1
|
Khodayari Moez E, Warkentin MT, Brhane Y, Lam S, Field JK, Liu G, Zulueta JJ, Valencia K, Mesa-Guzman M, Nialet AP, Atkar-Khattra S, Davies MPA, Grant B, Murison K, Montuenga LM, Amos CI, Robbins HA, Johansson M, Hung RJ. Circulating proteome for pulmonary nodule malignancy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:1060-1070. [PMID: 37369027 PMCID: PMC10483334 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is rolling out in many areas of the world, differentiating indeterminate pulmonary nodules remains a major challenge. We conducted one of the first systematic investigations of circulating protein markers to differentiate malignant from benign screen-detected pulmonary nodules. METHODS Based on 4 international low-dose computed tomography screening studies, we assayed 1078 protein markers using prediagnostic blood samples from 1253 participants based on a nested case-control design. Protein markers were measured using proximity extension assays, and data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, random forest, and penalized regressions. Protein burden scores (PBSs) for overall nodule malignancy and imminent tumors were estimated. RESULTS We identified 36 potentially informative circulating protein markers differentiating malignant from benign nodules, representing a tightly connected biological network. Ten markers were found to be particularly relevant for imminent lung cancer diagnoses within 1 year. Increases in PBSs for overall nodule malignancy and imminent tumors by 1 standard deviation were associated with odds ratios of 2.29 (95% confidence interval: 1.95 to 2.72) and 2.81 (95% confidence interval: 2.27 to 3.54) for nodule malignancy overall and within 1 year of diagnosis, respectively. Both PBSs for overall nodule malignancy and for imminent tumors were substantially higher for those with malignant nodules than for those with benign nodules, even when limited to Lung Computed Tomography Screening Reporting and Data System (LungRADS) category 4 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Circulating protein markers can help differentiate malignant from benign pulmonary nodules. Validation with an independent computed tomographic screening study will be required before clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elham Khodayari Moez
- Prosserman Centre for Population Health Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew T Warkentin
- Prosserman Centre for Population Health Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yonathan Brhane
- Prosserman Centre for Population Health Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen Lam
- Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - John K Field
- Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Geoffrey Liu
- Computational Biology and Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Javier J Zulueta
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karmele Valencia
- Center of Applied Medical Research (CIMA) and Schools of Sciences and Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Cancer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Mesa-Guzman
- Thoracic Surgery Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Andrea Pasquier Nialet
- Center of Applied Medical Research (CIMA) and Schools of Sciences and Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Cancer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Michael P A Davies
- Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Benjamin Grant
- Computational Biology and Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kiera Murison
- Prosserman Centre for Population Health Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Luis M Montuenga
- Center of Applied Medical Research (CIMA) and Schools of Sciences and Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Cancer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Christopher I Amos
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hilary A Robbins
- Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Mattias Johansson
- Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Rayjean J Hung
- Prosserman Centre for Population Health Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marmor HN, Zorn JT, Deppen SA, Massion PP, Grogan EL. Biomarkers in Lung Cancer Screening: a Narrative Review. CURRENT CHALLENGES IN THORACIC SURGERY 2023; 5:5. [PMID: 37016707 PMCID: PMC10069480 DOI: 10.21037/ccts-20-171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
Although when used as a lung cancer screening tool low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has demonstrated a significant reduction in lung cancer related mortality, it is not without pitfalls. The associated high false positive rate, inability to distinguish between benign and malignant nodules, cumulative radiation exposure, and resulting patient anxiety have all demonstrated the need for adjunctive testing in lung cancer screening. Current research focuses on developing liquid biomarkers to complement imaging as non-invasive lung cancer diagnostics. Biomarkers can be useful for both the early detection and diagnosis of disease, thereby decreasing the number of unnecessary radiologic tests performed. Biomarkers can stratify cancer risk to further enrich the screening population and augment existing risk prediction. Finally, biomarkers can be used to distinguish benign from malignant nodules in lung cancer screening. While many biomarkers require further validation studies, several, including autoantibodies and blood protein profiling, are available for clinical use. This paper describes the need for biomarkers as a lung cancer screening tool, both in terms of diagnosis and risk assessment. Additionally, this paper will discuss the goals of biomarker use, describe properties of a good biomarker, and review several of the most promising biomarkers currently being studied including autoantibodies, complement fragments, microRNA, blood proteins, circulating tumor DNA, and DNA methylation. Finally, we will describe future directions in the field of biomarker development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah N. Marmor
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - J. Tyler Zorn
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Stephen A. Deppen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Pierre P. Massion
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Eric L. Grogan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tennessee Valley VA Healthcare System, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Voigt W, Prosch H, Silva M. Clinical Scores, Biomarkers and IT Tools in Lung Cancer Screening-Can an Integrated Approach Overcome Current Challenges? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041218. [PMID: 36831559 PMCID: PMC9954060 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
As most lung cancer (LC) cases are still detected at advanced and incurable stages, there are increasing efforts to foster detection at earlier stages by low dose computed tomography (LDCT) based LC screening. In this scoping review, we describe current advances in candidate selection for screening (selection phase), technical aspects (screening), and probability evaluation of malignancy of CT-detected pulmonary nodules (PN management). Literature was non-systematically assessed and reviewed for suitability by the authors. For the selection phase, we describe current eligibility criteria for screening, along with their limitations and potential refinements through advanced clinical scores and biomarker assessments. For LC screening, we discuss how the accuracy of computerized tomography (CT) scan reading might be augmented by IT tools, helping radiologists to cope with increasing workloads. For PN management, we evaluate the precision of follow-up scans by semi-automatic volume measurements of CT-detected PN. Moreover, we present an integrative approach to evaluate the probability of PN malignancy to enable safe decisions on further management. As a clear limitation, additional validation studies are required for most innovative diagnostic approaches presented in this article, but the integration of clinical risk models, current imaging techniques, and advancing biomarker research has the potential to improve the LC screening performance generally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wieland Voigt
- Medical Innovation and Management, Steinbeis University Berlin, Ernst-Augustin-Strasse 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Helmut Prosch
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, General Hospital, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Mario Silva
- Scienze Radiologiche, Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, 43121 Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kammer MN, Deppen SA, Antic S, Jamshedur Rahman S, Eisenberg R, Maldonado F, Aldrich MC, Sandler KL, Landman B, Massion PP, Grogan EL. The impact of the lung EDRN-CVC on Phase 1, 2, & 3 biomarker validation studies. Cancer Biomark 2022; 33:449-465. [DOI: 10.3233/cbm-210382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The Early Detection Research Network’s (EDRN) purpose is to discover, develop and validate biomarkers and imaging methods to detect early-stage cancers or at-risk individuals. The EDRN is composed of sites that fall into four categories: Biomarker Developmental Laboratories (BDL), Biomarker Reference Laboratories (BRL), Clinical Validation Centers (CVC) and Data Management and Coordinating Centers. Each component has a crucial role to play within the mission of the EDRN. The primary role of the CVCs is to support biomarker developers through validation trials on promising biomarkers discovered by both EDRN and non-EDRN investigators. The second round of funding for the EDRN Lung CVC at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) was funded in October 2016 and we intended to accomplish the three missions of the CVCs: To conduct innovative research on the validation of candidate biomarkers for early cancer detection and risk assessment of lung cancer in an observational study; to compare biomarker performance; and to serve as a resource center for collaborative research within the Network and partner with established EDRN BDLs and BRLs, new laboratories and industry partners. This report outlines the impact of the VUMC EDRN Lung CVC and describes the role in promoting and validating biological and imaging biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael N. Kammer
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Stephen A. Deppen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Veterans Affairs, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sanja Antic
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - S.M. Jamshedur Rahman
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Rosana Eisenberg
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Fabien Maldonado
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Melinda C. Aldrich
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kim L. Sandler
- Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Bennett Landman
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Pierre P. Massion
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Veterans Affairs, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Eric L. Grogan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Veterans Affairs, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kammer MN, Lakhani DA, Balar AB, Antic SL, Kussrow AK, Webster RL, Mahapatra S, Barad U, Shah C, Atwater T, Diergaarde B, Qian J, Kaizer A, New M, Hirsch E, Feser WJ, Strong J, Rioth M, Miller YE, Balagurunathan Y, Rowe DJ, Helmey S, Chen SC, Bauza J, Deppen SA, Sandler K, Maldonado F, Spira A, Billatos E, Schabath MB, Gillies RJ, Wilson DO, Walker RC, Landman B, Chen H, Grogan EL, Barón AE, Bornhop DJ, Massion PP. Integrated Biomarkers for the Management of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 204:1306-1316. [PMID: 34464235 PMCID: PMC8786067 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202012-4438oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) at risk of cancer undergo high rates of invasive, costly, and morbid procedures. Objectives: To train and externally validate a risk prediction model that combined clinical, blood, and imaging biomarkers to improve the noninvasive management of IPNs. Methods: In this prospectively collected, retrospective blinded evaluation study, probability of cancer was calculated for 456 patient nodules using the Mayo Clinic model, and patients were categorized into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. A combined biomarker model (CBM) including clinical variables, serum high sensitivity CYFRA 21-1 level, and a radiomic signature was trained in cohort 1 (n = 170) and validated in cohorts 2-4 (total n = 286). All patients were pooled to recalibrate the model for clinical implementation. The clinical utility of the CBM compared with current clinical care was evaluated in 2 cohorts. Measurements and Main Results: The CBM provided improved diagnostic accuracy over the Mayo Clinic model with an improvement in area under the curve of 0.124 (95% bootstrap confidence interval, 0.091-0.156; P < 2 × 10-16). Applying 10% and 70% risk thresholds resulted in a bias-corrected clinical reclassification index for cases and control subjects of 0.15 and 0.12, respectively. A clinical utility analysis of patient medical records estimated that a CBM-guided strategy would have reduced invasive procedures from 62.9% to 50.6% in the intermediate-risk benign population and shortened the median time to diagnosis of cancer from 60 to 21 days in intermediate-risk cancers. Conclusions: Integration of clinical, blood, and image biomarkers improves noninvasive diagnosis of patients with IPNs, potentially reducing the rate of unnecessary invasive procedures while shortening the time to diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael N. Kammer
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
- Department of Chemistry, and
| | - Dhairya A. Lakhani
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Aneri B. Balar
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Sanja L. Antic
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Amanda K. Kussrow
- Department of Chemistry, and
- Vanderbilt Institute for Chemical Biology, Nashville, Tennessee
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Shayan Mahapatra
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | | | | | - Thomas Atwater
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Brenda Diergaarde
- Department of Human Genetics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jun Qian
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Alexander Kaizer
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | - Erin Hirsch
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - William J. Feser
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jolene Strong
- Biomedical Informatics and Personalized Medicine, and
| | - Matthew Rioth
- Medical Oncology and Biomedical Informatics and Personalized Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | | | - Dianna J. Rowe
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Sherif Helmey
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Sheau-Chiann Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Joseph Bauza
- American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen A. Deppen
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Kim Sandler
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Fabien Maldonado
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Avrum Spira
- Department of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ehab Billatos
- Department of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - David O. Wilson
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | | | - Bennett Landman
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Heidi Chen
- American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Eric L. Grogan
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Anna E. Barón
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Darryl J. Bornhop
- Department of Chemistry, and
- Vanderbilt Institute for Chemical Biology, Nashville, Tennessee
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Pierre P. Massion
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Pulmonary Section, Medical Service, Tennessee Valley Healthcare Systems Nashville Campus, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|