Effusive pericarditis in the pathogenesis of cardiac arrhythmias in COVID-19: a case series

[Сardiac arrhythmias in people who have had a coronavirus infection COVID-19: A review]

Heart rhythm disorders are one of the most common complications of coronavirus infection. Heart rhythm disorders can develop in 6-17% of hospitalized patients, and in convalescents, COVID-19 can manifest itself up to 12 months after the completion of the acute phase of the disease. Among the mechanisms for the development of cardiac arrhythmias, there are a direct cytopathic effect of SARS-CoV-2 on the myocardium, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, electrolyte imbalance, hypoxia, the use of antibacterial, antimalarial and antiviral drugs, exudative pericarditis, autonomic dysfunction. The main COVID-19-mediated heart rhythm disorders are sinus tachycardia and bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, long QT syndrome. Despite a significant amount of research, the literature data on the prevalence of certain types of cardiac arrhythmias (especially in COVID-19 convalescents), as well as methods for their correction, are somewhat contradictory and need to be clarified. Taking into account the impact of arrhythmia on the quality of life and mortality, active monitoring of convalescents of coronavirus infection, identification and development of approaches to the treatment of heart rhythm disorders in patients who have had COVID-19, seem to be relevant and promising areas in modern cardiology.

Russian-language publication activity of medical researchers in during the COVID-19 pandemic: “post-COVID-19 syndrome”

Aim. To study the dynamics and pattern of publications in Russian on post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) in order to assess the completeness of information and identify medical specialties with its most active investigation in Russia.

Material and methods. The search for publications was carried out in the database of the largest digital scientific library in Russia Elibrary.ru from February 1, 2021 to February 1, 2022. The study included publicly available medical publications on the consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Russian. Publications were classified according to subject matter, study design, and evidence hierarchy. The data obtained is reflected using integers, percentages and graphs.

Results. The study included 478 publications, of which 196 (41%) presented data from original studies, while 269 (56,3%) reflected the results of existing sources. Expert community documents accounted for 2,7%. In terms of study design, most of original studies described case series (37,2%) and individual case reports (22,4%). Casecontrol studies accounted for 20,4%, cross-sectional studies — 8,7%, prospective cohort studies — 3,6%, randomized clinical trials — 1,5%, and systematic reviews — 1%. In addition, 5,1% of publications were devoted to preclinical studies, mathematical models and various methodological aspects. By topic, the largest number of publications noted cardiovascular (12,2%) and neurological manifestations of PCS (12,2%). Furthermore, 23,5% of publications described the course of PCS in specific groups of patients, particular issues of COVID-19 consequences, and healthcare management problems. We also revealed that 11,7% of publications were devoted to general rehabilitation, 71% — to imaging diagnostics, 5,6% — to herd immunity to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2 (SARSCoV-2), and 5,6% — to PCS features in children. The smallest number of publications considered mental (5,1%), gastroenterological (4,6%), pharmacological (4,6%), rheumatological (4%) and pulmonological aspects of PCS.

Conclusion. The dynamics and pattern of publications on COVID-19 in Russian are generally consistent with global trends and reflect the natural consequences of the pandemic. This analysis of publications on PCS showed that the most in-demand specializations in this filed are cardiology, neurology, and rehabilitation.