Changing aneurysmal morphology after endovascular grafting: relation to leakage or persistent perfusion

Decreased Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Size Following EVAR in Patients With CT Evidence of Subclinical Thoracic Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular repair (EVAR) of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an established indicator of surgical success. However, even with a completely excluded aneurysm, the degree of aortic sac regression may vary. This study evaluates the relationship between aneurysm sac regression after EVAR and the presence of morphological features in the thoracic aorta that can be associated with a subclinical aortic dissection, termed dissection morphology in this study.

METHODS

Patients who underwent EVAR to repair an infrarenal aortic aneurysm at Mount Sinai Hospital between 1996 and 2017 with a postoperative CT scan and a 3-year follow-up scan available for analysis were included in the study. Patients with a type I or type III endoleak were not included. The thoracic aorta was evaluated for dissection morphology on CT scan, which included the presence of aortic dissection, penetrating aortic ulcers, and intramural hematomas. AAA sac regression after EVAR was compared between patients with dissection morphology (n = 157) and patients without those characteristics (n = 141). An independent investigator performed the CT analysis and was blinded to the degree of sac regression.

RESULTS

Demographics and comorbid clinical conditions were compared between patients with and without dissection morphology. There were no significant differences in age, gender, smoking habits, or cardiovascular conditions. The median AAA diameter after EVAR, over the course of the study, in patients with dissection morphology decreased by 11.30 mm (-17.20, -3.60) compared to a median change of 0.30 mm (-8.60, 8.60) in patients without dissection morphology features (p < 0.001). Patients with dissection morphology also had fewer type II endoleaks in postoperative follow-up scans (22.9% vs. 53.9%, p < 0.001). Additionally, patients with dissection morphology had longer EVAR operative times (192.00 min [167.25, 230.00] vs.174.00 min [150.00, 215.00], p = 0.004). AAA-related mortality after 3 years was not significantly different between the 2 groups (p = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of imaging features consistent with dissection morphology in the thoracic aorta correlated with greater AAA sac regression and fewer type II endoleaks after EVAR. Assessing these imaging features in patients undergoing EVAR may be useful in understanding aneurysm behavior in terms of aneurysm growth, risk of rupture, and outcomes following endovascular surgery. Identifying differential rates of aneurysm sac regression may have implications regarding the role of subclinical dissections in the etiology of AAA development.

The Relationship between Temporal Changes in Proximal Neck Angulation and Stent-Graft Migration after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

In recent years, endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for treating abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has become quite prevalent in Japan. Though little information is available about temporal changes in proximal neck angulation due to the difficulties encountered in measuring the angle. Therefore, we examined temporal changes in proximal neck angulation and its relationship to stent-graft migration after EVAR.

METHODS

Between June 2007 and March 2010, 159 patients underwent EVAR for treatment of fusiform AAAs at our hospital. This study focuses on the 80 patients among this group whose treatment sites and subsequent stent grafts were examined by contrast computed tomographic angiography before surgery, directly after surgery (within 4 days), as well as 1 year and 2 years thereafter. We created curved planar reconstruction (CPR) images and measured the length of migration and neck angle using our method.

RESULTS

At 2 years after EVAR, the average length of proximal landing zone was 21.4 ± 9.2 mm. The average length of stent migration after 2 years was 1.41 ± 2.68 mm. The average neck angle was 33.9° preoperatively and 29.9° directly after surgery yielding a significant difference. However, 1 and 2 years after surgery the average neck angle was 28.2° and 28.4°, respectively. The number of patients experiencing a change >6° in the angle of the proximal neck between the preoperative condition and that directly after surgery was 16 (34.8%) with the use of Zenith stent grafts (n = 46) and 14 (41.2%) with the use of Excluder stent grafts (n = 34). There was no correlation between the proximal neck angle and migration of the proximal stent graft. In addition, there was no correlation between the changes in proximal neck angle and the secondary intervention rate and the occurrence of endoleak.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant change in the neck angle between the preoperative condition and the immediate postoperative condition. However, there was no clear relationship found between the angle of the neck and the proximal stent-graft migration. Postoperative changes in the proximal neck angle just after EVAR and subsequent temporal changes during a 2-year follow-up period do not appear to predict stent-graft migration, secondary intervention rates, or the occurrence of endoleak.

Gender Differences in Aortic Neck Morphology in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Undergoing Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that women tend to have adverse aortic neck morphology leading to exclusion of some women from undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The objective of this study is to investigate differences in aortic neck morphology in men versus women, changes in the neck morphology and sac behavior after EVAR, and investigate how these features may influence outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of elective EVARs (2004-2013). We excluded patients who underwent elective EVAR with no postoperative imaging available and those patients with fenestrated repairs. Using TeraRecon and volumetric analysis, several features were investigated. These included percent thrombus, shape, length, angulation of the neck, and changes in neck and abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients were found to meet inclusion criteria (115 men and 31 women) with similar baseline characteristics. Neck angulation was greater in women (23.9° vs. 13.5°; P < 0.028). The percent thrombus in women was higher than men (35.4% vs. 31%; P < 0.02). Abdominal aneurysm's were smaller in women at 1 year (4.2 cm vs. 5.1 cm; P < 0.002), and secondary interventions were higher in men (11.3% vs. 0%; P < 0.05). Other features such as neck shape, changes in neck diameter, neck length, and percent oversizing of graft where not statistically different between genders.

CONCLUSIONS

Gender differences in neck characteristics and changes in neck morphology do not appear to adversely affect EVAR outcomes. Longer follow-up is necessary to further assess whether these findings are clinically durable.

Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms--a feasibility study

OBJECTIVES

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), being predominantly atherosclerotic in nature, have underlying inflammatory activity. As it is well established that ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) particles accumulate in the macrophages within atheromatous lesions, USPIO-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can be potentially effective in the quantification of the associated inflammatory processes.

METHODS

A total of 14 patients underwent USPIO-enhanced MR imaging using a 1.5T-MR system. Quantitative T(2)* and T(2) relaxation time data were acquired before and 36 h after UPSIO infusion at identical AAA locations. The pre- and post-USPIO-infusion relaxation times (T(2)(∗) and T(2)) were quantified and the correlation between pre- and post-USPIO infusion T(2)* and T(2) values was investigated.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between pre- and post-infusion T(2)* and T(2) values (both respective p-values = 0.005). A significant correlation between T(2)* and T(2) values post-USPIO infusion was observed (r = 0.90, p < 0.001), which indicates USPIO uptake by the aortic wall.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic wall inflammation using USPIO-enhanced MR imaging is feasible. Use of quantitative T(2) and T(2)* pulse sequences provides a quantitative method for assessing USPIO uptake by the aortic wall.

Treatment of a Large Type II Endoleak via Extraperitoneal Dissection and Embolization of a Collateral Vessel Using Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol Copolymer (Onyx)

Type II endoleak is defined as persistent blood flow and pressure within an aneurysmal sac after endovascular deployment of a stent graft from patent aortic branches. This paper describes the simultaneous deployment of an endoluminal graft, with limited extraperitoneal dissection of a collateral vessel and use of an ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer, Onyx, to obliterate a large type II endoleak.

Aortic necks of ruptured abdominal aneurysms dilate more than asymptomatic aneurysms after endovascular repair

BACKGROUND

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is increasingly used. We evaluated if a difference exists in the rate of change of the aortic neck diameter between non-ruptured and ruptured AAAs after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

Details of patients undergoing elective (group I) and emergency (group II) EVAR using Talent stents between October 1999 and September 2005 were reviewed. Top neck diameters were prospectively recorded on the hospital database from computed tomography scans preoperatively and at 1, 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The aortic neck diameter rate of change was calculated for each group.

RESULTS

Endovascular repair was performed on 110 elective and 41 emergency patients, of which 100 (80 male) elective and 29 (26 male) emergency patients were included in this analysis. Mean age was similar in each group. Stents were oversized by 20.9% +/- 13.6% in group I and by 24.7% +/- 16.3% in group II (P = .37). The preoperative mean proximal aortic neck was larger in group II (25.0 +/- 3.3 mm vs 23.5 +/- 2.8 mm; P = .029). The growth rate of the top neck diameter was significantly greater at 12 months (1.48 +/- 2.4 mm/year vs 3.89 +/- 6.24 mm/year; P = .04) and 24 months (.99 +/- 1.1 mm/year vs 2.61 +/- 3.3 mm/year; P = .04) in group II than in group I. A decreasing sac size was found in 68.2% of patients whose neck dilated. The complication rate was similar in each group.

CONCLUSION

Aneurysm necks in patients with ruptured aneurysms are larger and dilate at a greater rate than those with nonruptured aneurysms. The accelerated rate of expansion in some patients must be borne in mind during follow-up and in secondary endovascular interventions and conversion to open surgery.

Factors predictive of early or late aneurysm sac size change following endovascular repair

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between aneurysm sac size change at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months and a set of 10 independent "predictive" variables by using a general linear model analysis.

METHODS

In a multicenter trial, 351 patients received the Zenith tri-modular bifurcated endograft. The predictive variables used for this analysis were endoleak by type, age, gender, smoking status, and the preprocedure variables of maximum aneurysm major diameter, minor neck diameter, proximal neck length, neck plaque/thrombus, and neck shape; and patent inferior mesenteric artery at predischarge. The aneurysm change was calculated as the difference from the predischarge (< or = 7 days of implant) maximum aneurysm major diameter measurement to the maximum aneurysm major diameter measurement at follow-up examination periods of 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. The same 10 predictive variables were used to assess the absolute change in maximum aneurysm minor diameter and aneurysm area. Additionally, the percent change from predischarge was also assessed for the major diameter, minor diameter, and aneurysm area.

RESULTS

None of the independent variables were predictive of absolute sac size change or percent change at 1 month. At 6 months, the presence of an endoleak (P < .01) and preprocedure neck thrombus/plaque (P = .01) were significant predictors of absolute and relative aneurysm size change for all measurements (major diameter, minor diameter, and area) and were more likely to be associated with less sac shrinkage or to have sac growth. Additionally, preoperative maximum aneurysm major diameter was a significant predictor for absolute change in area (P < .01). Larger preprocedure aneurysm diameters were more likely to experience more shrinkage. The significant predictors of size change at 12 months included preprocedure maximum aneurysm major diameter, the presence of endoleak at 12 months, preoperative neck thrombus/plaque, and gender. At 24 months, significant predictors of aneurysm size change included preprocedure maximum aneurysm major diameter, endoleak at 24 months, and preprocedure neck thrombus/plaque. When the longitudinal model was used, the presence of an endoleak, thrombus/plaque within the proximal neck at preprocedure, and preprocedure maximum aneurysm major diameter were found to be significantly related to the size of the maximum aneurysm major diameter over time.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the concept that early and late sac size change following EVAR is influenced by identifiable independent predictive variables.

Long-term outcome after Talent endograft implantation for aneurysms of the abdominal aorta: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The development of newer-generation endografts for the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms has resulted in considerable improvements in clinical performance. However, long-term outcome data are still scarce. To assess long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after use of the Talent stent graft, a retrospective analysis was performed that was based on 165 patients treated with this endograft in Germany between October 1996 and December 1998.

METHODS

Data were collected according to the recommendation of the ad hoc committee for standardized reporting practices in vascular surgery and were evaluated statistically by using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 165 patients were treated with a Talent endograft in 9 German centers before December 31, 1998. Most were asymptomatic (94.5%), male (97.6%), and treated with a bifurcated graft (86.7%). Two patients (1.2%) died within 30 days, and 28 (17%) died during the follow-up period. The cause of death was aneurysm rupture in one case. Survival was 95.4% +/- 1.7% at 1 year, 89% +/- 2.6% at 2 years, 78.1% +/- 3.6% at 5 years, and 76.2% +/- 4.1% at 7 years. Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists grade IV had a significantly lower survival rate (24.9%) than those classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists grade II and III (91.9% and 77.3%). During a mean follow-up period of 53.2 +/- 20.1 months (range, 1-84 months), 47 secondary procedures were performed in 31 patients (18.8%). Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a freedom from secondary intervention of 94.7% +/- 1.8%, 81.7% +/- 3.3%, and 77.4% +/- 3.6% at 1, 3, and 7 years, respectively. The reason for secondary treatment was endograft thrombosis in 10 patients (6.1%), persisting primary endoleak in 9 (5.5%), late secondary endoleak in 6 (3.6%), graft migration in 3 (1.8%), aneurysm rupture in 2 (1.2%), and graft infection in 1 (0.6%). Device migration (> or =10 mm) occurred in seven patients (4.2%). Other graft changes, such as graft kinking (n = 4; 2.4%), fracture of metallic stents (n = 2; 1.2%), erosion of the longitudinal bar (n = 2; 1.2%), or modular component separation (n = 1; 0.6%), were rare. Follow-up computed tomographic imaging revealed a decrease of the maximum aneurysm sac diameter (>5 mm) in 106 (64.2%) patients and an increase in 14 (8.5%) patients. The mean aneurysm diameter significantly decreased (P < .001). Of the factors recorded at baseline, only endoleaks showed a significant correlation with the risk of aneurysm increase during follow-up (P < .001). Adverse anatomy (neck diameter >28 mm, neck length <15 mm, and '5 patent aortic branches) did not adversely influence the aneurysm shrinkage rate, the risk for a secondary procedure, or the clinical success rate. A significantly higher rate of clinical success (P < .05) was observed in patients older than 65 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of the Talent endograft device is a safe and effective alternative to open surgery for exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm. In comparison with first-generation grafts, the device showed superior durability for as long as 5 to 7 years after implantation. Even if prototypes of the Talent device were implanted in this study, the graft was also successfully used in most patients, even in those with adverse anatomy. Because improvements of the endograft have been made to address connecting bar breaks, a lower incidence of graft limb occlusion can be expected in the future.

Pain and Quality of Life Assessment after Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Patients at Low Risk

PURPOSE

To compare functional autonomy, quality of life (QOL), and pain control after endovascular and open repair (OR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients with a low surgical risk profile and anatomic compatibility for stent-graft therapy were randomized to receive OR or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Technical and clinical success as well as mortality were assessed in both groups and compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Functional autonomy and QOL were assessed by Karnofsky score and Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Pain control was assessed by a numeric rating scale and Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire. QOL outcomes by means of the SF-36 and pain questionnaires were compared with use of mixed-effects models for repeated-measures analysis.

RESULTS

All procedures were technically successful in both groups. Three late clinical failures requiring surgical conversion or repeated intervention were observed in the EVAR group and one was observed in the OR group. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of functional autonomy or QOL. No difference in pain level was evident during the early postoperative period, whereas the pain level was lower in the OR group after 1 month. Opioid analgesic drug consumption was significantly greater in the OR group during the postoperative period. Mean hospitalization duration was shorter in the EVAR group than in the OR group (4.5 days +/- 2.4 vs 11.5 days +/- 8.1; P= .001).

CONCLUSION

EVAR has no advantage over OR in patients at low risk in terms of functional autonomy, QOL, and pain control. However, EVAR was associated with shorter hospitalization durations compared with OR.

Pulsatile Wall Motion (PWM) Measurements after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Exclusion are not Useful in the Classification of Endoleak

The pulsatile wall motion (PWM) of AAA is reduced after endovascular stent-graft placement. The purpose of this study was to identify whether PWM after endografting was useful in the classification of endoleak.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

162 patients treated with EVAR underwent pre- and post-operative PWM assessment with ultrasonography. Follow-up was 1-9 years. 111 patients had well-excluded aneurysms, three patients had enlarging aneurysms without any recognizable endoleak (endotension), 16 had type I, 31 had type II and 1 had type III endoleak.

RESULTS

The PWM was reduced from about 1mm pre-operatively to 0.24 mm post-operatively in well-excluded aneurysms. PWM remained stable during follow-up. Type I endoleak was associated with moderately reduced PWM (proximal endoleak 0.79 mm and distal 0.32 mm). PWM in patients with type II endoleak was higher (0.32 mm) post-operatively (p=0.002) compared to well-excluded aneurysms.

CONCLUSION

PWM is permanently reduced after endografting. The smallest reduction in PWM was in patients with type II endoleaks. However, the overlap between the groups does not allow reliable identification of patients having endoleak with PWM-measurements.

Device Migration after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Experience with a Talent Stent-Graft

PURPOSE

Device migration (DM) may cause late failure after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Computed tomography (CT) scans following EVAR were reviewed to establish the frequency of DM and whether it can be predicted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients underwent EVAR with a Talent stent-graft with suprarenal fixation. CT with a fixed protocol was performed at regular intervals. Patient demographics, risk factors, procedure details, and follow-up events were reviewed. Two observers, blinded to each other, reviewed axial images and mutliplanar reformats of the CT scans. DM was defined as a change of > or = 10 mm in the distance between a reference vessel (celiac axis/superior mesenteric artery) and the proximal device. Follow-up was performed for a minimum of 2 years (mean, 3 years; range, 2-5 years).

RESULTS

DM was detected in six of 38 patients (15.8%) by 2 years. There were no new cases of migration in the 19 patients at 3 years but one new case in the six patients at 4 years (16.6%). Mean migration over 2 years was 4.8 mm +/- 4.2 mm. One patient with DM developed a type I endoleak that required reintervention. This patient developed a further endoleak and died following surgery for rupture. Top neck enlargement was the only predictive factor identified, present in 71% of patients with DM (P = .056).

CONCLUSION

DM occurred in a small proportion of patients; closer follow-up intervals may be necessary in patients with short/enlarging proximal necks.

Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using 3 Commercially Available Devices:Midterm Results

PURPOSE

To report the early and midterm results of 3 commercially available stent-grafts for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) exclusion.

METHODS

Since fall 1999, 151 patients (137 men; mean age 74 years, range 54-88) have undergone AAA repair using 88 Ancure, 46 AneuRx, and 17 Excluder stent-grafts in elective procedures. All patients were followed clinically and underwent postoperative duplex ultrasound and/or computed tomographic angiography, which was repeated every 6 months.

RESULTS

The mean overall follow-up was 17 months (range 1-46). Initial technical failure was 3% (3/88) for Ancure versus 0% for AneuRx and Excluder. Primary endoleak occurred in 8% (7/88) of the Ancure patients versus 22% (10/46) for AneuRx and 6% (1/17) for Excluder (p=NS). Early (30-day) graft thrombosis (2/151, 1%) was seen only in the Ancure group. The perioperative complication rates (excluding endoleak and fever) were 22% (19/ 88) for Ancure, 15% (7/46) for AneuRx, and 0% for Excluder (p=NS). There was only 1 (0.7%) perioperative death in the series (Ancure patient). More ancillary procedures were performed in the Ancure group (p<0.05). Postoperatively, the size of the AAA decreased or remained unchanged in 76% for Ancure patients versus 75% for AneuRx and 64% for Excluder (p=NS). The incidences of late endoleak were 6% for Ancure, 2% for AneuRx, and 0% for Excluder (p=NS). The freedom from late endoleak at 3 years was 88% for Ancure and 97% for AneuRx (100% at 1 year for Excluder). Survival rates were similar. No AAA rupture was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ancure device has slightly higher overall perioperative complications and early technical failure than AneuRx or Excluder. All 3 devices are effective in preventing aneurysm rupture; the overall midterm survival rates, freedom of endoleak, and limb patency are somewhat similar.

Intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair: differences between shrinking, unchanged, and expanding aneurysms with and without endoleaks

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to study intra-aneurysm pressure after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in shrinking, unchanged, and expanding abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with and without endoleaks.

METHODS

Direct intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurement (DISP) by percutaneous translumbar puncture of the AAA under fluoroscopic guidance was performed 46 times during the follow-up of 37 patients (30 men; median age, 73 years [range, 58-82 years]; AAA diameter: median, 60 mm [range, 48-84 mm]). Three patients were included in two different groups because DISP was performed more than once with different indications. Tip-pressure sensors mounted on 0.014-inch guidewires were used for simultaneous measurement of systemic and AAA sac pressures. Mean pressure index (MPI) was calculated as the percentage of mean intra-aneurysm pressure relative to the simultaneous mean intra-aortic pressure.

RESULTS

Median MPI was 19% in shrinking (11 patients), 30% in unchanged (10 patients), and 59% in expanding (9 patients) aneurysms without endoleaks. Pulse pressure was also higher in expanding (10 mm Hg) compared with shrinking (2 mm Hg; P <.0001) AAAs. Four of the nine patients with expanding AAAs underwent five repeated DISPs later in the follow-up, and MPIs were consistently elevated. Seven of the 10 patients with unchanged AAAs without endoleaks underwent further computed tomography follow-up after DISP; 2 expanded (MPI, 47%-63%), 4 shrank (MPI, 21%-30%), and 1 remained unchanged (MPI, 14%). Type II endoleaks (6 patients, 7 DISPs) were associated with wide range of MPI (22%-92%). Successful endoleak embolization (n = 4) resulted in pressure reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurement is an important adjunctive for EVAR evaluation, possibly allowing early detection of failures. High pressure is associated with AAA expansion and low pressure with shrinkage. Type II endoleaks can be responsible for AAA pressurization, and successful embolization appears to result in pressure reduction.

Assessment of Automatic Vessel Tracking Techniques in Preoperative Planning of Transluminal Aortic Stent Graft Implantation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate automatic vessel tracking techniques in the course of preoperative planning prior to transluminal aortic endograft implantation by comparing accuracy, reproducibility, and postprocessing time with source image and volume-rendered analysis methods.

METHODS

Multislice computed tomography datasets of 5 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms were preoperatively examined, performing volumetric analysis of diameter and position of renal artery orifices, aneurysmal neck, maximal aneurysmal extension, aortic bifurcation, and iliac arteries and bifurcation. Analysis was realized by utilizing transverse datasets, volume rendering, and automated vessel tracking strategies (MxView, Philips, Best, The Netherlands). Measurement techniques were evaluated by 2 independent readers 3 times for each patient and measurement modality. Statistical analysis evaluated accuracy of the measurements and intra- and interobserver reliability. Postprocessing time was documented.

RESULTS

Using transverse source datasets, intraobserver reliability ranged from 0.49 to 0.58. Intraobserver reliability improved to 0.7 to 0.98 when volume-rendered datasets were evaluated. Interobserver variability for transverse and volume-rendered datasets ranged from 0.49 to 0.76 and 0.70 to 0.96, respectively. Automated vessel tracking datasets did not demonstrate any intra- or interobserver variability. Based on transverse datasets, the length and diameter of iliac arteries and location and diameter of the aneurysmal neck were measured as statistically different in all cases in contrast to volume rendering and automated segmentation techniques. Postprocessing time consumption for measurements based on transverse, volume-rendered, and automated tracking segmentation datasets averaged 3.32 minutes, 25.43 minutes, and 2.24 minutes, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative measurements improve significantly if datasets are evaluated based on volume-rendering techniques. This time-consuming procedure can be shortened, while further reducing observer variability, with automatic segmentation techniques.

Variable sac behavior after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: analysis of core laboratory data

OBJECTIVES

The behavior of the aneurysm sac after endovascular grafting has been the subject of significant speculation. The importance of sac behavior is manifested by the correlation between aneurysm size or size change and risk for rupture, and potentially further extrapolated to define the need for secondary intervention. This study was undertaken to define graft-specific differences and the effect of endoleak on sac remodeling.

METHODS

Core laboratory data were obtained for three US Phase II clinical trials. Patients were included if they met anatomic inclusion criteria and underwent placement of the latest version of a bifurcated endovascular prosthesis. Unsupported Dacron (Ancure), supported Dacron (Zenith), and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Excluder) grafts were evaluated. Digitized images were electronically assessed for aneurysm size (area, maximum, minimum diameter) with National Institutes of Health Image software. Two blinded reviewers analyzed each radiographic study to ensure accurate image selection and establish the presence or absence of endoleak. A third reviewer adjudicated discrepancies. chi(2) analysis and mixed nonlinear modeling were used to analyze the results.

RESULTS

Of 1506 patients evaluated, 723 (227 Ancure, 343 Excluder, 153 Zenith) met inclusion criteria for the study. Mean follow-up was 23.2 months (Ancure, 31.3 months; Excluder, 19.6 months; Zenith, 19.3 months). The incidence of any endoleak was 39.1% (Ancure, 58.1%; Excluder, 34.7%; Zenith, 20.9%; P <.001). Type of prosthesis, presence or absence of endoleak, and baseline size were determinants of rate of aneurysm shrinkage. Reduction in sac size was greatest with the Zenith graft, followed by the Ancure and Excluder grafts. Presence of endoleak had a moderating effect on rate of sac shrinkage with the Zenith and Ancure grafts; however, sac size increased in the presence of endoleak with the Excluder graft. Finally, baseline size was positively correlated with rate of aneurysm shrinkage.

CONCLUSIONS

The behavior of the aneurysm sac depends on the type of prosthesis, presence or absence of endoleak, and baseline size of the sac. Differential sac behavior must be considered when determining the need for secondary interventions, timing follow-up studies, and assessing success or failure of endovascular repair.

Aneurysm enlargement following endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and significance of aneurysm enlargement, with or without treatment, in relation to the primary end points of rupture, surgical conversion, aneurysm-related death, and survival following endovascular repair.

METHOD

Aneurysm (AAA) size changes and clinical outcome of all patients treated from 1997 through 1998 during the Phase II AneuRx multicenter clinical trial of endovascular AAA repair were reviewed. Aneurysm dimensions and the presence or absence of endoleak were determined by an independent core laboratory, with enlargement or shrinkage defined as a diameter change of 5 mm or more compared with baseline.

RESULTS

Among 383 patients (89% men, 11% women, age 73 +/- 9 years), with a mean device implant time of 36 +/- 11 months (median = 39 months), aneurysm diameter decreased from 5.7 +/- 1.0 at baseline to 5.2 +/- 1.0 at 3 years (P =.0001). A total of 46 patients (12%) experienced AAA enlargement, 199 patients (52%) had no change in AAA diameter, and 138 patients (36%) had a decrease in AAA diameter of 5 mm or more. Significant risk factors for enlargement included age (enlargement patients were 4 years older on average than patients with aneurysms that decreased in size; P =.002) and the presence of an endoleak (P <.001). Among patients with endoleak at any time, 17% had aneurysm enlargement, whereas only 2% of patients without endoleak had aneurysm enlargement (P <.001). Patients with enlargement were more likely to undergo secondary endovascular procedures and surgical conversions (P <.001). Twenty patients (43%) with enlargement underwent treatment, and 26 patients were untreated. There were two deaths following elective surgical conversion and one death in a patient with untreated enlargement and a type I endoleak. Three aneurysms ruptured: one with enlargement, one with no change, and one with a decrease in aneurysm size; all three aneurysms were larger than 6.5 cm. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that freedom from rupture at 3 years was 98% with enlargement, 99% with no change, and 99% with decrease in AAA size (log-rank test, not significant). Freedom from AAA death at 3 years was 93% in patients with enlargement, 99% in no increase, and 99% in decrease (P =.005). Survival at 3 years was 86% with increase, 82% with no change, and 93% with decrease (P =.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Aneurysm enlargement following endovascular repair was not associated with an increased risk of aneurysm rupture or decrease in patient survival during a 3-year observation period. Aneurysm size rather than enlargement may be a more meaningful predictor of rupture. Close follow-up and a high re-intervention rate (43%) may account for the low risk of rupture in patients with enlargement. The long-term significance of aneurysm enlargement following endovascular repair remains to be determined.

Volume regression of abdominal aortic aneurysms and its relation to successful endoluminal exclusion

OBJECTIVES

Evaluating the success of endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is frequently based on diameter measurements and determining the presence of endoleaks. The use of three-dimensional volumetric data and observation of morphologic changes in the aneurysm and device have been proposed to be more appropriate for postdeployment surveillance. The purpose of this study was to analyze the long-term volumetric and morphologic data of 161 patients who underwent endovascular AAA exclusion and to assess the utility of volume measurements for determining successful AAA repair.

METHODS

Patients with spiral computed tomography scans obtained preoperatively, within the first postoperative month, at 6 months, and annually thereafter, were included in this analysis. Computerized interactive three-dimensional reconstruction of each AAA scan was performed. Total aneurysm sac volume was measured at each time interval (mean preoperative volume 169.0 +/- 78.5 mL), and the significance of volume changes was determined by mixed linear modeling, a form of repeated measures analysis, to account for longitudinal data clustered at the individual level. Sixty-two patients (38%) developed endoleaks at some time during follow-up-15 type I leaks, 45 type II leaks, and 2 type III leaks. The patients with type I and type III leaks were treated with cuffs, and the type II leaks were treated either with observation, side-branch embolization, or required open conversion.

RESULTS

Aneurysm sac volume increased slightly at 1-month follow-up (+3.3%), and then decreased steadily to -12.9% at 5 years (P <.0001). This effect remained unchanged after controlling for the three device types used in our study population. Patients who did not exhibit an endoleak (n = 99) showed a significant decrease in aneurysm volume across the entire follow-up duration when compared with those who did exhibit an endoleak (n = 62) (P <.0001). The presence of a 10% or greater decrease in volume at 6 months demonstrated a sensitivity of 64%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 95%, a negative predictive value of 62%, and an accuracy of 75% for predicting primary clinical success defined by successful deployment of the device; freedom from aneurysm- or procedure-related death; freedom from endoleak, rupture, migration, or device malfunction; or conversion to open repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Volumetric analysis may be used to predict successful endoluminal exclusion of AAAs. Volume regression appears to be device-independent and should be expected in most clinically successful cases. The presence of volume increases in the first 6 months is suspicious for an endoleak that is pressurizing the aneurysm sac and heralds the need for closer evaluation and possible intervention. A volume decrease of 10% or greater at 6 months and continuing regression over time is associated with successful endovascular repair.

Mechanical properties of various z-stent designs: an endovascular stent-grafting perspective

PURPOSE

To comparatively assess the mechani-cal behavior of various clinically relevant Z-stent designs.

METHODS

A total of 16 Z-stents of original, biliary, spiral, and double-skirted designs (n=4 for each) were constructed using similar specifications for all. Stents were then evaluated for stiffness, snap opening force (SOF), flexibility, and displacement force using a novel tensiometer. Differences among the stents were determined using statistical methods. Stents explanted from dog aorta after a mean follow-up of 13 months were examined under a scanning electron microscope for surface defects.

RESULTS

Forces required for about 50% reduction in diameter were 1.88 +/- 0.16 N, 3.81 +/- 0.21 N, 2.76 +/- 0.22 N, and 3.35 +/- 0.19 N for original, biliary, spiral, and skirted designs, respectively. Differences among the four designs were statistically significant at almost all points of measurement (P < 0.0001). Biliary and skirted designs showed higher SOF values in the early measurements. Stents explanted from dog aorta after a mean duration of 13 months showed no obvious corrosion or breakage in the wire struts.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences exist among the various Z-stent designs in terms of their mechanical properties. Understanding them should help to select the appropriate stent for a given lesion. 316L stainless steel shows a favorable long-term tissue interaction.

Technique and results of transfemoral superselective coil embolization of type II lumbar endoleak

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to describe the technique of transfemoral superselective coil embolization of type II endoleak and its influence on abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter.

METHODS

Over 23 months, 104 aortic stent grafts were deployed to exclude abdominal aortic aneurysms, at an academic medical center. Increase in aneurysm diameter and perigraft findings on contrast material-enhanced computed tomography scans prompted arteriography. Procedures were performed solely by vascular surgeons in a surgical angiography suite. In 7 patients aneurysm access was via the iliolumbar branches of the internal iliac artery, and in 1 patient aneurysm access was via the inferior mesenteric artery through the arc of Riolan from the superior mesenteric artery. Coaxial catheters were placed to gain access to the aneurysm (8F to 5F to 3F, or 5F to 3F). A 3F Tracker18 was the most distal catheter through which an assortment of 0.018 microcoils were deployed within the aneurysm, and the origin of the feeding vessels when possible.

RESULTS

Aneurysm diameter increased 0.48 +/- 0.2 cm over 10.8 +/- 5 months before superselective coil embolization. In 6 of 8 patients superselective coil embolization embolization resulted in a mean decrease in aneurysm diameter of 1.3 +/- 1.2 cm over 9 +/- 3.2 months. Failure was presumed due to inability to reach the aneurysm sac in 1 patient and was associated with oral anticoagulation in 1 other patient.

CONCLUSION

Proper identification of the source of type II endoleak and its complete occlusion, combined with aneurysm sac coiling, may result in prompt decrease in aneurysm size.

Does gender influence outcome of AAA endoluminal repair?

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that female patients have a less favourable outcome of endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Yet, data on stratified per gender are lacking.

METHODS

We reviewed our prospective database of 402 endografts over a 4-year period and the peri- and postoperative course in the 25 (6%) female patients was compared with the 377 (94%) male patients. Median follow-up was 24 months (range 1-56 months). Logistic regression analysis was performed to test the effect of five confounding variables (gender, age, ASA grade IV, EUROSTAR class D or E, AAA diameter) on failure of AAA exclusion.

RESULTS

There were no perioperative deaths in the female group and 5 (1.3%) in the male group (p = 0.8). Major perioperative morbidity occurred in 17% versus 6% (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.2-10.6; p = 0.026). There were 1 (4%) and 5 (1%) conversions to open repair in the female and male groups, respectively (p = 0.3). Late failure of AAA exclusion occurred in 5 (21%) and 26 (7%) patients, respectively (p = 0.03). Of the five variables examined for their influence on failure of AAA exclusion, female gender (hazard ratio 4.42; 95% CI 1.4-13.4; p = 0.009) and AAA diameter (hazard ratio 1.05; 95% CI 1.009-1.09; p = 0.017), were positive independent predictors of late failure of AAA exclusion on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Endoluminal AAA repair in female patients appear associated with a less favorable outcome when compared to their male counterparts. These data may be taken into consideration when endoluminal AAA repair is suggested to a female patient.

Predictive factors and clinical consequences of proximal aortic neck dilatation in 230 patients undergoing abdominal aorta aneurysm repair with self-expandable stent-grafts

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have suggested that proximal aortic neck dilatation (AND) is a frequent event after balloon-expandable endografting. Yet few data are available on AND after repair with self-expandable stent grafts. To investigate incidence, predictive factors, and clinical consequences of AND, computed tomography (CT) scans obtained at intervals during follow-up of 230 patients who had undergone endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with self-expandable stents were reviewed.

SUBJECTS

Between April 1997 and March 2001, 318 patients underwent endoluminal AAA repair with a self-expandable endograft at our unit. CT scans obtained at 1 and 12 months after surgery and yearly thereafter were prospectively stored in a computer imaging data base. Two hundred thirty patients were available for minimum 1-year assessment. Two vascular surgeons with tested interobserver agreement reviewed 686 CT scans. Diameter of the proximal aortic neck was measured as the minor axis of the first CT section that contained at least half of the proximal portion of the endograft. For endografts with suprarenal attachment the first scan below the lowest renal artery was considered. Diameter change of 3 mm or more between the CT scan at 1 month and subsequent evaluations was defined as AND. Nine possible independent predictors of AND were analyzed with Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 24 months (range, 12-54 months). In 2 patients, AAA ruptured during follow-up. CT scans for 65 patients (28%) showed AND. Thirteen patients with AND (5.6%) underwent repeat intervention, including positioning of the proximal cuff in 8 patients and late conversion to open repair in five patients. Of the nine variables examined with multivariate analysis, only 3, ie, presence of neck circumferential thrombus (hazard ratio [HR], 2.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-5.01; P =.008), preoperative proximal neck diameter (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07-135; P =.001), and preoperative AAA diameter (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06; P =.046) were positive independent predictors of AND, whereas the other 6, ie, neck angulation more than 60 degrees, neck length, suprarenal fixation, oversizing more than 15%, endoleak at 30 days, and increased AAA diameter during follow-up, showed no significant correlation. Probability of AND at 48 months was 59 +/- 6.1 at analysis with the Kaplan-Meier method.

CONCLUSIONS

AND is a frequent sequela of endoluminal repair in the mid-term. Severe AND developed in a small percentage of our patients, compromising integrity of AAA repair. Patients with large aneurysms and aortic necks and patients with aortic neck circumferential thrombus are at high risk for aortic neck enlargement after endoluminal repair of AAA.

Detection of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of unenhanced and delayed helical CT acquisitions

PURPOSE

To assess unenhanced and delayed phase computed tomographic (CT) images combined with arterial phase images for detecting endoleaks after endovascular treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT scans were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of endoleaks after endovascular treatment of AAAs in 33 patients with endoleak (positive group) and 40 patients without evidence of endoleak or aneurysm enlargement (negative group). All patients underwent unenhanced and biphasic contrast material-enhanced CT. The CT scans were reviewed in the following combinations: (a) arterial phase and unenhanced scans (uniphasic/unenhanced set), (b) arterial and delayed phase scans only (biphasic set), and (c) arterial and delayed phase scans with unenhanced scans (complete set). Each set was reviewed by two radiologists blinded to the diagnosis of endoleak. Findings were recorded as positive, negative, or indeterminate for endoleak.

RESULTS

Within the positive group, endoleaks were diagnosed with the uniphasic/unenhanced, biphasic, and complete image sets in 30 (91%), 32 (97%), and 33 (100%) patients, respectively. With the uniphasic/unenhanced set, three (9%) endoleaks (seen only on delayed phase images) were missed. With the biphasic set, one (3%) endoleak was interpreted as indeterminate. Within the negative group, uniphasic/unenhanced, biphasic, and complete image sets were negative for endoleaks in 100%, 80%, and 100% of patients, respectively. With the biphasic set, results were indeterminate in 20% of cases.

CONCLUSION

A delayed CT acquisition enables detection of additional endoleaks, while an unenhanced acquisition helps eliminate indeterminate results. Thus, both acquisitions contribute to accurate diagnosis of endoleaks when combined with an arterial phase acquisition.

Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery

Decision-making in regard to elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) requires careful assessment of factors that influence rupture risk, operative mortality, and life expectancy. Individualized consideration of these factors in each patient is essential, and the role of patient preference is of increasing importance. It is not possible or appropriate to recommend a single threshold diameter for intervention which can be generalized to all patients. Based upon the best available current evidence, 5.5 cm is the best threshold for repair in an "average" patient. However, subsets of younger, good-risk patients or aneurysms at higher rupture risk may be identified in whom repair at smaller sizes is justified. Conversely, delay in repair until larger diameter may be best for older, higher-risk patients, especially if endovascular repair is not possible. Intervention at diameter <5.5 cm appears indicated in women with AAA. If a patient has suitable anatomy, endovascular repair may be considered, and it is most advantageous for older, higher-risk patients or patients with a hostile abdomen or other technical factors that may complicate standard open repair. With endovascular repair, perioperative morbidity and recovery time are clearly reduced; however, there is a higher reintervention rate, increased surveillance burden, and a small but ongoing risk of AAA rupture. There is no justification at present for different indications for endovascular repair, such as earlier treatment of smaller AAA. Until long-term outcome of endoluminal repair is better defined and results of randomized trials available, the choice between endovascular and open repair will continue to rely heavily on patient preference.

Intra-aneurysm pressure measurements in successfully excluded abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair

PURPOSE

This study was performed to determine intra-aneurysm sac pressure of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular aneurysm repair in patients considered successfully treated with aneurysm shrinkage and absence of endovascular leakage.

METHODS

In 10 patients with median aneurysm shrinkage of 12 mm (range, 7 to 22 mm) and median follow-up of 19 months (range, 14-43 months), a percutaneous translumbar intra-aneurysm pressure measurement was made with a 0.014-inch guide wire-mounted pressure sensor and compared with intra-aortic pressure.

RESULTS

Median intra-aneurysm systolic/diastolic/mean pressure was 19/18/19 (range, 17-35/13-33/17-31) compared with median intra-aortic pressure of 135/75/99 (range, 126-199/60-95/84-129). Mean intra-aneurysm pressure was 20% of mean intra-aortic pressure (range, 13%-33%). Pulsatility was negligible.

CONCLUSION

Successful endovascular aneurysm repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm results in considerable pressure reduction in the aneurysm sac. The ability to monitor intra-aneurysm pressure provides hemodynamic information within the sac, which can be used in conjunction with imaging to determine whether a secondary intervention is warranted.

Endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm prevents enlargement of the proximal neck: a 9-year life-table and 5-year longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

Endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is predicated on stability of the proximal neck of the aneurysm. Reports on morphologic changes in the proximal neck after endoluminal repair of AAA have thus far been limited in duration to 3 years or less. The aim of this study was to document changes in diameter of the proximal neck of AAA in a group of patients who had undergone endoluminal repair between 5 and 9 years previously.

METHODS

Between May 1992 and December 1996, 61 patients with AAA were treated with endoluminal repair by the senior author. The following patients were excluded from the study group: those requiring primary conversion to open repair at the original operation (n = 8), those with false aneurysm (n = 1), and those with dissection in the proximal neck (n = 1). Fifty-one patients (48 men and three women) with a mean age of 71 years remained in the study group. The endoprostheses used were modified Parodi (n = 4), Endovascular Technologies (n = 14), White-Yu (n = 10), Stentor/Vanguard (n = 21), and Bard 1996 prototype (n = 2). Morphologic changes in the proximal aortic neck were studied with contrast computed tomographic scan with the methodology recommended by the Ad Hoc Committee for Standardized Reporting Practices for Endovascular AAA Repair (revised version). The maximum transverse diameter of the proximal neck was measured 1 cm below the most inferior renal artery. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed showing the proportion of patients at risk with a demonstrated enlargement of the neck at each interval of time compared with the predischarge computed tomographic scan. A longitudinal study of morphologic changes in the proximal aortic neck was also undertaken in 28 patients with successful endoluminal repair who survived 5 years.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier curve showed a probability of no dilatation of the proximal neck of 0.943 at 7 years after endoluminal AAA repair. Of 28 patients with 5 years of follow-up after discharge, only two had increases in the diameter of the proximal neck greater than 2 mm. The endograft in both patients had undergone migration before any proximal neck dilation. A paired t test showed that the overall average increase of 0.4 mm (standard error, 0.3 mm) in these 28 patients was not statistically significant (P =.23).

CONCLUSION

A high probability (0.943 at 7 years) exists of no enlargement of the proximal neck of AAA after endoluminal repair. We hypothesize that endografts positioned correctly immediately below the renal arteries protect the proximal neck from dilatation in a manner that does not occur after open repair of AAA.

Conformational changes associated with proximal seal zone failure in abdominal aortic endografts

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become a popular treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This study examines conformational changes in the infrarenal aortas of patients in whom proximal seal zone failures (PSF) developed after EVAR.

METHODS

All 189 patients with aortic endograft underwent routine post-EVAR computed tomographic scan surveillance. Patients identified with proximal type I endoleaks, type III endoleaks, or proximal component separation without demonstrable endoleak underwent three-dimensional reconstruction of the computed tomographic scans from which measurements of the migration, length, volume, and angulation of the infrarenal aorta were made.

RESULTS

Five patients (3%) had PSF develop, four of whom had aortic extender cuffs. Although changes in the AAA volume and aortic neck angle were slight or variable, the mean AAA length increased 34 mm and the mean aortic body angulation increased 17 degrees (P =.03 and.01, respectively). Lengthening and migration caused proximal component separation in four patients, with concomitant migration in two patients. Two patients underwent endovascular repair, two patients needed explantation of the endograft, and one patient awaits endovascular repair. Proximal component separation and type III endoleak recurred in one patient and were repaired with a custom-fitted graft.

CONCLUSION

PSF of aortic endografts is associated with proximal angulation and lengthening of the infrarenal aorta. These findings reinforce the importance of proper initial deployment to minimize the need for aortic extender cuffs, which pose a risk of late endoleak development.

Intra-aneurysm sac pressure--the holy grail of endoluminal grafting of AAA

OBJECTIVES

To relate intra-aneurysm sac pressure during endoluminal AAA repair to early and late endoleak, as well as to the aneurysm size upon follow-up.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical investigation.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

In 46 patients who had their AAAs treated by a stent graft (group I), intra-operative pressure measurement was performed (aorta uni-iliac stent grafts: 25 cases, bifurcated stent grafts: 21 cases). In 18 patients with open repair (group II) flow in the inferior mesenteric artery, and the pressure in the aneurysm sac was measured, before and after aortic and iliac cross clamping. Values are given in median with range.

RESULTS

In group I, complete exclusion of AAA (no endoleak on intra-operative control angiogram) resulted in a statistically significant decrease in mean sac pressure from 74 (55-101) to 47 (4-104) mmHg. Pulse pressure reduced from 67 (34-103) to 8 (0-74) mmHg. In 11 patients a proximal type I endoleak was sealed by balloon modeling, after which the mean sac pressure reduced from 63 (14-91) to 52 (4-74) mmHg (n.s. versus patients with primary seal). Intra-operative pressure did not correlate with change in AAA diameter during twelve months follow-up. In group II, cross clamping of the proximal aorta significantly reduced mean sac pressure to 32 (21-55) mmHg, and the pulse pressure to 0 (0-13) mmHg (p < 0.05). Subsequent cross clamping of the iliac arteries did not significantly change the pressures.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of intra-aneurysm sac pressure can help to detect and treat endoleaks during endoluminal grafting. However, the intra-operative sac pressure did not predict the fate of aneurysm during follow up. Compared to open repair of AAA, the sac pressure after endoluminal grafting remains significantly higher, in relation to pulse pressure.

Does the presence of an iliac aneurysm affect outcome of endoluminal AAA repair? An analysis of 336 cases

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the presence of an iliac aneurysm compromises outcome of endovascular exclusion of AAA and to ascertain the fate of the iliac aneurysmal sac.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 1997 and March 2001, data on 336 consecutive patients undergoing endovascular repair for AAA were entered in a prospective database. Suitability for endovascular repair was assessed by preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography. A maximum common iliac artery (CIA) diameter > or = 20 mm was defined as iliac aneurysm. Patients with and without iliac aneurysms were compared to early (immediate conversion or perioperative death) and late failure (increase in aneurysm diameter or persisting graft-related endoleak, or late AAA rupture or conversion).

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients (18%) had iliac aneurysms, 19 were bilateral, for a total of 78 aneurysmal iliac arteries (median diameter 23 mm; range 20-50 mm). A distal seal was achieved by landing in 33 external iliac arteries, in 20 ectatic CIAs, and in 25 normal CIAs. Operating time differed significantly between patients with and without CIA aneurysms (153 +/- 71 vs 123 +/- 55 min, p = 0.0001), whereas no statistically significant differences were found with respect to early and late failure (2% vs 3%, p = 0.5 and 14% vs 8%, p = 0.11, respectively). There were no cases of buttock or colon necrosis. At a median follow-up of 14 months (range 0-46; i.q.r. 7-27 months) common iliac diameter decreased > or = 2 mm in 49 cases, remained stable in 25, and increased > or = 2 mm in 3.

CONCLUSION

The presence of iliac aneurysm rendered endoluminal AAA repair more complex but did not affect feasibility and long-term outcome of the procedure. In our experience internal iliac exclusion was never associated with significant morbidity. These data may be useful when considering endovascular repair in high-risk patients with challenging anatomy.

Imaging of aortic stent-grafts and endoleaks

Although the technical success of stent-graft implantation is established and relatively safe, data on the long-term safety and efficacy of endovascular repair are just emerging. Because several late complications of aortic stent-graft placement have been observed, life-long follow-up remains essential. Imaging methods form an integral part of every stage of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. The current imaging strategy should include initial plain films, CT angiography, and color-coded Duplex sonography. Plain films are an excellent means to detect migration, angulation, kinking, and structural changes of the stent mesh, including material fatigue, at follow-up. Helical CT angiography is considered a potentially revolutionary method for the noninvasive complete postprocedural assessment of aortic sten-grafting. Current data justify the use of biphasic C angiography as the postprocedural imaging technique of choice in most patients [118]. Ultrasound offers the advantages of low cost and lack of radiation exposure. High-quality ultrasound reliably excludes endoleaks in patients after stent-grafting of AAAs. There is a substantial variability, however, in measuring the diameter of aneurysm sacs; thus, confirmation using an alternative study is prudent in cases that demonstrate a significant change in size during follow-up. MR angiography serves as an attractive alternative to CT angiography in patients with impaired renal function or known allergic reaction to iodinated contrast media. With current techniques, the visualization of aortic stent-grafts (with the exception of stainless-steel-based devices) is sufficient with MR angiography. There is evidence that MR imaging is superior to CT angiography in detecting small type 2 endoleaks or for excluding retrograde perfusion in patients with suspected endotension. The role of diagnostic catheter angiography is limited to assessment of vascular pathways in equivocal cases or for suspected endotension. Currently, a consensus view about postprocedural management after aortic stent-graft implantation is lacking. The authors propose performing a baseline CT angiography at discharge and a biphasic CT angiography and Duplex ultrasound scan at three months. In patients with no evidence of an endoleak, CT angiography, plain film and Duplex sonography (abdomen) should be repeated every year after endovascular repair. If an endoleak is present at follow-up, immediate appropriate treatment should be initiated.

The sac shrinking process after EAR does not start immediately in most patients

OBJECTIVE

the aim of this study was to determine the pattern of shrinkage after endovascular aneurysm repair (EAR) using logarithmic, exponential and linear models and to calculate a lag time is present.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

patients with a complete CTA follow-up of 2 years and a primary shrinking aneurysm were included, resulting in a study group of 29 patients. Six functions, logarithmic, exponential and linear, all with and without lag time, were fitted to the thrombus volume obtained from measurements postoperative and after 6, 12 and 24 months. The correlation coefficient was used to determine the association between the calculated and measured values. A correlation coefficient >0.95 was considered a good fit.

RESULTS

a logarithmic model produced the best fits. From the 29 patients, two patients could not be described by any model. The remaining 27 patients could be fitted using a logarithmic function with a correlation coefficient of >0.95 (median 0.99, range 0.95-1.00). Twenty-two of these patients had a lag time (median 63.4 days, range 5.8-252.3). Only five of the initial 44 patients (11%) showed immediate sac shrinkage.

CONCLUSION

almost all shrinkage processes could be described by a logarithmic function. In over 75% of patients a lag time to shrinkage could be calculated. In only a small proportion did the shrinking process start immediately after EAR.

Endovascular aneurysm repair: Magnetic resonance monitoring of histological organization processes in the excluded aneurysm

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to systematically analyze the histopathologic organization processes in excluded aneurysms after endovascular stenting and to develop a noninvasive monitoring method for these processes using MRI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 36 mongrel dogs, autologous aortic aneurysms were created. Endovascular treatment was performed using covered stents. Follow-up was after 1 week, 6 weeks, and 6 months. MRI was performed with T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequences and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences and was repeated after contrast bolus with gadolinium. Histopathologic findings were correlated to signal intensities (SIs) of MRI images. SIs of distinct areas were analyzed and related to the SI of the reference tissue (SI ratio). The histological organization process was gradated in the following 4 classes: class 0, detritus without organization; classes I and II, connective tissue proliferation with increasing fiber synthesis; and class III, dense fibrous connective tissue. The SI ratios of T2-weighted images were significantly reduced from 4.76 in detritus (0) to 1.70 in dense fibrous connective tissue (III) as a function of histopathologic classes. SI ratios of T1-weighted images were reduced from 1.84 (0) to 1.12 (III). Contrast bolus with gadolinium-DTPA showed no change of SI ratio in detritus (0.99) but an increase from 1.12 (I) to 1.70 (III) as organization increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The histological organization of excluded aneurysms can be monitored by MRI. Progressive organization is indicated by decreasing SIs in T2- and an increasing signal increase in T1-weighted images after gadolinium bolus.