MicroRNA profile before and after antiviral therapy in liver transplant recipients for hepatitis C virus cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence is a major challenge after liver transplantation. Significant dysregulated expression of HCV receptors (i.e. claudin-1, occludin, tetraspanin CD81, scavenger receptor type B1) has been shown recently during HCV infection. This might facilitate hepatocytic entry and reinfection of HCV. MicroRNAs (miRs) play role in the regulation of gene expression. We aimed to characterize miR expression profiles related to HCV infection and antiviral therapy in adult liver transplant recipients, with special emphasis on miRs predicted to target HCV receptors.

METHODS

Twenty-eight adult liver transplant recipients were enrolled in the study. Paired biopsies were obtained at the time of HCV recurrence and at the end of antiviral treatment. MiRs for HCV receptors were selected using target prediction software. Expression levels of miR-21, miR-23a miR-34a, miR-96, miR-99a*, miR-122, miR-125b, miR-181a-2*, miR-194, miR-195, miR-217, miR-221, and miR-224 were determined by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

miR-99a* and miR-224 expressions were increased in HCV recurrence samples, while miR-21 and miR-194 were decreased in comparison to normal liver tissue. Increased expressions of miR-221, miR-224, and miR-217 were observed in samples taken after antiviral therapy when compared with HCV recurrence samples. High HCV titer at recurrence was associated with higher level of miR-122.

CONCLUSIONS

Samples at recurrence of HCV and after antiviral therapy revealed distinct HCV-related miR expression profiles, with significant dysregulation of those miRNAs potentially targeting mRNAs of HCV receptors. In particular, miR-194 and miR-21 might be involved in the regulation of HCV receptor proteins' expression during HCV infection and antiviral therapy.

[Kidney function and liver transplantation]

INTRODUCTION

In liver cirrhosis renal function decreases as well. Hepatorenal syndrome is the most frequent cause of the decrease, but primary kidney failure, diabetes mellitus and some diseases underlying endstage liver failure (such as hepatitis C virus infection) can also play an important role. In liver transplantation several further factors (total cross-clamping of vena cava inferior, polytransfusion, immunosuppression) impair the renal function, too.

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyse the changes in kidney function during the first postoperative year after liver transplantation.

METHOD

Retrospective data analysis was performed after primary liver transplantations (n = 319).

RESULTS

impaired preoperative renal function increased the devepolment of postoperative complications and the first year cumulative patient survival was significantly worse (91,7% vs 69,9%; p<0,001) in this group. If renal function of the patients increased above 60 ml/min/1,73 m2 after the first year, patient survival was better. Independently of the preoperative kidney function, 76% of the patients had impaired kidney function at the first postoperative year. In this group, de novo diabetes mellitus was more frequently diagnosed (22,5% vs 9,5%; p = 0,023).

CONCLUSIONS

Selection of personalized immunosuppressive medication has a positive effect on renal function.

Hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation in Hungary. Trends over the past 10 years

Introduction: Management of hepatitis C virus recurrence is a challenge after liver transplantation. Aim: The aim of the authors was to analyse the outcome of liver transplantation performed in hepatitis C virus positive patients during the past ten years and to compare recent data with a previous report of the authors. Method: The authors retrospectively evaluated the data (donors, recipients, perioperative characteristics, patient and graft survival, serum titer of hepatitis C virus RNA, histology) of 409 patients who underwent liver transplantation between 2003 and 2012. Results: 156 patients were transplanted due to hepatitis C virus associated liver cirrhosis (38%). Worse outcome was observed in these patients in comparison to hepatitis C virus negative recipients. The cumulative patient survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 year were 80%, 61%, 51% in the hepatitis C virus positive group and 92%, 85%, 79% in the hepatitis C virus negative group, respectively (p<0.001). The cumulative graft survival rates at 1, 5 and 10 year were 79%, 59% and 50% in hepatitis C virus positive and 89%, 80% and 70% in hepatitis C virus negative patients (p<0.001). Hepatitis C virus recurrence was observed in the majority of the patients (132 patients, 85%), mainly within the first year (83%). The authors observed recurrence within 6 months in 71 patients (56%), and within 3 months in 26 patients (20%). The mean hepatitis C virus recurrence free survival was 243 days. Higher rate of de novo diabetes was detected in case of early recurrence. The cumulative patient survival rates at 1, 3, 5, 10 years were 98%, 89.5%, 81% and 65% when hepatitis C virus recurrence exceeded 3 months and 64%, 53%, 30.5% and 30.5% in patients with early recurrence (p<0.001). Conclusions: Poor outcome of liver transplantation in hepatitis C virus positive patients is still a challenge. Hepatitis C virus recurrence is observed earlier after liver transplantation in comparison with a previous report of the authors. De novo diabetes occurs more frequently in case of early recurrence. Despite an immediate start of antiviral treatment, early recurrence has a significant negative impact on the outcome of transplantation. Orv. Hetil., 2013, 154, 1058–1066.

The role of marginal donors in liver transplantation. The Hungarian experience

A májátültetések számát korlátozza a beültetésre alkalmas donorszervek mennyisége. A szervhiány megoldására az egyik lehetőség az úgynevezett marginális donorok (extended donor criteria) elfogadása a májátültetési programban. Célkitűzés: A magyar májátültetési program szervdonációs jellemzőinek vizsgálata, különös tekintettel a marginális donorokra. Módszer: Donor- és recipiensadatok retrospektív feldolgozása 2003. január és 2008. december között. A marginálisdonor-kritériumrendszert nemzetközi ajánlások alapján állítottuk fel. Eredmények: A vizsgált periódus alatt összesen 1078 donort jelentettek a klinikán. Nyolcszázharmincöt esetben (77,4%) alkalmatlannak ítélték a donormájat a transzplantációra, 243 esetben (22,6%) volt beültetésre alkalmas a donormáj. A beültetett májgraftok közül 40 (16%) származott marginális, 203 (84%) nem marginális donorból. Marginális májgraftok beültetése esetén nem volt különbség a beteg- és grafttúlélésben, a posztoperatív graftfunkciót jelző paraméterekben és az általános szövődmények gyakoriságában. A korai hepatitis C-rekurrencia gyakoribb volt marginális graft beültetése esetén. Következtetések: A májátültetésre váró betegek száma hazánkban is folyamatosan növekszik. Marginális májgraftok alkalmazása esetén a betegek morbiditása és mortalitása nem különbözik számottevően a standard donorokból származó májgraftok beültetése után tapasztalt eredményektől. Hepatitis C-vírus esetén nem javasolt marginális májgraft beültetése. A donorok felső életkori határának kiterjesztése megfontolandó.

[Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation]

The main indication of liver transplantation is the final stage of liver cirrhosis developed in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The recurrence of HCV infection after transplantation is a common situation. The recurrent hepatitis C is a progressive disease, in 20 percent of patients it produces liver cirrhosis without treatment beside immunosuppression within 5 years. The treatment of recurrent HCV infection is the most important factor of the survival in patients with transplantation. The authors review the factors influencing the progression of recurrent HCV infection on the basis of literary data and also on their observation. They discuss in details the effect of immunosuppressive treatment, the importance in the selection of corresponding immunosuppressive drugs. They review the main keypoints in the diagnosis of recurrent hepatitis C, underline the important role of liver biopsy carried out according to the protocol in the diagnosis, furthermore the hard consultation among pathologist, hepatologist and surgeon. They demonstrate the observations with the treatment of patients on the waiting list, the results in the early, preemptive treatment of recurrent chronic hepatitis, furthermore the treatment modalities and the results in patients with chronic hepatitis C histologically proved. The drug of choice of chronic hepatitis C after transplantation is the combined therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. This therapy is able to assure virus-free stage in 20-50 percent of patients. In the virus-free patients the inflammatory activity in the liver significantly decreases, the histologic activity index improves. There are data showing the effect of treatment for inhibiting the fibrosis, but multicenter studies are necessary for the confirmation of these data. The advantage of early antiviral therapy without histologic alteration has not been confirmed by most of the trials. The anaemia and the neutropenia are frequent side effects in this patient group, that is why the applications of erythropoietin and granulocyte stimulating factor are recommended. Further trials and clinical studies are necessary for the optimal treatment of patients with recurrent hepatitis C, and to determine the dosage of pegylated interferon and ribavirin, to decrease the duration of therapy and the side effects, finally to achieve a healing phase of higher degree.