A novel system to monitor mitochondrial translation in yeast

Approaches and challenges in identifying, quantifying, and manipulating dynamic mitochondrial genome variations

Mitochondria, the cellular powerhouses, possess their own unique genetic system, including replication, transcription, and translation. Studying these processes is crucial for comprehending mitochondrial disorders, energy production, and their related diseases. Over the past decades, various approaches have been applied in detecting and quantifying mitochondrial genome variations with also the purpose of manipulation of mitochondria or mitochondrial genome for therapeutics. Understanding the scope and limitations of above strategies is not only fundamental to the understanding of basic biology but also critical for exploring disease-related novel target(s), as well to develop innovative therapies. Here, this review provides an overview of different tools and techniques for accurate mitochondrial genome variations identification, quantification, and discuss novel strategies for the manipulation of mitochondria to develop innovative therapeutic interventions, through combining the insights gained from the study of mitochondrial genetics with ongoing single cell omics combined with advanced single molecular tools.

Biolistic transformation of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondrial DNA

The insertion of genes into mitochondria by biolistic transformation is currently only possible in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The fact that S. cerevisiae mitochondria can exist with partial (ρ- mutants) or complete deletions (ρ0 mutants) of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), without requiring a specific origin of replication, enables the propagation of exogenous sequences. Additionally, mtDNA in this organism undergoes efficient homologous recombination, making it well-suited for genetic manipulation. In this review, we present a summarized historical overview of the development of biolistic transformation and discuss iconic applications of the technique. We also provide a detailed example on how to obtain transformants with recombined foreign DNA in their mitochondrial genome.

Biolistic Transformation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mitochondria

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are currently the two micro-organisms in which genetic transformation of mitochondria is routinely performed. The generation of a large variety of defined alterations as well as the insertion of ectopic genes in the mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) are possible, especially in yeast. Biolistic transformation of mitochondria is achieved through the bombardment of microprojectiles coated with DNA, which can be incorporated into mtDNA thanks to the highly efficient homologous recombination machinery present in S. cerevisiae and C. reinhardtii organelles. Despite a low frequency of transformation, the isolation of transformants in yeast is relatively quick and easy, since several natural or artificial selectable markers are available, while the selection in C. reinhardtii remains long and awaits new markers. Here, we describe the materials and techniques used to perform biolistic transformation, in order to mutagenize endogenous mitochondrial genes or insert novel markers into mtDNA. Although alternative strategies to edit mtDNA are being set up, so far, insertion of ectopic genes relies on the biolistic transformation techniques.

DPC29 promotes post-initiation mitochondrial translation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Mitochondrial ribosomes synthesize essential components of the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system in a tightly regulated process. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mitochondrial mRNAs require specific translational activators, which orchestrate protein synthesis by recognition of their target gene's 5'-untranslated region (UTR). Most of these yeast genes lack orthologues in mammals, and only one such gene-specific translational activator has been proposed in humans-TACO1. The mechanism by which TACO1 acts is unclear because mammalian mitochondrial mRNAs do not have significant 5'-UTRs, and therefore must promote translation by alternative mechanisms. In this study, we examined the role of the TACO1 orthologue in yeast. We found this 29 kDa protein to be a general mitochondrial translation factor, Dpc29, rather than a COX1-specific translational activator. Its activity was necessary for the optimal expression of OXPHOS mtDNA reporters, and mutations within the mitoribosomal large subunit protein gene MRP7 produced a global reduction of mitochondrial translation in dpc29Δ cells, indicative of a general mitochondrial translation factor. Northern-based mitoribosome profiling of dpc29Δ cells showed higher footprint frequencies at the 3' ends of mRNAs, suggesting a role in translation post-initiation. Additionally, human TACO1 expressed at native levels rescued defects in dpc29Δ yeast strains, suggesting that the two proteins perform highly conserved functions.

The ARG8m Reporter for the Study of Yeast Mitochondrial Translation

Mitochondrial translation is an intricate process involving both general and mRNA-specific factors. In addition, in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, translation of mitochondrial mRNAs is coupled to assembly of nascent polypeptides into the membrane. ARG8^m is a reporter gene widely used to study the mechanisms of yeast mitochondrial translation. This reporter is a recodified gene that uses the mitochondrial genetic code and is inserted at the desired locus in the mitochondrial genome. After deletion of the endogenous nuclear gene, this reporter produces Arg8, an enzyme necessary for arginine biosynthesis. Since Arg8 is a soluble protein with no relation to oxidative phosphorylation, it is a reliable reporter to study mitochondrial mRNAs translation and dissect translation form assembly processes. In this chapter, we explain how to insert the ARG8^m reporter in the desired spot in the mitochondrial DNA, how to analyze Arg8 synthesis inside mitochondria, and how to follow steady-state levels of the protein. We also explain how to use it to find spontaneous suppressors of translation defects.

Incorporation of reporter genes into mitochondrial DNA in budding yeast

Many aspects of mitochondrial gene expression are still unknown, which can be attributed to limitations in molecular tools. Here, we present a protocol to introduce reporter genes into the mitochondrial genome of budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mitochondrially encoded reporter constructs can be used to interrogate various aspects of mitochondrial gene expression. The power of this technique is exemplified by a mitochondrially encoded nanoluciferase, which allows to monitor levels of mitochondrial translation under a variety of growth conditions.

The Analysis of Yeast Mitochondrial Translation

The mitochondrial genome encodes only a handful of proteins, but methods to track their synthesis are highly limited. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a model organism that offers possibilities to expand the classical systems to analyze mitochondrial translation. In this chapter, we present two approaches of monitoring mitochondrial protein synthesis. Labeling of mitochondrially translated products with radioactive amino acids can be performed either in intact cells or in isolated mitochondria. However, these classical methods have disadvantages that can affect cell physiology and hence are not suitable for all types of research questions. Some of these limitations can be overcome by the use of reporter genes that are inserted into yeast genetic screens mitochondrial DNA via biolistic transformation. These reporter genes can be used for yeast genetic screen and to monitor regulation and efficiency of mitochondrial translation with a variety of methods.

Does functional specialization of ribosomes really exist?

It has recently become clear that ribosomes are much more heterogeneous than previously thought, with diversity arising from rRNA sequence and modifications, ribosomal protein (RP) content and posttranslational modifications (PTMs), as well as bound nonribosomal proteins. In some cases, the existence of these diverse ribosome populations has been verified by biochemical or structural methods. Furthermore, knockout or knockdown of RPs can diversify ribosome populations, while also affecting the translation of some mRNAs (but not others) with biological consequences. However, the effects on translation arising from depletion of diverse proteins can be highly similar, suggesting that there may be a more general defect in ribosome function or stability, perhaps arising from reduced ribosome numbers. Consistently, overall reduced ribosome numbers can differentially affect subclasses of mRNAs, necessitating controls for specificity. Moreover, in order to study the functional consequences of ribosome diversity, perturbations including affinity tags and knockouts are introduced, which can also affect the outcome of the experiment. Here we review the available literature to carefully evaluate whether the published data support functional diversification, defined as diverse ribosome populations differentially affecting translation of distinct mRNA (classes). Based on these observations and the commonly observed cellular responses to perturbations in the system, we suggest a set of important controls to validate functional diversity, which should include gain-of-function assays and the demonstration of inducibility under physiological conditions.

Mitochondrial Translation Efficiency Controls Cytoplasmic Protein Homeostasis

Cellular proteostasis is maintained via the coordinated synthesis, maintenance, and breakdown of proteins in the cytosol and organelles. While biogenesis of the mitochondrial membrane complexes that execute oxidative phosphorylation depends on cytoplasmic translation, it is unknown how translation within mitochondria impacts cytoplasmic proteostasis and nuclear gene expression. Here we have analyzed the effects of mutations in the highly conserved accuracy center of the yeast mitoribosome. Decreased accuracy of mitochondrial translation shortened chronological lifespan, impaired management of cytosolic protein aggregates, and elicited a general transcriptional stress response. In striking contrast, increased accuracy extended lifespan, improved cytosolic aggregate clearance, and suppressed a normally stress-induced, Msn2/4-dependent interorganellar proteostasis transcription program (IPTP) that regulates genes important for mitochondrial proteostasis. Collectively, the data demonstrate that cytosolic protein homeostasis and nuclear stress signaling are controlled by mitochondrial translation efficiency in an inter-connected organelle quality control network that determines cellular lifespan.