HIV Susceptibility of human antigen-specific CD4 T cells in AIDS pathogenesis and vaccine response

Safety and durability of AGT103-T autologous T cell therapy for HIV infection in a Phase 1 trial

The cell and gene therapy product AGT103-T was designed to restore the Gag-specific CD4+ T cell response in persons with chronic HIV disease who are receiving antiretroviral therapy. This autologous, genetically engineered cell product is under investigation in a Phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03215004). Trial participants were conditioned with cyclophosphamide approximately 1 week before receiving a one-time low (< 109 genetically modified CD4+ T cells) or high (≥109 genetically modified CD4+ T cells) dose of AGT103-T, delivering between 2 and 21 million genetically modified cells per kilogram (kg) body weight. There were no serious adverse events (SAEs) and all adverse events (AEs) were mild. Genetically modified AGT103-T cells were detected in most of the participant blood samples collected 6 months after infusion, which was the last scheduled monitoring visit. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) collected after cell product infusion were tested to determine the abundance of Gag-specific T cells as a measure of objective responses to therapy. Gag-specific CD4+ T cells were detected in all treated individuals and were substantially increased by 9 to 300-fold compared to baseline, by 14 days after cell product infusion. Gag-specific CD8+ T cells were increased by 1.7 to 10-fold relative to baseline, by 28 days after cell product infusion. Levels of Gag-specific CD4+ T cells remained high (~2 to 70-fold higher relative to baseline) throughout 3-6 months after infusion. AGT103-T at low or high doses was safe and effective for improving host T cell immunity to HIV. Further studies, including antiretroviral treatment interruption, are warranted to evaluate the product's efficacy in HIV disease.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT03215004.

Characterization of a mouse neuropathic pain model caused by the highly active antiviral therapy (HAART) Stavudine

BACKGROUND

Although highly active antiviral therapies (HAART) exert control over viral replication in persons with Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), neuropathic pain is a side effect. Symptoms include hyperalgesia and allodynia. Stavudine, also known as D4T, is a HAART used to treat Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). This study examined the extent to which D4T produces neuropathic pain and examined pharmacological management with a standard opioid analgesic.

METHODS

Male and female C57BL/6 J mice were injected intraperitoneally with one dose of vehicle or D4T (10-56 mg/kg). Mice were tested through day 92 post injection for mechanical allodynia, assessed with von Frey filaments, and thermal hyperalgesia, assessed via the hotplate test. Separate cohorts received vehicle or 56 mg/kg D4T, the presence of allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia confirmed, and mice received intraperitoneal vehicle, morphine, or 0.032 mg/kg naltrexone + morphine.

RESULTS

D4T produced dose- and time-dependent mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia. The smallest effective D4T dose was 17.8 mg/kg. This dose produced mechanical allodynia but not thermal hyperalgesia. Larger D4T doses (32 and 56 mg/kg) produced mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia lasting 92 days. Morphine dose-dependently alleviated both mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in D4T-treated mice with ED50 values of 4.4 and 1.2 mg/kg, respectively. Naltrexone produced a rightward shift of the morphine dose-response function, i.e., increased the ED50 value of morphine by at least 3.8-fold.

CONCLUSION

Stavudine produced neuropathic pain as a function of dose and time in mice. Opioid analgesics appear to be effective in alleviating neuropathic pain in a D4T-induced mouse model.

HIV infection confers distinct mechanisms in severe drug eruption: Endogenous virus activation with aberrant Th2/Th1 and CD8+ T cells function

Severe drug eruption (SDE), a common skin disease, becomes dangerous when it occurs in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, the molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Forty patients including HIV⁺ SDE⁺ (n = 15), HIV^- SDE⁺ (n = 15) and HIV⁺ SDE^- (n = 10) subjects were enrolled in our study. All HIV⁺ patients were at acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) stage. Serum levels of TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-13, IL-6, CXCL9, and CCL17 were quantified by ELISA. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) loads were quantified by RT-qPCR. CD4, CD8, Th1, Th2, TNF-α-CD8, and IFN-γ-CD8 T cell populations were measured by flow cytometry. Levels of biochemical indexes in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients were significantly different from in HIV^- SDE⁺ patients (P < .05). EBV and CMV viral loads were significantly higher in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients, but not in HIV^- SDE⁺ patients (P < .05). Inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IFN-γ were significantly elevated in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients (P < .05). Th2/Th1 populations and TNF-α secreting or IFN-γ secreting CD8⁺ T cells, were significantly up-regulated in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients compared to HIV^- SDE⁺ patients (P < .05). Conversely, the CD4/CD8 ratio was significantly down-regulated in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients compared to HIV^- SDE⁺ patients (P < .05). HIV infection confers distinct clinical phenotypes and immune inflammatory mechanisms in SDE. Sustained EBV and CMV activation, unbalanced Th2/Th1 and overactive CD8⁺ T cells mediating a pro-inflammatory response could act as distinct mechanisms in the aggravation of SDE in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients.

Strength of T cell signaling regulates HIV-1 replication and establishment of latency

A major barrier to curing HIV-1 is the long-lived latent reservoir that supports re-emergence of HIV-1 upon treatment interruption. Targeting this reservoir will require mechanistic insights into the establishment and maintenance of HIV-1 latency. Whether T cell signaling at the time of HIV-1 infection influences productive replication or latency is not fully understood. We used a panel of chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) with different ligand binding affinities to induce a range of signaling strengths to model differential T cell receptor signaling at the time of HIV-1 infection. Stimulation of T cell lines or primary CD4+ T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors supported HIV-1 infection regardless of affinity for ligand; however, only signaling by the highest affinity receptor facilitated HIV-1 expression. Activation of chimeric antigen receptors that had intermediate and low binding affinities did not support provirus transcription, suggesting that a minimal signal is required for optimal HIV-1 expression. In addition, strong signaling at the time of infection produced a latent population that was readily inducible, whereas latent cells generated in response to weaker signals were not easily reversed. Chromatin immunoprecipitation showed HIV-1 transcription was limited by transcriptional elongation and that robust signaling decreased the presence of negative elongation factor, a pausing factor, by more than 80%. These studies demonstrate that T cell signaling influences HIV-1 infection and the establishment of different subsets of latently infected cells, which may have implications for targeting the HIV-1 reservoir.

Activation of CD4+ T cells facilitates HIV-1 infection; however, whether there are minimal signals required for the establishment of infection, replication, and latency has not been explored. To determine how T cell signaling influences HIV-1 infection and the generation of latently infected cells, we used chimeric antigen receptors to create a tunable model. Stronger signals result in robust HIV-1 expression and an inducible latent population. Minimal signals predispose cells towards latent infections that are refractory to reversal. We discovered that repression of HIV-1 transcription immediately after infection is due to RNA polymerase II pausing and inefficient transcription elongation. These studies demonstrate that signaling events influence the course of HIV-1 infection and have implications for cure strategies. They also provide a mechanistic explanation for why a significant portion of the HIV-1 latent reservoir is not responsive to latency reversing agents which function by modifying chromatin.

Distinct susceptibility of HIV vaccine vector-induced CD4 T cells to HIV infection

The concerns raised from adenovirus 5 (Ad5)-based HIV vaccine clinical trials, where excess HIV infections were observed in some vaccine recipients, have highlighted the importance of understanding host responses to vaccine vectors and the HIV susceptibility of vector-specific CD4 T cells in HIV vaccination. Our recent study reported that human Ad5-specific CD4 T cells induced by Ad5 vaccination (RV156A trial) are susceptible to HIV. Here we further investigated the HIV susceptibility of vector-specific CD4 T cells induced by ALVAC, a canarypox viral vector tested in the Thai trial RV144, as compared to Ad5 vector-specific CD4 T cells in the HVTN204 trial. We showed that while Ad5 vector-specific CD4 T cells were readily susceptible to HIV, ALVAC-specific CD4 T cells in RV144 PBMC were substantially less susceptible to both R5 and X4 HIV in vitro. The lower HIV susceptibility of ALVAC-specific CD4 T cells was associated with the reduced surface expression of HIV entry co-receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 on these cells. Phenotypic analyses identified that ALVAC-specific CD4 T cells displayed a strong Th1 phenotype, producing higher levels of IFN-γ and CCL4 (MIP-1β) but little IL-17. Of interest, ALVAC and Ad5 vectors induced distinct profiles of vector-specific CD8 vs. CD4 T-cell proliferative responses in PBMC, with ALVAC preferentially inducing CD8 T-cell proliferation, while Ad5 vector induced CD4 T-cell proliferation. Depletion of ALVAC-, but not Ad5-, induced CD8 T cells in PBMC led to a modest increase in HIV infection of vector-specific CD4 T cells, suggesting a role of ALVAC-specific CD8 T cells in protecting ALVAC-specific CD4 T cells from HIV. Taken together, our data provide strong evidence for distinct HIV susceptibility of CD4 T cells induced by different vaccine vectors and highlight the importance of better evaluating anti-vector responses in HIV vaccination.