Self-management education programs for patients with heart failure: a literature review

Effects of nurse-led self-care interventions on health outcomes among people with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To estimate the effects of nurse-led self-care interventions on people with heart failure (HF).

BACKGROUND

Research evidence of the effects of nurse-led HF self-care interventions on patient outcomes is scant.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

DATA SOURCES

Six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PsycINFO) were searched from the inception to December 2022 to identify eligible studies.

METHODS

RCTs published in English that evaluated the impact of nurse-led HF self-care interventions on quality of life, anxiety, symptom burden, sleep quality, healthcare service utilisation and mortality were included. The risk of bias in included studies was assessed using RoB 2.0. We conducted data syntheses using the R software and graded the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies with 2746 subjects were included. Our findings demonstrated, that compared to the controls, nurse-led self-care interventions improved QOL (SMD: .83, 95% CI: .50-1.15, moderate evidence), anxiety (MD: 1.39, 95% CI: .49-2.29, high evidence) and symptom burden (SMD: .81, 95% CI: .24-1.38, low evidence) in people with HF. No significant effects were found in all-cause hospital readmission and all-cause emergency department visit. Research evidence on sleep quality, cardiac-related hospital readmission, cardiac-related emergency department visit and all-cause mortality remained unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review suggests that nurse-led HF self-care interventions have favourable effects on the QOL, anxiety and symptom burden. Further, well-designed RCTs are warranted to address the gaps identified in this review.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The results indicated that nurse-led HF self-care interventions could improve QOL, anxiety and symptom burden in people with HF. Nurse-led self-care intervention could be integrated into current HF management practices.

A Supportive Heart Failure Care Program to Reduce Hospital Readmissions

In the United States, heart failure (HF) is the leading reason for hospital readmissions, with 27% of Medicare recipients with HF being readmitted within 30 days The purpose of this quality improvement project was to decrease HF readmissions during their first 30 days of care with our home health agency. The Supportive Heart Failure Care education program was based on the results of a population assessment and included establishment of agency-wide best practices, nursing education sessions, and implementation of best practices focused on evidence-based self-management. After implementation of this project, the hospital readmission rate decreased from 32% to 21%. The nurses who completed the education sessions (N = 35) showed an increase in knowledge of 4.1% from pre-test scores. However, chart audits showed varying levels of documented practice in alignment with best practices. Although results of this project showed a small improvement in nurse knowledge and varied changes to documented practice, the overall project goal of decreasing hospital readmissions was achieved. Understanding individual and systems-level barriers to translating education to practice is needed to better meet the needs of home health nurses and the HF patients they serve.

One-year trajectories of self-care behaviours and unplanned hospital readmissions among patients with heart failure: A prospective longitudinal study

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify the associations between longitudinal trajectories of self-care behaviours and unplanned hospital readmissions in patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND

Adherence to self-care behaviours is crucial to prevent hospital readmissions; however, self-care behaviours remain unsatisfactory among patients with heart failure. Studies of long-term trajectories of self-care behaviours and their influence on hospital readmissions are limited in this population.

DESIGN

A prospective, longitudinal observational study.

METHODS

Among 137 participants with heart failure (mean age 67.36 years, 62% men), we analysed the 1-year follow-up data to determine the association between 1-year trajectories of self-care behaviours and hospital readmissions using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression, adjusted for confounding variables.

RESULTS

Self-care behaviour trajectories of heart failure patients were classified as 'high-stable' (58.4%) or 'low-sustained' (41.6%). The cumulative rate of readmissions for the low-sustained class was higher than that of the high-stable class for all periods. Factors influencing readmissions included anaemia, cognitive function, frailty and self-care behaviours trajectories. The low-sustained class had a 2.77 times higher risk of readmissions within 1 year than that in the high-stable class.

CONCLUSIONS

Longitudinal self-care behaviours pattern trajectories of heart failure patients were stratified as high-stable and low-sustained. Routine follow-up assessment of patients' self-care behavioural patterns, including anaemia and frailty, and cognitive function can minimise unplanned hospital readmissions.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Identification of trajectory patterns of self-care behaviours over time and provision of timely and individualised care can reduce readmissions for heart failure patients. Healthcare professionals should recognise the significance of developing tailored strategies incorporating longitudinal self-care behavioural patterns in heart failure patients.

REPORTING METHOD

The study has been reported in accordance with the STROBE checklist (Appendix S1).

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients have completed a self-reported questionnaire after providing informed consent.

Self-Care Management for Hypertension in Southeast Asia: A Scoping Review

Background

Self-care practices such as lifestyle modifications in diet, exercise, and stress management are effective in reducing the incidence of and enhancing better management of hypertension. However, little is known about the self-care management practices of people with hypertension in Southeast Asia (SEA) countries where the prevalence of hypertension is sharply increasing.

Methods

A scoping review of research and grey literature (2006-2021) was performed using Scoping Review Frameworks by Arkey and O'Malley. For the research literature, ten databases were searched followed by a manual search of the reference lists of relevant topical papers. Criteria for inclusion included both qualitative and quantitative primary data studies, focused on adult (18 years and over) hypertensive patients, self-care management methods, conducted in SEA. The study protocol has been registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/s4nvk/).

Results

Out of 1667 studies examined, there were 57 studies that met criteria and were included in this review. Results indicate a paucity of relevant literature. Moreover, most studies reviewed showed an incident rate of 50% or more incidence of behavioural risk factors in people diagnosed with hypertension, including overweight/obesity, poor physical exercise, poor/low-quality dietary intake, and not adhering to medication. Few studies indicated adequate traditional self-care practice among SEA hypertension populations. Use of a non-prescription herbal as the medication is identified in some studies. Several reviewed articles indicated that there is individual variation in the facilitators and barriers to implementing self-care practices and we put it into a working framework. The facilitators and barriers are relevant to personal choice (internal factors) or to the environment or context (external factors).

Conclusion

Enhancing self-care management of hypertension in SEA may require a multi-focused approach including targeting personal choice as well as external factors such as cultural relevance, environment, and resources.