentration of 60 ppm and a pH value of 6.0 was generated using
purpose-built equipment. One volume of mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), Sendai virus,
lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, Bordetella bronchiseptica,
Pasteurella pneumotropica, Corynebacterium kutscheri,
Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was
mixed with 9 or 99 volumes of WAHS (×10 and ×100 reaction) for various periods (0.5, 1,
and 5 min) at 25°C. After incubation, the remaining infectious viruses and live bacteria
were determined by plaque assay or culture. In the ×100 reaction mixture, infectious
viruses and live bacteria could not be detected for any of the pathogens examined even
with the 0.5-min incubation. However, the effects for MHV, B.
bronchiseptica, and P. aeruginosa were variable in the ×10
reaction mixture with the 0.5- and 1-min incubations. Sufficient effects were obtained by
elongation of the reaction time to 5 min. In the case of MHV, reducing organic substances
in the virus stock resulted in the WAHS being completely effective. WAHS is recommended
for daily cleaning in animal facilities but should be used properly in order to obtain a
sufficient effect, which includes such things as using a large enough volume to reduce
effects of organic substances.
Collapse
|
5
|
Prevalence of viral, bacterial and parasitological diseases in rats and mice used in research environments in Australasia over a 5-y period. Lab Anim (NY) 2011; 40:341-50. [PMID: 22012194 PMCID: PMC7091690 DOI: 10.1038/laban1111-341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2011] [Accepted: 09/12/2011] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Viral, bacterial and parasitological infections in rats and mice used in biomedical research continue to occur despite improved housing and biosurveillance. The presence of disease in laboratory animals can lead to spurious results for research undertaken in universities, research institutes and the pharmaceutical industry. Here the authors report the results of serological, microbiological, parasitological and molecular tests done on mice and rats from Australasia submitted to a rodent health monitoring laboratory (Cerberus Sciences) from 2004 to 2009. In tested mice, norovirus was the most prevalent virus and ectromelia virus was the least prevalent virus. In tested rats, pneumonia virus of mice was the most prevalent virus and adenoviruses 1 and 2 were the least prevalent viruses. In mice, Helicobacter hepaticus was the most prevalent bacterium, and in rats, Proteus spp. were the most prevalent bacteria. The most common positive helminthological finding in mice and rats was the presence of all pinworms (including Aspicularis spp. and Syphacia spp.). The most common positive protozoan findings in mice and rats were Chilomastix spp. and Trichomonads.
Collapse
|
6
|
Microbiological Contamination of Laboratory Mice and Rats in Korea from 2007 to 2008. Lab Anim Res 2010. [DOI: 10.5625/lar.2010.26.3.249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
7
|
Wiese E, Maurer S, Steige G, Saaler-Reinhardt S, Lecher B, Ott S, Reifenberg K. Decontamination of a barrier facility using microisolator cages and provisional partitioning. Lab Anim (NY) 2007; 36:31-5. [PMID: 17585355 DOI: 10.1038/laban0707-31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2007] [Accepted: 03/30/2007] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
In 2000, the authors found endemic infections of mouse hepatitis virus, minute virus of mice, Syphacia obvelata, and Myobia musculi among mice in a large barrier facility at the University of Mainz. To eliminate the infections, they subdivided the facility into two distinct hygiene units. However, architectural constraints made it impossible to completely separate the HVAC systems of both hygiene units and to establish adequate personnel locks. To compensate for these suboptimal barrier conditions of the two newly established units, the authors replaced the open-top caging and open-servicing system with filter-top cages that were manipulated in cage-changing stations. The authors then depopulated the two units in series, independently eliminating the contaminated mice and restocking the units with SPF animals. In spite of the high infection pressure and the suboptimal barrier conditions, the authors had only a single case of recontamination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Wiese
- Central Laboratory Animal Facility, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Won YS, Jeong ES, Park HJ, Lee CH, Nam KH, Kim HC, Hyun BH, Lee SK, Choi YK. Microbiological contamination of laboratory mice and rats in Korea from 1999 to 2003. Exp Anim 2006; 55:11-6. [PMID: 16508207 DOI: 10.1538/expanim.55.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
To survey the microbiological contamination of laboratory mice and rats in Korea during a 5-year period, we monitored animals housed in mouse and rat facilities with either barrier or conventional systems. At barrier and conventional mouse facilities, the most important pathogen identified was mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), while Mycoplasma pulmonis was the most important pathogen at conventional rat facilities. Interestingly, hantavirus was recovered from both barrier and conventional mouse facilities. The most common protozoon identified was Tritrichomonas muris in mouse facilities and Entamoeba muris in rat facilities. In addition, we found that the microbiological contamination of mice and rats in conventional facilities was severe. These results suggest that conventional facilities should be renovated and monitored regularly to decrease microbiological contamination. We also propose that hantavirus should be monitored in Korea as an important mouse pathogen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Suk Won
- ICLAS Monitoring Subcenter Korea, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Otto G, Franklin CL. Medical Management and Diagnostic Approaches. THE LABORATORY RAT 2006. [PMCID: PMC7150000 DOI: 10.1016/b978-012074903-4/50019-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
This chapter reviews the basic principles of medical management of rat colonies and diagnostic approaches to detect infectious diseases of rats. Due to the fact that a comprehensive colony health monitoring program is so vital in protecting the validity and reproducibility of experimental research data, it must be devoted an appropriate priority in terms of budget, personnel, and other resources. The policies and practices should be defined in written plans, and agreement with the principles set forth should be secured by the scientific and administrative leadership of the institution, as well as by the veterinary and animal care group. Programs should be designed to monitor individual animal health through the use of direct methods such as close observation and physical examination. A program created to monitor the overall health status of a colony population often utilizes more indirect methods. Routine testing of selected representative animals (even in the absence of any signs of illness or disease) can provide valuable information regarding the viral, parasitic, and bacterial agents that such animals are either currently harboring or have been exposed to in the past. Risk analysis should be done by any institution planning on holding rodents, a process that should involve a discussion of the relative costs and benefits of the various options available for routine health monitoring as well as quarantine isolation and testing.
Collapse
|