[Cryopreservation of spermatozoa of a transgenic mouse]

Cryopreservation Protocols for Genetically Engineered Mice

Protocols for cryopreservation of mouse embryos and sperm are important for preserving genetically engineered mice (GEMs) used in research to study human development and diseases. Embryo cryopreservation is mainly carried out using either of two protocols: controlled gradual cooling or vitrification. Sperm cryopreservation protocols include two methodologies that are commonly referred to as JAX and CARD. Quality-control measures are necessary to ensure that GEMs are properly cryopreserved so that they can be retrieved for future use. An archiving system is also important in keeping proper records of frozen sperm and embryos. Frozen embryos and sperm are now preferred over live mice for shipping to distant locations. This article describes detailed protocols used in cryopreservation of mouse embryos and sperm, as well as their retrieval to live mice. © 2021 U.S. Government. Sperm cryopreservation Basic Protocol 1: JAX protocol for sperm cryopreservation Support Protocol 1: JAX protocol for making sperm cryopreservation medium Basic Protocol 2: JAX protocol for IVF of mouse sperm Alternate Protocol 1: Modified CARD protocol for sperm cryopreservation Support Protocol 2: CARD protocol for making sperm cryopreservation medium Alternate Protocol 2: CARD protocol for IVF of mouse sperm Embryo cryopreservation Basic Protocol 3: Cryopreserving and thawing 2-cell embryos Alternate Protocol 3: Cryopreserving and thawing 8-cell to morula-stage embryos Surgical transfer of embryos Basic Protocol 4: Infundibulum transfer of 2-cell to morula-stage embryos.

History of cryobiology, with special emphasis in evolution of mouse sperm cryopreservation

Confucius said study the past if you would define the future and a popular statement says that history depends on who writes it. To talk about history it is necessary to find and define a milestone where to start the narration. The intention of this quick review is to take the reader through moments and selected publications; part and pieces of memories showing how the concept of cryopreservation, specifically for mouse sperm, was conceived and sustained as we know it today. Beginning with the development of the microscope (1677) and continuing through the 17th century with the first documented observation by L. Spallanzani describing that sperm could maintain the motility under cold conditions. As J. Sherman suggested, we divide the cryopreservation evolution into two sequences, previous to and after 1949 when Polge, Smith and Parkes discovered the property of glycerol as cryoprotectant. Later, in 1972, D. Whittingham, S. Leibo, and P. Mazur applying a slow freezing process achieved the first embryo freezing (mouse). During that time many theories were scientifically confirmed. Among those, Peter Mazur demonstrated the relation between the speed of freezing and intracellular ice formation, and Stanley Leibo that each cell type has their unique freezing curve. In 1950, after the discovery of the protective aspect of glycerol, sperm from many mammals were frozen, except from the mouse. It was in the early 90's when the mouse sperm freezing becomes important and it was a real challenge for many groups, nevertheless, the technique using skim milk and raffinose modified by Dr Nakagata was the beginning of a different story ….

The mechanism by which mouse spermatozoa are injured during freezing

To improve the cryopreservation protocol for mouse sperm, we attempted to estimate the type and extent of cryoinjury at various steps of the process. First, we demonstrated that mouse sperm are sensitive to chilling at -15 C and that the sensitivity is dependent on the length of exposure. To estimate cryoinjuries, sperm suspensions were ice-seeded at -5 or -15 C, frozen with liquid nitrogen (LN(2)) gas and then frozen in LN(2). In one experiment, sperm seeded at -5 C were cooled slowly to -15 C before deep freezing. At various steps of the cryopreservation process, the sperm were warmed and their viability was assessed based on motility and the integrities of the plasma membrane and acrosome. The motility of frozen-thawed sperm was higher on seeding at -5 C (28%) than at -15 C (9%). The motility did not decrease when the sample was transferred from LN(2) gas to LN(2). To estimate cryoinjury of sperm, we presumed the viability of frozen sperm to be decreased by chilling, hypertonic stress and formation of intracellular ice. When the sperm suspension was cooled and seeded at -5 C, the motility decreased by 25% due to hypertonic stress. When the sperm were cooled in LN(2) gas, the motility decreased by 17% with the formation of intracellular ice. When the sperm were cooled to -15 C, the motility decreased by 51% from chilling. After seeding, the motility decreased by 18% due to formation of intracellular ice and by 7% due to hypertonic stress. Considering the results, it would be preferable to seed samples at a higher temperature to prevent intracellular ice from forming and to cool seeded samples rapidly enough to minimize chilling injury and hypertonic stress, but not too rapidly to allow intracellular ice to form.

Cryopreservation of wild mouse spermatozoa

Spermatozoa of wild mice from China, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, India, Japan and Switzerland were frozen and stored at -196 degrees C. After thawing, intact oocytes were inseminated in vitro with relatively high motility frozen-thawed mouse spermatozoa from Czechoslovakia, Denmark and India, while oocytes with a partially dissected zona were inseminated with low motility frozen-thawed spermatozoa from China, Japan and Switzerland. Embryos developing to the 2-cell stage from oocytes fertilized with frozen-thawed spermatozoa were transferred to the oviducts of female recipients on the first day of pseudopregnancy (day when a vaginal plug was confirmed). Successful embryo development to the 2-cell stage was 46 to 67%. Offspring resulted from 17 to 51% of these transferred 2-cell embryos.

Effects of cryopreservation on sperm quality, nuclear DNA integrity, in vitro fertilization, and in vitro embryo development in the mouse

Efficient freezing, archiving, and thawing of sperm are essential techniques to support large scale research programs using mouse models of human disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of variable combinations and concentrations of cryoprotectants on sperm-assessment parameters of frozen–thawed mouse sperm in order to optimize cryopreservation protocols. Sperm was frozen using combinations of 3% skim milk + 0.2 or 0.3 M nonpermeating raffinose with either permeating glucose, fructose, propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, glycerol, or sodium pyruvate in CD-1, C3FeB6F1/J, B6129SF1, C57BL/6NCrIBR, 129S/SvPaslco, and DBA/2NCrIBR mice. Sperm-assessment parameters included progressive motility, plasma membrane integrity (SYBR-14 + PI),in vitrofertilization rate, andin vitroembryo development rate to blastocyst. DNA content analysis of sperm was measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA). 0.3 M raffinose with 0.1 M fructose significantly improved post-thaw sperm-assessment parameters for CD-1, C3B6F1, B6129SF1 mice (P< 0.05–0.01), whereas 0.2 M raffinose with 0.1 M glycerol or 0.1 M fructose enhanced sperm assessment values for C57BL/6 and 129S mice (P< 0.01), compared to 0.3 M raffinose alone. DNA fragmentation during cryopreservation was significantly increased in all strains evaluated when compared with fresh control sperm in a strain-dependent manner (P< 0.01). Supplementation with permeating glycerol or fructose to the cryoprotectant (CPA) solution showed a significant protective effect to DNA integrity when cryopreserving sperm from C57BL/6 and 129S mice. Damage to sperm DNA significantly decreased the rate ofin vitroembryo development to blastocyst in C57BL/6 mice. The type of monosaccharide sugar or polyols, CPA molarity, and combination of permeating and nonpermeating cryoprotectant are significant factors for improving progressive motility, plasma membrane integrity, DNA integrity,in vitrofertilization rate, andin vitroembryo development rate to blastocyst in cryopreserved mouse sperm.

Cryopreservation of murine spermatozoa

Cryopreservation of mouse sperm provides an economic option for preserving the large number of mouse strains now being generated by transgenic and targeted mutation methodologies. The ability of a spermatozoan cell to survive cryobiological preservation depends on general biophysical constraints that apply to all cells, such as the avoidance or minimization of the formation of intracellular ice during cooling. This action is typically achieved by use of cryoprotectant substances and by controlled, slow rates of cooling. Superimposed on those general constraints may be special characteristics of mouse spermatozoa, such as more narrow, osmotically driven volume tolerance limits and the fact that relatively successful freezing can be obtained without the use of a permeating cryoprotective agent. The lack of important information regarding sperm cells fundamental cryobiological properties, including their osmotic and membrane permeability characteristics, has hindered progress in developing anything but empirically derived methods. Genetic differences between inbred mouse strains are reflected in motility and fertility characteristics of mouse sperm and contribute to the difficulty of developing successful cryopreservation methods. Recovery of live young from frozen sperm has been much more successful with sperm from hybrid mice than from most inbred strains. There have been no published reports of successful cryopreservation of rat sperm. Nevertheless, in mice, success in deriving live young from intracytoplasmic sperm injection using sperm frozen under suboptimal conditions raises the possibility of using this technique for the ultimate rescue of sperm regardless of the success of cryopreservation. This technique, however, requires additional development and verification of its efficacy before it will be suitable for general laboratory use. Although cryopreservation of mouse sperm is not yet universally successful, it can be used reliably to supplement cryopreservation of embryos and other germline cells or tissues for preserving biomedically important strains of mice for research.

Factors affecting the survival of frozen-thawed mouse spermatozoa

Mouse epididymal spermatozoa were frozen in solutions containing various compounds with different molecular weights, and the factors affecting the postthawing survival were examined. Monosaccharides (glucose, galactose) had almost no protective effect regardless of the concentration and the temperature of exposure. On the other hand, disaccharides (sucrose, trehalose) and trisaccharides (raffinose, melezitose) resulted in higher survival rates, especially at a concentration of around 0.35 mol/kg H(2)O (0.381-0.412 Osm/kg). Macromolecules, such as PVP10, Ficoll 70, bovine serum albumin, and skim milk had almost no effect, but compounds with a molecular weight of about 800, such as metrizamide and Nycodenz, had some protective effect. When a raffinose solution was supplemented with 10% metrizamide, resulting in an osmolality of approximately 0.400 Osm/kg, a high survival rate was obtained. Solutions at about 0.400 Osm/kg containing trehalose alone, trehalose + metrizamide, raffinose alone, and raffinose + metrizamide, were all effective for sperm freezing; frozen-thawed sperm could fertilize oocytes, and the resultant embryos could develop to live young after transfer. For freezing mouse spermatozoa, aqueous solutions at approximately 0.400 Osm/kg containing a disaccharide or a trisaccharide seem to be effective.