Technical Aspects of Provisional Stenting in Percutaneous Treatment of Complex Bifurcation Lesions

Carina: A major determinant in the pathophysiology and treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions

Over the last decade, several in vivo and computational investigations have significantly advanced our understanding of the pathophysiology of coronary bifurcations, contributing to the enhancement of their percutaneous revascularization. The carina of the coronary bifurcations plays a substantial role in generating their main hemodynamic features, including distinctive flow patterns with secondary flows and specific shear stress patterns. These factors play a pivotal role in determining the susceptibility, development, and progression of atherosclerosis. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of atherosclerosis in coronary bifurcations are complex and multifactorial. Understanding these mechanisms is fundamental to comprehending lesions at the bifurcation level and informing future treatment strategies. This review aims to present the currently available data regarding the pathophysiological and prognostic role of the carina in coronary bifurcations, offering an interpretation of these findings from the perspective of interventional cardiologists, providing valuable insights for their clinical practice.

Kissing Balloon-Stent Technique for Simple Bifurcation Lesions

Background: Coronary bifurcation lesions are commonly encountered during coronary angiography. The management of bifurcation lesions remains challenging, with various bifurcation techniques being available and outcomes varying depending on the Medina classification and operator experience. Methods: We present a short case series and the outcomes of a new bifurcation technique for the management of simple Medina '0,0,1' and '0,0,1' bifurcation lesions using the kissing balloon-stent technique (kissing BS). Results: We retrospectively identified 8 patients who underwent bifurcation stenting using the kissing Balloon-Stent technique, along with their clinical and angiographic follow-up outcomes. We also describe the benefits and limitations of the technique, delineate the potential mechanisms of target lesion failure, and outline appropriate patient selection. Conclusions: Kissing Balloon-Stent technique is a simple single stent technique that is safe and feasible in select patients with Medina '0,0,1' and '0,0,1' bifurcation lesions.

Drug-coated balloon in the treatment of coronary left main true bifurcation lesion: A patient-level propensity-matched analysis

Aims

An increasing body of evidence suggests that drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty represents a valuable option for revascularization in selected patients with coronary bifurcation disease. However, there remains a paucity of real-world observational evidence on the efficacy of DCB in left main (LM) true bifurcation lesion. We compared clinical and angiographic outcomes of hybrid [DCB + drug-eluting stent (DES)] versus DES-only strategy (provisional stenting or two-stent strategies) in de novo LM true bifurcated lesions.

Methods

The primary endpoint was the 2-year composite rate of target lesion failure (TLF): cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). A routine 1-year angiographic follow-up was scheduled. Propensity-score matching was utilized to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics.

Results

Among 1077 eligible patients, 199 who received DCB treatment and 398 who were assigned to DES therapy had similar propensity scores and were included in the analysis. TLF within 2 years occurred in 13 patients (7.56%) assigned to DCB group, and 52 patients (14.36%) assigned to DES group (odds ratio: 0.487; 95% confidence interval: 0.258–0.922; P = 0.025; Log-rank P = 0.024). Compared with the DES group, the DCB group resulted in a lower rate of CD-TLR (2.91% vs. 9.42%; P = 0.007). Cardiac death, TVMI, all-cause mortality, and stent thrombosis were comparable between both groups. Patients treated with DES-only were associated with a higher late lumen loss (0.42 ± 0.62 mm vs. 0.13 ± 0.42 mm, P < 0.001) compared with the DCB group at 1 year. In sensitivity analysis, the DCB group also presented a lower incidence of TLF, CD-TLR and stent thrombosis both compared to the two-stent strategy and compared to provisional stenting (Ps < 0.05).

Conclusion

The 2-year results of PCI utilizing DCB for LM true bifurcation lesions are superior to employing DES alone in terms of safety and effectiveness.