Once-daily gentamicin dosing in newborn infants

Antibiotic regimens for early-onset neonatal sepsis

BACKGROUND

Neonatal sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It is the third leading cause of neonatal mortality globally constituting 13% of overall neonatal mortality. Despite the high burden of neonatal sepsis, high-quality evidence in diagnosis and treatment is scarce. Possibly due to the diagnostic challenges of sepsis and the relative immunosuppression of the newborn, many neonates receive antibiotics for suspected sepsis. Antibiotics have become the most used therapeutics in neonatal intensive care units. The last Cochrane Review was updated in 2004. Given the clinical importance, an updated systematic review assessing the effects of different antibiotic regimens for early-onset neonatal sepsis is needed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of different antibiotic regimens for early-onset neonatal sepsis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases: CENTRAL (2020, Issue 8); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase Ovid; CINAHL; LILACS; Science Citation Index EXPANDED and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science on 12 March 2021. We searched clinical trials databases and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs comparing different antibiotic regimens for early-onset neonatal sepsis. We included participants from birth to 72 hours of life at randomisation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and our secondary outcomes were: serious adverse events, respiratory support, circulatory support, nephrotoxicity, neurological developmental impairment, necrotising enterocolitis, and ototoxicity. Our primary time point of interest was at maximum follow-up.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five RCTs (865 participants). All trials were at high risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence according to GRADE was very low. The included trials assessed five different comparisons of antibiotics. We did not conduct any meta-analyses due to lack of relevant data. Of the five included trials one trial compared ampicillin plus gentamicin with benzylpenicillin plus gentamicin; one trial compared piperacillin plus tazobactam with amikacin; one trial compared ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid with piperacillin plus gentamicin; one trial compared piperacillin with ampicillin plus amikacin; and one trial compared ceftazidime with benzylpenicillin plus gentamicin. None of the five comparisons found any evidence of a difference when assessing all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, circulatory support, nephrotoxicity, neurological developmental impairment, or necrotising enterocolitis; however, none of the trials were near an information size that could contribute significantly to the evidence of the comparative benefits and risks of any particular antibiotic regimen. None of the trials assessed respiratory support or ototoxicity. The benefits and harms of different antibiotic regimens remain unclear due to the lack of well-powered trials and the high risk of systematic errors.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence is insufficient to support any antibiotic regimen being superior to another. Large RCTs assessing different antibiotic regimens in early-onset neonatal sepsis with low risk of bias are warranted.

Standard-dose gentamicin does not increase risk of patent ductus arteriosus

BACKGROUND

Rates of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and infection are high in preterm infants. Preterm infants with infection are more likely to develop symptomatic PDA, a potentially fatal disease. Clinically, gentamicin is widely used for early-onset infection in neonates including preterm infants. A recent study demonstrated that standard-dose gentamicin itself, not infection, increased risk of PDA in mice, suggesting that gentamicin should be avoided in neonates with a risk of PDA. This claim has been insufficiently investigated in subsequent in-vivo experiments. We reevaluated the in-vivo effect of standard-dose gentamicin on patency of the rat ductus arteriosus (DA).

METHODS

1) To evaluate the effect of gentamicin on DA patency duration, gentamicin was intraperitoneally injected immediately after birth. 2) To evaluate the effect of gentamicin on DA reopening, gentamicin was intraperitoneally injected 30 min after birth. In both scenarios, 30 min after gentamicin administration, rapid whole-body freezing was performed and the inner diameter of the DA was measured.

RESULTS

Standard-dose gentamicin (5 μg/g) did not prolong patency of the DA or increase the likelihood of DA reopening in rat neonates. High-dose gentamicin (100 μg/g), however, significantly prolonged patency of the DA and was associated with DA reopening in rat neonates, although the dilative effect did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Standard-dose gentamicin does not increase the risk of PDA in rat neonates. This study suggests that standard-dose gentamicin can be used to treat infection in neonates without increasing PDA morbidity.

Optimizing gentamicin conventional and extended interval dosing in neonates using Monte Carlo simulation - a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Although aminoglycosides are routinely used in neonates, controversy exists regarding empiric dosing regimens. The objectives were to determine gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates, and develop initial mg/kg dosing recommendations that optimized target peak and trough concentration attainment for conventional and extended-interval dosing (EID) regimens.

METHODS

Patient demographics and steady-state gentamicin concentration data were retrospectively collected for 60 neonates with no renal impairment admitted to a level III neonatal intensive care unit. Mean pharmacokinetics were calculated and multiple linear regression was performed to determine significant covariates of clearance (L/h) and volume of distribution (L). Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis identified breakpoints for significant covariates. Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) was used to determine optimal dosing recommendations for each CART-identified sub-group.

RESULTS

Gentamicin clearance and volume of distribution were significantly associated with weight at gentamicin initiation. CART-identified breakpoints for weight at gentamicin initiation were: ≤ 850 g, 851-1200 g, and > 1200 g. MCS identified that a conventional dose of gentamicin 3.5 mg/kg given every 48 h or an EID of 8-9 mg/kg administered every 72 h in neonates weighing ≤ 850 g, and every 24 and 48 h, respectively, in neonates weighing 851-1200 g, provided the best probability of attaining conventional (peak: 5-10 mg/L and trough: ≤ 2 mg/L) and EID targets (peak:12-20 mg/L, trough:≤ 0.5 mg/L). Insufficient sample size in the > 1200 g neonatal group precluded further investigation of this weight category.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides initial gentamicin dosing recommendations that optimize target attainment for conventional and EID regimens in neonates weighing ≤ 1200 g. Prospective validation and empiric dose optimization for neonates > 1200 g is needed.

One dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin for treatment of suspected or proven sepsis in neonates

BACKGROUND

Animal studies and trials in older children and adults suggest that a 'one dose per day' regimen of gentamicin is superior to a 'multiple doses per day' regimen.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of one dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin in suspected or proven sepsis in neonates.

SEARCH METHODS

Eligible studies were identified by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 3) in the Cochrane Library (searched 8 April 2016), MEDLINE (1966 to 8 April 2016), Embase (1980 to 8 April 2016), and CINAHL (December 1982 to 8 April 2016).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing one dose per day ('once a day') compared to multiple doses per day ('multiple doses a day') of gentamicin to newborn infants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection and analysis was performed according to the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven RCTs were included (N = 574) and 28 excluded. All except one study enrolled infants of more than 32 weeks' gestation. Limited information suggested that infants in both 'once a day' as well as 'multiple doses a day' regimens showed adequate clearance of sepsis (typical RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.19; typical RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.19; 3 trials; N = 37). 'Once a day' gentamicin regimen was associated with fewer failures to attain peak level of at least 5 µg/ml (typical RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.47; typical RD -0.13, 95% CI -0.19 to -0.08; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 8; 9 trials; N = 422); and fewer failures to achieve trough levels of 2 µg/ml or less (typical RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.55; typical RD -0.22, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.15; NNTB = 4; 11 trials; N = 503). 'Once a day' gentamicin achieved higher peak levels (MD 2.58, 95% CI 2.26 to 2.89; 10 trials; N = 440) and lower trough levels (MD -0.57, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.44; 10 trials; N = 440) than 'multiple doses a day' regimen. There was no significant difference in ototoxicity between two groups (typical RR 1.69, 95% CI 0.18 to 16.25; typical RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.05; 5 trials; N = 214). Nephrotoxicity was not noted with either of the treatment regimens. Overall, the quality of evidence was considered to be moderate on GRADE analysis, given the small sample size and unclear/high risk of bias in some of the domains in a few of the included studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from the currently available RCTs to conclude whether a 'once a day' or a 'multiple doses a day' regimen of gentamicin is superior in treating proven neonatal sepsis. However, data suggest that pharmacokinetic properties of a 'once a day' gentamicin regimen are superior to a 'multiple doses a day' regimen in that it achieves higher peak levels while avoiding toxic trough levels. There was no change in nephrotoxicity or auditory toxicity. Based on the assessment of pharmacokinetics, a 'once a day regimen' may be superior in treating sepsis in neonates of more than 32 weeks' gestation.

Should gentamicin trough levels be routinely obtained in term neonates?

OBJECTIVE

Gentamicin is a common antibiotic used to treat sepsis in neonates. We hypothesize that obtaining routine gentamicin trough levels may not be necessary in low-risk, term infants.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study of term infants (n=346) treated with gentamicin in a single level III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The results of gentamicin trough levels and the correlation with risk factors and potential side effects were recorded. In addition, we conducted a survey of 75 academic NICUs across the United States regarding their gentamicin monitoring practice.

RESULTS

Routine trough levels did not predict potential gentamicin toxicity in neonates with low risk factors. Regression analysis demonstrated a positive correlation between gentamicin trough levels and serum creatinine. The survey of the NICUs in the United States demonstrated significant inconsistency in gentamicin monitoring practice.

CONCLUSION

Obtaining gentamicin trough levels guided by risk factors is more appropriate than obtaining routine trough levels in low-risk term neonates.

Extended-interval gentamicin administration in neonates: a simplified approach

OBJECTIVE

Gentamicin dosing is highly variable and remains complicated in the neonatal population. Traditional dosing in our unit resulted in an excessive number of elevated trough serum gentamicin levels. We hypothesized that one uniform gentamicin dose for neonates of all gestational ages will reduce the incidence of elevated trough levels from 50 to 10%.

STUDY DESIGN

Our prospective, randomized, controlled trial enrolled eligible neonates into two groups, according to gestational age (⩽34 6/7 (group I) and >35 0/7 weeks (group II)). Patients in the study arm received a dose of gentamicin 5 mg kg(-1) intravenous (i.v.) every 36 h, whereas patients in the control arm received traditional dosage. Patients were monitored for resolution of infection, serum gentamicin levels and adverse effects. We confirmed our findings in a follow-up study. Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We enrolled 96 neonates, 50 in group I (n=25 per arm) and 46 in group II (n=23 per arm). Elevated trough levels were reduced by 66% in group I (P=0.61) and 100% in group II (P=0.0015). In the study arm of both groups, 48/49 neonates had Cmin serum gentamicin concentration (SGC) <2 mg l(-1) and the majority had a trough SGC <1 mg l(-1) (P<0.0001). The study dose resulted in maximum gentamicin levels in the goal range and a 50% reduction in dosage modifications. There were no treatment failures or adverse effects. Our follow-up study phase confirmed these results.

CONCLUSION

A standardized gentamicin dosage of 5 mg kg(-1) i.v. every 36 h to neonates of all gestational ages was safe and resulted in SGCs in goal therapeutic ranges. The implications of this simplified gentamicin dosage are to reduce health-care costs by less frequent dosing of gentamicin and reducing medication errors in physician prescribing from complicated dosing schemes.

Identification of Risk Factors for Elevated Neonatal Gentamicin Trough Concentrations

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to identify neonatal and maternal characteristics that may be associated with elevated neonatal gentamicin trough concentrations despite application of a previously published gentamicin dosage strategy.

METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all neonates admitted to University of Vermont Medical Center (562-bed academic teaching hospital, Burlington, VT) receiving gentamicin between June 1, 2009, and August 31, 2013. A total of 205 neonates were included, with 41 cases and 164 controls.

RESULTS: Postmenstrual age (PMA, gestational age plus chronological age) and small-for–gestational age (SGA) status were independently associated with elevated neonatal gentamicin trough concentrations. No maternal risk factor evaluated remained significantly associated in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS: The probability of an elevated gentamicin trough concentration increases with lower PMA and is further accentuated in neonates with SGA status. In contrast, the presence of maternal risk factors did not increase the likelihood of elevated gentamicin trough concentrations. Neonates with lower PMA and SGA status may require an individualized dosage and monitoring strategy.

Risk of gentamicin toxicity in neonates treated for possible severe bacterial infection in low- and middle-income countries: Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risk of gentamicin toxicity and potential number of neonates exposed annually to this risk, through treatment with WHO-recommended first-line antibiotics (gentamicin with penicillin) for the 6.9 million neonates with possible serious bacterial infection (PSBI).

METHODS

Systematic literature review and assessment of the evidence using Cochrane and GRADE criteria. Meta-analysis was undertaken for pooled estimates where appropriate.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (946 neonates) were included (nine randomised controlled trials and two prospective cohort studies). Six trials reported consistently measured ototoxicity outcomes in neonates treated with gentamicin, and the pooled estimate for hearing loss was 3% (95% CI 0-7%). Nephrotoxicity could not be assessed due to variation in case definitions used. Estimates of the number of neonates potentially affected by gentamicin toxicity were not undertaken due to insufficient data.

CONCLUSION

Given wider scale-up of outpatient-based and lower-level treatment of PSBI, improved data are essential to better assess the risks from neonatal gentamicin treatment without assessment of blood levels, to maximise benefit and reduce harm.

Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in newborns with moderate-to-severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy undergoing therapeutic hypothermia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates with moderate-to-severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) who underwent therapeutic hypothermia (TH).

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively from infants admitted between January 2007 and February 2011. Gentamicin was given at 2.5 mg/kg/dose q12h intravenously. Infants not eligible for TH underwent therapeutic normothermia (TN). After reviewing the data which showed >85 % of infants undergoing TH had gentamicin trough concentration >2 µg/ml at steady state, the gentamicin level monitoring protocol was modified since March 2011.

RESULTS

In the initial retrospective study, 15 TN infants were compared with 19 TH infants. There was significant difference in median gentamicin half-life (7.01 vs. 9.57 h). A higher proportion of infants in the TH group required dosage adjustment (8/15 vs. 17/19). After March 2011, gentamicin level taken 12-h post 1st dose was measured routinely and 18/22 infants had trough gentamicin levels >2 µg/ml. Their dosing intervals were extended to Q18h or beyond.

CONCLUSIONS

Infants with moderate-to-severe HIE who undergo TH may exhibit changes in the pharmacokinetic properties of gentamicin compared to infants who undergo TN. By measuring gentamicin level at 12-h after the first dose of 2.5 mg/kg/dose, appropriate dosing interval can be determined and the duration of exposure to toxic gentamicin level can be reduced.

Aminoglycoside toxicity in neonates: something to worry about?

Toxicity has limited the use of aminoglycosides and adult studies report high rates of both ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Conversely paediatric studies have shown lower rates and extended interval dosing may have reduced toxicity further. We review the animal and human evidence for aminoglycoside toxicity in neonates including mechanisms, measurement and rates of toxicity; and differences between aminoglycosides and dosing regimens. We discuss genetic susceptibility and the impact of other synergistic effects.

One dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin for treatment of suspected or proven sepsis in neonates

BACKGROUND

Animal studies and trials in older children and adults suggest that a one dose per day regimen of gentamicin is superior to a multiple doses per day regimen.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of one dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin in suspected or proven sepsis in neonates.

SEARCH METHODS

Eligible studies were identified by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, April 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2011), EMBASE 1980 to April 2011, and CINAHL (December 1982 to April 2011). Abstracts of the Society for Pediatric Research were searched from 1980 to 2010 inclusive.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi randomised controlled trials comparing one dose per day ( 'once a day') compared to multiple doses per day ( 'multiple doses a day') of gentamicin to newborn infants < 28 days of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection and analysis was performed according to the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven studies were included (N = 574) and nineteen excluded. All infants in both 'once a day' as well as 'multiple doses a day' regimen showed adequate clearance of sepsis [typical RD 0.00 (95% CI - 0.19 to 0.19); 3 trials; N = 36]. For the other primary outcome measures relating to gentamicin pharmacokinetics 'once a day' dosing of gentamicin was superior. 'Once a day' gentamicin regimen was associated with less failures to attain peak level of at least 5 µg/ml [typical RR 0.22 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.47); 9 trials; N = 422] and less failures to achieve trough levels of < 2 µg/ml [typical RR 0.38 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.55); 11 trials N = 503] compared to 'multiple doses a day' regimen.Ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity were not noted with either of the treatment regimens.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from the currently available RCTs to conclude whether 'once a day' or 'multiple doses a day' regimen of gentamicin is superior in treating proven neonatal sepsis. However, data suggests that pharmacokinetic properties of 'once a day' gentamicin regimen are superior to 'multiple doses a day' regimen in that it achieves higher peak levels while avoiding toxic trough levels. There is no change in nephrotoxicity or auditory toxicity. Based on this assessment of pharmacokinetics, 'once a day regimen' may be superior in treating neonatal sepsis in neonates greater than 32 weeks gestation.

The efficacy and toxicity of two dosing-regimens of amikacin in neonates with sepsis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Neonatal sepsis is one of the most common reasons for admission to neonatal units in developing countries. Aminoglycosides widely used in its treatment are usually administered two or three times a day. Less frequent doing may be more convenient and as effective. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety (nephrotoxicity) of once daily vs. twice daily dosing of amikacin in neonates with suspected or proven sepsis and report on the drug's pharmacokinetics in these subjects.

METHODS

Thirty neonates of gestational age ≥ 36 weeks and body weight ≥ 2500 g with suspected or proven sepsis were randomized to receive amikacin either at a dose of 15 mg/kg once per day; group I (n = 15), or a dose of 7.5 mg/kg twice per day, group II (n = 15). All neonates received classical treatment of sepsis including antibiotics, hemodynamic support, inotropic support based on blood pressure levels and size of the heart in chest X-ray, if needed. Amikacin was infused over 1 h. Peak and trough serum samples for amikacin were measured for all infants at steady state. Nephrotoxicity was assessed by serum creatinine and urinary N-acetyl β-D-glucosaminidase before and 7 days after therapy. Clinical efficacy was compared using both observation of clinical status and normalization of laboratory tests.

RESULTS

All the patients in group I had achieved a trough level < 10 μg/mL and two patients had trough concentration > 10 μg/mL in group II. No significant difference between group I and group II in either baseline or day 7 serum creatinine was demonstrated (P >0.05). No significant difference was found between the two groups in clinical efficacy or renal toxicity. The calculated pharmacokinetic parameters were in group I and II, respectively: clearance = 63.8 ± 15.9 mL/kg/h and 73.5 ± 18.1 mL/kg/h; volume of distribution = 0.54 ± 0.09 L/kg and 0.61 ± 0.13 L/kg, half-life =6.1 ± 1.0 h and 5.95 ± 1.1 h.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

As expected, amikacin given once every 24 h to septic neonates of ≥ 36 weeks of gestation achieved higher peak levels and lower trough concentrations than the twice daily regimen. Treatment with once daily regimen did not lead to more nephrotoxicity than with a twice-daily regimen, and showed comparable efficacy.

Pharmacokinetic outcomes of a simplified, weight-based, extended-interval gentamicin dosing protocol in critically ill neonates

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the pharmacokinetic outcomes of a simplified, weight-based, extended-interval gentamicin dosing protocol for critically ill neonates.

DESIGN

Retrospective medical record review with pharmacokinetic analysis.

SETTING

Two neonatal intensive care units in a pediatric tertiary care system.

PATIENTS

Sequential sample of 644 critically ill neonates less than 7 days old without evidence of renal dysfunction who received gentamicin, dosed by using a simplified, weight-based, extended-interval dosing protocol, on the first day of life for suspected sepsis between February 2003 and January 2008, and who had subsequent gentamicin plasma concentrations measured during their first week of life.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data were collected on birth weight, gestational age at birth, serum creatinine concentration during the first 10 days of life, medical conditions, and concomitant drugs. Gentamicin dosing and its pharmacokinetic parameters were noted for each patient. A mean dose of 3.96 mg/kg/dose of gentamicin was administered intravenously every 48 hours in neonates weighing less than 1250 g at birth and every 24 hours in those weighing 1250 g or more. If the neonate received concurrent indomethacin, however, gentamicin was given every 48 hours. Protocol success was defined as a peak gentamicin plasma concentration of 7-10 mg/L and a trough concentration less than 2 mg/L. Mean gentamicin peak and trough concentrations were 9.38 mg/L (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.24-9.52 mg/L) and 1.00 mg/L (95% CI 0.96-1.04 mg/L), respectively. With use of the protocol, 361 neonates (56.1%) achieved gentamicin peak plasma concentrations in the range defined as successful and 610 neonates (94.7%) achieved successful trough concentrations. The mean gentamicin apparent volume of distribution and half-life were 0.48 L/kg (95% CI 0.47-0.49 L/kg) and 8.31 hours (95% CI 8.09-8.52 hrs), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This simplified, weight-based, extended-interval gentamicin dosing protocol for critically ill neonates was effective in achieving therapeutic peak plasma concentrations of gentamicin in most of the patients and, as a high proportion of patients had acceptable trough concentrations, may minimize the potential for toxicity.

Accuracy of Empiric Gentamicin Dosing Guidelines in Neonates

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of a neonatal gentamicin nomogram to achieve therapeutic gentamicin serum concentrations without further adjustment, allowing for decreased serum drug monitoring

METHODS

Retrospective single center review of all gentamicin pharmacokinetic evaluations in patients ≤ 30 days of life from July 2005 – June 2007. Patients were evaluated for postnatal age, gestational age, weight, serum creatinine, dose/interval, serum drug peaks and troughs, results of discharge hearing test and recent use of indomethacin. Logistic regression was utilized to determine potential factors impacting overall dosing accuracy, potentially allowing for decreased therapeutic drug monitoring. Factors found to be significant were incorporated into new guidelines which were evaluated through pharmacokinetic modeling.

RESULTS

Overall accuracy rate was 84% when empiric dosing guidelines were utilized; 16% of all doses were changed due to supratherapeutic troughs and 1% were changed due to subtherapeutic peaks. Variables found to impact the necessity for dose changes incuded gestational age (p≤0.001), weight (p≤0.001), indomethacin use (p≤0.001), number of indomethacin doses used (p≤0.001 and p=0.009 for 1–3 and 4–6 doses, respectively), and SCr in patients ≥ 7 days old (p=0.028); however, only gestational age remained a significant predictor when all other factors were considered (p=0.008). The current guidelines were changed to account for increased troughs in patients ≤ 28 weeks gestation and examined through pharmacokinetic modeling. Pharmacokinetic modeling of the new guidelines predicted an overall accuracy of 94%.

CONCLUSIONS

From the data gathered regarding the accuracy in patients ≥ 35 weeks gestation, we recommend to decrease therapeutic drug monitoring within this cohort. Utilizing the results of regression analysis, the current guidelines have been adjusted to allow for increased clearance in patients ≤ 28 weeks gestation, although they still need to be prospectively evaluated.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides in neonates

The efficacy and toxicity of aminoglycosides show a strong direct positive relationship with blood drug concentrations, therefore, therapy with aminoglycosides in adults is usually guided by therapeutic drug monitoring. Dosing regimens in adults have evolved from multiple daily dosing to extended-interval dosing. This evolution has also taken place in neonates. Neonates, however, display large interindividual differences in the pharmacokinetics of aminoglycosides due to developmental differences early in life. The volume of distribution of aminoglycosides shows a strong relationship with bodyweight, which tends to be larger (corrected for bodyweight) in more premature infants and those with sepsis. Renal clearance of aminoglycosides increases with gestational age and accelerates immediately after birth. Because of these developmental influences, there is great inter- and intraindividual variability in the volume of distribution and clearance of these drugs, and investigators have established aminoglycoside dosing regimens based on bodyweight and/or gestational age. Widely practised dosing regimens comprise 4-5 mg/kg bodyweight of gentamicin every 24-48 hours as a first dose, followed by dose adjustment based on therapeutic drug monitoring. Although formal toxicity studies are scarce, there is no evidence that aminoglycoside toxicity in neonates differs from that in adults. Monitoring of blood drug concentrations and intelligent reconstruction of individual pharmacokinetic behaviour using a population pharmacokinetic model, optimally chosen blood sampling times and appropriate pharmacokinetic software, help clinicians to quickly optimize aminoglycoside dosing regimens to maximize the clinical effect and minimize the toxicity of these drugs.

Parenteral antibiotics for the treatment of serious neonatal bacterial infections in developing country settings

BACKGROUND

A number of special issues must be considered when selecting simple, safe, inexpensive, and effective antimicrobial regimens for treatment of neonatal sepsis in developing country community settings.

METHODS

We reviewed available data regarding pharmacologic profiles of parenteral antibiotics with specific attention to properties relevant to their use in the treatment of neonatal infections in developing country communities.

RESULTS

For community-based management of neonatal infections, particularly attractive properties include efficacy and safety of extended-interval, intramuscular dosing regimens. The penicillins and cephalosporins have relatively favorable efficacy and safety profiles. Although the aminoglycosides have narrow therapeutic indices, when used appropriately, they are safe and effective. Although inexpensive and effective, the potential for significant life-threatening toxicity among neonates associated with chloramphenicol makes it the least preferred of the parenteral agents for empiric therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The preferred parenteral regimens for community and first-level facility use are a combination of procaine penicillin G and gentamicin, or ceftriaxone given alone, which are safe and retain efficacy when dosed at extended intervals (> or =24 hours) by intramuscular administration.

[Comparison of two gentamicin dosing schedules in the newborn]

INTRODUCTION

Gentamicin is widely used in full-term neonates as empirical therapy for early-onset suspected or proven sepsis. Several dosing schedules for gentamicin have been recommended for this neonatal population.

OBJECTIVE

To compare gentamicin serum levels, efficacy and toxicity of two dosing schedules in term and preterm newborns.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 200 newborns who were started on gentamicin therapy. Group A (N=100) was prescribed a multiple-daily dosing regimen and Group B (N=100) on a once-daily dosing regimen. Newborns in Group A received gentamicin at 2.5-3.5 mg/kg/dose q12-18 h depending on postnatal age and serum creatinine levels, and newborns in Group B received 4-5 mg/kg/dose q24-48 h depending on postconceptional and postnatal age. All peak and trough serum drug levels, demographic data, and markers of potential nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity were compared.

RESULTS

Peak serum gentamicin levels were significantly higher (8.2+/-0.22 microg/ml vs. 5.9+/-0.13 microg/ml; p <or= 0.001) and trough levels were significantly lower (0.9+/-0.06 microg/ml vs. 1.7+/-0.08 microg/ml; p <or= 0.001) in Group B than in Group A. There was no significant difference between the groups either in the clinical failure rate or in the nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily dosing regimen of gentamicin in preterm and term newborns is safe and effective, with a reduced risk of serum drug concentrations falling outside the therapeutic range.

Observational trial of a 48-hour gentamicin dosing regimen derived from Monte Carlo simulations in infants born at less than 28 weeks' gestation

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a 48-hour gentamicin dosing regimen for infants born at <28 weeks' gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

Using previously published pharmacokinetic data, we performed Monte Carlo simulations for several candidate gentamicin dosing regimens. On the basis of these simulations, we changed dosing for infants born at <28 weeks to 4.5 mg/kg every 48 hours. We then conducted an observational study of 30 infants on this new regimen and compared serum gentamicin levels with 60 historical control subjects who received 2.5 mg/kg every 24 hours.

RESULTS

Infants in the 48-hour group achieved higher gentamicin peaks (mean 9.43 microg/mL vs 6.0 microg/mL, P < .001) and lower gentamicin troughs (mean 1.08 microg/mL vs 1.54 microg/mL, P < .001) compared with the 24-hour group. Seven percent of the 48-hour group infants had a gentamicin peak <6 microg/mL versus 43% in the 24-hour group. With a goal for peaks of 6 to 12 microg/mL and for troughs of <1.5 microg/mL, infants in the 48-hour group required fewer adjustments of their dosing regimens compared with the 24-hour group (26.7% vs 78.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gentamicin given every 48 hours to infants born at <28 weeks achieves optimal blood concentrations more frequently than does once-daily dosing. Monte Carlo simulations on the basis of pharmacokinetic modeling are useful to optimize drug dosing in premature infants.

Determination of extended-interval gentamicin dosing for neonatal patients in developing countries

BACKGROUND

Infectious diseases account for an estimated 36% of neonatal deaths globally. The purpose of this study was to determine safe, effective, simplified dosing regimens of gentamicin for treatment of neonatal sepsis in developing countries.

METHODS

Neonates with suspected sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at Christian Medical College and Hospital (CMC), Vellore, India (n = 49), and Dhaka Shishu Hospital (DSH), Bangladesh (n = 59), were administered gentamicin intravenously according to the following regimens: (1) 10 mg every 48 hours for neonates <2000 g; (2) 10 mg every 24 hours for neonates 2000-2249 g; and (3) 13.5 mg every 24 hours for neonates > or =2500 g. Serum gentamicin concentration (SGC) at steady state and pharmacokinetic indices were determined. Renal function was followed while under treatment and hearing was examined 6 weeks to 3 months after discharge.

RESULTS

All neonates, except 1 weighing 2000-2249 g at DSH, had a peak SGC >4 microg/mL. Overall, 5 (10%) and 17 (29%) infants had a peak SGC level > or =12 microg/mL from CMC and DSH, respectively, and 10 (20%) and 4 (7%) cases from CMC and DSH, respectively, had a trough SGC level > or =2 microg/mL. However, no infant <2000 g had a trough SGC level > or =2 microg/mL. We found no evidence of gentamicin nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Safe, therapeutic gentamicin dosing regimens were identified for treatment of neonatal sepsis in developing country settings. Administration of these doses could be simplified through use of Uniject, a prefilled, single injection device designed to make injections safe and easy to deliver in developing country settings.

Acute effects of gentamicin on glomerular and tubular functions in preterm neonates

It has been reported that gentamicin causes natriuresis, magnesuria and calciuria in neonates. The aim of this study was to determine the acute effects of trough and peak levels of gentamicin on the values of serum creatinine (SCr), urine albumin/urine creatinine (UA/UCr), fractional excretion of sodium and potassium (FENa, FEK) and urine calcium/urine creatinine (UCa/UCr) in preterm neonates treated with gentamicin for suspected infection. Baseline levels of serum and urine Cr, Na and K and urine albumin and Ca levels together with trough and peak gentamicin levels were measured in 61 preterm neonates at the start of the therapy, on the day of the third gentamicin dose and 48-72 h after the cessation of the gentamicin therapy. Therapeutic trough and peak levels were recorded in 56 (91.8%) and 39 (63.9%) of the preterm neonates, respectively, whereas high trough (>2 mg/dl) and peak (>9.99 mg/dl) levels were recorded in five (8.1%) and 11 (18%) of the 61 preterm neonates, respectively. Trough and peak levels of gentamicin were positively correlated with SCr, UA/UCr, FENa, FEK and UCa/UCr values. The UA/UCr, FENa and UCa/UCr values recorded during treatment were statistically significantly different from sub-therapeutic, therapeutic and high peak gentamicin levels. Gentamicin was found to have a serum peak level-dependent microalbuminuric, natriuric and calciuric effect in preterm neonates. Based on these results, we suggest that when the monitoring of serum gentamicin levels is not possible, the monitoring of UA/UCr, FENa and UCa/UCr can be useful as a noninvasive alternative.

"Random" gentamicin concentrations do not predict trough levels in neonates receiving once daily fixed dose regimens

BACKGROUND

Monitoring plasma gentamicin concentrations in neonates 24 hours after a once daily dose (4 mg/kg) often necessitates additional blood sampling. In adults a nomogram has been developed enabling evaluation of gentamicin doses by sampling concentrations with other blood tests, 4-16 hours after administration. We attempted to develop a similar nomogram for neonates.

METHODS

In addition to standard 24 hour sampling to monitor trough concentrations, one additional "random" gentamicin concentration was measured in each of 50 neonates < 4 days of age (median gestation 33 weeks [28-41]), when other blood samples were clinically necessary, 4-20 hours after gentamicin administration. 24 hour concentrations of > 1 mg/L were considered high, and an indication to extend the dosing interval.

RESULTS

Highest correlation (r2 = 0.51) of plasma gentamicin concentration against time (4 to 20 hours) was with logarithmic regression. A line drawn 0.5 mg/L below the true regression line resulted in all babies with 24 hr gentamicin concentrations > 1 mg/L having the additional "random" test result above that line, i.e. 100% sensitivity for 24 hour concentrations > 1 mg/L, though only 58% specificity. Having created the nomogram, 39 further babies (median gestation 34 weeks [28-41]), were studied and results tested against the nomogram. In this validation group, sensitivity of the nomogram for 24 hr concentrations > 1 mg/L was 92%; specificity 14%, positive predictive value 66%, and negative predictive value 50%. Prematurity (< or = 37 weeks) was a more sensitive (94%) and specific (61%) indicator of high 24-hour concentrations. 62 (87%) of 71 preterm babies had high 24-hour concentrations.

CONCLUSION

It was not possible to construct a nomogram to predict gentamicin concentrations at 24 hours in neonates with a variety of gestational ages. Dosage tailored to gestation with monitoring of trough concentrations remains management of choice.

One dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin for treatment of suspected or proven sepsis in neonates

BACKGROUND

Gentamicin is widely used in the treatment of suspected or proven neonatal sepsis. Animal studies and systematic reviews from trials in older children and adults suggest that a one dose per day regimen is superior to a multiple doses per day regimen. Pharmacokinetic studies and retrospective audits in neonatal population also favour once a day administration of gentamicin. However, there is no consensus regarding the dose interval regimen in the neonatal population.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of one dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin in suspected or proven sepsis in neonates.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible studies were identified by searching MEDLINE (March 2005), EMBASE 1980 - 2004, Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2005) and CINAHL (December 1982 - March 2005). Abstracts of the Society for Pediatric Research were hand searched from 1980 to 2004 inclusive. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi randomised controlled trials comparing one dose per day ( 'once a day') compared to multiple doses per day ( 'multiple doses a day') of gentamicin to newborn infants < 28 days of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed according to allocation concealment, blinding of intervention, blinding of outcome assessment and completeness of follow up. Data were sought regarding effects on clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetic efficacy, ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity of the two regimens. When appropriate, meta-analysis was conducted to provide a pooled estimate of effect. For categorical data, the typical relative risk (RR), typical risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Continuous data were analysed using weighted mean difference (WMD).

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty four studies were initially identified. Thirteen were excluded and eleven studies (N = 574) included. All studies compared the effectiveness and safety of 'once a day' versus 'multiple doses a day' regimen of gentamicin in newborn infants. Only one study enrolled infants less than 32 weeks gestation. All except one trial used intravenous infusion. One trial used gentamicin as a bolus dose over one minute. Two trials used intramuscular gentamicin in some of their study infants. For the primary outcome of 'clearance of sepsis', all infants in both 'once a day' as well as 'multiple doses a day' regimen showed adequate clearance of sepsis [Typical RD 0.00 (95% CI - 0.19, 0.19); 3 trials; N = 36]. For the other primary outcome measures relating to gentamicin pharmacokinetics, 'once a day dosing' of gentamicin was superior. 'Once a day' gentamicin regimen is associated with less failures to attain peak level of at least 5 microg/ml [Typical RR 0.22 (95% CI 0.11, 0.47); Typical RD -0.13 (95% CI -0.19, -0.08); 9 trials; N = 422]; less failures to achieve trough levels of < 2 microg/ml [Typical RR 0.38 (95% CI 0.27, 0.55); Typical RD -0.22 (95% CI -0.29, -0.15); 11 trials N = 503]; higher peak levels [WMD 2.58 (95% CI 2.26, 2.89); 10 trials; N = 440] and lower trough levels [WMD -0.57 (95% CI -0.69, -0.44); 10 trials; N = 440] compared to 'multiple doses a day' regimen. Ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity were not noted with either of the treatment regimens. Significant heterogeneity was noted for some of the outcomes measured. Hence the results need to be interpreted with caution. Possible reasons for heterogeneity are different gestational ages of study infants and the timing of collection of blood samples in relation to a particular dose and the day of therapy on which the samples were collected.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from the currently available RCTs to conclude whether 'once a day' or 'multiple doses a day' regimen of gentamicin is superior in treating proven neonatal sepsis. However data suggests that pharmacokinetic properties of 'once a day' gentamicin regimen are superior to 'multiple doses a day' regimen in that it achieves higher peak levels while avoiding toxic trough levels. There is no change in nephrotoxicity or auditory toxicity. Based on this assessment of pharmacokinetics, 'once a day regimen' may be superior in treating neonatal sepsis in neonates more than 32 weeks gestation.

Aminoglycoside extended interval dosing in neonates is safe and effective: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence from controlled clinical trials of neonates given equal daily aminoglycoside doses as extended interval dosing (dosage interval typically 24 hours in term and 36-48 hours in immature neonates) compared with traditional dosing (dosage interval typically 8-12 hours in term and 12-24 hours in immature neonates).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials found in electronic databases, trial registers, and references in reviews and selected trials.

SETTINGS

The selected trials were blinded and assessed for methodological quality. Each trial's own predefined criteria for treatment failure, nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and therapeutic serum drug concentrations were used.

SUBJECTS

Controlled trials of neonatal aminoglycoside treatment in which equal aminoglycoside daily doses were given at traditional and extended dosage intervals.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Serum drug concentrations outside the therapeutic range. Treatment failure and toxicity.

RESULTS

Sixteen trials involving 823 neonates met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Twelve trials involving 698 neonates were included in the meta-analysis of the pharmacokinetics. Compared with traditional dosing, extended interval dosing was associated with a significantly lower risk of both peak (summary risk ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.94) and trough (0.36, 0.25 to 0.56) serum drug concentrations outside the therapeutic range. Accurate information on treatment failure was obtained in nine trials involving 555 neonates. One trial reported treatment failure. In this trial two neonates in the traditional dosing group did not respond to treatment within 72 hours. Nephrotoxicity was investigated in 589 neonates in 12 trials and ototoxicity in 210 neonates in four trials, with no significant differences between the two dosing regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended interval dosing of aminoglycosides in neonates is safe and effective, with a reduced risk of serum drug concentrations outside the therapeutic range.

The effect of sepsis upon gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates

AIM

To investigate the effect of sepsis upon the volume of distribution (Vd) of gentamicin in neonates.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of neonates admitted to Dunedin Hospital who had gentamicin concentrations performed between 1st January 2000 and 30th October 2003. Data from 277 neonates, including a total of 576 gentamicin concentrations, were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Fifteen (5.4%) of the neonates had confirmed sepsis. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed with NONMEM using a one compartment first order elimination model. Duration of infusion (D) was included as a parameter in the model. Covariates included sepsis (SEP), chronological age, gestational age (GA), birth weight, current weight, gender, Apgar score at 1 (AP1) and 5 (AP2) minutes, plasma C-reactive protein and serum creatinine.

RESULTS

The initial model provided a mean estimates of clearance (CL) of 0.0460 l kg(-1) h(-1), volume of distribution (Vd) of 0.483 l kg(-1) and D of 0.748 h. The magnitudes of interpatient variability, expressed as CV%, were 29.2% for CL, 20.8% for Vd and 71.5% for D. The magnitude of residual variability in gentamicin concentrations was 88.0%. The final pharmacokinetic model was: CL = (0.0177 + 0.00147.(GA-20) + 0.000635.AP2) l kg(-1) h(-1), Vd = (0.483 +0.0656. sepsis) l kg(-1), D = 0.672 h. The interpatient variability (CV%) was 22.8% for CL, 22.8% for Vd and 97.7% for D. The magnitude of residual variability in gentamicin concentrations was 83.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The 14% increase in Vd in septic neonates implies that larger doses may be required to achieve peak therapeutic concentrations in the presence of sepsis. D is an important parameter in neonatal pharmacokinetic models.

High compared with standard gentamicin dosing for chorioamnionitis: a comparison of maternal and fetal serum drug levels

OBJECTIVE

To compare umbilical cord and maternal serum peak gentamicin concentration, gentamicin elimination, and clinical outcomes between women who received once-daily compared with standard, thrice-daily dosing for clinical chorioamnionitis.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 38 laboring women, at least 34 weeks gestation, with clinical chorioamnionitis, into 1 of 2 gentamicin dosing groups: 5.1 mg/kg every 24 hours (once-daily; n = 18), or 120 mg followed by 80 mg every 8 hours (standard; n = 20). We measured maternal serum peak and delivery gentamicin concentrations and cord serum levels at delivery. Polynomial curve fitting was used to summarize gentamicin elimination. We also compared maternal and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. Median maternal peak gentamicin levels were higher with once-daily (18.2 microg/mL) compared with standard dosing (7.1 microg/mL) (P < .001). Maternal serum levels decreased below 2 microg/mL by 10 hours in the once-daily group and by 5 hours in the standard dosing group. Extrapolated peak cord serum levels were 6.9 microg/mL in the once-daily and 2.9 microg/mL in the standard dosing arm. Cord levels decreased below 2 microg/mL by 10 hours in the once-daily and by 5 hours in the standard dosing group. We found no differences in maternal or neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Peak maternal serum gentamicin levels ranged from 13 to 25 microg/mL after a dose of 5.1 mg/kg. Single-dose gentamicin resulted in fetal serum peak levels that were closer to optimal neonatal values. Gentamicin clearance in the term fetus was similar to published values for the newborn infant. No adverse effects of high-dose therapy were noted.

New dosing strategies for antibacterial agents in the neonate

Dosing of antibiotics in neonates requires finding a delicate balance between maximal efficacy and minimal toxicity. There is a lack of data on efficacy of currently used antibiotics in neonates, and rational dosing therefore needs to be based on gestational- and postnatal-age-dependent pharmacokinetics in combination with surrogate markers. These surrogate markers are: (i) the area-under-the serum concentration time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC/MIC); (ii) peak concentration to MIC ratio (Cmax/MIC); and (iii) the time the concentration remains above the MIC (T>MIC). Whereas the efficacy of beta-lactam antibiotics (including carbapenems) depends on T>MIC, the efficacy of most other antimicrobials (including aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones) is related to AUC/MIC and Cmax/MIC. Most modern dosing regimens are adequate when these concentration effect relationships are taken into account. Dosing adjustments in neonates are suggested, based on these relationships. Several antimicrobial combinations for treatment of meningitis and necrotizing enterocolitis exist. Empiric treatment should be based on efficacy, concerns about resistance as well as information from institutional microbiological surveillance.

Dosage regimen of arbekacin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in newborns and infants

BACKGROUND

Arbekacin (ABK) is an aminoglycoside antibiotic that has a dose-dependent bactericidal action. Because it inhibits the production of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1) by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), it has attracted attention as a therapeutic drug for MRSA infection. In this study, the authors investigated the pharmacokinetics of ABK based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), in order to establish an effective dosage regimen with minimal adverse reactions in MRSA infected newborns and infants.

METHODS

Arbekacin was administered to nine MRSA infected newborns and infants between October 2000 and March 2002. Following the initial ABK administration, blood was collected and the blood concentration of ABK was measured. The blood concentrations of ABK were analyzed by the two-compartment model or by a model-independent method in order to elucidate the pharmacokinetics of ABK. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using WinNonlin Professional V3.1.

RESULTS

The mean age at initial ABK administration was 24.0 +/- 26.0 days (postconceptional age: 39.2 +/- 3.9 weeks). The increase in the peak blood concentration of ABK was 2.40 +/- 0.20 microg/mL per mg ABK per kg bodyweight, showing great consistency among cases. The elimination half-life of ABK was 0.22-3.52 h in the alpha phase (T(1/2alpha)) and 2.42-33.44 h in the beta phase (T(1/2beta)), showing great variation among cases. The distribution volume was 0.75 +/- 0.13 L/kg, and systemic clearance was 0.054 +/- 0.012 L/h/kg. ABK alleviated clinical symptoms and inflammations in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Nine newborns and infants with MRSA infection and various underlying diseases were successfully treated with TDM-based administration of ABK with no severe adverse reactions.

Phenotypic and genotypic aminoglycoside resistance in blood culture isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci from a single neonatal intensive care unit, 1989–2000

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence of aminoglycoside resistance and genes encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AME) in blood culture isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) from neonates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 180 isolates from 148 patients collected in a single neonatal unit over a 12 year period were examined for susceptibility to gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin, amikacin and arbekacin by Etest and/or disc diffusion. AME genes were detected by PCR.

RESULTS

The overall non-susceptibility rates to gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin, amikacin and arbekacin were 66%, 68%, 52%, 38% and 1%, respectively. Gentamicin non-susceptibility rates were 4% and 91% in methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates, respectively. aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'')-Ia, aph(3')-IIIa and/or ant(4')-Ia were encountered in 125 (69%), 1 (0.5%) and 30 (16.6%) isolates, respectively. Forty-six (26%) isolates negative for AME genes were susceptible to all aminoglycosides. In contrast, 115 (92%), 91 (73%) and 66 (53%) of aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'')-Ia positive isolates were non-susceptible to gentamicin, netilmicin and amikacin, respectively. Only one isolate showed arbekacin resistance. However, aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'')-Ia positive isolates and isolates with gentamicin MIC > or =128 mg/L displayed a significant reduction in arbekacin inhibition zones.

CONCLUSIONS

A high prevalence of aminoglycoside resistance was detected and associated with methicillin resistance. Discrepancies between phenotypic and genetic detection of aminoglycoside resistance were discerned. Gentamicin was the preferred substrate for phenotypic detection of aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'')-Ia. Arbekacin showed favourable antibacterial activity even in aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'')-Ia-positive isolates. We suggest including arbekacin in future clinical trials of empirical treatment of late onset neonatal sepsis.

Validation of a simplified netilmicin dosage regimen in infants

The aim of this study was to validate a simplified high-dosage, extended-interval netilmicin dosage regimen for infants. A total of 129 infants receiving 163 treatment courses of netilmicin (6 mg kg every 24 or 36 h depending on gestational age (GA), postnatal age and postmenstrual age) was analysed. Serum netilmicin concentrations were monitored before (Cmin), 30 min (C0.5h) after and 7.5 h (C7.5h) after the third dose. In 110 patients during first week of life mean C0.5h was 10.5 mg/l. Mean C0.5h was significantly lower (9.0 mg/l) in 38 infants older than 1 week of age. 14 of 15 patients with Cmin levels > or = 2 mg/l receiving netilmicin every 36 h were < 28 weeks of gestation. In the first week of life significant correlations between GA and elimination half-life (p < 0.001) and between plasma creatinine and elevated Cmin (p < 0.002) were found, but no correlation between C0.5h and GA. In this high-dosage regimen a dosing interval of 48 h for GA < 29 weeks, 36 h for GA 29-36 weeks and 24 h for full term babies seems appropriate, during first week of life, to avoid the majority of elevated trough levels and still obtain maximal therapeutic efficacy.

Pharmacokinetics of a high dose of amikacin administered at extended intervals to neonatal foals

OBJECTIVE

To determine disposition kinetics of amikacin in neonatal foals administered high doses at extended intervals.

ANIMALS

7 neonatal foals.

PROCEDURE

Amikacin was administered (21 mg/kg, i.v., q 24 h) for 10 days. On days 1, 5, and 10, serial plasma samples were obtained for measurement of amikacin concentrations and determination of pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

Mean +/- SD peak plasma concentrations of amikacin extrapolated to time 0 were 103.1 +/- 23.4, 102.9 +/- 9.8, and 120.7 +/- 17.9 microg/mL on days 1, 5, and 10, respectively. Plasma concentrations at 1 hour were 37.5 +/- 6.7, 32.9 +/- 2.6, and 30.6 +/- 3.5 microg/mL; area under the curve (AUC) was 293.0 +/- 61.0, 202.3 +/- 40.4, and 180.9 +/- 31.2 (microg x h)/mL; elimination half-life (t(1/2)beta) was 5.33, 4.08, and 3.85 hours; and clearance was 1.3 +/- 0.3, 1.8 +/- 0.4, and 2.0 +/- 0.3 mL/(min x kg), respectively. There were significant increases in clearance and decreases in t(1/2)beta, AUC, mean residence time, and plasma concentrations of amikacin at 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours as foals matured.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Once-daily administration of high doses of amikacin to foals resulted in high peak plasma amikacin concentrations, high 1-hour peak concentrations, and large values for AUC, consistent with potentially enhanced bactericidal activity. Age-related findings suggested maturation of renal function during the first 10 days after birth, reflected in enhanced clearance of amikacin. High-dose, extended-interval dosing regimens of amikacin in neonatal foals appear rational, although clinical use remains to be confirmed.

Once-daily gentamicin dosing for the preterm and term newborn: proposal for a simple regimen that achieves target levels

OBJECTIVE

Based on recent safety and efficacy data, combined with the known pharmacokinetic parameters of aminoglycosides in the newborn, once-daily gentamicin should be preferable to the many other dosing regimens currently in use. Although there are growing data to support its use in term newborns, experience with preterm infants is more limited. In our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, we experienced difficulties regarding complicated dosing regimens, actual dosing errors, and the tendency to check trough and peak levels around the third dose for infants receiving only a 48 hour course. Therefore, we conducted a quality improvement initiative in which we developed and tested a clinical practice guideline for the use of once-daily gentamicin for preterm and term infants that we hoped would yield trough and peak levels in our target range.

METHODS

We combined a review of the published English language literature with pharmacokinetic analysis of our own data prior to initiation of this new regimen to design the following dosing regimen: <35 weeks gestation: 3 mg/kg q 24 hours, > or =35 weeks gestation: 4 mg/kg q 24 hours. Our goal serum levels were a trough < or =2 microg/ml and a peak between 6 and 12 microg/ml. We collected and analyzed trough and peak levels from all infants receiving this dosing regimen in the first week of life for at least 72 hours between 3/1/99 and 12/31/00.

RESULTS

In total, 214 babies met our inclusion criteria, 75 of whom were <35 weeks gestation. 100% of babies of all gestational ages had a nontoxic trough level. For infants <35 weeks gestation, 79% had a therapeutic peak level, with a mean value of 6.8 microg/ml. For infants of at least 35 weeks gestation, 93% had a therapeutic peak level, with a mean value of 8.4 microg/ml. 92% of nontherapeutic peaks were too low.

CONCLUSION

This study of once-daily gentamicin represents the largest sample size of pre-term infants published to date. The proposed regimen is simple and yields a high proportion of desirable levels. We recommend it for use in preterm and term newborns.

Pharmacodynamics and dosing of aminoglycosides

Aminoglycosides are concentration-dependent killing agents whose pharmacodynamic predictors of efficacy are the area-under-the-curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio and the peak to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio. Prospective studies have shown that these agents can be given once-daily or less frequently in most clinical settings, with equal efficacy and possible reduced toxicity. Dosages for different clinical settings have been studied and methods are available to monitor once-daily dosing.

A gentamicin pharmacokinetic population model and once-daily dosing algorithm for neonates

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To develop a gentamicin pharmacokinetic population model and once-daily dosing algorithm for neonates younger than 10 days.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label study.

SETTING

Neonatal intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

One hundred thirty-nine neonates prescribed gentamicin.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Gentamicin peak and trough serum concentrations were collected from 139 neonates divided into three groups who were receiving one of the following intravenous 24-hour gentamicin regimens during the first 10 days of life, based on gestational age and birth weight (group 1, < 28 wks, 2.5 mg/kg; group 2, 28-34 wks, 3 mg/kg; and group 3, > 34 wks, 4 mg/kg). A structural model was developed in ADAPT II software using a MAP Bayesian approach. Final population parameter estimates were calculated using iterative two-stage analysis. The median (range) gestational age and birth weight, respectively, were 32 weeks (23-42 wks) and 1.92 kg (0.47-5.00 kg). The final one-compartmental linear model had a median (range) gentamicin total clearance, half-life, and volume of distribution of 0.0709 L/hour (0.0151-0.246 L/hr), 8.59 hours (4.88-16.9 hrs), and 0.262 L (0.0903-0.929 L), respectively. Total clearance increased as gestational age increased (p<0.001). Group 1 (10.2 hrs) had a significantly longer half-life than either group 2 (8.89 hrs, p<0.01) or group 3 (6.98 hrs, p<0.01). Total clearance was associated with gestational age and birth weight: clearance (L/hr) = (0.00504 + [0.00108 x gestational age]) x birth weight (coefficient of determination [r2] = 0.897), and volume of distribution was associated with birth weight (r2 = 0.700). The following dosing algorithm was designed to reach a therapeutic 24-hour area under the curve (87.5 mg/L x hr) in neonates during the first 10 days after birth: 24-hour gentamicin dose (mg) = (0.441 + [0.0945 x gestational age]) x birth weight.

CONCLUSION

This dosing algorithm provides a new approach for determining initial gentamicin dosing regimens in neonates; however, clinical validation is required.

Pharmacokinetics and dosing of arbekacin in preterm and term newborn infants

BACKGROUND

The objective of the present study was to determine pharmacokinetic variables and to characterize a new initial dosing regimen of arbekacin (ABK) for preterm and term newborn infants.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Subjects were 40 infants treated with ABK in a tertiary care neonatal unit over a period of 18 months. At birth, the infants were 23 5/7-40 0/7 weeks and weighed 530-3428 g. Serum ABK concentration was measured at two points in a course of treatment. Data were analyzed by a one-compartment model to obtain volume of distribution (Vd) and clearance (CL) of ABK. These variables were correlated with the patients' demographic and laboratory data. The new initial dosing regimen was determined based on these data.

RESULTS

Sixty pairs of blood samples were taken from the infants. They were divided into three groups: preterm early (PE), gestational age (GA) < 37 weeks and postnatal age (PNA) < 28 days; preterm late (PL), GA < 37 weeks and PNA >or= 28 days; and term (T), GA >or= 37 weeks and PNA < 28 days. The Vd was 0.50 +/- 0.02, 0.48 +/- 0.04, and 0.43 +/- 0.03 L/kg, and CL was 0.59 +/- 0.04, 1.12 +/- 0.10, and 0.78 +/- 0.09 mL/min per kg (mean +/- SEM) in PE, PL, and T, respectively. The new dosing regimen is 5 mg/kg every 48 h, 5 mg/kg every 24 h, and 4 mg/kg every 24 h for PE, PL, and T, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

With the new dosing regimen, more infants achieved serum ABK levels within the optimal range than the conventional one.

Newborn hearing screening: tobramycin and vancomycin are not risk factors for hearing loss

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the chance of detecting hearing loss with neonatal hearing screening in relation to exposure to tobramycin and vancomycin.

STUDY DESIGN

Automated auditory brainstem response (A-ABR) hearing screening was performed in all neonates with at least one risk factor. Data on drug administration were abstracted from patient files. Exposure to these drugs was related to the result of hearing screening. In patients failing hearing screening, exposure to ototoxic medication was assessed in the light of other risk factors for hearing loss.

RESULTS

Six hundred twenty-five patients were analyzed; 45 neonates failed hearing screening. Tobramycin, vancomycin, and furosemide were used in 508, 130, and 174 patients, respectively. Exposure to vancomycin, tobramycin, or furosemide or a combination, defined in terms of treatment duration, total dose, or serum concentrations of antibiotics, was not related to failure to pass A-ABR screening. Ototoxic medication was not the most probable risk factor in any of the patients with serum concentrations outside the therapeutic range.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin and tobramycin in neonates for ototoxicity reasons is not helpful in detecting patients at risk for clinically important hearing loss in the 2- to 4-kHz range. A longer period of audiometric follow-up is needed to determine any long-term effects.

Efficacy and tolerability of extended-interval aminoglycoside administration in pediatric patients

Aminoglycosides are commonly used to treat serious Gram-negative infections in pediatric patients. An effort to improve the efficacy and tolerability of this antibiotic class has led to evaluation of extended-interval aminoglycoside administration (EIAA). EIAA is designed to achieve higher peak plasma aminoglycoside concentrations, with relatively undetectable trough concentrations, when compared with conventional aminoglycoside administration (CAA), and is therefore expected to be markedly effective and to reduce drug accumulation and prevent nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. Clinical trials evaluating EIAA in neonates included patients with suspected Gram-negative infections requiring short courses of aminoglycoside therapy. Consequently, comparative efficacy of EIAA versus CAA could not be assessed. In addition, ototoxicity was often not assessed, and nephrotoxicity was virtually undetectable. Similarly, trials evaluating EIAA versus CAA in infants and children have not demonstrated a difference in outcomes. The use of EIAA in children with febrile neutropenia has been evaluated primarily with amikacin. The incidences of nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity were low, and were similar between EIAA and CAA. No deaths were reported in any of these studies; however, this could be related to the inclusion of patients with undocumented bacteremia. Further investigation of EIAA is necessary in patients with documented bacteremia, since plasma aminoglycoside concentrations were undetectable for most of the dosage interval in children with febrile neutropenia who were treated once daily. Overall, clinical studies suggest that EIAA has similar efficacy to, and no higher risk of toxicity than, CAA in neonates, infants, and children. A few evaluations have also demonstrated that EIAA is cost-effective in neonates and in children with febrile neutropenia. Future studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of EIAA in pediatric patients with documented systemic infections should be prospective, randomized, controlled trials with sample sizes sufficient to detect differences between administration methods. Further evaluations should also address the optimal dosage and cost-effectiveness of EIAA in infants and children.

A pilot case control follow-up study on hearing in children treated with tobramycin in the newborn period

OBJECTIVE

To assess the occurrence of hearing loss in children due to neonatal exposure to long courses of tobramycin and/or high tobramycin serum concentrations.

METHODS

This was a pilot case-control study in 3-4-year old children. Data on tobramycin administration were abstracted from the patient files of an earlier study. Patients exposed in the neonatal period to either long courses (>7 days) or high serum concentrations of tobramycin constituted the study group. The control group consisted of patients without tobramycin exposure. Patients were matched for other risk factor according to criteria of the joint committee on infant hearing. All patients underwent the following investigations: otoscopy and pneumatic otoscopy, followed by impedance audiometry, to exclude middle ear effusion. Click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions (ce-OAE) as well as distortion product oto-acoustic emissions (dp-OAE), tested at f2 frequencies ranging from 1 to 10 kHz, were measured to assess hearing. All patients with abnormal ce-OAE results underwent brainstem electric response audiometry (BERA) as well. Since aminoglycoside ototoxicity is usually bilateral, results were compared per patient and not per ear.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients were tested. Eleven patients were excluded due to middle ear effusion. Data for 18 patients were analyzed. In the tobramycin treated group (n=9) both ce-OAE and dp-OAE (at all tested frequencies) were not detectable in six ears of three patients. All other patients had normal ce-OAE's as well as normal dp-OAE's in this frequency range. Difference between the tobramycin treated and control group for OAE as well as dp-OAE showed a trend (P=0.08). In all three patients with undetectable emissions BERA confirmed a cochlear loss of 60-70 dB at 3 kHz in both ears. These three patients had the longest total exposure to tobramycin: 20-24 days and 84-92 mg/kg, respectively. No relation to either peak or trough serum concentrations could be detected.

CONCLUSION

There was no statistical relation between hearing loss and tobramycin exposure, probably due to sample size. Our results do indicate a need for a case-control follow-up study of hearing in neonates exposed to long courses of aminoglycosides.

Vancomycin and gentamicin in neonates: hindsight, current controversies, and forethought

The use of both vancomycin and gentamicin in the treatment of suspected or documented neonatal infections, while routine, is a challenge for bedside and advanced practice nurses caring for neonates in intensive care units. A review of the background information surrounding neonatal infections as well as the history, intended use, and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of vancomycin and gentamicin is presented with the goal of aiding in proper treatment with these two medications. Specific attention is given to doses in special situations, means of drug monitoring, strategies for avoiding antibiotic resistance, alternative medication choices, and areas for future investigation.

Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily gentamicin dosing regimens in infants > or = 2500 g

OBJECTIVE

There is no uniformity in the current recommendations of dosing regimen of gentamicin for neonates. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare a once-daily dosing regimen to the twice-daily dosing regimen for neonates > or = 2500 g during the first 7 days after birth.

STUDY DESIGN

Infants > or = 2500 g admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and prescribed gentamicin for suspected bacterial infection were randomized to receive either 4 mg/kg every 24 hours, study group (n=20), or a standard regimen of 2.5 mg/kg every 12 hours, control group (n=21). Serum gentamicin concentrations (SGCs) were followed and gentamicin pharmacokinetics calculated on all infants.

RESULTS

Peak SGC 30 minutes after the first dose was 8.2+/-1.7 microg/ml in the study group, compared to 6.4+/-1.5 microg/ml in the control group (p=0.001). Ninety-five percent of study group infants, compared to 81% of the control group, had peak SGCs in therapeutic range after the first dose. Peak SGC at 48 hours (steady state) was 8.9+/-1.5 in the study group and 6.8+/-1.1 in the control group (p=0.0001). On further analysis, a significantly higher percentage of infants in the study group, compared to the control group, had peak SGCs in higher therapeutic ranges of 6 to 12 microg/ml as well as 8 to 12 microg/ml. None of the study infants, compared to six control infants, had trough SGCs > or = 2 microg/ml at steady state. Thus, none of the study group infants, versus six of the control group infants, needed a dosing adjustment at 48 hours (p=0.02, Fisher's exact test).

CONCLUSION

We found that 4 mg/kg gentamicin given every 24 hours achieved significantly higher peak SGCs and safe trough concentrations in all infants, compared to the twice-daily regimen of 2.5 mg/kg. We suggest that SGCs may not need to be followed in term infants prescribed a short course of this once-daily regimen for suspected early-onset sepsis if renal functions are normal.