Outpatient neurosurgery

New Frontiers in Wide-Awake Surgery

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Explain the most important benefits of wide-awake surgery to patients. 2. Tumesce large parts of the body with minimal pain local anesthesia injection technique to eliminate the need for sedation for many operations. 3. Apply tourniquet-free surgery to upper and lower limb operations to avoid the sedation required to tolerate tourniquet pain. 4. Move many procedures out of the main operating room to minor procedure rooms with no increase in infection rates to decrease unnecessary cost and solid waste in surgery.

SUMMARY

Three disruptive innovations are changing the landscape of surgery: (1) minimally painful injection of large-volume, low-concentration tumescent local anesthesia eliminates the need for sedation for many procedures over the entire body; (2) epinephrine vasoconstriction in tumescent local anesthesia is a good alternative to the tourniquet and proximal nerve blocks in extremity surgery (sedation for tourniquet pain is no longer required for many procedures); and (3) evidence-based sterility and the elimination of sedation enable many larger procedures to move out of the main operating room into minor procedure rooms with no increase in infection rates. This continuing medical education article explores some of the new frontiers in which these changes affect surgery all over the body.

Temporal trends in neurosurgical volume and length of stay in a public healthcare system: A decade in review with a focus on the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

Over the past decade, neurosurgical interventions have experienced changes in operative frequency and postoperative length of stay (LOS), with the recent COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacting these metrics. Evaluating these trends in a tertiary National Health Service center provides insights into the impact of surgical practices and health policy on LOS and is essential for optimizing healthcare management decisions.

Methods

This was a single tertiary center retrospective case series analysis of neurosurgical procedures from 2012 to 2022. Factors including procedure type, admission urgency, and LOS were extracted from a prospectively maintained database. Six subspecialties were analyzed: Spine, Neuro-oncology, Skull base (SB), Functional, Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and Peripheral nerve (PN). Mann-Kendall temporal trend test and exploratory data analysis were performed.

Results

19,237 elective and day case operations were analyzed. Of the 6 sub-specialties, spine, neuro-oncology, SB, and CSF procedures all showed a significant trend toward decreasing frequency. A shift toward day case over elective procedures was evident, especially in spine (P < 0.001), SB (tau = 0.733, P = 0.0042), functional (tau = 0.156, P = 0.0016), and PN surgeries (P < 0.005). Over the last decade, decreasing LOS was observed for neuro-oncology (tau = -0.648, P = 0.0077), SB (tau = -0.382, P = 0.012), and functional operations, a trend which remained consistent during the COVID-19 pandemic (P = 0.01). Spine remained constant across the decade while PN demonstrated a trend toward increasing LOS.

Conclusion

Most subspecialties demonstrate a decreasing LOS coupled with a shift toward day case procedures, potentially attributable to improvements in surgical techniques, less invasive approaches, and increased pressure on beds. Setting up extra dedicated day case theaters could help deal with the backlog of procedures, particularly with regard to the impact of COVID-19.

The Hitchhiker's Guide to Spine Awake Surgery. The Oxford SAS Protocol and Early Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Spine awake surgery (SAS) aims to achieve faster recovery times, better outcomes, and a lesser economic impact on society. Our drive to establish SAS was to improve patient outcomes and health economics during the COVID-19 pandemic. After a systematic review and to the best of our knowledge, SAS, the Oxford Protocol, is the first protocolized pathway that aims to train bespoke teams performing SAS safely, efficiently, and in a standardized repeatable fashion. A pilot study was designed around newly derived protocols and simulated training to determine if SAS is a safe and implementable pathway to improve patient outcomes and health economics.

METHODS

We assessed a cohort of 10 patients undergoing one-level lumbar discectomies and decompressions, analyzing the related costs, length of stay, complications, pain management, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The age range of our patients was 46-84 years. Three discectomies and 7 central canal stenosis decompressions were performed. Eight patients were discharged on the same day. All patients gave positive feedback about their experience of SAS. A significant cost saving was made compared to a general anesthesia (GA) overnight stay across the group. No on day cancellations occurred due to lack of bed availability. No patient needed analgesia in the recovery room or needed additional analgesia over and above the SAS e-prescription take home package.

CONCLUSIONS

Our early experience and journey reinforce our drive to push forward and expand on this process. It aligns with the international literature which highlights this approach as safe, efficient, and economical.

Awake Craniotomy in Africa: A Scoping Review of Literature and Proposed Solutions to Tackle Challenges

BACKGROUND

Awake craniotomy (AC) is a common neurosurgical procedure for the resection of lesions in eloquent brain areas, which has the advantage of avoiding general anesthesia to reduce associated complications and costs. A significant resource limitation in low- and middle-income countries constrains the usage of AC.

OBJECTIVE

To review the published literature on AC in African countries, identify challenges, and propose pragmatic solutions by practicing neurosurgeons in Africa.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review under Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-Scoping Review guidelines across 3 databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). English articles investigating AC in Africa were included.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies consisting of 396 patients were included. Egypt was the most represented country with 8 studies (42.1%), followed by Nigeria with 6 records (31.6%). Glioma was the most common lesion type, corresponding to 120 of 396 patients (30.3%), followed by epilepsy in 71 patients (17.9%). Awake-awake-awake was the most common protocol used in 7 studies (36.8%). Sixteen studies (84.2%) contained adult patients. The youngest reported AC patient was 11 years old, whereas the oldest one was 92. Nine studies (47.4%) reported infrastructure limitations for performing AC, including the lack of funding, intraoperative monitoring equipment, imaging, medications, and limited human resources.

CONCLUSION

Despite many constraints, AC is being safely performed in low-resource settings. International collaborations among centers are a move forward, but adequate resources and management are essential to make AC an accessible procedure in many more African neurosurgical centers.

Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of a telemedicine-based outpatient brain tumor surgery program

OBJECTIVE

Despite growing evidence on the benefits of outpatient oncological neurosurgery (OON), it is only performed in a few specialized centers and there are no previous descriptions of established OON programs in Europe. Moreover, increasing application of telemedicine strategies, especially after the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, is drastically changing neurosurgical management, particularly in the case of vulnerable populations such as neuro-oncological patients. In this context, the authors implemented an OON program in their hospital with telematic follow-up. Herein, they describe the protocol and qualitatively analyze the barriers and facilitators of the development process.

METHODS

An OON program was developed through the following steps: assessment of hospital needs, specific OON training, multidisciplinary team organization, and OON protocol design. In addition, the implementation phase included training sessions, a pilot study, and continuous improvement sessions. Finally, barriers and facilitators of the protocol’s implementation were identified from the feedback of all participants.

RESULTS

An OON protocol was successfully designed and implemented for resection or biopsy of supratentorial lesions up to 3 cm in diameter. The protocol included the patient’s admission to the day surgery unit, noninvasive anesthetic monitoring, same-day discharge, and admission to the hospital-at-home (HaH) unit for telematic and on-site postoperative care. After a pilot study including 10 procedures in 9 patients, the main barriers identified were healthcare provider resistance to change, lack of experience in outpatient neurosurgery, patient reluctance, and limitations in the recruitment of patients. Key facilitators of the process were the patient education program, the multidisciplinary team approach, and the HaH-based telematic postoperative care.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiating an OON program with telematic follow-up in a European clinical setting is feasible. Nevertheless, it poses several barriers that can be overcome by identifying and maximizing key facilitators of the process. Among them, patient education, a multidisciplinary team approach, and HaH-based postoperative care were crucial to the success of the program. Future studies should investigate the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine to assess potential cost savings, from reduced travel and wait times, and the impact on patient satisfaction.

Same day discharge for craniotomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Same-day protocols for craniotomy have been demonstrated to be feasible and safe. Its several benefits include decreased hospital costs, less nosocomial complications, fewer case cancellations, with a high degree of patient satisfaction. This paper reviews the most recent publications in the field of same-day discharge after craniotomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since 2019, several studies on same-day neurosurgical procedures were published. Ambulatory craniotomy protocols for brain tumor were successfully implemented in more centers around the world, and for the first time, in a developing country. Additional information emerged on predictors for successful early discharge, and the barriers and enablers of same-day craniotomy programs. Moreover, the cost benefits of same-day craniotomy were reaffirmed.

SUMMARY

Same- day discharge after craniotomy is feasible, safe and continues to expand to a wider variety of procedures, in new institutions and countries. There are several benefits to ambulatory surgery. Well-established protocols for perioperative management are essential to the success of early discharge programs. With continued research, these protocols can be refined and implemented in more institutions globally, ultimately to provide better, more efficient care for neurosurgical patients.

Outpatient stereotactic brain biopsies

Outpatient neurosurgery is rising popularity leading to patients’ satisfaction and cost-savings. Although several North-American teams have shown the safety of outpatient stereotactic brain biopsies, few data from other countries with different health care systems are available. We therefore conducted a feasibility and safety study on the outpatient stereotactic brain biopsies. We prospectively examined all the consecutive stereotactic brain biopsies performed in an outpatient setting at our tertiary medical center, between June 2018 and September 2020. Among the 437 patients who underwent stereotactic brain biopsy during the study period, 40 (9.2%) patients were enrolled for an outpatient management. The sex ratio was 1 and the median age on biopsy day was 55 [41–66] years. The median distance from patients’ home to hospital was 17 km [3–47]. 95% of patients had pre-biopsy ASA score of 1 or 2 and mRs equal to 2 or less. The rate of same-day discharge was 100%. No patient experienced post-biopsy symptomatic complication necessitating readmission within the month following the biopsy. One patient (2.5%) resorted to an unplanned consultation. Histological findings obtained from brain biopsy led to a diagnosis in all patients; the most frequently found were neoplastic lesions (77.5%). Stereotactic brain biopsies can therefore be safely achieved on an outpatient setting in carefully selected patients. This process could be more widely adopted in other neurosurgical centers, without affecting the quality of patient’s health care and safety. In this article, we propose management guidelines and pre-biopsy checklist for performing ambulatory stereotactic brain biopsies.

[Sensations of patients and their satisfaction during awake craniotomy]

Awake craniotomy (AC) has gained fantastic popularity over the past years. This approach is no longer the destiny of only highly specialized neurosurgical centers. Technical features of AC are completely developed. However, certain aspects of patients' sensations and their satisfaction are still unclear. The review is devoted to these issues. It was shown that AC is positively evaluated by the vast majority of patients. Many patients would choose this technique for redo surgery. However, there are certain important details that can adversely affect satisfaction of patients. Thus, these features should be considered in AC.

Outpatient neurosurgery in neuro-oncology

Technological breakthroughs along with modern application of awake craniotomy and new neuroanesthesia protocols have led to a progressive development in outpatient brain tumor surgery and improved surgical outcomes. As a result, outpatient neurosurgery has become a standard of care at the authors' center due to its clinical benefits and impact on patient recovery and overall satisfaction. On the other hand, the financial savings derived from its application is also another favorable factor exerting influence on patients, health care systems, and society. Although validated several years ago and with recent data supporting its application, outpatient brain tumor surgery has not gained the traction that it deserves, based on scientific skepticism and perceived potential for medicolegal issues. The goal of this review, based on the available literature and the senior author's experience in outpatient brain tumor surgery, was to evaluate the most important aspects regarding indications, clinical outcomes, economic burden, and patient perceptions.

Challenging the myth of outpatient craniotomy for brain tumor in a Sub-Saharan African setting: A case series of two patients in Ibadan, Nigeria

BACKGROUND

The concept of modern neuro-oncology hinges on strategic innovation and refinement of procedures with the intention to enhance safety, optimize extent of tumor resection, and improve not only survival but also the quality of life as well. One of such refinements includes same-day hospital admission, as well as early discharge following brain tumor surgeries. The latter has been further stretched to same-day discharge in particular settings to reduce the risk of nosocomial infections, cut brain tumor surgery costs, and improve patients' satisfaction. We highlight the challenges and possible benefits of outpatient craniotomy in a sub-Saharan African setting portrayed by the presence of lean resources and a predominant "out of pocket" health-care financing.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Outpatient craniotomy was performed in two selected patients harboring intra-axial tumors: a right temporal low-grade glioma and a left frontal metastasis. The clinical outcome proved successful at short- and long-term in both patients; complications related to surgery and same-day discharge were not reported.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient craniotomy is practicable and safe in resource-challenged environments and can further make brain tumor surgery cost effective and acceptable in carefully selected patients. Further prospective studies in similar settings but involving larger groups of patients are warranted.

Anesthesia for Same Day Discharge After Craniotomy: Review of a Single Center Experience

Same day discharge or outpatient surgery for intracranial procedures has become possible with the advent of image-guided minimally invasive approaches to surgery and availability of short-acting anesthetic agents. In addition, patient satisfaction and the benefits of avoiding hospital stay have resulted in the evolution of neurosurgical day surgery. We reviewed our experience and the available literature to determine the perioperative factors involved which have promoted and will improve this concept in the future. Craniotomy and biopsy for supratentorial brain tumors and surgical clipping of intact cerebral aneurysms have been successfully performed as day surgeries. Patient perceptions and satisfaction surveys have helped in better understanding and delivery of care and successful outcomes. There are major differences in health care across the globe along with socioeconomic, medicolegal, and ethical disparities, which must be considered before widespread application of this approach. Nevertheless, collaborative effort by surgeons, anesthesiologists, and nurses can help in same day discharge of patients after cranial neurosurgery.

Outpatient elective posterior lumbar fusions appear to be safely considered for appropriately selected patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There has been growing interest in performing posterior lumbar fusions (PLFs) in the outpatient setting to optimize patient satisfaction and reduce cost. Although still done in only a small percentage of cases, this has been more possible because of advances in surgical techniques and anesthesia. However, data on the perioperative course of outpatient compared with inpatient PLF in a large sample size are scarce.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare perioperative complications between outpatient and inpatient PLF in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective cohort comparison study was carried out.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients undergoing PLF with or without interbody fusion from the 2005 to 2015 NSQIP database comprised the sample.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures were postoperative complications within 30 days and readmission within 30 days.

METHODS

Patients who underwent PLF with or without interbody fusion were identified in the 2005-2015 NSQIP database. Outpatient procedures were defined as cases that had hospital length of stay (LOS)=0 days, whereas inpatient procedures were defined as LOS=1-30 days. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and procedural variables (inclusion of interbody fusion, instrumentation, and number of levels fused) were compared between the two cohorts. Propensity score-matched comparisons were then performed for postoperative complications and 30-day readmissions between the two groups.

RESULTS

The current study included 360 outpatient and 36,610 inpatient PLF cases. After propensity matching to control potential confounding factors, statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in postoperative adverse events other than significantly lower blood transfusions in the outpatient group (2.78% vs. 10.83%, p<.001). Notably, the rate of readmissions was not different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the lack of differences in rates of most perioperative complications and 30-day readmissions between the outpatient and inpatient cohorts, it seems that outpatient PLF may be appropriately considered for select patients. However, extremely careful patient selection should be exercised.

Discrepancies in the Definition of "Outpatient" Surgeries and Their Effect on Study Outcomes Related to ACDF and Lumbar Discectomy Procedures: A Retrospective Analysis of 45,204 Cases

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To study the differences in definition of "inpatient" and "outpatient" [stated status vs. actual length of stay (LOS)], and the effect of defining populations based on the different definitions, for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and lumbar discectomy procedures in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There has been an overall trend toward performing ACDF and lumbar discectomy in the outpatient setting. However, with the possibility of patients who underwent outpatient surgery staying overnight or longer at the hospital under "observation" status, the distinction of "inpatient" and "outpatient" is not clear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent ACDF or lumbar discectomy in the 2005-2014 ACS-NSQIP database were identified. Outpatient procedures were defined in 1 of 2 ways: either as being termed "outpatient" or hospital LOS=0. Differences in definitions were studied. Further, to evaluate the effect of the different definitions, 30-day outcomes were compared between "inpatient" and "outpatient" and between LOS>0 and LOS=0 for ACDF patients.

RESULTS

Of the 4123 "outpatient" ACDF patients, 919 had LOS=0, whereas 3204 had LOS>0. Of the 13,210 "inpatient" ACDF patients, 337 had LOS=0, whereas 12,873 had LOS>0. Of the 15,166 "outpatient" lumbar discectomy patients, 8968 had LOS=0, whereas 6198 had LOS>0. Of the 12,705 "inpatient" lumbar discectomy patients, 814 had LOS=0, whereas 11,891 had LOS>0. On multivariate analysis of ACDF patients, when comparing "inpatient" with "outpatient" and "LOS>0" with "LOS=0" there were differences in risks for adverse outcomes based on the definition of outpatient status.

CONCLUSIONS

When evaluating the ACS-NSQIP population, ACDF and lumbar discectomy procedures recorded as "outpatient" can be misleading and often did not correlate with same day discharge. These findings have significant impact on the interpretation of existing studies and define an area that needs clarification for future studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Recent trends in the anesthetic management of craniotomy for supratentorial tumor resection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The article reviews the recent evidence on the anesthetic management of patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumor resection.

RECENT FINDINGS

A rapid recovery of neurological function after craniotomy for supratentorial tumor allows for the prompt diagnosis of intracranial complications and possibly an early hospital discharge. Intraoperative esmolol infusion was shown to reduce the anesthetic requirements, and may facilitate a more rapid recovery of neurological function. Outpatient craniotomy for supratentorial tumor resection has been associated with several clinical and economic benefits, but has not gained widespread use because of skepticism and medical-legal concerns. Awake craniotomy is associated with advantageous outcomes compared with surgery under general anesthesia, and is regarded as the standard of care for tumors that reside in or in close proximity to the eloquent brain. Recent studies have demonstrated that intraoperative electroacupuncture, dexmedetomidine, pregabalin, and lidocaine may facilitate postcraniotomy pain management. The use of volatile anesthetic agents in cancer surgery is associated with a worse survival compared with intravenous anesthetics, possibly by hindering immunologic defenses against cancer cells.

SUMMARY

Recent evidence has yielded valuable information regarding anesthetic management of patients undergoing supratentorial tumor craniotomy. Despite a plethora of studies that compare short-term outcomes using different anesthetic and analgesic regimens, randomized controlled trials that examine the long-term outcomes (i.e., neurocognitive function, quality of life, tumor recurrence, and survival) that are of particular interest to patients are needed.