1
|
Ayoubi L, Pruente J, Daunter AK, Erickson SR, Whibley D, Whitney DG. Opioid prescription patterns among commercially insured children with and without cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 2024; 17:47-56. [PMID: 38489199 PMCID: PMC10977359 DOI: 10.3233/prm-230009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to describe opioid prescription patterns for children with vs. without cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS This cohort study used commercial claims from 01/01/2015-12/31/2016 and included children aged 2-18 years old with and without CP. Opioid prescription patterns (proportion exposed, number of days supplied) were described. A zero-inflated generalized linear model compared the proportion exposed to opioids in the follow-up year (2016) and, among those exposed, the number of days supplied opioids between cohorts before and after adjusting for age, gender, race, U.S. region of residence, and the number of co-occurring neurological/neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDDs). RESULTS A higher proportion of children with (n = 1,966) vs. without (n = 1,219,399) CP were exposed to opioids (12.1% vs. 5.3%), even among the youngest age group (2-4 years: 9.6% vs. 1.8%), and had a greater number of days supplied (median [interquartile range], 8 [5-13] vs. 6 [4-9] days; P < 0.05). Comparing children with opioid exposure with vs. without CP, a greater number of days supplied was identified for older age, Asian race/ethnicity, and without co-occurring NDDs, and a lower number of days supplied was observed for Black race/ethnicity and with ≥1 co-occurring NDDs. CONCLUSION Children with CP are more likely to be exposed to opioids and have a higher number of days supplied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lubna Ayoubi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jessica Pruente
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Alecia K. Daunter
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Steven R. Erickson
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Daniel Whibley
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Daniel G. Whitney
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Orth LE, Feudtner C, Kempe A, Morris MA, Colborn KL, Gritz RM, Linnebur SA, Begum A, Feinstein JA. A coordinated approach for managing polypharmacy among children with medical complexity: rationale and design of the Pediatric Medication Therapy Management (pMTM) randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:414. [PMID: 37120509 PMCID: PMC10148507 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09439-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with medical complexity (CMC) often rely upon the use of multiple medications to sustain quality of life and control substantial symptom burden. Pediatric polypharmacy (≥ 5 concurrent medications) is prevalent and increases the risk of medication-related problems (MRPs). Although MRPs are associated with pediatric morbidity and healthcare utilization, polypharmacy is infrequently assessed during routine clinical care for CMC. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to determine if a structured pharmacist-led Pediatric Medication Therapy Management (pMTM) intervention reduces MRP counts, as well as the secondary outcomes of symptom burden and acute healthcare utilization. METHODS This is a hybrid type 2 randomized controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of pMTM compared to usual care in a large, patient-centered medical home for CMC. Eligible patients include all children ages 2-18 years old, with ≥ 1 complex chronic condition, and with ≥ 5 active medications, as well as their English-speaking primary caregivers. Child participants and their primary parental caregivers will be randomized to pMTM or usual care before a non-acute primary care visit and followed for 90 days. Using generalized linear models, the overall effectiveness of the intervention will be evaluated using total MRP counts at 90 days following pMTM intervention or usual care visit. Following attrition, a total of 296 CMC will contribute measurements at 90 days, which provides > 90% power to detect a clinically significant 1.0 reduction in total MRPs with an alpha level of 0.05. Secondary outcomes include Parent-Reported Outcomes of Symptoms (PRO-Sx) symptom burden scores and acute healthcare visit counts. Program replication costs will be assessed using time-driven activity-based scoring. DISCUSSION This pMTM trial aims to test hypotheses that a patient-centered medication optimization intervention delivered by pediatric pharmacists will result in lower MRP counts, stable or improved symptom burdens, and fewer cumulative acute healthcare encounters at 90 days following pMTM compared to usual care. The results of this trial will be used to quantify medication-related outcomes, safety, and value for a high-utilization group of CMC, and outcomes may elucidate the role of integrated pharmacist services as a key component of outpatient complex care programs for this priority pediatric population. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was prospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05761847) on Feb 25, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas E Orth
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Chris Feudtner
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Allison Kempe
- Adult & Child Center for Outcomes Research & Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, 1890 N. Revere Court, 3Rd Level, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Megan A Morris
- Adult & Child Center for Outcomes Research & Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, 1890 N. Revere Court, 3Rd Level, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kathryn L Colborn
- Adult & Child Center for Outcomes Research & Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, 1890 N. Revere Court, 3Rd Level, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - R Mark Gritz
- Adult & Child Center for Outcomes Research & Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, 1890 N. Revere Court, 3Rd Level, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sunny A Linnebur
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Anowara Begum
- Adult & Child Center for Outcomes Research & Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, 1890 N. Revere Court, 3Rd Level, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - James A Feinstein
- Adult & Child Center for Outcomes Research & Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, 1890 N. Revere Court, 3Rd Level, Mail Stop F443, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Feinstein JA, Orth LE. Making Polypharmacy Safer for Children with Medical Complexity. J Pediatr 2023; 254:4-10. [PMID: 36252865 PMCID: PMC10023276 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
A 14-year-old patient who has severe cerebral palsy and seizures, requested that his parents speak to his pediatrician about a medication to help with sleep. He already uses 13 other medications, including anticonvulsants, analgesics, and respiratory medications, and 5 additional as needed (PRN) medications (Figure 1 ). He has a vagal nerve stimulator and a gastrostomy tube. His parents had researched several sleep medications, and they were interested in discussing trazodone therapy for his sleep issues. Clinicians who prescribe medications to children with medical complexity (CMC) frequently must consider the question: How does one safely prescribe a patient like ours a new medication, like the sleep medication trazodone, amidst an already complex background of polypharmacy?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A Feinstein
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research & Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
| | - Lucas E Orth
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Check DK, Avecilla RAV, Mills C, Dinan MA, Kamal AH, Murphy B, Rezk S, Winn A, Oeffinger KC. Opioid Prescribing and Use Among Cancer Survivors: A Mapping Review of Observational and Intervention Studies. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:e397-e417. [PMID: 34748896 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Recent years show a sharp increase in research on opioid use among cancer survivors, but evidence syntheses are lacking, leaving knowledge gaps. Corresponding research needs are unclear. OBJECTIVES To provide an evidence synthesis. METHODS We searched PubMed and Embase, identifying articles related to cancer, and opioid prescribing/use published through September 2020. We screened resulting titles/abstracts. Relevant studies underwent full-text review. Inclusion criteria were quantitative examination of and primary focus on opioid prescribing or use, and explicit inclusion of cancer survivors. Exclusion criteria included end-of-life opioid use and opioid use as a secondary or downstream outcome (for intervention studies). We extracted information on the opioid-related outcome(s) examined (including definitions and terminology used), study design, and methods. RESULTS Research returned 16,591 articles; 296 were included. Only 22 of 296 studies evaluated an intervention. There were 105 studies evaluating outcomes indicative of potentially high-risk, nonrecommended, or avoidable opioid use, e.g., continuous use-described as chronic use, prolonged use, and persistent use (n = 17); use after completion of curative-intent treatment-described as chronic opioid use, long-term opioid use, persistent opioid use, prolonged opioid use, continued opioid use, late opioid use, post-treatment opioid use (n = 27); use of opioids concurrent with other potentially high-risk medications (n = 13), and opioid misuse (n = 14). CONCLUSIONS We found lack of consistency in the measurement of and terms used to describe similar opioid use outcomes, and a lack of interventional research targeting well-documented patterns of potentially nonrecommended, potentially avoidable, or potentially high-risk opioid prescribing or use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devon K Check
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine (D.K.C.), Durham, North Carolina; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Cente (D.K.C., R.A.A., C.M., A.H.K., K.C.O.), Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Renee A V Avecilla
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Cente (D.K.C., R.A.A., C.M., A.H.K., K.C.O.), Durham, North Carolina
| | - Coleman Mills
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Cente (D.K.C., R.A.A., C.M., A.H.K., K.C.O.), Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michaela A Dinan
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health (M.A.D.), New Haven, Connecticut; Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale Cancer Center (M.A.D.), New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Arif H Kamal
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Cente (D.K.C., R.A.A., C.M., A.H.K., K.C.O.), Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center (A.H.K.), Durham, North Carolina
| | - Beverly Murphy
- Duke University Medical Center Library & Archives, Duke University School of Medicine (B.M.), Durham, North Carolina
| | - Salma Rezk
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy (S.R.), Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Aaron Winn
- School of Pharmacy, Medical College of Wisconsin (A.W.), Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Kevin C Oeffinger
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Cente (D.K.C., R.A.A., C.M., A.H.K., K.C.O.), Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine (K.C.O.), Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Feinstein JA, Feudtner C, Blackmer AB, Valuck RJ, Fairclough DL, Holstein J, Gregoire L, Samay S, Kempe A. Parent-Reported Symptoms and Medications Used Among Children With Severe Neurological Impairment. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2029082. [PMID: 33306117 PMCID: PMC7733159 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Children with severe neurological impairment (SNI) often take multiple medications to treat problematic symptoms. However, for children who cannot self-report symptoms, no system exists to assess multiple symptoms and their association with medication use. OBJECTIVES To assess the prevalence of 28 distinct symptoms, test whether higher global symptom scores (GSS) were associated with use of more medications, and assess the associations between specific symptoms and medications. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study was conducted between April 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019, using structured parent-reported symptom data paired with clinical and pharmacy data, at a single-center, large, hospital-based special health care needs clinic. Participants included children aged 1 to 18 years with SNI and 5 or more prescribed medications. Data analysis was performed from April to June 2020. EXPOSURE During routine clinical visits, parent-reported symptoms were collected using the validated 28-symptom Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) and merged with clinical and pharmacy data. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Symptom prevalence, counts, and GSS (scored 0-100, with 100 being the worst) were calculated, and the association of GSS with medications was examined. To evaluate associations between symptom-medication pairs, the proportion of patients with a symptom who used a medication class or specific medication was calculated. RESULTS Of 100 patients, 55.0% were boys, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 9 (5-12) years, 62.0% had 3 or more complex chronic conditions, 76.0% took 10 or more medications, and none were able to complete the MSAS themselves. Parents reported a median (IQR) of 7 (4-10) concurrent active symptoms. The median (IQR) GSS was 12.1 (5.4-20.8) (range, 0.0-41.2) and the GSS was 9.8 points (95% CI, 5.5-14.1 points) higher for those with worse recent health than usual. Irritability (65.0%), insomnia (55.0%), and pain (54.0%) were the most prevalent symptoms. Each 10-point GSS increase was associated with 12% (95% CI, 4%-19%) higher medication counts, adjusted for age and complex chronic condition count. Among the 54.0% of children with reported pain, 61.0% were prescribed an analgesic. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that children with SNI reportedly experience substantial symptom burdens and that higher symptom scores are associated with increased medication use. Paired symptom-medication data may help clinicians identify targets for personalized symptom management, including underrecognized or undertreated symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A. Feinstein
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| | - Chris Feudtner
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Allison B. Blackmer
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora
| | - Robert J. Valuck
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora
| | - Diane L. Fairclough
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora
- Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora
| | | | | | - Sadaf Samay
- Research Informatics, Analytics Resource Center, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora
| | - Allison Kempe
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shen Y, Bhagwandass H, Branchcomb T, Galvez SA, Grande I, Lessing J, Mollanazar M, Ourhaan N, Oueini R, Sasser M, Valdes IL, Jadubans A, Hollmann J, Maguire M, Usmani S, Vouri SM, Hincapie-Castillo JM, Adkins LE, Goodin AJ. Chronic Opioid Therapy: A Scoping Literature Review on Evolving Clinical and Scientific Definitions. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2020; 22:246-262. [PMID: 33031943 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
The management of chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) with chronic opioid therapy (COT) is controversial. There is a lack of consensus on how COT is defined resulting in unclear clinical guidance. This scoping review identifies and evaluates evolving COT definitions throughout the published clinical and scientific literature. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. A total of 227 studies were identified from 8,866 studies published between January 2000 and July 2019. COT definitions were classified by pain population of application and specific dosage/duration definition parameters, with results reported according to PRISMA-ScR. Approximately half of studies defined COT as "days' supply duration >90 days" and 9.3% defined as ">120 days' supply," with other days' supply cut-off points (>30, >60, or >70) each appearing in <5% of total studies. COT was defined by number of prescriptions in 63 studies, with 16.3% and 11.0% using number of initiations or refills, respectively. Few studies explicitly distinguished acute treatment and COT. Episode duration/dosage criteria was used in 90 studies, with 7.5% by Morphine Milligram Equivalents + days' supply and 32.2% by other "episode" combination definitions. COT definitions were applied in musculoskeletal CNCP (60.8%) most often, and typically in adults aged 18 to 64 (69.6%). The usage of ">90 days' supply" COT definitions increased from 3.2 publications/year before 2016 to 20.7 publications/year after 2016. An increasing proportion of studies define COT as ">90 days' supply." The most recent literature trends toward shorter duration criteria, suggesting that contemporary COT definitions are increasingly conservative. PERSPECTIVE: This study summarized the most common, current definition criteria for chronic opioid therapy (COT) and recommends adoption of consistent definition criteria to be utilized in practice and research. The most recent literature trends toward shorter duration criteria overall, suggesting that COT definition criteria are increasingly stringent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Shen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Hemita Bhagwandass
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Tychell Branchcomb
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Sophia A Galvez
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ivanna Grande
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Julia Lessing
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Mikela Mollanazar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Natalie Ourhaan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Razanne Oueini
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Michael Sasser
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ivelisse L Valdes
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ashmita Jadubans
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Josef Hollmann
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Michael Maguire
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Silken Usmani
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Scott M Vouri
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Juan M Hincapie-Castillo
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Lauren E Adkins
- University of Florida Health Science Center Libraries, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Amie J Goodin
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brown KW, Carlisle K, Raman SR, Shrader P, Jiao M, Smith MJ, Einhorn LM, Wong CA. Children And The Opioid Epidemic: Age-Stratified Exposures And Harms. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020; 39:1737-1742. [PMID: 33017234 PMCID: PMC8157201 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Using North Carolina Medicaid 2016-18 claims data, we found that approximately one in ten adolescents (10.8 percent) filled at least one opioid prescription per year. Dentists, advanced practice providers, and surgeons were common prescribers of opioids to children. In addition, half of children who experienced opioid-related adverse events had filled opioid prescriptions in the prior six months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelby W Brown
- Kelby W. Brown is a graduate scholar in the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy at Duke University, in Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kayla Carlisle
- Kayla Carlisle is a student scholar in the Children's Health and Discovery Initiative at Duke University
| | - Sudha R Raman
- Sudha R. Raman is an assistant professor of population health sciences at Duke University School of Medicine
| | - Peter Shrader
- Peter Shrader is a biostatistician in Outcomes at the Duke Clinical Research Institute
| | - Megan Jiao
- Megan Jiao is a research associate in the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy at Duke University
| | - Michael J Smith
- Michael J. Smith is an associate professor of pediatrics at Duke University School of Medicine
| | - Lisa M Einhorn
- Lisa M. Einhorn is an assistant professor of anesthesiology at Duke University School of Medicine
| | - Charlene A Wong
- Charlene A. Wong is an associate professor of pediatrics and public policy at Duke University, the Children's Health and Discovery Initiative, and the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy
| |
Collapse
|