Commentary: Below-the-Ankle Angioplasty:To Stent or Not to Stent

Clinical Outcomes of Additional Below-The-Ankle Intervention Compared to Below-The-Knee Intervention Alone: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a Prospective Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical implication of additional below-the-ankle (BTA) intervention in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing below-the-knee (BTK) intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A sub-analysis was performed using data from the LIBERTY trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01855412), a prospective, observational, core-laboratory adjudicated, multicenter study of endovascular intervention in 1204 patients. Patients with CLTI (Rutherford Classification 4-6) who underwent BTK intervention were included in this sub-analysis. Participants were then stratified into 2 treatment groups according to whether at least one lesion intervened on was BTA (n=66) or not (n=273). The decision on whether and where to intervene was made during the procedure. The main outcome measures included major amputation, target vessel revascularization (TVR), major adverse events (MAE), survival, amputation-free survival, major adverse limb events or peri-operative death (MALE-POD), and all-cause death. Other outcome measures included procedural success, procedural complications, and wound healing rate.

RESULTS

There were no differences in procedural success or severe angiographic complications between the 2 groups. At 1-year post-procedure, patients in the BTK group had a higher rate of freedom from major amputation (95.0% vs. 86.9%, respectively; HR: 2.87, 95% CI: 1.17-7.03), a higher rate of freedom from TVR (80.1% vs. 66.9%, respectively; HR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.14-3.32), a higher rate of freedom from MALE-POD (94.6% vs. 86.9%, respectively; HR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.10-6.41), and a higher rate of freedom from MAE at both 1 (76.0% vs. 60.1%, respectively; HR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.24-3.22) and 3 years post procedure (67.5% vs. 55.8%, respectively; HR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.08-2.65). There was a significantly lower rate of survival in the BTK group at 3 years (74.3% vs. 91.1%, respectively; HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.14-0.87). After risk adjustment, there was a higher rate of all-cause death in the BTK group at 3 years (19.4% vs. 9.1%, respectively; p=0.023) post-intervention.

CONCLUSION

Patients with disease requiring intervention to BTA lesions have a potential increased amputation rate in the short term, but BTA intervention carries a potential survival benefit in the long term when compared to BTK intervention alone.

Limb Salvage in Diabetic Patients With Ischemic Heel Ulcers

The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of diabetic individuals with ischemic heel ulcers. The study group was composed of a consecutive sample of persons with diabetic ischemic foot ulcers managed by a preset multidisciplinary limb salvage protocol, including revascularization through endovascular technique. The outcome measures were healing, major amputation (above the ankle), and death at 1-year of follow-up. The outcomes between patients with heel ulcers (HUs) and without (NHUs) were compared. A total of 254 patients were recruited. There were 50/254 (19.7%) HUs and 204/254 (79.3%) NHUs. Overall, 190/254 (74.8%) patients healed. The rate of healing for HUs and NHUs was 30/50 (60%) and 160/204 (78.4%); P = .03, respectively. Major amputation occurred in 24/254 (9.4%) patients. The rates of major amputation for HUs and NHUs were 10/50 (20%) and 14/204 (6.9%; P = .002), respectively; 40/254 (15.7%) patients died, unhealed. The rates of mortality for HUs and NHUs were 10/50 (20%) and 30/204 (14.7%; P = .07), respectively. In HUs patients, absence of infection [95% CI = 3.1 (1.6-5.5); P = .002] and superficial ulcers [95% CI = 4.4 (2.2-9.3); P = .0001] were independent predictors of healing, whereas revascularization failure [95% CI = 8.1 (1.5.0-19.4); P = .0001], involvement of the plantar arch [95% CI = 6.3 (2.0-15.4); P = .0001], and dialysis [95% CI = 2.2 (1.3-4.5); P = .006] were independent predictors of major amputation. A multidisciplinary approach achieves good rate of limb salvage in people with diabetic ischemic heel ulcers.

Below-the-ankle arterial disease severely impairs the outcomes of diabetic patients with ischemic foot ulcers

AIM

To evaluate the impact of below-the-ankle (BTA) arterial disease in people with ischemic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).

METHODS

Patients with ischemic DFUs treated by a pre-set limb salvage protocol including peripheral revascularization were included. They were divided in two groups according to the involvement of BTA arteries (BTA+) or not (BTA-). Not healing, minor amputation, major amputation and mortality have been evaluated as primary outcome. Revascularization failure has been evaluated as secondary outcome.

RESULTS

The study group was composed of 272 patients, 120 (44.1%) belonging to BTA+ group and 152 (55.9%) to BTA-. After 1 year of follow-up the outcomes for BTA+ and BTA- were respectively: not healing (40.8 vs 17.8%, p < 0.0001), minor amputation (80.8 vs 20.4%, p < 0.0001), major amputation (18.3 vs 6.6%, p = 0.002), mortality (16.7% vs 10.5%, p = 0.001). The rate of revascularization failure was respectively 38.3 vs 11.2%, p < 0.0001. At the multivariate analysis BTA arterial disease resulted an independent predictor of not healing [OR 3.5 (CI 95% 2.3-6.1) p = 0.0001], minor amputation [OR 3.1 (1.5-5.9) p < 0.0001] and revascularization failure [OR 3.5 (1.9-6.3) p = 0.0001]. BTA+ patients with successful BTA revascularization showed lower rate of not healing (37.8 vs 89.1%) p < 0.0001, minor amputation (74.3 vs 91.3%) p = 0.002 and major amputation (8.1 vs 34.8%) p = 0.0003 in comparison to patients with unsuccessful BTA revascularization.

CONCLUSION

BTA arterial disease severely impairs the outcomes of diabetics with ischemic foot ulcers. BTA revascularization reduces the rate of not healing, minor and major amputation.

Below-the-ankle angioplasty and stenting for limb salvage: anatomical considerations and long-term outcomes

PURPOSE

To report the long-term angiographic and clinical results in a series of below-the-ankle (BTA) angioplasty procedures and to present some biomechanical issues related to the unique anatomical geometry of the ankle.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of BTA angioplasty procedures. Clinical end points included technical success, patient mortality, salvage of the treated foot, and repeat target lesion revascularization. Imaging end points included primary patency, binary restenosis of the target lesion at the 50% threshold, and stent integrity (stent fracture, deformation, or collapse). Univariate subgroup analysis was performed.

RESULTS

In total, 40 limbs in 37 patients (age 73.5 ± 8.2 years) with critical limb ischemia were included and 42 inframalleolar lesions (4.2 ± 1.4 cm) were analyzed. Technical success was achieved in 95.2% (40 of 42). Provisional stent placement was performed in 45.2% (19 of 42). Two patients died, and two major amputations occurred up to 3 years. At 1 year, overall primary vessel patency was 50.4 ± 9.1%, lesion binary restenosis rate was 64.1 ± 8.3%, and repeat intervention-free survival was 93.6 ± 4.3% according to life table analysis of all treated lesions. Pairwise subgroup analysis showed that BTA self-expanding stents were associated with significantly higher restenosis and poorer primary patency compared to plain balloon angioplasty or sirolimus-eluting balloon-expandable stents. Significant deformation and/or fracture of balloon-expandable stents placed BTA were identified in five of 11. Dynamic imaging showed that the dorsalis pedis artery is kinked during foot dorsiflexion, whereas the distal posterior tibial artery is kinked during plantar flexion of the foot.

CONCLUSION

BTA angioplasty for critical limb ischemia treatment is safe and feasible with satisfactory long-term results. BTA stent placement must be reserved for bailout indications.

Below-the-knee drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons

Endovascular procedures have evolved to the mainstream treatment of choice for revascularization of infrapopliteal obstructive disease, especially in patients suffering from critical limb ischemia and multiple comorbidities. However, standard balloon angioplasty is limited by the potential of a suboptimal acute outcome due to elastic recoil and/or flow-limiting dissection, followed by neointimal hyperplasia and progressive vascular restenosis even in the case of bare-metal stent use. Drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons are emerging endovascular technologies with the promise of significant inhibition of vessel restenosis and improved clinical outcomes. The current review outlines the drug-eluting properties of those instruments and summarizes the currently available clinical data. The authors critically appraise the current status and also provide a glimpse of the near future of endovascular below-the-knee treatments.