Fluoropyrimidine resistance in colon cancer

A Nanomedicine Structure-Activity Framework for Research, Development, and Regulation of Future Cancer Therapies

Despite their clinical success in drug delivery applications, the potential of theranostic nanomedicines is hampered by mechanistic uncertainty and a lack of science-informed regulatory guidance. Both the therapeutic efficacy and the toxicity of nanoformulations are tightly controlled by the complex interplay of the nanoparticle's physicochemical properties and the individual patient/tumor biology; however, it can be difficult to correlate such information with observed outcomes. Additionally, as nanomedicine research attempts to gradually move away from large-scale animal testing, the need for computer-assisted solutions for evaluation will increase. Such models will depend on a clear understanding of structure-activity relationships. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the field of cancer nanomedicine and provides a knowledge framework and foundational interaction maps that can facilitate future research, assessments, and regulation. By forming three complementary maps profiling nanobio interactions and pathways at different levels of biological complexity, a clear picture of a nanoparticle's journey through the body and the therapeutic and adverse consequences of each potential interaction are presented.

Andrographis-mediated chemosensitization through activation of ferroptosis and suppression of β-catenin/Wnt-signaling pathways in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in the USA. As much as 50-60% of CRC patients develop resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapeutic regimens, attributing the increased overall morbidity and mortality. In view of the growing evidence that active principles in various naturally occurring botanicals can facilitate chemosensitization in cancer cells, herein, we undertook a comprehensive effort in interrogating the activity of one such botanical-andrographis-by analyzing its activity in CRC cell lines [both sensitive and 5FU resistant (5FUR)], a xenograft animal model and patient-derived tumor organoids. We observed that combined treatment with andrographis was synergistic and resulted in a significant and dose-dependent increase in the efficacy of 5FU in HCT116 and SW480 5FUR cells (P < 0.05), reduced clonogenic formation (P < 0.01) and increased rates of caspase-9-mediated apoptosis (P < 0.05). The genomewide expression analysis in cell lines led us to uncover that activation of ferroptosis and suppression of β-catenin/Wnt-signaling pathways were the key mediators for the anti-cancer and chemosensitizing effects of andrographis. Subsequently, we validated our findings in a xenograft animal model, as well as two independent CRC patient-derived organoids-which confirmed that combined treatment with andrographis was significantly more effective than 5FU and andrographis alone and that these effects were in part orchestrated through dysregulated expression of key genes (including HMOX1, GCLC, GCLM and TCF7L2) within the ferroptosis and Wnt-signaling pathways. Collectively, our data highlight that andrographis might offer a safe and inexpensive adjunctive therapeutic option in the management of CRC patients.

Selection of Oral Therapeutics in China for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Intravenous administration of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy has been the backbone of treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC) for decades. The availability of oral capecitabine has improved the tolerability and simplified combination schedules. In addition to capecitabine, several other oral drugs have proven efficacy, particularly in palliative treatment lines. Clinical guidelines describe several available third-line treatment options for metastatic CRC (mCRC), but few insights are provided to guide the selection and sequence. In this review, we describe the available evidence and most recent data concerning oral drugs with proven efficacy in CRC, including antiangiogenetic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKIs), inhibitors blocking EGFR/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway and modified fluoropyrimidine, and share recommendations and insights on selecting third-line oral therapies for mCRC in China. In general, third-line treatment options for mCRC are mainly regorafenib, fruquintinib, and chemo/targeted therapy reintroduction, while FTD/TPI was rarely used in China probably due to poor accessibility. Fruquintinib is preferred in patients with poor performance status (PS), elder age, and severe organ dysfunction, compared to regorafenib. New drugs of clinical trials were more recommended for the patients with BRAF mutant tumor, and those with good previous treatment efficacy tended to be recommended for chemo/targeted therapy reintroduction. The management of mCRC is evolving, and it must be emphasized that the consideration and recommendations presented here reflect current treatment practices in China and thus might change according to new clinical data as well as the availability of new oral drugs.

Promising New Agents for Colorectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Choosing the optimal treatment approach for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) demands that oncologists assess both clinical and genomic variables and individualize care based upon the findings. Clinically, choices depend on assessing the side of the colon in which the primary tumor originates, the sites and burden of metastatic disease, the patient's performance status, and their individual comorbidities. Genomic assessment of the tumor to discern the mutational status of genes such as RAS/RAF, HER2, and TRK, as well as assessing whether tumors have defective mismatch repair (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), all factor in to potential treatment options and can determine clinical trial eligibility. Metastasectomy may be an option for patients with a low burden of disease and accessible liver- or lung-limited metastases. In some unresectable cases, systemic therapy with a FOLFOX- or FOLFIRI-based regimen with or without a biologic agent can lead to sufficient disease reduction to make a patient eligible for resection of metastatic disease. Tumor sidedness and RAS mutational status guide which biologic we add to the initial chemotherapy backbone, with patients with left-sided, RAS wild-type (WT) tumors receiving anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-directed therapy and patients with right-sided tumors or those with RAS mutations receiving bevacizumab. In patients with tumors that manifest microsatellite instability or deficient mismatch repair, we typically administer checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab after progression on irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based therapies. In patients with progressive disease, we routinely send tumor tissue for next generation sequencing (NGS) to assess for the presence of actionable genomic alterations such as HER2, BRAF, and TRK fusions and offer them the option of enrollment on clinical trials with agents targeting those or other identified alterations.

Decreased levels of UMP kinase as a mechanism of fluoropyrimidine resistance

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) continues to be widely used for treatment of gastrointestinal cancers. Because many tumors show primary or acquired resistance, it is important to understand the molecular basis underlying the mechanism of resistance to 5-FU. In addition to its effect on thymidylate synthase inhibition and DNA synthesis, 5-FU may also influence RNA metabolism. Our previous studies revealed that colorectal cancer cells resistant to bolus 5-FU (HCT-8/4hFU) showed significantly decreased incorporation of the drug into RNA. Resistance to bolus 5-FU was associated with lower expression of UMP kinase (UMPK), an enzyme that plays an important role in the activation of 5-FU to 5-FUTP and its incorporation into RNA. Activities of other 5-FU-metabolizing enzymes (e.g., thymidine kinase, uridine phosphorylase, thymidine phosphorylase, and orotate phosphoribosyltransferase) remained unchanged between sensitive and resistant cell lines. Herein, we show that UMPK down-regulation in 5-FU-sensitive cells (HCT-8/P) induces resistance to bolus 5-FU treatment. Moreover, HCT-8/4hFU cells are even more cross-resistant to treatment with 5-fluorouridine, consistent with the current understanding of 5-fluorouridine as a RNA-directed drug. Importantly, colorectal cancer hepatic metastases isolated from patients clinically resistant to weekly bolus 5-FU/leucovorin treatment exhibited decreased mRNA expression of UMPK but not thymidylate synthase or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase compared with tumor samples of patients not previously exposed to 5-FU. Our findings provide new insights into the mechanisms of acquired resistance to 5-FU in colorectal cancer and implicate UMPK as an important mechanism of clinical resistance to pulse 5-FU treatment in some patients.

Molecular markers that predict response to colon cancer therapy

Progress in the treatment of colon cancer depends on the development of target-based molecules built on an improved understanding of the molecular biology of the disease. Defining end points for chemotherapy resistance is needed as drug resistance develops quickly and patients demonstrate variation in response to chemotherapy. Many techniques that measure a marker's preponderance have been developed including biochemical, immunohistochemical, genomics, proteomics or a combination thereof. However, standardization of these techniques that measure either genes or their protein products is urgently needed. This article reviews several markers (TS,TP, DPD, FT, EGFR, VEGF, CD44v6, TRAIL, microsatellite instability, allelic deletions, oncogenes and suppressor genes [c-myc, Ki-Ras, p53, p21, Topo I, Topo IIalpha, Fos, hMLH1, Bcl-2/Bax and MDR1], MDR-related proteins [Pgp, MRP and LRP], genomic polymorphisms [XPD, ERCC1, GSTP1 and TS 3 -UTR] and COX-;2) that influence DNA metabolism, DNA damage, programmed cell death, the immune or vascular system, or lead to mutations. When combined together and tested by newly developed genomic and proteomic approaches, many of these markers provide a more sensitive indicative predictor of response than when evaluated separately or by older biochemical, immunohistologic or morphologic methods. A global approach involving the simultaneous testing of several predictive multimarkers will provide critical information for improving chemotherapy to alleviate suffering from this disease.

Comparison of the rapid pro-apoptotic effect of trans-ß-nitrostyrenes with delayed apoptosis induced by the standard agent 5-fluorouracil in colon cancer cells

Trans-beta-nitrostyrene (TBNS) has been reported to be a potent inhibitor of protein phosphatases PTB1 and PP2A and to display a pro-apoptotic effect even in multidrug resistant tumour cells. Here we compared the anti-tumour potential of TBNS with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as the standard chemotherapeutic agent for colorectal cancer in LoVo cells. Resistance to 5-FU based therapy might be a consequence of 5-FU's delayed effect requiring long-term effective concentrations in the tumour tissue. Thus, alternatives like platin containing drugs with a more rapid effect have been introduced recently. Compared to 5-FU TBNS displayed a faster cytotoxic and pro-apoptotic effect. A 50% decrease in viability was observed already after 8 h with TBNS while 5-FU displayed no significant effect before 48 h. DNA fragmentation and caspase-3 assays confirmed the more rapid apoptotic effect of TBNS. Since apoptosis affects individual cells these results about a rapidly induced apoptosis were further studied on a single cell level in microscopic assays of caspase-3 and caspase-8 activation. Adducts of trans-beta-nitrostyrene displayed an anti-tumour effect comparable to TBNS which suggests the possibility of creating adducts with optimised tissue targeting. Finally, the calculation of a drug combination index displayed a synergistic effect for the combination of TBNS and 5-FU in Lovo as well as in HT-29 and HCT116 colon cancer cells.