Standard Fixed-Schedule Methadone Taper Versus Symptom-Triggered Methadone Approach for Treatment of Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome

Neurobehavioral outcomes of infants exposed to buprenorphine-naloxone compared with naltrexone during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Naltrexone is a medication used to treat both opioid and alcohol use disorder with limited experience in pregnant individuals, particularly in comparison to more commonly utilized treatments such as buprenorphine-naloxone. The long-term outcomes of infants exposed to naltrexone has not been previously examined.

AIMS

To compare the neurobehavioral outcomes of naltrexone versus buprenorphine-naloxone exposed infants.

STUDY DESIGN

Multi-centered prospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS

Pregnant people on prescribed buprenorphine-naloxone or naltrexone were enrolled during pregnancy and the dyad followed until 12 months after delivery.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Infants were evaluated at 4-6 weeks corrected gestational age (CGA) using the NICU Neonatal Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS) and at the 12-month CGA visit using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition (ASQ-3).

RESULTS

There were 7 dyads in the naltrexone group and 34 in the buprenorphine-naloxone group. On the NNNS, infants exposed to naltrexone had higher median scores for arousal and excitability, and lower median scores for attention and regulation at 4-6 weeks CGA compared to the buprenorphine-naloxone group. None of the infants in the naltrexone group were monitored for NOWS and had shorter length of hospital stay compared with the buprenorphine-naloxone group. Although no statistically significant differences were observed, more infants in the buprenorphine-naloxone group were identified as at risk for development delays in the communication, problem solving, and personal social domains of the ASQ-3 at 12 months CGA. Results should be interpreted with caution given this study's small sample size and lack of a prospective comparison cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small cohort, there are differences noted in infant neurobehavior by NNNS at 4-6 weeks of age when comparing the buprenorphine-naloxone and naltrexone groups. At 12 months, ASQ-3 scores were similar but with percentage differences in potential development delay risk observed between the two groups. Larger cohort studies are needed to determine the long-term child outcomes after naltrexone exposure in pregnancy.

Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome Treatment Guidelines and Birth Hospital Utilization

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In November 2020, the American Academy of Pediatrics published guidelines for management of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), recommending nonpharmacologic treatment as the first-line approach, unless pharmacologic treatment is needed for severe NOWS. Using data from tertiary care pediatric hospitals, we examined the impact of the guidelines on use of pharmacotherapy, length of stay, and NICU admission for infants with NOWS.

METHODS

We extracted birth hospitalization data for newborns diagnosed with NOWS discharged from 2019 to 2022 from the Pediatric Health Information System. We compared hospital utilization and pharmacologic treatment pre- and postguidelines and used interrupted time series regression to examine trends over time.

RESULTS

We included N = 824 newborns (n = 434 pre, n = 390 post) with NOWS from 11 hospitals. The use of pharmacologic treatment was significantly lower in the postguidelines period (59.0% pre versus 50.3% post; P = .01). Median length of stay was similar pre and post (P = .55). NICU admission was significantly lower in the postguidelines period (78.6% pre versus 46.7% post; P < .001), with an immediate decrease (β = -23.0%; P < .001) and a decrease over time in the postguidelines period (β = -0.7% per month; P = .03). Most hospitals reduced pharmacologic treatment (8 of 11; 73%) and NICU use (10 of 11; 91%) postguidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a reduction in the use of pharmacologic treatment and NICU utilization for infants with NOWS after the release of American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines for NOWS management.

Addressing drivers of healthcare utilization for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Aim to reduce healthcare utilization (HU) for infants at risk of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) by 30% in 1 year and sustain for 2 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Baseline data from three Level I & II newborn nurseries from January 2016 to June 2018 informed PDSA cycles from August 2018 to December 2021. Shewhart process control charts evaluated length of stay (LOS), pharmacologic treatment (PT) rates, direct cost (DC), process, and balancing measures for special cause variation (SCV).

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventeen infants showed downward SCV in LOS (12.6 to 4.4 days), PT (53% to 17%) and DC ($12593.82 to $5219.17). Onset of the COVID-19 pandemic coincided with reversible SCV. DC varied by provider specialty.

CONCLUSION

Transition from MFNASS to ESC led to decrease in healthcare utilization for infants at risk of NOWS. QI methodology identified persistent drivers of variability, including the COVID-19 pandemic and provider specialty.

Buprenorphine-naloxone versus Buprenorphine for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnancy

OBJECTIVES

Data regarding treatment outcomes with the use of buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) in pregnancy are scarce. The objective of this study is to examine the outcomes in a cohort of pregnancies treated with BUP-NX versus buprenorphine (BUP).

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective cohort study examined birthing person-infant dyads treated with BUP-NX versus BUP. The primary birthing person outcome was return to opioid use in pregnancy. The primary neonatal outcome was the need for pharmacologic treatment for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS).

RESULTS

The BUP-NX and the BUP treatment groups included 33 and 73 dyads, respectively. Except for psychiatric medication use, all demographics were similar between groups. In the final regression models, neither the birthing person nor the neonatal outcomes differed. The adjusted odds ratio for return to use during pregnancy for the BUP-NX versus BUP groups was 1.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-4.76). The adjusted odds ratio for pharmacologic treatment of NOWS for the BUP-NX versus BUP groups was 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-1.54). Among a subgroup of persons who transitioned from BUP to BUP-NX mid-pregnancy, there was no proximate return to use or need for dose increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with BUP, the use of BUP-NX in pregnancy is not associated with a higher risk of return to opioid use or a higher need for pharmacological treatment for NOWS.

Impact of Coronavirus Disease-2019 on Hospital Care for Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To compare prenatal exposures, hospital care processes, and hospitalization outcomes for opioid-exposed newborns before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

STUDY DESIGN

In this multicenter retrospective analysis, data were collected from 19 Massachusetts hospitals, including 5 academic and 14 community hospitals. The pre-COVID-19 cohort was defined as births occurring during March 1, 2019-February 28, 2020, and the COVID-19 cohort was defined as births occurring during March 1, 2020-December 31, 2020. Opioid-exposed newborns born at ≥35 weeks of gestation were included. Differences in prenatal substance exposures, hospital care processes, and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) outcomes, including pharmacologic treatment for NOWS (PharmTx), length of stay (LOS), and as-needed (prn) treatment failure rates, were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 663 opioid-exposed newborns in the pre-COVID-19 group and 476 in the COVID-19 group. No between-group differences were seen in prenatal substance exposures or the need for PharmTx. Compared with the pre-COVID-19 group, in the COVID-19 group there was less rooming-in after maternal discharge (53.8% vs 63.0%; P = .001) and less care in the pediatric unit setting (23.5% vs 25.3%; P = .001), longer LOS (adjusted risk ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08), and a higher rate of breast milk receipt at discharge (aOR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.22-3.39). Within the subset of academic centers, more infants failed prn treatment in the COVID-19 group (53.8% vs 26.5%, P = .02; aOR, 3.77; 95% CI, 0.98-14.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Among the hospitals in our collaborative, hospital processes for NOWS, including care setting, rooming-in, and LOS were negatively impacted in the COVID-19 group, particularly in academic medical centers.

Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome: A Comparison of As-Needed Pharmacotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Methadone and morphine are commonly administered medications for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). Infants are increasingly treated with as-needed or "pro re nata" (PRN) medication. The optimal pharmacologic agent for PRN treatment of NOWS has not been examined. This study's objective is to compare NOWS hospital outcomes between infants treated with PRN methadone versus morphine.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of infants pharmacologically treated for NOWS across 4 Massachusetts hospitals between January 2018 and February 2021. Infants born ≥36 weeks gestation with prenatal opioid exposure treated with PRN methadone or morphine were included. Mixed effects logistic and linear regression models were employed to evaluate differences in transition rates to scheduled dosing, length of stay, and number of PRN doses administered depending on PRN treatment agent.

RESULTS

There were 86 infants in the methadone group and 52 in the morphine group. There were no significant differences in NOWS hospital outcomes between groups in adjusted models: transition to scheduled dosing (methadone 31.6% vs morphine 28.6%, adjusted odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.19), mean length of stay (methadone 15.5 vs morphine 14.3 days, adjusted risk ratio 1.06, 95% CI 0.80-1.41), and the mean number of PRN doses (methadone 2.3 vs morphine 3.4, adjusted risk ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.41-1.02). There was an association with nonpharmacologic care practices and improved NOWS hospital outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in NOWS hospitalization outcomes based on pharmacologic agent type; nonpharmacologic care practices were most strongly associated with improved NOWS hospitalization outcomes.

Neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome: a review of the science and a look toward the use of buprenorphine for affected infants

Neonates born to mothers taking opioids during pregnancy are at risk for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), for which there is no recognized standard approach to care. Nonpharmacologic treatment is typically used as a first-line approach for management, and pharmacologic treatment is added when clinical signs are not responding to nonpharmacologic measures alone. Although morphine and methadone are the most commonly used pharmacotherapies for NOWS, buprenorphine has emerged as a treatment option based on its pharmacologic profile and results from initial single site clinical trials. The objective of this report is to provide an overview of NOWS including a summary of ongoing work in the field and to review the state of the science, knowledge gaps, and practical considerations specific to the use of buprenorphine for the treatment of NOWS as discussed by a panel of experts during a virtual workshop hosted by the National Institutes of Health.

Correlating Scores but Contrasting Outcomes for Eat Sleep Console Versus Modified Finnegan

OBJECTIVES

The Modified Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (M-FNASS) and the newer Eat, Sleep, and Console (ESC) model guide the clinical management of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). In this study, we evaluate how the M-FNASS and ESC model directly compare in inpatient practice. We hypothesized that ESC scores would correlate with M-FNASS scores, whereas ESC management would reduce health care use for infants with NOWS.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we compared management of infants with NOWS admitted to nursery settings. Epoch 1 was managed by using an M-FNASS algorithm. Epoch 2 was scored simultaneously with the M-FNASS and ESC model and managed by using the ESC approach. In the statistical analysis, we compared M-FNASS and ESC scores and outcomes between epochs.

RESULTS

A total of 158 infants provided 2101 scoring instances for analysis. Demographic characteristics were similar between epochs. ESC scores significantly correlated with overall M-FNASS scores and specific M-FNASS domains. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that an ESC score containing at least 1 "no" was best predicted by an M-FNASS cutoff value of 7.5 (sensitivity 0.84; specificity 0.70; area under the curve = 0.842). Length of stay (median 9.5 vs 5 days; P = .0002) and initiation (53% vs. 33%; P = .018) and duration of pharmacologic treatment (median 11 vs 7 days; P = .0042), as well as length of stay for infants who were pharmacologically treated (median 15 vs 10 days; P = .0002), were significantly reduced with ESC-based management after adjustment for covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

The ESC approach meaningfully correlates with the M-FNASS to detect NOWS. Management with the ESC approach continues to be associated with reduced health care use when compared with an M-FNASS approach, implying that the ESC approach may facilitate higher-value inpatient care.