Post-Endograft Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Shrinkage Varies Among Hospitals:Observations From Multicenter Trials

Effect of β-blocker on aneurysm sac behavior after endovascular abdominal aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to determine whether β-blocker (BB) therapy is associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac regression after endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR).

METHODS

A total of 198 patients (mean age, 76 years) who underwent EVAR were analyzed (104 in the BB group and 94 in the non-BB group). The primary end point was the incidence of AAA sac regression at 1 and 2 years.

RESULTS

Hypertension, coronary artery disease, and hyperlipidemia were more common in the BB group. The BB group was also more likely to have been prescribed an aspirin and a statin than the non-BB group. The length of proximal neck was significantly longer in the non-BB group than in the BB group. All study patients were monitored for at least 1 year after EVAR, and 2-year follow-up was available in 104 patients (52.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of aneurysm sac regression in either group at 1 year (52.1% in the non-BB group vs 45.2% in the BB group; P = .330) and 2 years (58.5% in the non-BB group vs 64.7% in the BB group; P = .515). The difference of the change of AAA maximum diameter between two groups did not reach statistical significance at 1 year (-6.0 ± 7.0 mm in the non-BB group vs -5.5 ± 8.1 mm in the BB group; P = .644) and 2 years (-9.0 ± 10.5 mm in the non-BB group vs -9.0 ± 10.0 mm in the BB group; P = .977). BB therapy was not associated with increased odds of AAA sac regression. The effect of third-generation BBs on AAA sac regression was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

BB therapy had no effect on AAA sac regression. At the present time, there is insufficient evidence to recommend BB therapy for the purpose of AAA sac regression.

Surveillance of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: An Audit of Sonographer-Led Ultrasound and Radiologist-Led Computed Tomography Services

Objectives

Postoperative complications associated with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) mandate the need for lifelong surveillance. The aim of this audit was to compare the detection rates of endoleaks during the first 10 months of a combined sonographer-led colour Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) and radiologist-led contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), postoperative EVAR surveillance programme, within a single National Health Service Hospital.

Methods

A prospective audit was carried out of all patients with EVAR, who had same-day CECT and CDUS surveillance examinations between March 2010 and January 2011. CECT examinations were reported by three consultant vascular radiologists. Of 66 CDUS examinations, 64 (97%) were performed and reported by four certified vascular sonographers. The reports of dual-modality, same-day scans were compared, to establish agreement on the presence and classification of the type, or absence of endoleaks. CECT was used as the gold standard, against which the sensitivity and specificity of CDUS in endoleak detection was determined.

Results

Sixty-six paired same-day CECT and CDUS reports were compared. Ten endoleaks were identified by CECT (15% incidence) and eight (80%) of 10 were type II. The number of observed agreements was 58 (88%) of 66; CDUS missed six endoleaks (five type II) and suggested two false-positives. CDUS had a sensitivity of 40% and a specificity of 96%. Conclusions: In our study, CDUS demonstrated an excellent specificity but had a low sensitivity for endoleak detection. We agree CDUS cannot effectively replace CECT as the sole imaging modality. Research to determine an international consensus for an effective and efficient postoperative EVAR surveillance patient pathway is required.

Secondary interventions after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

One adverse outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR) is a significantly increased incidence of secondary interventions (SIs) required compared with traditional open aortic repair. We present a consecutive series of EVARs using a single endograft to identify the incidence and types of SIs performed.

METHODS

From February 1, 2000, to January 31, 2005, we repaired 136 AAAs with the Zenith (Cook, Bloomington, Indiana) endograft. All patients met the same strict anatomic inclusion and exclusion criteria. Follow-up lasted from 1.5 to 61 months (median 36). The indications for SI group A were procedural and technical errors, for group B were aortic morphology, and for group C were device failures.

RESULTS

Twenty-one SIs were required in 17 of 136 patients (12.5%). Three patients required multiple interventions. Nine patients were in group A, four were in group B, and six were in group C. All but 4 patients required SIs for late (>30 days) complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it is a viable alternative to open aortic repair, EVAR is associated with a significantly higher rate of SIs. To maintain the efficacy of EVAR, patients must be followed-up in a vigilant graft surveillance protocol for life.

Endovascular Repair of Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Pre- and Postprocedural Imaging

Endovascular repair of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms is a safe alternative to conventional open surgical repair. Clinical success, however, is highly dependent on patient selection. Diagnostic vascular imaging has an essential role for this selection process. Following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), patients require long-term surveillance and again vascular imaging serves an integral function. This article reviews EVAR selection criteria and post-EVAR assessment and then discusses the imaging modalities used to evaluate these patients, namely multi-detector-row computed tomographic angiography, magnetic resonance imaging/angiography, duplex ultrasonography, and catheter angiography.

Surveillance for endoleaks: How to detect all of them

Endovascular aneurysm repair has proven to be a valuable alternative to open repair in selected patients. This less invasive procedure, however, requires long-term surveillance for its own set of potential complications, including perigraft leakage, or endoleak. This article focuses on the detection of these leaks, first defining and classifying endoleaks and then describing various means of detecting them, including computed tomographic angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, color-flow duplex ultrasonography, and conventional angiography.