Midterm Results of Intentional Celiac Artery Coverage During TEVAR for Type B Aortic Dissection

Clinical outcomes of celiac artery coverage vs preservation during thoracic endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

Adequate proximal and distal seal zones are necessary for successful thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Often, the achievement of an adequate distal seal zone requires celiac artery (CA) coverage by endograft with or without preservation of CA blood flow. The outcomes of CA coverage without its flow preservation were studied only in small case series. This study aims to determine the difference in outcomes between CA coverage with vs without preservation of CA blood flow during TEVAR using a multi-institutional national database.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative database was reviewed for all TEVAR patients distally landing in zone 6. The cohort was divided into TEVAR with vs without CA flow preservation. Demographic, clinical, and perioperative characteristics, as well as postoperative mortality, morbidities, and complications, were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 25,549 reviewed patients, 772 had a distal landing in Zone 6, 212 of which (27.5%) had TEVAR without CA flow preservation, whereas 560 (72.5%) underwent TEVAR with CA flow preservation. Indications for TEVAR were aneurysm in 431 (55.8%), dissection in 247 (32.0%), or other in 94 (12.2%) cases. Patients who underwent TEVAR without CA flow preservation had statistically significantly higher rates of 30-day mortality (11.3% vs 5.9%; P = .010), 30-day disease/treatment-related mortality (8.0% vs 4.3%; P = .039), as well as a tendency of increased intestinal ischemia requiring intervention (1.9% vs 0.5%; P = .077). After adjusting for potential confounders, CA coverage without flow preservation was associated with more than a two-fold increase in the overall 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-5.92; P = .006) and 30-day disease/treatment-related mortality (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.11-6.72; P = .029). In a sub-group analysis based on disease pathology, these results persisted only in the aneurysm group (30-day mortality [OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.01-5.48; P = .047]; 30-day disease/treatment-related mortality [OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.08-7.67; P = .034]), whereas there was no significant association between CA flow preservation status and the endpoints in the dissection subgroup (30-day mortality [OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.22-6.05; P = .856], 30-day disease/treatment-related mortality [OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.16-5.19; P = .911]).

CONCLUSIONS

CA coverage during TEVAR without preservation of its blood flow is associated with significantly higher mortality in patients with aortic aneurysm, but not dissection. In patients with aortic aneurysm, CA flow should be preserved during TEVAR whenever feasible, whereas in patients with dissection, it may be safe to cover CA without preservation of its flow. Prospective studies should be done to confirm these findings and compare the open vs endovascular revascularization techniques on outcomes.

Celiac Artery Coverage During TEVAR for Dissection and Acute Aortic Injury is Not Associated with Worse Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Studies have previously identified increased morbidity and mortality with celiac artery coverage during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aneurysmal disease. This study aimed to delineate the risks associated with celiac artery coverage in all patients undergoing TEVAR for dissection, trauma, or aneurysmal disease.

METHODS

Using the Vascular Quality Initiative database, we identified all patients undergoing TEVAR from 2012 to 2020 and categorized them based on the underlying pathology (aneurysm, dissection, or acute/trauma). Patients were excluded if their endograft was deployed distal to aortic zone 6 or if they had any preoperative/operative celiac revascularization procedure. Univariate, regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed for all 3 groups, focusing on postoperative complications and survival.

RESULTS

There were 8,265 patients who underwent TEVAR over the 8-year study period with 142 (1.7%) having celiac artery coverage during their index procedure. Of those patients, the celiac artery was covered during TEVAR in 1.2% of patients with dissection, 1.3% with aneurysm, and 0.7% with trauma. On unadjusted analysis, celiac artery coverage in TEVAR for aneurysmal disease was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (16% vs. 5%, P < 0.001), 30-day mortality (33% vs. 23%, P = 0.029), any postoperative complication (excluding death) (42% vs. 25%, P < 0.001), and postoperative bowel complication (3% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.003). There were no differences in outcomes for patients treated with celiac coverage versus those without celiac coverage during TEVAR for dissection or trauma on univariate analysis. After risk adjustment, celiac artery coverage remained predictive of worse postoperative outcomes in patients with aneurysmal disease: in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 3.6, confidence interval [CI] 1.8-6.9), 30-day death (OR = 1.6, CI 1.0-2.4), any postoperative complication (OR 2.2, CI 1.4-3.5), and bowel-specific postoperative complication (3.3, CI 1.0-10.8). There were no differences in patient outcomes for those treated with celiac coverage versus those without celiac coverage during TEVAR for dissection or trauma on multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves show a significant difference in overall survival based on pathology, specifically lower survival rates for patients with celiac coverage treated for aneurysmal disease. Cox regression analysis showed that celiac artery coverage for aneurysmal disease was associated with significantly increased hazard ratio affecting overall survival (hazard ratio = 2.6, P < 0.001), but there was no impact on survival in patients who underwent TEVAR with celiac coverage for dissection or trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

Celiac artery coverage for patients with aneurysmal disease was correlated with a significant increase in postoperative morbidity, mortality, and lowers overall survival. However, for patients with dissection or acute/traumatic aortic pathology, celiac artery coverage does not portend worse outcomes.

Safety and Efficacy of Intentional Celiac Artery Coverage in Endovascular Management of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) has emerged as an attractive alternative option in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) diseases, reporting lower morbidity and mortality rates compared with open or hybrid repair. A challenging situation arises when the aneurysm involves the celiac artery (CA), precluding a safe distal landing zone. We investigated the safety and efficacy of CA coverage in the treatment of complex TAAA diseases during endovascular management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The electronic bibliographic sources searched were MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases. Primary outcomes of interest were perioperative and 30-day mortality. Any type of endoleak, mesenteric ischemia, perioperative spinal cord ischemia, and reintervention rates were secondary end points. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Summary statistics of event risks were expressed as proportions and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Ten observational cohort studies published between 2009 and 2020, reporting a total of 175 patients, were eligible for quantitative synthesis. Indications for TEVAR were primary TAAAs in 82% of patients, aortic dissection in 14% of patients, type Ib endoleak after previous endograft deployment in 3% of patients, and penetrating aortic ulcer in 1 patient. Reintervention rate was 9% (95% CI, 4%-20%) and spinal cord ischemia was 7% (95% CI, 4%--12%). Type II endoleak was the predominant type of endoleak in 10% of patients (95% CI, 4%-22%), followed by type I endoleak in 5% of patients (95% CI, 2%-12%) and type III endoleak in 1% (95% CI, 0%-16%) of patients. Mesenteric ischemia occurred in 6% of patients (95% CI, 3%-10%). Thirty-day mortality was 5% (95% CI, 2%-13%) and the pooled estimate for overall mortality was 21% (95% CI, 14%-31%).

CONCLUSIONS

Celiac artery coverage during TEVAR is a challenging but feasible option for the treatment of TAAA diseases, providing acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Demonstration of adequate visceral collateral pathways before definitive CA coverage is the sine quo non for the success of the technique.

Celiac Artery Coverage After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Procedure: A Meta-Analysis of Early and Late Results

BACKGROUND/AIM

Clinical outcomes of celiac artery (CA) coverage during aortic procedures are often contradicting and the fate of this additional maneuver is still unclear. This study summarizes the results of available literature and aims to clarify the impact of CA coverage during thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) in patients with inadequate distal sealing zone.

METHODS

Prospective and retrospective, observational original articles focused on CA coverage during elective/urgent TEVAR for descending thoracic aortic pathology (DTAP) were included. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database were examined to identify articles published from January 2007 to December 2020, according to PRISMA guidelines. Early and late visceral (any sign or symptom reported) and neurological (both transient and permanent) complications were considered as primary outcomes. Onset of any endoleak, type IB endoleak, need of reintervention, and TEVAR-related mortality were considered as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 5618 articles were extracted for analysis and 13 studies were finally included in the synthesis. A total of 178 CAs were covered during 2653 TEVAR (7%). Spinal cord ischemia was 8% (95% CI, 5-14%, I² 0%) Any endoleak and type IB endoleak was observed in 12% (95% CI, 6-21%, I² 17%) and 5% (95% CI, 2-11%, I² 0%), respectively. Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair-related reoperation was necessary in 8% (95% CI, 4-14%, I² 0%), the majority of which (14/18, 78%) performed for distal sealing failure; mortality rate was 9% (95% CI, 5-14%, I² 0%). Out of 178 patients, 168 (94%) were available for follow-up, ranged 12 to 42 months. Visceral complications, any endoleak, and type IB endoleak were identified in 15% (95% CI, 10-23%, I² 45%), 20% (95% CI, 13-29%, I² 8%), and 8% (95% CI, 4-15%, I² 0%), respectively. Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair-related reintervention was required in 8% (95% CI, 4-14%, I² 0%). Mortality rate was 17% (95% CI, 12-25%, I² 4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Celiac artery coverage in DTAP should be regarded as a "bailout" procedure especially in urgent/emergent settings but requires caution in elective cases. Even if transient visceral ischemia is frequent, life-threatening complications are rare. Early and late mortality rates are similar to standard TEVAR although the risk of type IB endoleak and reintervention may be an issue.

Occlusion of the Celiac Artery during Endovascular Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Is associated with Increased Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality

BACKGROUND

Some studies suggest that celiac artery coverage during elective endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair is safe given sufficient collateralization of visceral organ perfusion from the superior mesenteric artery. However, there is concern that celiac artery coverage may lead to increased risk of foregut or spinal cord ischemia with an attendant increased risk of mortality. We sought to investigate rates of bowel ischemia, spinal cord ischemia, and 30-day mortality associated with celiac artery coverage during TEVAR and complex EVAR.

METHODS

The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried for TEVAR and complex EVAR cases from 2012 to 2018. Inclusion criteria included TAAA pathology and endograft extension to aortic zone 6. Patients with aortic rupture, trauma, prior thoracic aortic surgery, known preoperative occlusion of the left subclavian superior mesenteric, or celiac arteries were excluded. Cases with intraoperative celiac artery occlusion (CAO) were compared retrospectively to cases with celiac artery preservation (CAP). Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality and a composite end point of 30-day mortality, spinal cord ischemia (transient or permanent lower extremity neurologic deficit), and bowel ischemia (colonoscopic evidence of ischemia, bloody stools in a patient who dies prior to colonoscopy or laparotomy, or other documented clinical diagnosis). Univariable comparisons were performed using chi-squared tests and Student's t-tests, as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to identify independent predictors of outcome.

RESULTS

There were 628 cases identified for inclusion in the study. Patients undergoing CAO (n = 44) were more likely to be female or to have higher rates of preoperative spinal drain use, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3, low preop hemoglobin, and/or symptomatic presentation, but fewer mean number of aortic zones covered. CAO was associated with higher 30-day mortality (5 of 44, 11%) compared to CAP (23 of 584, 4%), P = 0.039. The composite end point occurred at a significantly greater proportion for those who had CAO (10 of 44, 23%) compared to CAP (53 of 584, 9%, P = 0.008), driven by higher rates of 30-day mortality and bowel ischemia (9% vs. 2%, P = 0.026). By multivariate analysis, CAO was predictive of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-13.8, P = 0.04) and the composite endpoint (OR = 3.0, 95% CI = 1.1-8.5, P = 0.03). Increasing procedure time was also associated with 30-day mortality (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1-1.7, P < 0.001) and the composite end point (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1-1.6, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For those treated for TAAAs, CAO was independently predictive of increased 30-day mortality and a composite end point of perioperative mortality, spinal cord ischemia, and bowel ischemia. When treating patients with extensive aortic aneurysmal disease, physicians should attempt to preserve the celiac artery, by revascularization or avoiding ostium coverage, whenever feasible.

Simple Renal Cysts Are Associated With 24-Month Prognosis of Patients With Type B Aortic Dissection and Hypertension

BACKGROUND

The association of simple renal cyst (SRC) with type B aortic dissection (BAD) has recently been established. However, no studies have examined adverse events after BAD hospitalization among patients with SRC. In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of SRC in BAD patients with hypertension after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

We studied all BAD patients with hypertension who were admitted for TEVAR (n = 238; age 56.1 ± 9.8 years, 84.0% male). Aortic-related adverse events (ARAE) were evaluated as outcomes at 3 months and 24 months after TEVAR.

RESULTS

Among the total number of patients, 104 (43.7%) had at least 1 SRC. Patients with SRC were significantly older than those without (59.6 ± 8.8 vs 53.3 ± 9.7; P < 0.001). Patients with SRC were also more likely to suffer from peripheral arterial disease (55.8% vs 40.3%; P = 0.018) and cerebrovascular accidents (47.1% vs 29.9%; P = 0.006) than those without. Median follow-up for the 238 patients was 18.5 (range 6.4-24.0) months. Cumulative ARAE-free rates were 94.5 ± 1.5% at the 3-month follow-up and 81.5 ± 2.8% at the 24-month follow-up. Independent predictors of 3-month ARAE were found to be insertion of ≥ 2 stents (hazard ratio [HR] 3.977, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.224-12.920; P = 0.022). For 24-month follow-up, SRC (HR 1.962, 95% CI 1.023-3.764; P = 0.043) was evaluated as the only independent predictive factor. SRC (HR 8.841, 95% CI 1.726-45.294; P = 0.009) was also evaluated as an independent predictive factor for 24-month ARAEs in the chronic group, but not in the acute or the subacute group.

CONCLUSIONS

SRC could predict 24-month ARAE in BAD patients with hypertension after TEVAR, especially in the chronic group.

Total Endovascular Repair With Parallel Stent-Grafts for Postdissection Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm After Prior Proximal Repair

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of total endovascular repair with parallel stent-grafts for postoperative residual dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was undertaken of 21 patients (mean age 64.0±12.5 years; 17 men) undergoing total endovascular therapy with parallel stent-grafts for postdissection TAAA after prior proximal repair between 2014 and 2016. The preoperative minimum true lumen diameter was 12.3±4.8 mm and the mean extent of dissection was 248.1±48.2 mm. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative medical records were reviewed to assess technical success, spinal cord ischemia, patency of target branch arteries, endoleak, and short-term outcomes of this approach. Results: Technical success was achieved in 17 of 21 patients owing to 4 type I endoleaks at the end of the procedures. A total of 70 branch arteries were revascularized and 14 celiac trunks were covered intentionally without reconstruction. Of 7 intraoperative endoleaks, 2 were managed intraoperatively and 5 (4 type I and 1 type II) disappeared spontaneously within 1 month. No spinal cord or abdominal organ or limb ischemia was observed. Mean follow-up was 16.2±6.1 months. No death or type I or III endoleak occurred during the follow-up; 2 type II endoleaks were observed. Nineteen of the 21 false lumens thrombosed, and the total aortic diameter decreased (57.3±8.4 to 55.3±7.4 mm, p<0.01). Three (4.3%) of 70 target branch arteries occluded during follow-up. The cumulative patency of retrogradely and antegradely revascularized branch arteries was 97.3% vs 100% at 12 months and 91.2% vs 100% at 18 months. Conclusion: Total endovascular therapy with parallel stent-grafts could be an effective alternative in treating postdissection TAAA. Further studies with long-term follow-up and larger sample size are recommended to evaluate the technique.

Percutaneous retrograde recanalization of an occluded celiac artery complicating acute aortic dissection

A 79-year-old woman with a complaint of persistent upper abdominal pain was admitted to our hospital for the treatment of thrombosed acute type B aortic dissection. Computed tomography showed the complete static occlusion of the celiac artery. Because of progressive symptom with elevation of liver enzymes and metabolic acidosis 11 h after admission, endovascular revascularization was attempted on an emergent basis. After a failed catheterization of the celiac ostium in an antegrade fashion due to a hard occlusion, we succeeded in a retrograde recanalization through the pancreaticoduodenal arcade via the superior mesenteric artery with stent placement using a pull-through technique. This technique is useful and safe when an antegrade approach seems difficult.