Identification of Caregiver-Reported Social Risk Factors in Hospitalized Children

Addressing food insecurity in the inpatient setting: Results of a postdischarge pilot study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

With a growing interest in screening for food insecurity (FI) during pediatric hospitalization, there is a parallel need to develop interventions. With input from caregivers experiencing FI, we sought to identify interventions to assist with short-term FI after discharge and evaluate their feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness.

METHODS

We first employed qualitative methods to identify potential interventions. Next, we conducted a pilot study of selected interventions for families experiencing FI. Seven days postdischarge, caregivers rated the intervention's feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness. We also assessed for ongoing FI. We summarized the median and proportion of "completely agree" responses to feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness questions, and we compared in-hospital and postdischarge FI using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

In the qualitative stage, 14 caregivers prioritized three interventions: grocery store gift cards, grocery delivery/pick-up, and frozen meals. In the pilot study, 53 caregivers (25% of those screened) endorsed FI during their child's hospitalization and received one or more of the interventions. Every caregiver selected the grocery gift card option; 37 families (69.8%) also received frozen meals. Seven days after discharge, most caregivers rated the intervention as "completely" feasible (76%), acceptable (90%), and appropriate (88%). There was a significant decrease in caregivers who reported FI after discharge compared to during the hospitalization (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of inpatient interventions to address FI, particularly at the time of pediatric hospital discharge and transition home. Randomized trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of interventions employed during hospitalization.

Comparison of Caregiver and Provider Food Insecurity Screening Preferences Within a Health System

Food insecurity is a public health concern associated with poor health. Evidence guiding how to best implement screening for food insecurity across a pediatric health care system is lacking. We performed a single-center, multi-department, cross-sectional study of caregivers and health care providers in outpatient and inpatient settings to describe the beliefs, barriers, preferences, and preferred food insecurity screening location. Most providers and caregivers underestimated the pervasiveness of food insecurity while acknowledging the benefit of screening. Caregivers are overall receptive to food insecurity screening and disagree with feelings of discomfort or shame when disclosing food insecurity status. Providers acknowledged perceived caregiver discomfort, lack of community food resources, and lack of a validated screening tool as barriers to screening. Both caregivers and providers identified the primary care setting as the preferred screening setting.

Implementing Inpatient Social Needs Screening in an Urban Tertiary Care Children's Hospital

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening for unmet social needs, and the literature on inpatient screening implementation is growing. Our aim was to use quality improvement methods to implement standardized social needs screening in hospitalized pediatric patients.

METHODS

We implemented inpatient social needs screening using the Model for Improvement. An interprofessional team trialed interventions in a cyclical manner using plan-do-study-act cycles. Interventions included a structured screening questionnaire, standardized screening and referrals workflows, electronic health record (EHR) modifications, and house staff education, deliberate practice, and feedback. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of discharged patients screened for social needs. Screening for social needs was defined as a completed EHR screening questionnaire or a full social work evaluation. Process and balancing measures were collected to capture data on screening questionnaire completion and social work consultations. Data were plotted on statistical process control charts and analyzed for special cause variation.

RESULTS

The mean monthly percentage of patients screened for social needs improved from 20% at baseline to 51% during the intervention period. Special cause variation was observed for the percentage of patients with completed social needs screening, EHR-documented screening questionnaires, and social work consults.

CONCLUSIONS

Social needs screening during pediatric hospitalization can be implemented by using quality improvement methods. The next steps should be focused on sustainability and the spread of screening. Interventions with greater involvement of interdisciplinary health care team members will foster process sustainability and allow for the spread of screening interventions to the wider hospitalized pediatric population.

Evaluating the Impact of a Pediatric Inpatient Social Care Program in a Community Hospital

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of implementing a stakeholder-informed social risk screening and social service referral system in a community hospital setting.

METHODS

We implemented a stakeholder-informed social care program at a community hospital in April 2022. The evaluation included patients aged 0 to 17 years admitted to the pediatric unit between April 2021 and March 2022 (1 year preimplementation) and between April 2022 and March 2023 (1 year postimplementation). For a random subset of 232 preimplementation and 218 postimplementation patients, we performed manual data extraction, documenting program process measures and preliminary effectiveness outcomes. We used χ square and Wilcoxon rank tests to compare outcomes between the preimplementation and postimplementation groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the preliminary effectiveness of the social care program in identifying social risks.

RESULTS

Screening rates were higher in the postimplementation group for nearly all social domains. Compared with preimplementation, the postimplementation group had higher rates of social risks identified (17.4% vs 7.8% [P < .01]: adjusted odds ratio 2.9 [95% confidence interval 1.5-5.5]) on multivariate testing. Social work consults were completed more frequently and earlier for the postimplementation group (13.8.% vs 5.6% [P < .01]) and median (19 hours vs 25 hours [P = .03]), respectively. Rates of communication of social risks in discharge summaries were higher in the postimplementation group (46.8% vs 8.2% [P < .001]).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a stakeholder-informed social care program within a community hospital setting led to the increased identification of social risks and social work consultations and improved timeliness of social work consultations and written communication of social risks in discharge summaries for primary care providers.

Social and Medical Care Integration Practices Among Children's Hospitals

OBJECTIVES

In response to evidence linking social risk factors and adverse health outcomes, new incentives have emerged for hospitals to screen for adverse social determinants of health (SDOH). However, little information is available about the current state of social risk-related care practices among children's hospitals. To address outstanding knowledge gaps, we sought to describe social risk-related care practices among a national sample of children's hospitals.

METHODS

We analyzed responses to the 2020 American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Among children's hospitals, we calculated the prevalence of screening for social needs, strategies to address social risks/needs, partnerships with community-based organizations to address social risks/needs at the individual and community level, and rates of impact assessments of how social risk-related interventions affect outcomes. We also used χ2 tests to compare results by hospital characteristics. We weighted results to adjust for nonresponse.

RESULTS

The sample included 82 children's hospitals. A total of 79.6% screened for and 96.0% had strategies to address at least 1 social risk factor, although rates varied by SDOH domain. Children's hospitals more commonly partnered with community-based organizations to address patient-level social risks than to participate in community-level initiatives. A total of 39.2% of hospitals assessed SDOH intervention effectiveness. Differences in social risk-related care practices commonly varied by hospital ownership and Medicaid population but not by region.

CONCLUSIONS

We found wide variability in social risk-related care practices among children's hospitals based on the risk domain and hospital characteristics. Findings can be used to monitor whether social risk-related care practices change in the setting of new incentives.

Inpatient Screening of Parental Adversity and Strengths

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Social adversities, including health-harming social risks and adverse childhood experiences, contribute to poor outcomes after hospital discharge. Screening for social adversities is increasingly pursued in outpatient settings. Identifying and addressing such adversities has been linked to improved child outcomes. Screening for social adversities and strengths in the inpatient setting may contribute to better transitions from hospital to home. Our goal was twofold: 1. to use qualitative methods to understand parent perspectives around screening tools for potential use in inpatient settings; and 2. to develop a family-friendly inpatient screening tool for social adversity.

METHODS

We used in-depth, cognitive qualitative interviews with parents to elicit their views on existing screening tools covering social adversities and strengths. We partnered with a local nonprofit to recruit parents who recently had a child hospitalized or visited the emergency department. There were 2 phases of the study. In the first phase, we used qualitative methods to develop a screening prototype. In the second phase, we obtained feedback on the prototype.

RESULTS

We interviewed 18 parents who identified 3 major themes around screening: 1. factors that promote parents to respond openly and honestly during screening; 2. feedback about screening tools and the prototype; and 3. screening should include resources.

CONCLUSIONS

Social adversity routinely affects children; hospitalization is an important time to screen families for adversity and potential coexisting strengths. Using qualitative parent feedback, we developed the family friendly Collaborate to Optimize Parent Experience screening tool.

Social Needs Screening in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Addressing adverse social determinants of health is an upstream approach to potentially improve child health outcomes and health equity. We aimed to determine if systematically screening and referring for social needs in hospitalized pediatric patients increased families' enrollment in publicly available resources.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trial at a large urban children's hospital enrolled English-speaking caregivers of patients 0 to 36 months of age on the general pediatrics service from June 2016 to July 2017. The intervention arm received the WE CARE Houston social needs intervention (screener and resource referrals based on screening results and receptiveness to help); the control arm received standard of care. Baseline social risk data were collected for all participants. Caregivers who screened positive for mental health need, substance abuse, or domestic violence received additional support, including from social workers. The primary outcome was enrollment in resources at 6 months postdischarge. Univariate and multivariable analysis was performed to identify associations.

RESULTS

Our study sample consisted of 413 caregivers from diverse sociodemographic/socioeconomic backgrounds. Overall, 85% of study participants had ≥1 social risk (median 2, range 0-9). WE CARE Houston identified caregiver employment, health insurance, primary care physician, depression, childcare, smoking, and food resources as the most prevalent social needs. Among these, caregivers were most receptive to resources for childcare, mental health, health insurance, and primary care. There was no significant difference in enrollment in new resources by study arm.

CONCLUSION

Screening for social needs in the hospital is feasible and can result in the identification of social needs, but further work is needed to successfully address these needs.

Social determinants of health screening in pediatric healthcare settings

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article outlines updates in social determinants of health (SDOH) screening practices in pediatric healthcare and community settings. The transition to value-based care and the COVID-19 pandemic have both had significant impacts on screening practices, with implications for providers, communities, and policymakers.

RECENT FINDINGS

The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated social needs for vulnerable patients and families, resulting in increased recognition by healthcare teams through screening. Policy frameworks like value-based care that aim to deliver whole-child care in the community are reorienting the logistics of screening, including screening in acute-care settings and community settings. Recent studies on family and provider perspectives should be integrated into screening practices.

SUMMARY

Despite significant advances in and expansion of SDOH screening in the pediatric healthcare setting, there remain limitations and future research needs. More data is needed to evaluate social need screeners and interventions, and determine how healthcare systems, communities, and states can spread and scale such interventions based on outcomes and value measurements. Population-based social indices have the potential to augment individual patient screening, but this remains a future research need.

Caregiver Experiences in Pediatric Hospitalizations: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement

BACKGROUND

There are limited qualitative data describing general pediatric hospitalizations through the caregivers' lens, and most focus on one particular challenge or time during the hospitalization. This qualitative study aimed to address a gap in the description of the breadth and depth of personal challenges caregivers may face during the entire hospitalization, irrespective of severity of patient illness or diagnosis, and explored caregiver-suggested interventions.

METHODS

Caregivers of pediatric patients on the hospitalist service at a Pacific Northwest children's hospital were interviewed to explore their hospitalization experience and solicit feedback for potential interventions. Content was coded iteratively using a framework analysis until thematic saturation was met. Findings were triangulated through 2 focus groups, 1 with parent advisors and the other with hospital physicians and nurses.

RESULTS

Among 14 caregivers (7 each of readmitted and newly admitted patients) and focus group participants, emergent domains on difficulties faced with their child's hospitalization were anchored on physiologic (sleep, personal hygiene, and food), psychosocial (feelings of isolation, mental stress), and communication challenges (information flow between families and the medical teams). Caregivers recognized that addressing physiologic and psychosocial needs better enabled them to advocate for their child and suggested interventions to ameliorate hospital challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing physiologic and psychosocial needs may reduce barriers to caregivers optimally caring and advocating for their child. Downstream consequences of unaddressed caregiver challenges should be explored in relation to participation in hospital care and confidence in shared decision-making, both vital components for optimization of family-centered care.

Parent Perspectives on Screening for Social Needs During Pediatric Hospitalizations

OBJECTIVES

Social determinants of health have been demonstrated to be important drivers of health outcomes and disparities. Screening for social needs has been routinely performed and shown to be beneficial in ambulatory settings, but little is known regarding parent perspectives on screening during pediatric hospitalizations. This study sought to determine parental attitudes surrounding inpatient screening and screening process preferences in the hospital setting.

METHODS

We conducted 17 semistructured interviews with English- and Spanish-speaking parents of hospitalized children at 1 tertiary and 2 community hospitals between July 2020 and February 2021, with questions probing opinions and experiences with social needs screening, comfort level with discussing social needs with hospital providers, and screening process preferences in the hospital setting. Interviews were recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

Participants were median age 32 years, with majority female and English-speaking, and nearly one-half with children admitted to a community hospital. Emergent themes included (1) importance of screening for social needs across multiple health care settings, (2) hospitals viewed as capable systems to respond to social needs, (3) most parents comfortable discussing social needs with inpatient providers, (4) appreciation for providers expressing caring and desire to help during inpatient screening, and (5) importance of a family-centered approach to inpatient screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents reported positive perceptions regarding pediatric inpatient social needs screening importance and hospitals' ability to address social needs and identified multiple screening process preferences for the hospital setting that can inform the development of family-centered inpatient social needs screening strategies.

Clinical Stakeholder Perspectives on Pediatric Inpatient Screening for Social Needs

OBJECTIVES

Social determinants of health are major drivers of health outcomes and quality of life. While several social needs screening tools have been created for use in primary care settings, the best procedures to incorporate these tools into hospital workflow remain unclear. This study aimed to elicit clinical stakeholder perspectives on proposed screening for social needs during pediatric hospitalizations, with particular focus on informing implementation strategies.

METHODS

We conducted 23 semistructured interviews with pediatric clinical stakeholders (physicians, nurses, social workers, and case managers) at 1 tertiary and 2 community hospitals between July 2020 and January 2021, on topics including social needs screening practices, benefits and challenges to inpatient screening, and optimal screening and referral processes within hospital workflow. Interviews were recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

Participants ranged in age from 25 to 62 years, with nearly half working in community hospitals. Regarding inpatient social needs screening, themes emerged about benefits, including enabling clinicians to identify vulnerable patients/moments, and providing clinicians with comprehensive understanding of social context; barriers, including prioritization of medical needs, lack of clinician education surrounding screening, and lack of pre-established relationships; facilitators, including duration of time spent with families, and multidisciplinary clinicians; screening process preferences, including verbal screening, and integration into pre-existing systems; and referral process preferences, including resource provision with family empowerment, and care transition to outpatient clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical stakeholders identified multiple barriers, facilitators, and process preferences for pediatric inpatient social needs screening, which may inform the future development of feasible and sustainable implementation strategies.

Below the Surface: Caregivers' Experience of Hospital-to-Home Transitions

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to understand the breadth of the hospital-to-home experience from the caregiver perspective using a mixed method approach.

METHODS

Caregivers of children who experienced an inpatient admission (N = 184) completed a hospital-to-home transition questionnaire after discharge. Twenty-six closed-ended survey items captured child's hospitalization, discharge, and postdischarge experiences and were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Four additional free-response items allowed caregivers to expand on specific challenges or issues. A conventional content analysis coding framework was applied to the free responses.

RESULTS

Ninety-one percent of caregivers reported satisfaction with the hospital experience and 88% reported they understood how to manage their child's health after discharge. A majority of survey respondents (74%) provided answers to 1 or more of the qualitative free-response items. In the predischarge period, qualitative responses centered on concerns related to finances or available resources and support, communication, hospital environment, and the discharge process. Responses for the postdischarge time period centered on family well-being (child health, other family member health), finances (bills, cost of missed work), and medical follow-up (supplies, appointments, instruction).

CONCLUSIONS

Caregivers were generally satisfied with their hospital experience; however, incorporating survey items specifically related to family stressors either through closed- or open-ended questions gave a richer context for caregiver-identified concerns. Basing future quality improvement efforts on supporting caregiver needs and identifying stressors before discharge may make for a more robust and successful transition to home.

Using Quality Improvement and Technology to Improve Social Supports for Hospitalized Children

OBJECTIVES

To develop and test the feasibility of a caregiver self-administered social needs screener, a Web-based searchable community resource map, and a process map for implementation of these tools as part of social needs screening and referral on a pediatric inpatient unit.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team used quality improvement methodology to develop an electronic social needs screener, resource map Web site, and electronic health record enhancements. A process map for implementation of these tools was refined through plan-do-study-act cycles before full implementation. Weekly measures included the number of eligible caregivers screened, prevalence of reported social needs, and use of social work resources.

RESULTS

During the 22-week study period, 147 caregivers were screened and 2 declined to participate. Thirty-four percent of caregivers endorsed ≥1 social need. The most common needs identified were depressive symptoms (23%), food insecurity (19%), and need for assistance with utilities (10%). All participants received information about the resource map, and 99% of caregivers with an identified need met with a social worker during their admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Using quality improvement methodology and technology, the team implemented a new standardized process for addressing social needs on an inpatient unit. This led to identification of social needs in more than one-third of caregivers screened and provision of resource map information to all caregivers. These findings reinforce the importance of standardized assessment of social needs in the pediatric inpatient setting. The role of technology, including resource maps and electronic health record enhancements, was highlighted.

Prevalence of Social Risks on Inpatient Screening and Their Impact on Pediatric Care Use

OBJECTIVES

Screening for social determinants of health in the inpatient setting is uncommon. However, social risk factors documented in billing and electronic medical record data are associated with increased pediatric care use. We sought to describe (1) the epidemiology of social risks and referral acceptance and (2) association between social risks identified through routine inpatient screening and care use.

METHODS

Parents of children ages 0 to 18 admitted to a general pediatric floor at an academic children's hospital completed a psychosocial screening survey from October 2017 to June 2019. The survey covered the following domains: finances, housing, food security, medications, and benefits. Patient characteristics and care use outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical record and compared by using Pearson's χ² or the Wilcoxon rank test and logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 374 screened families, 141 (38%) had a positive screen result, of whom 78 (55%) reported >1 need and 64 (45%) accepted a community resource. In bivariate analyses, patients with a positive screen result had higher 30-day readmission (10% vs 5%; P = .05), lower median household income ($62 321 vs $71 460; P < .01), lower parental education (P < .01), public insurance (57% vs 43%; P < .01), lived in a 1-parent household (30 vs 12%; P < .01), and had a complex chronic condition (35% vs 23%; P = .01) compared with those with a negative screen result. There was no difference in care reuse by screening status in adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Social risks are common in the pediatric inpatient setting. Children with medical complexity offer a good target for initial screening efforts.

Screening for Health-Related Social Needs of Emergency Department Patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

There has been increasing attention to screening for health-related social needs. However, little is known about the screening practices of emergency departments (EDs). Within New England, we seek to identify the prevalence of ED screening for health-related social needs, understand the factors associated with screening, and understand how screening patterns for health-related social needs differ from those for violence, substance use, and mental health needs.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the 2018 National Emergency Department Inventory-New England survey, which was administered to all 194 New England EDs during 2019. We used descriptive statistics to compare ED characteristics by screening practices, and multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with screening.

RESULTS

Among the 166 (86%) responding EDs, 64 (39%) reported screening for at least one health-related social need, 160 (96%) for violence (including intimate partner violence or other violent exposures), 148 (89%) for substance use disorder, and 159 (96%) for mental health needs. EDs reported a wide range of social work resources to address identified needs, with 155 (93%) reporting any social worker availability and 41 (27%) reporting continuous availability.

CONCLUSION

New England EDs are screening for health-related social needs at a markedly lower rate than for violence, substance use, and mental health needs. EDs have relatively limited resources available to address health-related social needs. We encourage research on the development of scalable solutions for identifying and addressing health-related social needs in the ED.

The terminology of social emergency medicine: Measuring social determinants of health, social risk, and social need

Emergency medicine has increasingly focused on addressing social determinants of health (SDoH) in emergency medicine. However, efforts to standardize and evaluate measurement tools and compare results across studies have been limited by the plethora of terms (eg, SDoH, health-related social needs, social risk) and a lack of consensus regarding definitions. Specifically, the social risks of an individual may not align with the social needs of an individual, and this has ramifications for policy, research, risk stratification, and payment and for the measurement of health care quality. With the rise of social emergency medicine (SEM) as a field, there is a need for a simplified and consistent set of definitions. These definitions are important for clinicians screening in the emergency department, for health systems to understand service needs, for epidemiological tracking, and for research data sharing and harmonization. In this article, we propose a conceptual model for considering SDoH measurement and provide clear, actionable, definitions of key terms to increase consistency among clinicians, researchers, and policy makers.

The Role of Caregiver-Reported Risks in Predicting Adverse Pediatric Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Certain social risk factors (e.g., housing instability, food insecurity) have been shown to directly and indirectly influence pediatric health outcomes; however, there is limited understanding of which social factors are most salient for children admitted to the hospital. This study examines how caregiver-reported social and medical characteristics of children experiencing an inpatient admission are associated with the presence of future health complications.

METHODS

Caregivers of children experiencing an inpatient admission (N = 249) completed a predischarge questionnaire designed to capture medical and social risk factors across systems (e.g., patient, caregiver, family, community, healthcare environment). Electronic health record (EHR) data were reviewed for child demographic data, chronic disease status, and subsequent emergency department visits or readmissions (i.e., acute events) 90 days postindex hospitalization. Associations between risk factors and event presence were estimated using odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CI), both unadjusted and adjusted OR (aOR) for chronic disease and age.

RESULTS

Thirty-three percent (N = 82) of children experienced at least one event. After accounting for child age and chronic disease status, caregiver perceptions of child's health being generally "poor" or "not good" prior to discharge (aOR = 4.7, 95% CI = 2.3, 9.7), having high care coordination needs (aOR = 3.2, 95% CI = 1.6, 6.1), and experiencing difficulty accessing care coordination (aOR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.4, 4.7) were significantly associated with return events.

CONCLUSIONS

Caregiver report of risks may provide valuable information above and beyond EHR records to both determine risk of future health problems and inform intervention development.