Safety and reactogenicity of a novel DTPa-HBV-IPV combined vaccine given along with commercial Hib vaccines in comparison with separate concomitant administration of DTPa, Hib, and OPV vaccines in infants

Concomitant administration of a liquid formulation of human rotavirus vaccine (porcine circovirus-free) with routine childhood vaccines in infants in the United States: Results from a phase 3, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

In response to the detection of porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV-1) in the human rotavirus vaccine (HRV), a PCV-free HRV (no detection of PCV-1 and PCV-2 according to the detection limit of tests used) was developed. Liquid (Liq) PCV-free HRV previously showed immunogenicity and safety profiles comparable to lyophilized (Lyo) HRV.

METHODS

This was a phase 3a, randomized, single-blind study (NCT03207750) conducted in the United States. Healthy infants aged 6-12 weeks received 2 doses (0, 2 months) of either Liq PCV-free HRV or Lyo HRV with routine vaccines (0, 2, 4 months): diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis, hepatitis B and inactivated poliovirus combination vaccine (DTaP-HBV-IPV), monovalent tetanus toxoid-conjugated vaccine against Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib-TT), and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Co-primary objectives were: (i) to assess non-inferiority of immune responses to routine vaccine antigens 1 month post-dose 3 following co-administration with Liq PCV-free HRV compared to Lyo HRV; (ii) to rule out a 10% decrease in seroresponse to pertussis antigens after dose 3. Other objectives were to evaluate immunogenicity and safety of HRV vaccines.

RESULTS

Of 1272 vaccinated infants, 990 (489 in Liq PCV-free HRV and 501 in Lyo HRV group) were included in the per-protocol set. All statistical criteria were met, thus co-primary objectives were demonstrated. Seroprotection/seropositivity rates in both groups were high: 100% for diphtheria/tetanus, ≥99.3% for HBV, ≥99.8% for polio, ≥99.8% for each pertussis antigen, ≥90.8% for all pneumococcal serotypes except serotype 3 (≥69.1%), and ≥ 97.4% for Hib. Most infants seroconverted for anti-RV antibodies (76.3% of Liq PCV-free HRV and 78.9% of Lyo HRV recipients). Geometric mean concentrations/titers were comparable between groups. Incidences of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Routine pediatric vaccines co-administered with Liq PCV-free HRV showed non-inferior immune responses and similar safety profiles to those following co-administration with Lyo HRV.

A combined diphtheria, tetanus, five-component acellular pertussis, poliovirus andHaemophilus influenzaetype b vaccine

Ideally, combination vaccines should not only be safe and effective, but also integrate smoothly into the vaccination schedule and provide advantages over the use of separately administered vaccines. Pentaceltrade mark (Sanofi Pasteur Ltd., Toronto, Canada), a combination vaccine first licensed in Canada and subsequently in other countries, is immunogenic against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b when administered at 2, 4, 6 and 15-18 months of age. In published studies, the safety, immunogenicity and effectiveness of this combination vaccine were comparable with those of separately administered vaccines, with the advantage of a simplified dosing schedule.

PEDIARIX™: clinical trials

PEDIARIX is the first pentavalent combination vaccine licensed for use in infants in the USA. This vaccine is indicated for the prevention of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and poliovirus. This article reviews the available data regarding the vaccine's immunogenicity and safety.

Immunogenicity of the tuberculosis vaccine MVA85A is reduced by coadministration with EPI vaccines in a randomized controlled trial in Gambian infants

New tuberculosis vaccines are urgently needed to curtail the current epidemic. MVA85A is a subunit vaccine that could enhance immunity from BCG vaccination. To determine MVA85A safety and immunogenicity as well as interactions with other routine vaccines administered in infancy, we randomized healthy 4-month-old infants who had received Bacille Calmette-Guérin at birth to receive Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) vaccines alone, EPI and MVA85A simultaneously, or MVA85A alone. Adverse events were monitored throughout. Blood samples obtained before vaccination and at 1, 4, and 20 weeks after vaccination were used to assess safety and immunogenicity. The safety profile of both low and standard doses was comparable, but the standard dose was more immunogenic and therefore was selected for the second stage of the study. In total, 72 (first stage) and 142 (second stage) infants were enrolled. MVA85A was safe and well tolerated and induced a potent cellular immune response. Coadministration of MVA85A with EPI vaccines was associated with a significant reduction in MVA85A immunogenicity, but did not affect humoral responses to the EPI vaccines. These results provide important information regarding timing of immunizations, which is required for the design of infant efficacy trials with MVA85A, and suggest that modifications to the standard EPI schedule may be required to incorporate a new generation of T cell-inducing vaccines.

Safety and immunogenicity of a primary course and booster dose of a combined diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B and inactivated poliovirus vaccine

Primary immunization at 3, 4.5, and 6 months and boosting between 15 and 27 months of age with combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated poliovirus (DTPa-HBV-IPV) vaccine was compared with separate administration of DTPa-HBV and IPV to healthy children (trials DTPa-HBV-IPV-019/033). Antibody titres were measured before and 1 month after primary and booster courses. Solicited local and general symptoms were recorded using diary cards. One month after primary vaccination, all children in both groups developed antibody titres above the assay cut-off for all vaccine components. Significantly higher anti-diphtheria, anti-pertactin (PRN) and anti-polio GMTs were measured following DTPa-HBV-IPV than DTPa-HBV plus IPV. Prior to boosting similar seroprotection/seropositivity rates were recorded in both groups. After boosting all children had seroprotective levels of diphtheria, tetanus, polio and HBV. Criteria for pertussis vaccine response were fulfilled in most children. Significantly higher anti-PRN GMTs were measured following DTPa-HBV-IPV than DTPa-HBV plus IPV. There was no difference between groups in the incidence or intensity of local and general symptoms after primary or booster vaccination, except for fever which was more frequent after the booster dose in the combined vaccine group. Both vaccine regimens were well tolerated and immunogenic, however the combined administration has the advantage of being administered as a single injection.

Vitamin A supplements are well tolerated with the pentavalent vaccine

The Expanded Programme on Immunisation provides an opportunity to deliver vitamin A supplements to young infants in order to improve their vitamin A status. However, concerns have been raised about the safety of administering high dose vitamin A supplements to infants less than 6 months of age in developing countries. A randomized controlled trial was carried out by the Kintampo Health Research Centre to assess the safety and immunogenicity of administering 15 mg retinol equivalent (RE)1 vitamin A alongside the pentavalent "diphtheria-polio-tetanus-Haemophilus influenzae b-hepatitis B vaccine" at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age. All mothers received a post-partum supplement of 120 mg RE vitamin A as per national policy. Mothers of infants who had been vaccinated were visited 24 h after vaccination to assess the side effects of the vaccine. They were also interviewed about adverse events which may have occurred in the past 4 weeks since the child was vaccinated. There were significantly fewer reports of illnesses and fever in infants who had been given vitamin A compared to infants in the control group. The pentavalent vaccine was found to be tolerable when administered with vitamin A according to the WHO/EPI schedule for infant immunisation at 6, 10 and 14 weeks. There were few complaints made by the mothers of the children which were not thought to be related to giving vitamin A with the vaccines. There were six deaths in the trial, five in the intervention group and one in the control RR 4.65 (0.55-39.5), p = 0.12. Due to the high point estimate of 4.65, we wish to urge caution in administering high doses of vitamin A to young infants with the pentavalent vaccine at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age.

A population-based, postlicensure evaluation of the safety of a combination diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, and inactivated poliovirus vaccine in a large managed care organization

BACKGROUND

Prelicensure studies of diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated polio virus vaccine suggested that there were higher rates of fever after its administration than when its component antigens were given separately.

METHODS

We conducted an open, controlled, cohort study to evaluate selected potential adverse events after receipt of diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus vaccine in the Southern California Kaiser Permanente Health Care Plan. From April 2003 through June 2005, we identified 61,004 infants who received >or=1 dose of vaccine (120000 total doses). This group was compared with a previous cohort of 58,251 age-, gender-, and medical center-matched infants (116,637 doses) who received diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis vaccine and separate doses of hepatitis B and inactivated poliovirus vaccines from January 2002 through March 2003. We compared the incidence of seizures, medically attended events that were associated with fever, and other selected adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 16 infants (8 with fever) who had a seizure in the diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus cohort and 15 infants (6 with fever) among control subjects in the 8-day period after receipt of any dose of vaccine. The incidence of all seizures or seizures associated with fever was not significantly different between cohorts. The incidence of medically attended events that were associated with fever in the 4-day period after any dose of vaccine was also similar in both cohorts. As well, no significant differences between the diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus and control cohorts, were noted in the incidence of allergic reactions within 48 hours of any dose of vaccine, outpatient visits within 21 days, hospitalizations within 21 days, or death within 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe a statistically significant increase in any of several clinically important safety events after diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus vaccination compared with a historical cohort who received separate component vaccines.

Cost-benefit analysis of haemophilus influenzae type B immunization in Korea

An economic evaluation of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) immunization was conducted to examine whether Hib immunization should be included in Korea's national immunization program. The costs and benefits included direct and indirect values and an estimation of the economic efficiency. We determined that a universal Hib immunization program in Korea would prevent 17 deaths and 280 invasive Hib cases. When we assumed the one Hib immunization cost as 26,000 won, the national Hib immunization would cost 34.6 billion won. Costs for various Hib diseases were estimated at 26.8 billion won (11.8 billion won from direct costs and 14.9 billion won from indirect costs). A benefit-cost ratio of 0.77 showed that the economic efficiency of the integration of Hib immunization in Korea is low because of the low incidence rate of Hib disease and high price of vaccine. However, if the Hib immunization cost decrease to less than 20,000 won, a benefit-cost ratio increase to 1.0 and above, integrating Hib immunization into the national immunization program with economic efficiency can be considered.

DTPa-HBV-IPV vaccine for primary vaccination of infants

AIM

Combined vaccines have an increasingly important role to play in delivering these antigens acceptably. We describe the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a combined DTPa-HBV-IPV vaccine (diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus (DTPa-HBV-IPV: Infanrix penta) ) when administered for the primary vaccination of infants resulting from a study where the primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of the immune response induced by DTPa-HBV-IPV using an industrial-scale IPV production process.

METHODS

Three hundred and fourteen infants received primary immunisation with DTPa-HBV-IPV at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Routine Haemophilus influenzae immunisation was performed at 2 and 4 months of age at a separate injection site. Blood samples were taken at 2 and 7 months of age. Reactogenicity was assessed using diary cards for 7 days after each dose.

RESULTS

One month after the primary course, at least 98.9% of subjects achieved seroprotective antibody concentrations/titres against diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis-B and polio types 1, 2 and 3. More than 97% had a vaccine response to pertussis antigens. The incidence of local injection site reactions after DTPa-HBV-IPV was similar to that for the Haemophilus influenzae vaccine site. General reactions of Grade 3 intensity were uncommon.

CONCLUSIONS

The DTPa-HBV-IPV vaccine is a new combination of vaccines previously available separately, with established effectiveness and safety profiles. Combined vaccines reduce storage requirements and minimise the number of injections required, thereby reducing distress for infants and parents. DTPa-HBV-IPV was immunogenic with an acceptable safety profile and could replace separate administration of DTPa, HBV and IPV vaccines in infants.

Immunogenicity and safety of a combination diphtheria, tetanus toxoid, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, and inactivated poliovirus vaccine coadministered with a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and a Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of a diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, and inactivated poliovirus-containing vaccine (DTaP-HepB-IPV) coadministered with pneumococcal 7-valent conjugate vaccine (PCV-7) and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (Hib), with separate vaccines concurrently, or staggered (delayed) administration of PCV-7.

STUDY DESIGN

At 2, 4, and 6 months of age, infants received either DTaP-HepB-IPV plus PCV-7 and Hib (n = 199), separate vaccines (n = 188), or DTaP-HepB-IPV plus Hib with PCV-7 administered 2 weeks later (n = 188). Blood was drawn before and after vaccination. Parents reported symptoms for 4 days after each dose and adverse events throughout the entire study.

RESULTS

Immunogenicity in the Combination Vaccine Group was noninferior to that of the Separate and Staggered Vaccine Groups with respect to seroprotective rates for diphtheria, tetanus, and poliovirus and to geometric mean concentrations for pertussis. Seroprotective rates for HepB and Hib were not different between groups. Seropositivity for PCV-7 was high in all groups. Administration of combination vaccine appeared to be associated with higher rates of irritability, fever > or = 100.4 degrees F (38.0 degrees C) and some local symptoms compared with separate vaccines (exploratory P < .05). No group differences were observed in rates of symptoms for which parents sought medical advice.

CONCLUSIONS

DTaP-HepB-IPV was highly immunogenic and well tolerated when coadministered with Hib and PCV-7 at 2, 4, and 6 months of age.

Safety of a combination diphtheria, tetanus toxoid, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, and inactivated polio vaccine coadministered with a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and a Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine

The safety of DTaP-HepB-IPV vaccine coadministered with PCV and Hib was compared with separate administration of DTaP, HepB, IPV, Hib, and PCV at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. Healthy 2-month-old infants (N=1008) were randomized to the two groups. Following dose 1, there was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of fever >101.3 degrees F. After each dose, the incidence of any fever (> or =100.4 degrees F) was significantly higher in the Combination Vaccine Group. The rate of fever >103.1 degrees F was < or =1.4% in both groups after any of the doses. Medical advice visits for fever were infrequent in both groups (< or =1.2%). DTaP-HepB-IPV was safe and well tolerated when coadministered with PCV and Hib.

Booster immunization with a hexavalent diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus vaccine and Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate combination vaccine in the second year of life: safety, immunogenicity and persistence of antibody responses

The immunogenicity and reactogenicity of booster vaccination with GSK Biologicals' hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine was assessed in toddlers aged 12-18 months previously primed with the same combination (N=341), or with DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV administered separately (N=102; Trials 217744/059 and 217744/096). Antibody persistence at age 4-6 years was also assessed in children who had received a 4th consecutive dose of DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine or separate DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV vaccines in this study and in another study conducted under similar conditions in Germany. Prior to booster vaccination in the second year of life, antibody concentrations and seroprotection rates were similar irrespective of the primary vaccine used. One month after boosting with DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib, substantial antibody increases were observed against all vaccine antigens indicative of previous immune priming. Seropositivity and booster response rates against all antigens were 97.4-100%. Reactogenicity following booster vaccination with DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib was similar regardless of the primary regimen used. Three to four years after administration of the 4th DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib dose, >90% vaccinees had persistent protective antibody concentrations against diphtheria, hepatitis B, Hib and the three poliovirus types. Anti-tetanus antibody concentrations were > or = 0.1 IU/ml in 76.4% subjects and seropositivity for pertussis antibodies ranged from 34.5% for PT to 98.9% for FHA. In conclusion, the combined hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine is immunogenic and safe when used for boosting in the second year of life, regardless of the primary vaccine used, and offers sustained protection during early childhood and beyond.

Pertussis in Infants, Children, and Adolescents: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention

Pertussis, or "whooping cough," caused by the gram-negative pleomorphic bacillus Bordetella pertussis, is a highly contagious, potentially life-threatening respiratory tract illness that has re-emerged worldwide as a cause of substantial morbidity and mortality in infants, children, and adolescents, despite high vaccination rates. Increased awareness and reporting, in addition to the availability of better diagnostic tests, partially explain the recent resurgence of pertussis. However, waning immunity after childhood immunization has resulted in a growing pool of susceptible adolescents and adults who are capable of transmitting pertussis to vulnerable unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated infants. An acellular pertussis vaccine booster for adolescents has been recommended in the United States and other industrialized countries. Active immunization and early diagnosis are crucial in the management of pertussis.

Booster vaccination with hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine in the second year of life is as safe as concomitant DTPa-IPV/Hib + HBV administered separately

The safety and reactogenicity of a booster dose of GSK Biologicals' hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine (N=4725) was compared with the separate administration of GSK Biologicals' DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV vaccines (N=4474) in two open, randomized multicenter studies (A and B). Solicited symptoms occurring within 4 days of vaccination were recorded on diary cards and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected throughout the study period. In Study A (N=1149), incidences of solicited symptoms were similar in both groups; there were no SAEs either reported within 4 days of vaccination or considered to be causally related to vaccination. In study B (N=8050), where fever was the only solicited symptom, rectal temperature > or =39.5 degrees C was observed in 2.5% and 2.8% of the subjects, respectively. Fever > or =40.0 degrees C was rare (0.6%), and only two cases of febrile convulsions were recorded during the 4 days following vaccination both in the control group. Large swelling reactions (defined as local injection site swelling with diameter >50 mm, noticeable diffuse injection site swelling or noticeable increased circumference of the injected limb) were reported following 2.3% of the booster vaccine doses, regardless of the vaccine used. Extensive swelling reactions involving an adjacent joint were reported in 0.1% of the subjects. Two SAEs, both reported after booster doses of DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV vaccines administered separately, were considered by the investigators to be related to vaccination. Both resolved completely without sequelae. The hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine and the DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV vaccines administered separately have similar good reactogenicity and safety profiles when given as booster doses in the second year of life.

Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity following Primary Immunisation with a Combined DTaP-HBV Vaccine and a??Haemophilus influenzae Type B Vaccine Administered by Separate or Mixed Injection

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this open, randomised, multicentre trial was to evaluate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the tetravalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B (DTaP-HBV) vaccine when given either as a mixed or as a separate concomitant injection with the Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine at 3, 5 and 11 months of age.

METHODS

Antibody against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (ELISA), hepatitis B (radioimmunoassay) and Hib polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) [radiolabeled antigen binding assay] was determined. Solicited local and systemic adverse events were evaluated on the day of each vaccination and for three subsequent days. Follow-up of unsolicited and serious adverse events was conducted for 30 days following each vaccination.

RESULTS

A total of 360 subjects were enrolled in the study. After completion of the three-dose vaccination course, seroprotective antibody concentrations against diphtheria, tetanus and hepatitis B, together with a pertussis vaccine response, were seen in almost all subjects with immunogenicity results (n = 336). All subjects had post-vaccination Hib anti-PRP antibody concentrations of at least 0.15 mug/mL, and 97.0% and 99.4%, respectively, of the subjects receiving a single or separate injections had Hib anti-PRP antibody concentrations >/=1.0 mug/mL. Addition of the Hib vaccine to the tetravalent DTaP-HBV vaccine did not increase the incidence of local or systemic reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of DTaP-HBV and Hib vaccines in a single injection is safe, immunogenic and well tolerated, and thus has the potential to simplify the childhood immunisation schedule in Italy.

Safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a combined hexavalent tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus vaccine and Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine, for primary immunization of infants

Safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of GSK Biologicals' hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine (Infanrix)hexa) was assessed when used for primary vaccination at 3, 4 and 5 months of age (N = 2163), compared to the separate administration of DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV vaccines (N = 720). A similar safety and reactogenicity profile was demonstrated for both vaccine regimens, as well as a good immune response for all antigen components. By offering protection against six diseases in a series of single injections, the hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine was shown to be a safe, well tolerated and immunogenic alternative to primary immunization with licensed separately administered vaccines.

Vaccines and immunotherapies for the prevention of infectious diseases having cutaneous manifestations

Although the development of antimicrobial drugs has advanced rapidly in the past several years, such agents act against only certain groups of microbes and are associated with increasing rates of resistance. These limitations of treatment force physicians to continue to rely on prevention, which is more effective and cost-effective than therapy. From the use of the smallpox vaccine by Jenner in the 1700s to the current concerns about biologic warfare, the technology for vaccine development has seen numerous advances. The currently available vaccines for viral illnesses include Dryvax for smallpox; the combination measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; inactivated vaccine for hepatitis A; plasma-derived vaccine for hepatitis B; and the live attenuated Oka strain vaccine for varicella zoster. Vaccines available against bacterial illnesses include those for anthrax, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis. Currently in development for both prophylactic and therapeutic purposes are vaccines for HIV, herpes simplex virus, and human papillomavirus. Other vaccines being investigated for prevention are those for cytomegalovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, hepatitis C, and dengue fever, among many others. Fungal and protozoan diseases are also subjects of vaccine research. Among immunoglobulins approved for prophylactic and therapeutic use are those against cytomegalovirus, hepatitis A and B, measles, rabies, and tetanus. With this progress, it is hoped that effective vaccines soon will be developed for many more infectious diseases with cutaneous manifestations.

Calendario vacunal de la Asociación Española de Pediatría: recomendaciones 2004

The Vaccine Assessment Committee of the Spanish Association of Pediatrics discusses vaccine developments in 2003 and recommends some modifications to the vaccination schedule. The recommendation of substituting the oral polio vaccine for the inactivated polio vaccine, suppressing the fifth dose, is maintained. The introduction of the conjugate pneumococcal vaccine and the varicella vaccine is stressed. Concerning the meningococcal C vaccine, the improvement introduced by being able to immunize with just two doses is discussed. In agreement with the information received from the European Medicines Agency, there appear to be no well-founded reasons to abandon hexavalent preparations.

Does antigenic overload exist? The role of multiple immunizations in infants

There is no evidence that currently recommended vaccines overload or weaken the infant immune system. Infants have an enormous capacity to respond safely and effectively to multiple vaccines. The schedule for the administration of childhood vaccines is tailored to the unique developmental pattern of the infant immune system. Childhood vaccines provide immediate protection from common childhood illness and establish the foundation for lifelong immunity that develops with subsequent vaccination or infection. Widespread vaccination of infants and children represents a public health triumph of the 20th century. This fact must be reinforced continually by health care workers and parent education to help maintain progress in the 21st century.

Progress in the Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Pertussis

Pertussis ("whooping cough"), caused by the gram- negative pleomorphic bacillus Bordetella pertussis, is a highly contagious, potentially life-threatening respiratory tract illness that has re-emerged worldwide as a cause of substantial morbidity and mortality in infants, children, and adolescents, even in countries with high vaccination rates. Waning immunity after immunization during childhood has been associated with a growing pool of susceptible adolescents and adults who are capable of transmitting pertussis to vulnerable unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated infants. The use of acellular pertussis vaccine boosters in adolescents has been proposed and is likely to be recommended. Active immunization and improved methods for early diagnosis are key in the management of pertussis, and represent the most rapidly evolving aspects of this disease.

Communicating the benefits of combination vaccines to parents and health care providers

Infants may receive as many as 5 separate injections at an office visit in order to comply with the 2002 childhood immunization schedule. Many parents and healthcare providers disagree with administering 4 or 5 injections at one visit, and therefore may delay some injections until another visit. This practice may lead to decreased compliance and can increase costs for the parent. New combination vaccines will help to simplify the immunization schedule, and health care providers will need to be able to address parental concerns regarding these vaccines. Nurses are often responsible for administering vaccines in the office setting, and therefore are also influential in deciding which vaccines should be ordered. The purpose of this article is to educate nurses on communicating the benefits of combination vaccines to parents and other healthcare providers.

Vaccine interchangeability

The recommended childhood immunization schedule is complex, with multiple doses of vaccines required to complete the series. For a variety of reasons, a single manufacturer's product may not be available for all of the doses needed. In addition, combination products may become available, allowing for fewer injections to be administered but resulting in a change of vaccine components. To ensure the timely immunization of children and to avoid missed opportunities to vaccinate, it is important to be familiar with data documenting the interchangeability of vaccines. Although clear evidence is available to demonstrate the interchangeability of some vaccines (i.e., hepatitis B vaccines and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines), it is more difficult to evaluate the interchangeability of others (i.e., diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis [DTaP] vaccines). Limited data support the interchangeability of some DTaP products when necessary. This article presents the safety and immunogenicity data for immunization regimens that use vaccines from different manufacturers.