Cross-Sector Approach Expands Screening and Addresses Health-Related Social Needs in Primary Care

Beyond 'Screen & Refer': Understanding Families' Use of Resources for Health-related Social Needs Identified via Primary Care

OBJECTIVE

As health-related social needs (HRSN) screening increases, attention to families' resource preferences lags. This study of a pediatric primary care intervention (DULCE) with reliable HRSN screening and resource connection explored whether resources adequately addressed families' needs and, when HRSN persisted, families' reasons for declining resources.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort, mixed-methods study analyzed data from 989 families that received care at seven pediatric clinics implementing DULCE in three states. DULCE screens for seven HRSN around the 1-month and 4-month well-child visits; we calculated the percent of initial and ongoing positive screens. For positive rescreens, we calculated the percent that had all eligible or wanted resources and that were interested in further resources. We also analyzed case notes, which elicited families' resource preferences, and explored demographic characteristics associated with ongoing HRSN.

RESULTS

Half of enrolled families (508 of 989) initially screened positive for HRSN; 124 families had positive rescreens; 26 expressed interest in further assistance. Most families with ongoing concrete supports needs accessed all eligible resources (60-100%); 20-58% had everything they wanted. Fewer families with ongoing maternal depression and intimate partner violence accessed all eligible resources (48% and 18%, respectively); most reported having all wanted resources (76% and 90%, respectively). Families declined resources due to lack of perceived need, the HRSN resolving, or families addressed HRSN themselves. White families were more likely to rescreen positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric medical homes must honor family-centered decision-making while empowering families to accept beneficial resources. Healthcare systems should advocate for resources that families need and want.

Water and Sanitation Access for Children in Alabama

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Safe drinking water and closed sanitation are fundamental to health and are assumed in the United States, however, gaps remain, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities. We sought to describe household sanitation access for children in rural Alabama and local health provider knowledge of sanitation related health concerns.

METHODS

Data were collected from self-administered surveys obtained from children enrolled in a larger cross-sectional study to determine soil transmitted helminthiasis prevalence in Alabama, from a survey of health providers from local federally qualified health centers and from a baseline knowledge check of Alabama health providers enrolled in an online sanitation health course.

RESULTS

Surveys completed on 771 children (approximately 10% of county pediatric population) revealed less than half lived in homes connected to centralized sewers; 12% reported "straight-pipes," a method of discharging untreated sewage to the ground outside the home, and 8% reported sewage contamination of their home property in the past year. Additionally, 15% of respondents were likely to use well water. The local health providers surveyed did not include routine screening for water and sanitation failures or associated infections. Regional healthcare providers have limited knowledge of soil transmitted helminthiasis.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of children from rural counties of Alabama with high rates of poverty reside in homes with water and sanitation challenges that predominantly affect African American families. This is an under-recognized health risk by local health providers, and its contribution to well-documented health disparities in this region is poorly understood.

Participation in Pediatric Primary Care Innovation, DULCE, Increases Caregiver Agency and Resilience and Decreases Impact of Stress

The purpose of the present study was to explore outcomes and heterogeneous effects of an evidence-based, cross-sector pediatric healthcare intervention for families with infants, Developmental Understanding and Legal Collaboration for Everyone (DULCE). DULCE is tailored to allow families' needs and desires to drive DULCE intensity. This is a longitudinal study following families involved with pediatric primary care clinics from infant's birth to 15 months. Multi-level longitudinal modeling was used to compare the program's influence on resilience, parent agency, and the impact of stress on parent functioning among program recipients (n = 172) and non-recipients (n = 170). Study participants were recruited from four health care clinics in California and Florida, and participants completed in-person survey interviews at baseline (infant age 0-6 months) and final (infant age 12-15 months) timepoints, with a minimum of 6 months between baseline and final interview required. Assignment of families to intervention (participated in DULCE) or comparison group (received clinic care as usual) varied by clinic. The cross-sector pediatric primary care intervention screened families at high rates (70-90%), along with referring and connecting families to resources. DULCE participation was associated with increases in parents' agency and resilience. DULCE's positive influence on parent agency and impact of stress was observed with low dosage, and higher-risk families saw additional improvements in resilience at high dosage (high and low risk defined with Latent Profile Analysis). Findings reinforce the importance of examining heterogeneous effects of evidence-based interventions. DULCE's influence on parent agency and impact of stress was observed with low dosage; strengthened resilience among higher-risk families was found at high dosage. These findings document the value of a universal approach to prevention services in pediatric settings with tailoring that allows families to drive their engagement with the intervention.

Advancing early relational health: a collaborative exploration of a research agenda

Here, we introduce the Early Relational Health (ERH) Learning Community's bold, large-scale, collaborative, data-driven and practice-informed research agenda focused on furthering our mechanistic understanding of ERH and identifying feasible and effective practices for making ERH promotion a routine and integrated component of pediatric primary care. The ERH Learning Community, formed by a team of parent/caregiver leaders, pediatric care clinicians, researchers, and early childhood development specialists, is a workgroup of Nurture Connection-a hub geared toward promoting ERH, i.e., the positive and nurturing relationship between young children and their parent(s)/caregiver(s), in families and communities nationwide. In response to the current child mental health crisis and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) policy statement promoting ERH, the ERH Learning Community held an in-person meeting at the AAP national headquarters in December 2022 where members collaboratively designed an integrated research agenda to advance ERH. This agenda weaves together community partners, clinicians, and academics, melding the principles of participatory engagement and human-centered design, such as early engagement, co-design, iterative feedback, and cultural humility. Here, we present gaps in the ERH literature that prompted this initiative and the co-design activity that led to this novel and iterative community-focused research agenda, with parents/caregivers at the core, and in close collaboration with pediatric clinicians for real-world promotion of ERH in the pediatric primary care setting.

Social Needs as a Risk Factor for Positive Postpartum Depression Screens in Pediatric Primary Care

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to examine the association between self-reported social needs and postpartum depression (PPD) symptoms of mothers screened in pediatric primary care clinics.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data from 3616 pediatric patients (age 0-6 months), whose mothers completed the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) and a social needs screening in a large pediatric primary care network between April 2021 and February 2022. Mothers were screened for four self-reported social needs (food, housing, transportation, and utilities). Logistic regression evaluated the association between the report of any social need and a positive EPDS screen (≥ 10), adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics and ZIP code-level poverty.

RESULTS

Overall, 8.6% of mothers screened positive for PPD and 10.0% reported any social needs. The odds of a positive depression screen were significantly higher among mothers who reported any social need compared to those not reporting a social need (OR 4.18, 95% CI 3.11-5.61). The prevalence of all depressive symptoms on the EPDS was significantly higher among those who reported any social need, relative to those reporting no needs. Mothers reporting any social needs were significantly more likely to report thoughts of self-harm (6.9% vs 1.5%, P < .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-report of social need was significantly associated with positive PPD screens during infant well-child visits. Social needs may be a target of future interventions addressing PPD in pediatric settings. Improving care for social needs may have added benefit of alleviating the risk of PPD.

Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Practice

This review summarizes the current pediatric literature related to social determinants of health, including strengths and weaknesses of screening practices and intervention strategies, common concerns and potential unintended consequences, opportunities for further research, and provides evidence-informed practical strategies for clinicians.

Coordination challenges and promising practices for pediatric healthcare-community partnerships: A multi-site study

There have been delays integrating universal screening and referral for social needs in pediatric practice. The study investigated two frameworks for clinic-based screen-and-refer practice in eight clinics. The frameworks depict different organizational strategies to bolster family access to community resources. We conducted semi-structured interviews with healthcare and community partners at two timepoints (n = 65) to investigate start-up and ongoing implementation experiences, including continuing challenges. Results highlighted common within-clinic and clinic-community coordination challenges across diverse settings as well as promising practices supported by the two frameworks. In addition, we identified ongoing implementation challenges that face efforts to integrate these approaches and to translate screening results into activities that help children and families. Assessing the existing service referral coordination infrastructure of each clinic and community in early implementation is critical to screen-and-refer practice as this influences the continuum of supports available to meet family needs.

Social determinants of health screening in pediatric healthcare settings

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article outlines updates in social determinants of health (SDOH) screening practices in pediatric healthcare and community settings. The transition to value-based care and the COVID-19 pandemic have both had significant impacts on screening practices, with implications for providers, communities, and policymakers.

RECENT FINDINGS

The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated social needs for vulnerable patients and families, resulting in increased recognition by healthcare teams through screening. Policy frameworks like value-based care that aim to deliver whole-child care in the community are reorienting the logistics of screening, including screening in acute-care settings and community settings. Recent studies on family and provider perspectives should be integrated into screening practices.

SUMMARY

Despite significant advances in and expansion of SDOH screening in the pediatric healthcare setting, there remain limitations and future research needs. More data is needed to evaluate social need screeners and interventions, and determine how healthcare systems, communities, and states can spread and scale such interventions based on outcomes and value measurements. Population-based social indices have the potential to augment individual patient screening, but this remains a future research need.

Sustaining and scaling a clinic-based approach to address health-related social needs

Objective

Scaling evidence-based interventions (EBIs) from pilot phase remains a pressing challenge in efforts to address health-related social needs (HRSN) and improve population health. This study describes an innovative approach to sustaining and further spreading DULCE (Developmental Understanding and Legal Collaboration for Everyone), a universal EBI that supports pediatric clinics to implement the American Academy of Pediatrics' Bright Futures™ guidelines for infants' well-child visits (WCVs) and introduces a new quality measure of families' HRSN resource use.

Methods

Between August 2018 and December 2019, seven teams in four communities in three states implemented DULCE: four teams that had been implementing DULCE since 2016 and three new teams. Teams received monthly data reports and individualized continuous quality improvement (CQI) coaching for six months, followed by lighter-touch support via quarterly group calls (peer-to-peer learning and coaching). Run charts were used to study outcome (percent of infants that received all WCVs on time) and process measures (percent of families screened for HRSN and connected to resources).

Results

Integrating three new sites was associated with an initial regression of outcome: 41% of infants received all WCVs on time, followed by improvement to 48%. Process performance was sustained or improved: among 989 participating families, 84% (831) received 1-month WCVs on time; 96% (946) were screened for seven HRSN, 54% (508) had HRSN, and 87% (444) used HRSN resources.

Conclusion

An innovative, lighter-touch CQI approach to a second phase of scale-up resulted in sustainment or improvements in most processes and outcomes. Outcomes-oriented CQI measures (family receipt of resources) are an important addition to more traditional process-oriented indicators.

Benefits of a Universal Intervention in Pediatric Medical Homes to Identify and Address Health-Related Social Needs: An Observational Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Compare rates of identification of families with health-related social needs (HRSN) and connection to resources by targeted versus universal, pediatric clinic-based interventions.

METHODS

This observational cohort study included 1677 families that received care (January 2017-May 2020) at 8 pediatric medical homes in 3 states implementing Developmental Understanding and Legal Collaboration for Everyone (DULCE)-a universal, evidence-based intervention that addresses HRSN for families with infants. We divided the cohort into 2 groups using 4 common risk criteria in targeted programs serving families with infants; 862 families had no high-risk characteristics (Risk Criteria Absent [RCA]); 815 families had high-risk characteristics (Risk Criteria Present [RCP]). We compared both groups by prevalence of HRSN and connection to supports and estimated the performance of high-risk criteria to identify HRSN.

RESULTS

DULCE identified 990 families with HRSN, compared to an estimated 274 families, if a risk-targeted approach had been used. More than half of RCA families had HRSN, 11% used resources at enrollment, and 42.5% accessed resources through DULCE. Simultaneously, 68.8% of RCP families had ongoing HRSN although 46.0% used resources at enrollment; 63.9% accessed additional resources through DULCE. Commonly used risk criteria had a sensitivity of 55.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.2%-58.5%), specificity of 61.1% (95% CI, 57.2%-64.9%), positive predictive value of 68.8% (95% CI, 65.4%-72.0%), and negative predictive value of 46.9% (95% CI, 43.5%-50.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk criteria commonly used to identify families for targeted interventions are imperfect proxies for HRSN. Universal, medical home-based approaches can play a key role in supporting families with infants.

Medical Certification for Utility Shut-Off Protection and Health-Related Social Needs

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Children in families facing energy insecurity have greater odds of poor health and developmental problems. In this study of families who requested and received medical certification for utility shut-off protection and were contacted by our Medical Legal Partnership (MLP), we aimed to assess concurrent health-related social needs related to utilities, housing, finances, and nutrition.

METHODS

After medical certificates were completed at our academic pediatric center, our MLP office contacted families and assessed utility concerns as well as other health, social, and legal needs. In this observational study, we present descriptive analyses of patients who received certificates from September 2019 to May 2020 via data collected through the MLP survey during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic (June 2020-December 2021).

RESULTS

Of 167 families who received utility shut-off protection from September 2019 to May 2020, 84 (50.3%) parents and guardians were successfully contacted. Most (93%) found the medical certificate helpful. Additionally, 68% had applied for Energy Assistance, and 69% reported they were on utility company payment plans. Most (78%) owed arrearages, ranging from under $500 to over $20 000, for gas, electric, and/or water bills. Food, housing, and financial insecurity screening positivity rates were 65%, 85%, and 74%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who were contacted by an MLP after receiving medical certification for utility shutoff protection were found to have challenges paying for utilities and faced multiple food, housing, and financial stressors. Through consultation and completion of medical forms for utility shutoff protection, pediatricians and MLPs can provide resources and advocacy to support families' physical, emotional, and psychosocial needs.

Engagement in a Social Needs Navigation Program and Health Care Utilization in Pediatric Primary Care

OBJECTIVE

Evidence for social needs interventions on resource linkage has grown over the past decade. Though social and economic needs predict health care utilization, few studies have assessed social needs interventions on these outcomes. The objective of this study was to examine the association between enrollment in a clinic-based social needs program on subsequent well-child visit (WCV) attendance and emergency department (ED) use in 2 primary care clinics.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients in 2 clinics referred to a social risk screening and navigation program between June and August 2018. We compared health care utilization over the subsequent 12 months for those who completed a full intake and received resource navigation (enrolled) to those referred (not enrolled). Logistic regression was used to assess the association between enrollment with WCV attendance and ED visits.

RESULTS

During the study period, of the 969 patients referred to the program, 761 were enrolled across the 2 clinics. At both sites, the majority of enrolled patients had high WCV attendance postintervention (Site A: 81.6%, Site B: 71.4%). High WCV attendance for nonenrolled but referred patients was significantly lower (Site A: 52.7%, Site B: 35.0%). Enrolled participants were significantly more likely to have high WCV attendance than nonenrolled patients, adjusting for preintervention utilization (Site A adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 5.83, Site B aOR : 4.20). There were no significant differences in ED use at either clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing families' social needs through resource linkage and navigation can improve WCV attendance.

Mental Health-related Utilization of Emergency Departments During Pregnancy in the U.S., 2016-2019

INTRODUCTION

Mental health conditions are a leading comorbidity of pregnancy, but little is known about the use of emergency departments (EDs) for mental health-related care during pregnancy. This study aims to describe both the characteristics of pregnant women who receive mental health-related care in hospital EDs in the United States and the most common mental health diagnoses, types of medications, and mental health services that these women receive.

METHODS

Pooled, cross-sectional data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (2016-2019) were used. Pregnant patients were identified based on diagnosis and reason for visit codes. Weighted descriptive analyses were performed to describe characteristics of pregnant women, services offered, and medications received for mental health-related visits.

RESULTS

Mental health-related visits comprised 6.2% of all ED visits during pregnancy. History of depression was significantly higher in pregnant patients with mental health-related visits compared to those pregnant patients presenting for other reasons. The most common diagnoses for pregnant patients with mental health-related visits were substance use disorders (30.7%), anxiety-related disorders (19.1%), and depressive disorders (14.6%). Anxiolytics and antidepressants were the most common pharmacotherapies given. Few women saw a mental health provider during their visit (6.7%), while most were referred to an outside clinic for follow-up (55.0%).

DISCUSSION

Many pregnant women seek care from EDs for mental health-related reasons. It remains important to train health care professionals who treat pregnant women in EDs how to deliver effective treatments, particularly for substance use disorders and anxiety.

SIGNIFICANCE

Many pregnant patients receive care in emergency departments during pregnancy. Despite mental health conditions being a leading comorbidity of pregnancy, little is known about the use of emergency departments for mental health-related reasons during pregnancy. This study is the first to analyze a representative sample of emergency department visits by pregnant women in the United States between 2016 and 2019 and report on mental health-related visits. Among pregnant women seen in the ED for mental health-related reasons, the most common diagnoses were substance use disorders, anxiety-related disorders, and depressive disorders, but few saw a mental health provider during their visit.

Association Between Adverse Childhood Experiences at Age 5 Years and Healthcare Utilization at Age 9 Years

OBJECTIVE

To determine associations between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) at age 5 years and healthcare utilization patterns at age 9 years.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a secondary analysis using longitudinal data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study. Caregivers (n = 2521) provided data on their child's ACEs at age 5 years and on 4 types of healthcare utilization at age 9 years: past-year well visits, dental visits, primary care sick visits for injury or illness, and emergency room (ER) visits. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between ACEs at age 5 and each type of healthcare utilization, adjusting for relevant sociodemographic covariates.

RESULTS

Among the 2521 children (51% male, 48% Non-Hispanic Black), 77% had ≥1 ACE at age 5. Children with ≥4 ACEs had lower odds of a dental visit (aOR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.29-0.91) and higher odds of a primary care sick visit (aOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.20-2.64) and an ER visit (aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.11-2.59) compared with children with no reported ACEs.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate suboptimal healthcare utilization patterns among families with ACEs and indicate a need for targeted interventions that support appropriate healthcare utilization for children who endure adversity.

Screening and social prescribing in healthcare and social services to address housing issues among children and families: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Housing is a social determinant of health that impacts the health and well-being of children and families. Screening and referral to address social determinants of health in clinical and social service settings has been proposed to support families with housing problems. This study aims to identify housing screening questions asked of families in healthcare and social services, determine validated screening tools and extract information about recommendations for action after screening for housing issues.

METHODS

The electronic databases MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Ovid Emcare, Scopus and CINAHL were searched from 2009 to 2021. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed literature that included questions about housing being asked of children or young people aged 0-18 years and their families accessing any healthcare or social service. We extracted data on the housing questions asked, source of housing questions, validity and descriptions of actions to address housing issues.

RESULTS

Forty-nine peer-reviewed papers met the inclusion criteria. The housing questions in social screening tools vary widely. There are no standard housing-related questions that clinical and social service providers ask families. Fourteen screening tools were validated. An action was embedded as part of social screening activities in 27 of 42 studies. Actions for identified housing problems included provision of a community-based or clinic-based resource guide, and social prescribing included referral to a social worker, care coordinator or care navigation service, community health worker, social service agency, referral to a housing and child welfare demonstration project or provided intensive case management and wraparound services.

CONCLUSION

This review provides a catalogue of housing questions that can be asked of families in the clinical and/or social service setting, and potential subsequent actions.